- •Ian McLeod
- •7Th March [1991] 532
- •XXXIV Table of Cases
- •Interact with constitutional concerns.
- •1688 Conceded power to Parliament and is effectively appointed by
- •Independence, legislators, like judges, could claim to be insulated from
- •In its ideal form, treats all persons equally and releases the individual
- •Ireland. Until the Union with Ireland in 1801, Britain was a state, as
- •Incommensurables are the two freedoms identified by Sir Isaiah Berlin
- •Vices and the regulation of private activities.
- •22 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •26 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ing laws (Postema 1986, p. 46).
- •Idea which Hegel (1770–1831) ridiculed on the ground that the people
- •2.5 Rousseau: Communitarianism
- •Irrelevant (a view that is problematic when it comes to voting). This
- •36 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •3 All er 400 at 412, Lord Hoffman remarked that ‘the courts of the
- •Views of each state within the federation. In the uk any constitutional
- •Its actual output happens to have put great stress on individual rights
- •In the Ministerial Code (Cabinet Office, July 2001) may well furnish an
- •50 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •52 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •It is arguable that the cabinet has ceased to play a significant con-
- •56 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Importance of constitutional checks and balances. From this perspec-
- •Individually responsible to Parliament and that Parliament must be
- •70 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In the nineteenth century Bagehot claimed that the cabinet was the
- •2000A), recommended that the civil service be placed on a statutory
- •4.10 The Judiciary
- •4.2 The historical development of the constitution has been evolutionary in
- •Into line where rules are enforced in accordance with a predictable
- •5.4 Dicey’s Version of the Rule of Law
- •In body or goods except for a distinct breach of law established in the
- •Value of non-retrospectivity.
- •5.7 The Separation of Powers
- •5.7.1 The mixed constitution
- •In X Ltd V. Morgan Grampian Publishers Ltd [1990] 2 All er 1 at 13
- •Ing out of opinion within the legal profession (Judicial Appointments,
- •Ing, characteristically out of particular historical circumstances.
- •Independence could be compromised by a narrow ‘executive-centred’
- •114 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •It can dismiss superior court judges (Chapter 4).
- •Into account extra parliamentary remarks made by ministers, in for
- •3 All er 65 at 77–79; r. V. Khan (1996)). The courts will certainly take a
- •6.2 Historical Development
- •124 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ishing itself, having first created a body with more limited powers.
- •6.8 Note: Delegated Legislation
- •Ing the nineteenth century. Also during the nineteenth century the
- •158 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Includes a ‘Ministerial Code of Conduct’ (see sched. 4). The code
- •Ities in England and Wales.
- •168 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In particular transport policy is specifically subject to central govern-
- •176 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In one sense supported by dicta in Prescott V. Birmingham Corporation
- •View that the fiduciary duty implies that special weight must be given
- •178 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Increasingly important in view of the flexible nature of judicial review
- •In police and judicial affairs. Matters relating to immigration and asy-
- •184 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •186 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Increase in the powers of the European Assembly can be ratified by the
- •Implementing an ec Directive do not apply to future amendments of
- •Version to uk law, usually in the form of a statutory instrument (ibid.,
- •198 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interpret ‘so far as possible’ in the light of the aims and purposes of the
- •In English law, in the absence of bad faith, damages cannot normally
- •4 (1) (C) of the Act, which provides a defence to such an action where ‘the state
- •10 Parliament
- •10.1 Historical Development
- •Ing the constitution only because its members were easily corrupted by
- •214 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Is dominated by government business. This is why Bagehot thought
- •Is that it acts as a revising chamber to scrutinise the detail of legislation
- •10.4.2 Composition and procedure: ‘exclusive cognisance’
- •Injunction (see hc 365, 1986–7). In Rivlin V. Bilankin (1953) a libellous
- •242 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Vented ministers from sitting, and the uk Constitution would have
- •In a script other than roman, or containing words prohibited by the
- •In all the circumstances be taken to be at that time (a) resident there if
- •Vidual standing separately. The party list system is crude and has
- •In the case of a ‘money bill’ the Lords can delay only for one month
- •1957, Naa 1983 s. 1). The Comptroller is an Officer of the Commons
- •Independent bodies outside the central government.
- •X where another hospital has been closed?’. Conversely sycophantic
- •12.5.1 Scrutiny of delegated legislation
- •Inability of an individual mp to force disclosure of information. Early
- •In r. V. Preston [1993] 4 All er 638 at 663 Lord Mustill said ‘the
- •In each case she has a separate title and responsibilities. This is prob-
- •1936 (His Majesty’s Declaration of Abdication Act 1936). By conven-
- •In 1611 it was made clear that the King can legislate only within
- •Imply a power to tax directly or indirectly without very clear statutory
- •In Council relating to the civil service are legally enforceable, whereas
- •Industry was held to be bound by a statute regulating the licensing of
- •It, arguing that the decision is an unprecedented example of the courts
- •1997 S. 9; Intelligence Services Act 1994 s. 2; National Minimum Wages
- •In theory the prime minister may appoint anyone to the cabinet, but in
- •Is maintained by the Treasury. In cases of doubt the Attorney-General
- •324 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •1. Ministers of the Crown are expected to behave according to the high-
- •Is that it ensures that government explains its actions. It concluded that
- •Ing adverse publicity about his private life). Even in cases of personal
- •V. R. (1896)). This is consistent with the view that there is no contract.
- •In recent years concern has been expressed because of their involve-
- •View that there should be no distinction between the constitutional
- •Immunities and this may also apply to police officers while on duties on
- •Inquiry (s. 49). For example the Macpherson Inquiry into the death
- •In the relevant statute (for example the Attorney-General, or a speci-
- •356 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interfere with a decision to ban active homosexuals from serving in the
- •380 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •384 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Vention’ (per Lord Phillips mr in r. (Mahmood) V. Secretary of State
- •Itself and not merely an instrument of effective decision making.
- •In order to define the limits of judicial review. This excluded natural
- •Into most areas of government, including for example prison manage-
- •259 That justice must not only be done but must manifestly and
- •396 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Investigation more flexible than those of the courts but has limited
- •17.1 The Range of Remedies
- •17.2 The Judicial Review Procedure
- •408 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •17.2.1 Standing
- •Ise (r. V. Pollution Inspectorate ex parte Greenpeace (No. 2) (1994)).
- •V. Home Office (1990); r. V. Legal Aid Board ex parte Donn & Co.
- •In Cocks V. Thanet dc (1983) the House of Lords applied o’Reilly to
- •Important interests go beyond legal rules into territory where judges
- •424 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •469 At 477, Lord Donaldson said that ‘you have to look long and hard
- •Informed promptly of the reasons for the arrest and be brought
- •18.4.2 The interpretative obligation
- •8). However, it is not clear how far, if at all, it goes beyond the existing
- •577 At 581, Lord Slynn remarked that ‘it is clear that the 1998 Act
- •440 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •18.4.9 Derogation
- •Introduction of judicial consent for extended periods of detention
- •Vides a means to the end of self-actualisation. This argument has been
- •View that coheres with the thinking of the late Professor Karl Popper
- •V. Holmes (2000) a newspaper was permitted to publish a report on the
- •It is sometimes argued that s. 12 has the effect of privileging freedom
- •Ireland (1992) the Irish government banned a voluntary body from
- •Voluntarily and there seems no reason why these should be especially
- •International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
- •Important. A similar distinction is drawn in us law between the
- •It has been held that under Art. 11 states should take positive
- •Intimidation, including conditions as to the route of the procession
- •478 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ings because of its broad definition of terrorism. This includes the use
- •480 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In Sunday Business. In the article it was stated that the plaintiff ’s
- •In order to protect at least some privacy-related interests unprotected
- •506 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •20.7 A Hierarchy of Rights and the Contingencies
- •510 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ings of an experienced trial judge, the same confidence does not extend
- •21.4.3 Proprieties: sections 2, 3
- •Is no locality condition. If the object is to apprehend someone unlaw-
- •In relation to the need for reasonable suspicion, there is no
- •Information available, upon which to make his suspicion reasonable,
- •530 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interest in effective policing and the individual’s right to privacy and
- •Ing documents should be attempted before the issue of a warrant
- •538 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Items subject to legal privilege are, except as regards items held
- •540 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •1913). The conditions here are that there exist reasonable grounds for
- •If it is a search warrant (and not a production order) which is
- •It clear that such force can be used to secure entry to premises when
- •546 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interests of the United Kingdom. Nor does the duty to conform or
- •V. Evans (1985)). In Spycatcher, serious iniquity was not established
- •Information supplied under a legal duty had to be disclosed), economic-
- •Vention of crime but subject to the existence of independent safe-
- •22.5 Dan, a property developer, enters into an agreement with Oldcastle Council
- •580 Bibliography
- •Initiative in a public law Frame’, Public Law, 288–307.
- •In the civil law of defamation’, Communications Law, 1(5), 193–197.
- •2Nd edn, London: Cavendish.
In the civil law of defamation’, Communications Law, 1(5), 193–197.
Loveland, I. (1998a) ‘The constitutionalisation of political libels in English common
law?’, Public Law, 633–646.
Loveland, I. (ed.) (1998b) Importing the First Amendment, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Loveland, I. (2001) ‘Freedom of political expression: who needs the Human Rights
Act?’, Public Law, 233–244.
Lustgarten, L. (1986) The Governance of the Police, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Lustgarten, L. and Leigh, I. (1994) In from the Cold: National Security and Parlia-
mentary Democracy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MacCormick, N. (1978) ‘Does the United Kingdom have a constitution? Reflections on
MacCormick v. Lord Advocate’, Northern Ireland Law Quarterly, 29, 1–20.
MacCormick, N. (1983) ‘Jurisprudence and the Constitution’, Current Legal Problems,
36, 13–30.
MacCormick, N. (1993) ‘Beyond the sovereign state’, Modern Law Review, 56(1), 1–18.
McCrudden, C. and Chambers, G. (eds) (1998) Individual Rights and the Law in
Britain, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MacDonald, R. St. J., Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds) (1993) The European System
for the Protection of Human Rights, Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
MacFarlane, L. (1985) The Theory and Practice of Human Rights, Hounslow: Temple
Smith.
MacKay of Clashfern, James Peter Hymers, Baron (1994) The Administration of
Justice, London: Steven & Sons.
Maclean, J. (ed.) (1999) Property and the Constitution, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
MacPherson, C. (1977) The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Mahoney, P. (1994) ‘The doctrine of the margin of appreciation under the European
Convention of Human Rights: Its legitimacy in theory and application in practice’,
Human Rights Law Journal, 1–6.
Mahony, P. (1999) ‘Speculating on the future of the reformed European Court of
Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Journal, 1–4.
Maitland, F. (1901) ‘The Crown as corporation’, Law Quarterly Review, 17, 131–146.
586 Bibliography
Maitland, F. (1908) The Constitutional History of England, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Maltby, N. (1993) ‘Marleasing: what is all the fuss about?’, Law Quarterly Review, 109,
301–311.
Mancini, G. (1991) ‘The making of a constitution for Europe’, in R. Keohan and
S. Hoffman, The New European Community: Decision Making and Institutional
Change, Boulder: Westview.
Mancini, G. and Keeling, D. (1994) ‘Democracy and the European Court of Justice’,
Modern Law Review, 57(2), 175–190.
Manin, B. (1987) ‘On legitimacy and political deliberation’, Political Theory, 15(3),
338–368.
Markesinis, B. (ed.) (1998) The Impact of the Human Rights Bill on English Law,
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marks, S. (1995) ‘Civil liberties at the margin: the UK derogation and the European
Convention on Human Rights’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15, 69–95.
Marr, A. (1995) Ruling Britannia: The Failure and the Future of British Democracy,
London: Michael Joseph.
Marshall, G. (1971) Constitutional Theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Marshall, G. (1984) Constitutional Conventions: The Rules and Forms of Political
Accountability, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Marshall, G. (ed.) (1989a) Ministerial Responsibility, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Marshall, G. (1989b) ‘Taking rights for an override: free speech and commercial
expression’, Public Law, 4–11.
Marshall, G. (1998) ‘Interpreting Interpretation in the Human Rights Bill’, Public Law,
167–170.
Marshall, G. (2001) ‘Things we can say about rights’, Public Law, 207–209.
May, T. Erskine (1997) Erskine May’s Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings
and Usage of Parliament, 22nd edn, D. Limon (ed.) et al., London: Butterworths.
McAllister, L. (2001) ‘Wales: Labour’s devolution dilemma’, Parliamentary Affairs,
54(1), 156–159.
McClean, I. (1999) ‘Mr Asquith’s unfinished business’, Political Quarterly, 70, 382–389.
McHarg, E. (1999) ‘Reconciling human rights and the public interest: conceptual
problems and doctrinal uncertainty in the jurisprudence of the European Court of
Human Rights’, Modern Law Review, 62, 671–696.
Memorandum of Understanding and supplementary agreements between the UK
Government, the Scottish Ministers, the Cabinet of the National Assembly for Wales
and the Northern Ireland Executive Committee (1999), Cm. 4806, London: HMSO.
Mill, J. (1962) Utilitarianism, ed. M. Warnock, Glasgow: Collins/Fontana.
Mills, S. and Whitty, N. (1999) Feminist Perspectives on Public Law, London:
Cavendish.
Mitchell, J. (1965) ‘The causes and effects of the absence of a system of public law in
the United Kingdom’, Public Law, 95–118.
Mitchell, J. (1999) ‘The creation of the Scottish Parliament: journey without end’,
Parliamentary Affairs, 52(4), 649–665.
Morison, J. (1998) ‘The case against constitutional reform’, Journal of Law and
Society, 25(4), 510–535.
Morison, J. (2000) ‘The government–voluntary sector compacts: governance, govern-
mentality and civil society’, Journal of Law and Society, 27(1), 98–132.
Morison, J. (2001) ‘Democracy, governance and governmentality: civic public space
and constitutional renewal in Northern Ireland’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,
21(2), 287–310.
Morison, J. and Livingstone, S. (1995) Reshaping Public Power: Northern Ireland and
the British constitutional crisis, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Morris, D. (2000) ‘The Human Rights Act 1998: too many loose ends?’, Statute Law
Review, 21(2), 104–125.
587
Bibliography
Mount, F. (1992) The British Constitution Now, London: Heinemann.
Mowbray, A. (1994) ‘A New European Court of Human Rights’, Public Law, 540–552.
Mowbray, A. (1997) ‘The European Court of Human Right’s approach to just satis-
faction’, Public Law, 647–659.
Mullender, R. (1996) ‘Judicial review and the rule of law’, Law Quarterly Review, 112,
182–186.
Mullender, R. (1998a) ‘Privacy, paedophilia and the European Convention on Human
Rights: a deontological approach’, Public Law, 384–388.
Mullender, R. (1998b) ‘Parliamentary sovereignty, the constitution and the judiciary’,
Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 49(2), 138–166.
Mullender, R. (1999) ‘Defamation qualified privilege and the European Convention on
Human Rights’, Cambridge Law Journal, 58(1), 15–18.
Mullender, R. (2001) ‘Prima facie rights, rationality and the law of negligence’
in M. Kramer (ed.), Rights, Wrongs and Responsibilities, London: Palgrave.
Munday, R. (1996) ‘Inferences from silence and European Human Rights Law’,
Criminal Law Review, 370–385.
Munro, C. (1985) ‘Dicey on Constitutional Conventions’, Public Law, 637.
Munro, C. (1999) Studies in Constitutional Law, 2nd edn, London: Butterworths.
Nairn, T. (1988) The Enchanted Glass: Britain and its Monarchy, London: Radius.
Neill, Lord (1998) 5th Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Cm. 4057-1.
The Funding of Political Parties, London: HMSO.
Neill Lord (2000a) 6th Report on Standards in Committee on Standards in Public Life,
Cm. 4557-1, Reinforcing Standards, London: HMSO.
Neill Lord (2000b) 7th Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Cm. 4903-1,
London: HMSO.
Newton, Lord (2001) Standards of Conduct in The House of Lords, The Challenge for
Parliament; Making Government Work, London: Hansard Society.
Nicholson, D. and Reid, K. (1996) ‘Arrest for breach of the peace and the European
Convention on Human Rights’, Criminal Law Review, 764–775.
Nicholls (1999) Joint Committee on Parliamentary Privilege (1998–19), HL 43, HC 34
(see Leopold [1999]) PL 604.
Nolan, Lord (1995), First Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life,
Cm. 2850-I, London: HMSO.
Nolan, Lord and Sedley, Sir S. (1997), The Making and Remaking of the British
Constitution, London: Blackstone Press.
Norton, P. (1984) The British Polity, New York: Longman.
Norton, P (1993) Does Parliament Matter? Harvester, Wheatsheaf.
Nozick, R. (1975) Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basil Books.
Oliver, D. (1987) ‘Is the ultra vires rule the basis for judicial review?’, Public Law,
543–569.
Oliver, D. (1989) ‘Law convention and abuse of power’, Political Quarterly, 60(1),
38–49.
Oliver, D. (1994) ‘Law, politics and public accountability. The search for a new
equilibrium’, Public Law, 238–253.
Oliver, D. (1997) ‘Common values in public and private law and the public/private
divide’, Public Law, 630–646.
Oliver, D. (1998a) ‘Freedom of information and ministerial accountability’, Public Law,
171–175.
Oliver, D. (1998) ‘A negative aspect to legitimate expectations’, Public Law, 558–562.
Oliver, D. (1999) Common Values and the Public–Private Divide, London, Butterworths.
Oliver, D. (2000) ‘The frontiers of the state: public authorities and public functions
under the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, 76–493.
Oliver, D. (2002) ‘Public law procedures and remedies’, Public Law, 91.
Oliver, D. and Drewry, G. (1996) Public Service Reforms, London: Pinter.
Olowofoyeku, A. (1993) Suing judges: A Study of Judicial Immunity, Oxford: Claren-
don Press.
588 Bibliography
Olowofoyeku, A. (1999) ‘Decentralising the UK: the federal argument’, Edinburgh Law
Review, 3(1), 57–84.
Olowofoyeku, A. (2000) ‘The Nemo Judex rule: the case against automatic dis-
qualification’, Public Law, 456–475.
O’Neill, A. (2001) ‘Judicial politics and the judicial committee: the devolution juris-
prudence of the privy council’, Modern Law Review, 64(4), 603–618.
Paine, T. (1987) The Thomas Paine Reader (eds Foot, M. and Kramnick, I.) Harmonds-
worth: Penguin.
Palmer, S. (1990) ‘Tightening secrecy law: The Official Secrets Act 1989’, Public Law,
243–256.
Palmer, S. (1992) ‘Protecting journalists. Sources: Section 10, Contempt of Court Act
1981’, Public Law, 61–72.
Palmer, S. (1993) ‘Freedom of expression, democracy and the European Convention
on Human Rights’, Cambridge Law Review, 52(3), 363–364.
Pannick, D. (1998) ‘Principles of interpretation of Convention rights under the Human
Rights Act and the discretionary area of judgement’, Public Law, 545–551.
Paton, E. (1995) ‘Respecting freedom of speech’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,
15(4), 597–610.
Pettit, P. (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Phillipson, G. (1999) ‘The Human Rights Act, ‘‘horizontal effect’’ and the common law:
a bang or a whimper’, Modern Law Review, 62(6), 824–849.
Pliatzky, L. (1992) ‘Quangos and agencies’, Public Administration, 70, 555–563.
Poggi, G. (1990) The State: Its Nature, Development and Prospects, Cambridge:
Polity Press.
Popper, Sir K.T. (1966) The Open Society and its Enemies, II, The High Tide Of
Prophecy: Hegel, Marx and the Aftermath, 5th edn (revised), London: Routledge.
Posner, R. (1986) Economic Analysis of Law, 3rd edn, Boston: Little Brown.
Postema, G. (1986) Bentham and the Common Law Tradition, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Prosser, T. (1982) ‘Towards a critical theory of public law’, Journal of Law and
Society, 9(1), 1–19.
Prosser, T. (1995) ‘Bringing constitutional principles back’, in R. Bellamy et al. (eds),
Democracy and Constitutional Culture in the Union of Europe, London: Lothian
Foundation Press.
Prosser, W. (1960) ‘Privacy’, California Law Review, 48(3), 383–423.
Proudhon, P. (1969) General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century,
translated from the French by J.B. Robinson, New York: Haskell House Publishers.
Pugh, W. (1997) in T. Halliday and L. Karpik (eds), Lawyers and the Rise of West-
ern Political Liberalism: From the Eighteenth to Twentieth Centuries, Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Raphael, D. (ed.) (1967) Political Theory and the Rights of Man, London: Macmillan.
Raphael, D. (1981) Moral Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rasmussen, H. (1986) On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Com-
parative Study in Judicial Policymaking, Dordrecht: Nihoff.
Rawlings, R. (ed.) (1997) Law, Society and Economy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rawlings, R. (1998) ‘The new model Wales’, Journal of Law and Society, 25(4),
461–509.
Rawlings, R. (2000) ‘Concordats of the constitution’, Law Quarterly Review, 116,
257–286.
Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
Raz, J. (1977) ‘The rule of law and its virtue’, Law Quarterly Review, 93, 195–211.
Raz, J. (1986) The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (1991) ‘Free expression and personal identification’, Oxford Journal of Legal
Studies, 11(3), 303–324.
Rhodes, M. (ed.) (1995) The Regions and the New Europe: Patterns in Core and
Periphery Development, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
589
Bibliography
Rhodes, R. (1991) ‘The new public management’, special issue of Public Adminis-
tration, 69.
Rhodes, R. (1994) ‘The hollowing out of the state: the changing nature of the public
service in Britain’, Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138–151.
Rhodes, R. (1996) ‘The new governance: governing without government’, Political
Studies, 44, 652–667.
Richards, D. (1999) Free Speech and the Politics of Identity, Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Richardson, G. (1986) ‘The duty to give reasons: potential and practice’, Public Law,
437–469.
Richardson, G. and Genn, H. (eds) (1994) Administrative Law and Government Action:
The Courts and Alternative Mechanisms of Review, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richardson, G. and Sunkin, M. (1996) ‘Judicial review: questions of impact’, Public
Law, 79–103.
Riddall, P. (2000) ‘The second chamber: in search of a complementary role’, Political
Quarterly, 70(4), 404–410.
Ridley, F. (1988) ‘There is no British constitution – a dangerous case of the Emperor’s
Clothes’, Parliamentary Affairs, 41(3), 340–361.
Robertson, G. (1993) Freedom, the Individual and the Law, 7th edn, Harmondsworth:
Penguin.
Robson, W. (1928) Justice and Administrative Law: A Study of the British Constitution,
London: Macmillan.
Rose, R. (1982) Understanding the United Kingdom: The Territorial Dimension in
Government, London: Longman.
Rousseau, J. (1712–1778) (1968) The Social Contract, translated and introduced by
M. Cranston, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Russell, M. (2000) Reforming the Lords: Lessons from Overseas, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Russell, M. and Cornes, R. (2001) ‘The Royal Commission on the House of Lords:
A House for the future?’, Modern Law Review, 64(1), 82–99.
Sampford, C. (1987) ‘ ‘‘Recognize and declare’’: an Australian experience in codifying
constitutional conventions’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7(3), 369–417.
Schonberg, S. (2000) Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Scott, C. (1999) ‘Regulation inside Government: re-badging the Citizen’s Charter’,
Public Law, 595–603.
Scott, Sir R. (1996a) ‘Ministerial accountability’, Public Law, 410–426.
Scott, Sir R. (1996b) ‘The acceptable and unacceptable uses of public interest
immunity’, Public Law, 427–444.
Sedley, Sir S. (1994b) ‘The sound of silence: constitutional law without a constitution’,
Law Quarterly Review, 110, 270–291.
Sedley, Sir S. (1995a) ‘Human rights: a twenty-first century agenda’, Public Law,
386–400.
Sedley, Sir S. (1995b) ‘The moral economy of judicial review’, in G. Wilson (ed.),
Frontiers of Legal Scholarship, Chichester: Wiley.
Sedley, Sir S. (2001) ‘The common law and the political constitution: a reply’, Law
Quarterly Review, 117, 68–70.
Sedley, Sir S. (2001a) ‘Turning on turtles’, London Review of Books, 15 Nov., 11.
Seidentop, L. (2000) Democracy in Europe, London: Allen Lane.
Sharpe, L. (ed.) (1979) Decentralist Trends in Western Democracies, London: Sage.
Sharpe, S. (1997) ‘The European convention, a suspect’s charter?’, Criminal Law
Review, 848–860.
Shaw, J. (1996) Law of the European Union, 2nd edn, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Shaw, J. and More, G. (eds) (1995) The New Legal Dynamics of European Union, New
York: Clarendon Press.
590 Bibliography
Sheehy, Sir P. (1993) Inquiry into Police Responsibilities and Rewards, Cm. 2280-1,
London: HMSO.
Shell, D. (1988) The House of Lords, 2nd edn, Doddington: Philip Allen.
Shell, D. (1999) ‘The future of the second chamber’, Political Quarterly, 70(4),
390–395.
Short, E. and de Than, C. (1998) Civil Liberties, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Shrimpton, M. (1993) ‘In defence of habeas corpus’, Public Law, 24–30.
Silk, P. and Wallers, R. (1987) How Parliament Works, London: Longman.
Simcock, A. (1992) ‘One and many – the office of Secretary of State’, Public Adminis-
tration, 70, 535–553.
Steiner, J. (1993) ‘From direct effects to Frankovich: shifting means of enforcement of
community law’, European Law Review, 18, 3–22.
Stevens, R. (1993) The Independence of the Judiciary: The View from the Lord
Chancellor’s Office, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Stevens, R. (1999) ‘A loss of ninocence? Judicial independence and the separation of
powers, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19, 365–402.
Stewart, J. (1999) The Nature of British Local Government, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Stewart, J. and Walsh, K. (1992) ‘Change in the management of public services’,
Public Administration, 70, 499–518.
Steyn, The Rt Hon Lord (1997) ‘The weakest and least dangerous department of
government’, Public Law, 84–95.
Steyn, The Rt Hon Lord (2000) ‘The new legal landcape’, European Human Rights Law
Review, 549–554.
Suerin, J.L. (1994) ‘Towards a European constitution, problems of political integra-
tion’, Public Law, 625–636.
Sugerman, D. (1983) ‘The legal boundaries of liberty: Dicey, liberalism and legal
science’, Modern Law Review, 46(1), 102–111.
Sunkin, M. and Payne, S. (1999) (eds) The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political
Analysis, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sunkin, M., Bridges, L. and Meszaros, G. (1996) Judicial Review in Perspective,