- •Ian McLeod
- •7Th March [1991] 532
- •XXXIV Table of Cases
- •Interact with constitutional concerns.
- •1688 Conceded power to Parliament and is effectively appointed by
- •Independence, legislators, like judges, could claim to be insulated from
- •In its ideal form, treats all persons equally and releases the individual
- •Ireland. Until the Union with Ireland in 1801, Britain was a state, as
- •Incommensurables are the two freedoms identified by Sir Isaiah Berlin
- •Vices and the regulation of private activities.
- •22 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •26 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ing laws (Postema 1986, p. 46).
- •Idea which Hegel (1770–1831) ridiculed on the ground that the people
- •2.5 Rousseau: Communitarianism
- •Irrelevant (a view that is problematic when it comes to voting). This
- •36 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •3 All er 400 at 412, Lord Hoffman remarked that ‘the courts of the
- •Views of each state within the federation. In the uk any constitutional
- •Its actual output happens to have put great stress on individual rights
- •In the Ministerial Code (Cabinet Office, July 2001) may well furnish an
- •50 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •52 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •It is arguable that the cabinet has ceased to play a significant con-
- •56 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Importance of constitutional checks and balances. From this perspec-
- •Individually responsible to Parliament and that Parliament must be
- •70 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In the nineteenth century Bagehot claimed that the cabinet was the
- •2000A), recommended that the civil service be placed on a statutory
- •4.10 The Judiciary
- •4.2 The historical development of the constitution has been evolutionary in
- •Into line where rules are enforced in accordance with a predictable
- •5.4 Dicey’s Version of the Rule of Law
- •In body or goods except for a distinct breach of law established in the
- •Value of non-retrospectivity.
- •5.7 The Separation of Powers
- •5.7.1 The mixed constitution
- •In X Ltd V. Morgan Grampian Publishers Ltd [1990] 2 All er 1 at 13
- •Ing out of opinion within the legal profession (Judicial Appointments,
- •Ing, characteristically out of particular historical circumstances.
- •Independence could be compromised by a narrow ‘executive-centred’
- •114 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •It can dismiss superior court judges (Chapter 4).
- •Into account extra parliamentary remarks made by ministers, in for
- •3 All er 65 at 77–79; r. V. Khan (1996)). The courts will certainly take a
- •6.2 Historical Development
- •124 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ishing itself, having first created a body with more limited powers.
- •6.8 Note: Delegated Legislation
- •Ing the nineteenth century. Also during the nineteenth century the
- •158 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Includes a ‘Ministerial Code of Conduct’ (see sched. 4). The code
- •Ities in England and Wales.
- •168 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In particular transport policy is specifically subject to central govern-
- •176 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In one sense supported by dicta in Prescott V. Birmingham Corporation
- •View that the fiduciary duty implies that special weight must be given
- •178 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Increasingly important in view of the flexible nature of judicial review
- •In police and judicial affairs. Matters relating to immigration and asy-
- •184 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •186 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Increase in the powers of the European Assembly can be ratified by the
- •Implementing an ec Directive do not apply to future amendments of
- •Version to uk law, usually in the form of a statutory instrument (ibid.,
- •198 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interpret ‘so far as possible’ in the light of the aims and purposes of the
- •In English law, in the absence of bad faith, damages cannot normally
- •4 (1) (C) of the Act, which provides a defence to such an action where ‘the state
- •10 Parliament
- •10.1 Historical Development
- •Ing the constitution only because its members were easily corrupted by
- •214 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Is dominated by government business. This is why Bagehot thought
- •Is that it acts as a revising chamber to scrutinise the detail of legislation
- •10.4.2 Composition and procedure: ‘exclusive cognisance’
- •Injunction (see hc 365, 1986–7). In Rivlin V. Bilankin (1953) a libellous
- •242 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Vented ministers from sitting, and the uk Constitution would have
- •In a script other than roman, or containing words prohibited by the
- •In all the circumstances be taken to be at that time (a) resident there if
- •Vidual standing separately. The party list system is crude and has
- •In the case of a ‘money bill’ the Lords can delay only for one month
- •1957, Naa 1983 s. 1). The Comptroller is an Officer of the Commons
- •Independent bodies outside the central government.
- •X where another hospital has been closed?’. Conversely sycophantic
- •12.5.1 Scrutiny of delegated legislation
- •Inability of an individual mp to force disclosure of information. Early
- •In r. V. Preston [1993] 4 All er 638 at 663 Lord Mustill said ‘the
- •In each case she has a separate title and responsibilities. This is prob-
- •1936 (His Majesty’s Declaration of Abdication Act 1936). By conven-
- •In 1611 it was made clear that the King can legislate only within
- •Imply a power to tax directly or indirectly without very clear statutory
- •In Council relating to the civil service are legally enforceable, whereas
- •Industry was held to be bound by a statute regulating the licensing of
- •It, arguing that the decision is an unprecedented example of the courts
- •1997 S. 9; Intelligence Services Act 1994 s. 2; National Minimum Wages
- •In theory the prime minister may appoint anyone to the cabinet, but in
- •Is maintained by the Treasury. In cases of doubt the Attorney-General
- •324 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •1. Ministers of the Crown are expected to behave according to the high-
- •Is that it ensures that government explains its actions. It concluded that
- •Ing adverse publicity about his private life). Even in cases of personal
- •V. R. (1896)). This is consistent with the view that there is no contract.
- •In recent years concern has been expressed because of their involve-
- •View that there should be no distinction between the constitutional
- •Immunities and this may also apply to police officers while on duties on
- •Inquiry (s. 49). For example the Macpherson Inquiry into the death
- •In the relevant statute (for example the Attorney-General, or a speci-
- •356 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interfere with a decision to ban active homosexuals from serving in the
- •380 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •384 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Vention’ (per Lord Phillips mr in r. (Mahmood) V. Secretary of State
- •Itself and not merely an instrument of effective decision making.
- •In order to define the limits of judicial review. This excluded natural
- •Into most areas of government, including for example prison manage-
- •259 That justice must not only be done but must manifestly and
- •396 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Investigation more flexible than those of the courts but has limited
- •17.1 The Range of Remedies
- •17.2 The Judicial Review Procedure
- •408 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •17.2.1 Standing
- •Ise (r. V. Pollution Inspectorate ex parte Greenpeace (No. 2) (1994)).
- •V. Home Office (1990); r. V. Legal Aid Board ex parte Donn & Co.
- •In Cocks V. Thanet dc (1983) the House of Lords applied o’Reilly to
- •Important interests go beyond legal rules into territory where judges
- •424 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •469 At 477, Lord Donaldson said that ‘you have to look long and hard
- •Informed promptly of the reasons for the arrest and be brought
- •18.4.2 The interpretative obligation
- •8). However, it is not clear how far, if at all, it goes beyond the existing
- •577 At 581, Lord Slynn remarked that ‘it is clear that the 1998 Act
- •440 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •18.4.9 Derogation
- •Introduction of judicial consent for extended periods of detention
- •Vides a means to the end of self-actualisation. This argument has been
- •View that coheres with the thinking of the late Professor Karl Popper
- •V. Holmes (2000) a newspaper was permitted to publish a report on the
- •It is sometimes argued that s. 12 has the effect of privileging freedom
- •Ireland (1992) the Irish government banned a voluntary body from
- •Voluntarily and there seems no reason why these should be especially
- •International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
- •Important. A similar distinction is drawn in us law between the
- •It has been held that under Art. 11 states should take positive
- •Intimidation, including conditions as to the route of the procession
- •478 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ings because of its broad definition of terrorism. This includes the use
- •480 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In Sunday Business. In the article it was stated that the plaintiff ’s
- •In order to protect at least some privacy-related interests unprotected
- •506 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •20.7 A Hierarchy of Rights and the Contingencies
- •510 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ings of an experienced trial judge, the same confidence does not extend
- •21.4.3 Proprieties: sections 2, 3
- •Is no locality condition. If the object is to apprehend someone unlaw-
- •In relation to the need for reasonable suspicion, there is no
- •Information available, upon which to make his suspicion reasonable,
- •530 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interest in effective policing and the individual’s right to privacy and
- •Ing documents should be attempted before the issue of a warrant
- •538 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Items subject to legal privilege are, except as regards items held
- •540 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •1913). The conditions here are that there exist reasonable grounds for
- •If it is a search warrant (and not a production order) which is
- •It clear that such force can be used to secure entry to premises when
- •546 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interests of the United Kingdom. Nor does the duty to conform or
- •V. Evans (1985)). In Spycatcher, serious iniquity was not established
- •Information supplied under a legal duty had to be disclosed), economic-
- •Vention of crime but subject to the existence of independent safe-
- •22.5 Dan, a property developer, enters into an agreement with Oldcastle Council
- •580 Bibliography
- •Initiative in a public law Frame’, Public Law, 288–307.
- •In the civil law of defamation’, Communications Law, 1(5), 193–197.
- •2Nd edn, London: Cavendish.
21.4.3 Proprieties: sections 2, 3
Although there is no need for a search to take place following a stop,
PACE regulates the manner in which a search must be carried out.
Except as regards an unattended vehicle, a plain clothes officer must
produce his warrant card prior to the search (but not the initial stop)
and every officer must state his name (or as regards terrorist offences,
number), police station, the reasons for the search and the entitlement
to a record of the search. A failure to provide the grounds for the
search will render the search unlawful (R. v. Fenneley (1989)).
The search must be conducted in accordance with the Act and
Code A. Every reasonable effort must be made to minimise potential
embarrassment of the suspect (A: 3.1). The person or vehicle may be
detained only for such time as is reasonable in all the circumstances
and not beyond the time taken for the search (A: 3.3). In addition, the
thoroughness and extent of the search depends upon what items the
police are looking for. Since the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act
1994, the police may search the suspect’s mouth.
The searched person cannot, however, be compelled to remove, in
public, more than outer clothing (coat, jacket or gloves: s. 2 (9)) and, for
these purposes, a deserted street is regarded as being ‘in public’ (A: 3A).
523
Police Powers of Arrest and Search in the Investigation of Crime
The removal of other clothing can only be required if there are reason-
able grounds to consider it necessary and when the search is beyond
public view (A: 3.5). There is nothing, however, to prevent an officer
from requesting that a suspect voluntarily remove any clothing (A: 3A).
A search involving the removal of more than outer clothing, headgear
and footwear may only be made by (and in the presence of) an officer
of the same sex (A: 3.5). No member of the opposite sex may be pres-
ent unless the person searched specifically requests it. This could prove
to be a useful safeguard where the suspect is accompanied by, for
example, a spouse or parent. Intimate searches can be undertaken only
on the authorisation of an inspector or officer of higher rank.
A further safeguard is the general obligation to make a con-
temporaneous, written record of any search undertaken, unless it is
impractical to do so (s. 3 (1)). The Code advises that a record need not
be made contemporaneously where the officer has immediate duties
elsewhere or the weather is inclement (A: 4.2), but it must then be
compiled as soon as it becomes practical (s. 3 (2)); and need not be
compiled at all if it is a mass search or involves public disorder (A: 4.1).
The record must name the person searched (or, if unknown, contain a
description), disclose the suspect’s ethnic origin and state the purpose
of the search and details of its conduct and outcome (A: 4.5). The
individual enjoys a right to a copy of this record, provided a request is
made within 12 months of the date of the search (s. 3 (7), (8)). The
documentation provisions apply only to compulsory searches (s. 3 (1))
and, accordingly, nothing in the Code affects the routine searching,
with consent, of persons entering sports grounds or other premises or
when search is a condition of entry (A: 1D). The annual reports of
police authorities must contain statistical information about searches
made within their areas, and these will provide a breakdown of the
total monthly number of searches for stolen goods, offensive weapons
and other prohibited articles, and details of the number of arrests
arising from such searches (s. 5). This may serve to highlight any
random use of the power within a particular force, but is limited in the
sense that it does not cover the number of stops made without a sub-
sequent search and may not accurately reflect the figures of voluntary
stops and searches.
21.4.4 Road checks
Section 4 of PACE permits the setting up of ‘road checks’ (or ‘road
blocks’) which, except as a matter of urgency, must be authorised in
writing and by an officer of at least the rank of superintendent. The
524 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
authorisation can last for up to seven days (28 days under the Terror-
ism Act 2000 provided it is confirmed by the Secretary of State) and
may direct that the check be continuous or be conducted at specified
times. Thereafter, and if the senior officer thinks that the road check
‘ought’ to continue, further seven-day extensions may be authorised.
Section 4 leaves unaffected any other statutory power (e.g. or the
Terrorism Act 2000, the Road Traffic Act 1988 the Criminal Justice
and Public Order Act 1994) and the common law power in relation to
a breach of the peace, and these powers are not regulated by s. 4.
The purpose of s. 4 is to enable the police to ascertain whether there
is, in the vehicle stopped, someone who has committed, or is intend-
ing to commit, an offence, someone who has witnessed an offence
or someone who is ‘unlawfully at large’ (e.g. an escaped convict or a
person absconding while on bail). All searches are, therefore, for people
and not for evidence. A road check cannot, however, be authorised in
relation to any offence. The superintendent must reasonably ‘believe’
(a more onerous standard than ‘suspicion’) that it is ‘a serious arrest-
able offence’ (see below) and reasonably ‘suspect’ that the person who
has committed it, or intends to commit it, is going to be in the locality
where vehicles will be stopped. If the purpose is to seek witnesses, the
requirement is merely that the superintendent believes, on reasonable
grounds, that a serious arrestable offence has been committed. There
