27.Oxymoron

Oxymoron is based on the interaction of logical and emotive meanings. It presents a combination of two contrasting ideas.

The oxymoron reveals the contradictory sides of one and the same phenomenon. One of its components discloses some objectively existing feature or quality, while the other one serves to convey the author’s personal attitude towards the same.

The structure of oxymoron is extremely varied. By most critics it is regarded as an attributive syntagma.

As soon as an oxymoron gets into circulation it loses its most characteristic feature of bringing two opposite ideas together and becomes a phraseological unit.

e.g. awfully nice, pretty bad, mighty small.

28.Simile

The simile is a stylistic device expressing a likeness between different objects.

The formal element of the simile is the following conjunctions and adverbs: like, as, as like, etc.

The simile is based on the comparison of objects belonging to different spheres and involves an element of imagination.

Simile interprets the object by comparing it with some other objects of an entirely different nature, and produces the desired effect on the reader.

The simile usually serves as a means to clearer meaning. By comparing the object or phenomenon the writer describes with a concrete and familiar thing, he makes his description clearer and more picturesque.

Besides making a narrative more concrete and definite, the simile helps the author to reveal certain feelings of his own as well.

Besides the original similes created by writers there are a great number of so-called traditional similes in the language which must be regarded as phraseological units.

In the author‘s narrative traditional similes are most often used to stress the highest degree of quality.

e.g. “Funny how ideas come,” he said afterwards, “like a flash of lightning.”

29.Hyperbole

Hyperbole is a stylistic device based on the interaction between the logical and emotive meanings of a word. It is a deliberate over statement. Both the writer and the reader (or the speaker and the listener) are fully aware of the deliberateness of the exaggeration. The use of hyperbole shows the overflow of emotions in the speaker, and the listener is carried away by the flood.

Very often the hyperbole is used to create humorous or satirical effect and so to express the author’s attitude towards the described.

Through continuous usage hyperbole may lose its originality and become trite.

A kind of hyperbole with the same inner mechanism of the device is presented by understatement which is, too, based on the interaction between the logical and emotive meaning and shows the overflow of the speaker’s sentiments.

The specific feature of this kind of hyperbole is the direction of the exaggeration: hyperbole enlarges, while understatement deliberately diminishes the described object, phenomenon, etc.

e.g. “The little woman, for she was of pocket size, crossed her hands solemnly on her middle.”

30.Periphrasis

Periphrasis is a word-combination which is used instead of the word designating an object.

Every periphrasis indicates the feature of a notion which impressed the writer and conveys a purely individual perception of a given phenomenon.

As a result of frequent repetition periphrasis may become well established in the language as a synonymous expression for the word generally used to signify the object. Such word-combinations are called periphrastic synonyms.

In contrast to periphrastic synonyms genuine periphrasis is created in the process of writing and is an element of the individual style of a writer.

Periphrasis may be logical and figurative. Logical periphrases are based on logical notions. Figurative periphrasis may be based on metaphor and on metonymy.

Euphemistic periphrasis is a variety of periphrasis which substitutes a mild, delicate expression for one which seems to be rude or unpleasant. Euphemistic periphrasis has some features in common with euphemisms.

Periphrasis is used for various stylistic purposes, usually to achieve a humorous or satirical effect.

e.g. He bore under his arm the instruments of destruction.