Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Critical_review_paediatrics.docx
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.07.2025
Размер:
41.58 Кб
Скачать

Results and Conclusion

The results of the study are presented in a clear and satisfactory manner in the form of tables that are well explained. The results answer each hypothesis and meet the aims of the study as was outlined in the introduction. The results are satisfactory and vigorous because they involved a thorough genetical analysis using different techniques with both internal and external controls. According to Kamps-Hughes et al. (2013), ClaI digestion technique is an enzyme restriction method which is reliable and accurate in genetic analysis of DNA. The use of the technique by the researchers, therefore, authenticates the results. The identification of cohorts based on their disease status and not their parents genetical make-up also reduced the selection bias and other systematic errors that could have influenced the quality of the results. The results are also coherent with the results of other studies (Bouchireb et al. 2014). The In summary, the outcome of the study addresses the aims of the study. The conclusion that common variant can be implicated in rare monogenic diseases is based on the findings of the research.

Relevance, Implications and Future Research

The study provides new evidence-based information to the field of genetic disorders by expanding on the role of common variants in the inheritance of rare monogenic diseases. The information provided by this study is also crucial for the management of genetic disorders and in preventing the inheritance of the diseases. Paediatricians are, therefore, able to understand the genetic background of the different clinical manifestations of the disease in children. The article also assists paediatricians in establishing an accurate medical diagnosis of the condition in children. Based on the information provided by this study, carrier parents for the disease can be identified and genetically counselled.

References

1) Akilesh, S. et al., 2011. Arhgap24 inactivates Rac1 in mouse podocytes, and a mutant form is associated with familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The Journal of clinical investigation, 121(10), pp.4127–37. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3195463&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [Accessed December 27, 2014].

2) Benoit, G., Machuca, E. & Antignac, C., 2010. Hereditary nephrotic syndrome: a systematic approach for genetic testing and a review of associated podocyte gene mutations. Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 25, pp.1621–1632.

3) Bouchireb, K. et al., 2014. NPHS2 mutations in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a mutation update and the associated phenotypic spectrum. Human mutation, 35(2), pp.178–86. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24227627 [Accessed December 28, 2014].

4) Boute, N. et al., 2000. NPHS2, encoding the glomerular protein podocin, is mutated in autosomal recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Nature genetics, 24(4), pp.349–54. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10742096 [Accessed December 27, 2014].

5) Euser, A.M. et al., 2009. Cohort studies: prospective versus retrospective. Nephron. Clinical practice, 113(3), pp.c214–7. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19690438 [Accessed December 20, 2014].

6) Farrugia, P. et al., 2010. Practical tips for surgical research: Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 53(4), pp.278–81. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2912019&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [Accessed November 27, 2014].

7) Garg, A.X., Hackam, D. & Tonelli, M., 2008. Systematic review and meta-analysis: when one study is just not enough. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 3(1), pp.253–60. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18178786 [Accessed December 2, 2014].

8) Haber, J., 2009. Chapter 2: Research Questions, Hypotheses and Clinical Questions. In Nursing Research: : Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice. pp. 27–55.

9) Kamps-Hughes, N. et al., 2013. Massively parallel characterization of restriction endonucleases. Nucleic acids research, 41(11), p.e119. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3675476&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [Accessed December 28, 2014].

10) Knight, K.L., 2010. Study/experimental/research design: much more than statistics. Journal of athletic training, 45(1), pp.98–100. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2808761&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [Accessed December 28, 2014].

11) Kugler, C., 2002. Darwin’s Theory, Mendel's Laws: Labels & the Teaching of Science. The American Biology Teacher, 64(5), pp.341–351. Available at: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1662/0002-7685(2002)064[0341:DTMLLT]2.0.CO;2 [Accessed December 27, 2014].

12) Levin, K.A., 2006. Study design IV. Cohort studies. Evidence-based dentistry, 7(2), pp.51–2. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16858385 [Accessed December 27, 2014].

13) Lipska, B.S. et al., 2013. Genetic screening in adolescents with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Kidney international, 84(1), pp.206–13. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23515051 [Accessed December 27, 2014].

14) Otukesh, H. et al., 2009. NPHS2 mutations in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Iranian journal of kidney diseases, 3(2), pp.99–102. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19395786 [Accessed December 27, 2014].

15) Tory, K. et al., 2014. Mutation-dependent recessive inheritance of NPHS2-associated steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Nature genetics, 46(3), pp.299–304. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24509478 [Accessed December 27, 2014].

16) Yu, Z. et al., 2005. Mutations in NPHS2 in sporadic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in Chinese children. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 20(5), pp.902–8. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15769810 [Accessed December 27, 2014].

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]