Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
GUIDELINES FOR SIW.doc
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.07.2025
Размер:
170.5 Кб
Скачать

С.Ж.АСФЕНДИЯРОВ АТЫНДАҒЫ

ҚАЗАҚ ҰЛТТЫҚ МЕДИЦИНА УНИВЕРСИТЕТІ

KAZAKH NATIONAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY

NAMED AFTER SD ASFENDIYAROV

DEPARTMENT OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY № 2

GUIDELINES SUDENT’S INDEPENDENT WORK

Guidelines for student’s independent works

«DIAGNOSTIC ALGORITHM AND MANAGEMENT

OF PREGNANT WOMEN WITH PERINATAL INFECTION»

Specialty 051301 «General Medicine»

Sabject Obstetric and Gynecology

The course V

The semester IХ - Х

Almaty, 2013.

The Methodical recommendations for student’s independent works is compiled by MD Kaliyeva L.K., is discussed and approved at the meeting of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology№ 2.

Protocol №______, «_____»___________________2013.

Head of the department. Obstetrics and Gynecology № 2,

MD Kaliyeva LK

.

Topic №1

  1. The title: Review of the medical history of pregnant suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis.

  2. The purpose of presentation: Formation of students’ knowledge on the management of pregnant women with severe tuberculosis

  3. The problems are:

    • To make a presentation

  4. The form of the work:

    • Presentation

  5. The performance criterias of the work:

    • writing style should be simple

    • The student must abide by a single style, cool background, non-contrast texture, on one slide to use no more than 3-4 colors, the use of computer animation, the content should be short, clear.

  6. The time of work delivery

    • The last day of the course

  7. The evaluation criteria of independent work of the student

  • 90-100 score of "excellent" - the student has shown a comprehensive and in-depth knowledge of the material topics accurately and creatively fulfilled the task to meet a delivery structure presentation. The main points of clear and specific themes reflected by 10-15 slides, highlighting the most important information, with reference to the literature over the past 5 years. Illustrations of good quality (high resolution), with a clear image.

  • 75-89 points "good" - the student fulfilled the assignment subject to presentation of the layout structure, and the unprincipled made ​​mistakes in the presentation;

  • 50-74 points "satisfactory" - the student finished the task very briefly or with large amounts of text on a slide, illustrations of satisfactory quality;

  • 49 points or less "unsatisfactory" - introduced the presentation does not meet the requirements.

  1. Literature:

  1. Туберкулез и беременность. Методические рекомендации. Калиева Л.К.… Алматы, 2010г.- с.

  1. Form of control: Show of the presentation.

Topic2

  1. The title: Review of the case of viral pneumonia in pregnant.

  2. The purpose of presentation: Formation of students’ knowledge on the management of pregnant women with viral pneumonia

  3. The problems are:

    • To make a presentation

  4. The form of the work:

    • Presentation

  5. The performance criterias of the work:

    • writing style should be simple

    • The student must abide by a single style, cool background, non-contrast texture, on one slide to use no more than 3-4 colors, the use of computer animation, the content should be short, clear.

  6. The time of work delivery

    • The last day of the course

  7. The evaluation criteria of independent work of the student

  • 90-100 score of "excellent" - the student has shown a comprehensive and in-depth knowledge of the material topics accurately and creatively fulfilled the task to meet a delivery structure presentation. The main points of clear and specific themes reflected by 10-15 slides, highlighting the most important information, with reference to the literature over the past 5 years. Illustrations of good quality (high resolution), with a clear image.

  • 75-89 points "good" - the student fulfilled the assignment subject to presentation of the layout structure, and the unprincipled made ​​mistakes in the presentation;

  • 50-74 points "satisfactory" - the student finished the task very briefly or with large amounts of text on a slide, illustrations of satisfactory quality;

  • 49 points or less "unsatisfactory" - introduced the presentation does not meet the requirements.

  1. Literature:

  • The Order of MH RK № 869 on 2nd of December in 2011.

  1. Form of control: Show of the presentation.

Topic3

  1. The title: Current treatment regimens of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases of the urinary tract caused by mixed chlamydia-ureaplasma-herpetic infection.

  2. The purpose of presentation: Formation of students’ knowledge on the management of women with chronic inflammatory diseases of the urinary tract caused by mixed chlamydia-ureaplasma-herpetic infection

  3. The problems are:

    • To make a presentation

  4. The form of the work:

    • Presentation

  5. The performance criterias of the work:

    • writing style should be simple

    • The student must abide by a single style, cool background, non-contrast texture, on one slide to use no more than 3-4 colors, the use of computer animation, the content should be short, clear.

  6. The time of work delivery

    • The last day of the course

  7. The evaluation criteria of independent work of the student

  • 90-100 score of "excellent" - the student has shown a comprehensive and in-depth knowledge of the material topics accurately and creatively fulfilled the task to meet a delivery structure presentation. The main points of clear and specific themes reflected by 10-15 slides, highlighting the most important information, with reference to the literature over the past 5 years. Illustrations of good quality (high resolution), with a clear image.

  • 75-89 points "good" - the student fulfilled the assignment subject to presentation of the layout structure, and the unprincipled made ​​mistakes in the presentation;

  • 50-74 points "satisfactory" - the student finished the task very briefly or with large amounts of text on a slide, illustrations of satisfactory quality;

  • 49 points or less "unsatisfactory" - introduced the presentation does not meet the requirements.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]