
- •Sociolinguistics Class: Lectures, Questions, Handouts and Articles Written and compiled by Todd m. Ferry Starobilsk Department of Lugansk National Pedagogical University
- •Introduction to the topic:
- •Sociolinguistics: syllabus
- •Introduction:
- •Use at least three sources.
- •Footnote all citations.
- •Language and culture
- •Doctrine of linguistic relavtivity
- •Chomsky
- •Sapir_whorf hypothesis
- •The point
- •In summation
- •Sociolinguistics—again
- •Language definition part II.
- •What is a variety? slide#2
- •Slide #3
- •Slide #4 and #5
- •Slide #6
- •Slide #7
- •**Please look at your hand out
- •Regional dialects
- •Isoglosses
- •Variables
- •Bet and better, sometimes pronounced without the “t” like be-h and be-hher
- •He don’t mean no harm to nobody
- •Idiolect: redirect to slide # 5
- •Problems with accent
- •Lecture 3: When Languages Collide
- •Review: code/language
- •Slide 1: code switching
- •Review: speech community
- •Code-mixing
- •Slide 4: surzhyk
- •Borrowing
- •Languages collide
- •Pidgins
- •Slide 5: pidgin
- •Slide 5.5 and slide 6
- •Slide 10: Hawaiian Pidgin-Creole
- •Hawiian Pidgin-Creole
- •Slide 11: hawaiian pidgin-creole history History
- •Slide 13: hawiian pidgin-creole grammar/pro. Pronunciation
- •Grammatical Features
- •Slide: 14 gullah language
- •African origins
- •Lorenzo Turner's research
- •Slide 15: gullah verbal system Gullah verbs
- •Gullah language today
- •Slide 18: language shift language shift
- •Language planning and policy
- •Implicit language policy
- •Language planning in ukraine
- •Ukrainian language (1917-1932) Ukrainianization and tolerance
- •Russian language (1932-1953)
- •Russian language 1970’s-1980’s
- •Independence to the present
- •Slide 23: census data
- •Social interaction
- •Speech acts
- •Or for example ordering food at a restaurant
- •Now, taking it a step farther, what if your speech act fails? What if you do not say, “It is getting cold in here,” so that your friend understands your meaning?
- •Speech as skilled work
- •Norms governing speech
- •1. Norms governing what can be talked about: taboos and euphemism.
- •2. Norms governing non-verbal communication: body language
- •What does eye contact mean?
- •Conversational structure
- •Turn-taking
- •4. Norms governing the number of people who talk at once:
- •5. Norms governing the number of interruptions
- •We can say it more clearly as: I respect your right to…
- •Solidarity and power
- •Greetings and farewells
- •Labov, linguistic variable, middle class
- •English poll
- •Pronunciation and class dropping the g
- •Norwich, england
- •Los angeles
- •Dropping the h
- •Dropping the r or r-lessness—intrusive r—rhoticity
- •Labov’s new york department store
- •British english r-Lessness
- •Other r-variations
- •Various social dialects
- •In britain cockney—london, england (class based social dialect)
- •Characteristics
- •Aspect marking
- •New York English and Southern American English
- •You and me and discrimination
- •Aave in Education
- •Gender discrimination
- •History
- •Affirmative positions
- •Neutral positions
- •Negative positions
- •Articles
- •Sociolinguistics
- •Walt Wolfram
- •Language as Social Behavior
- •Suggested Readings
- •Which comes first, language or thought? Babies think first
- •Americans are Ruining English
- •American English is ‘very corrupting’
- •One way Americans are ruining English is by changing it
- •A language - or anything else that does not change - is dead
- •Both American and British have changed and go on changing
- •Sociolinguistics Basics
- •What is dialect?
- •Vocabulary sometimes varies by region
- •People adjust the way they talk to their social situation
- •State of American
- •Is English falling apart?
- •Sapir–Whorf hypothesis From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] History
- •[Edit] Experimental support
- •[Edit] Criticism
- •[Edit] Linguistic determinism
- •[Edit] Fictional presence
- •[Edit] Quotations
- •[Edit] People
- •[Edit] Further reading
- •[Edit] External links Speech act From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] Examples
- •[Edit] History
- •[Edit] Indirect speech acts
- •[Edit] Illocutionary acts
- •[Edit] John Searle's theory of "indirect speech acts"
- •[Edit] In language development
- •[Edit] In computer science
- •Performative utterance From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] Austin's definition
- •[Edit] Distinguishing performatives from other utterances
- •[Edit] Are performatives truth-evaluable?
- •[Edit] Sedgwick's account of performatives
- •[Edit] Naming
- •[Edit] Descriptives and promises
- •[Edit] Examples
- •[Edit] Performative writing
- •[Edit] Sources
- •Intas Project: Language policy in Ukraine
- •Resolution On The Oakland "Ebonics" Issue Unanimously Adopted at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America Chicago, Illinois January 3, l997
- •Selected references (books only)
- •From “Ukrainian language” in Wikipedia Ukrainianization and tolerance
- •[Edit] Persecution and russification
- •[Edit] The Khrushchev thaw
- •[Edit] The Shelest period
- •[Edit] The Shcherbytsky period
- •[Edit] Gorbachev and perestroika
- •[Edit] Independence in the modern era
- •Dialects of Ukrainian
- •[Edit] Ukrainophone population
- •Questions from articles for seminars
- •Sociolinguistics Discussion Questions for Seminar Two:
- •Sociolinguistics Discussion Questions for Seminar Three:
- •Handouts Lecture 1. Definitions, Chomsky and Sapir-Whorf
- •Social interaction
- •The norms governing speech
- •We can say it more clearly as: I respect your right to…
- •Aave aspectual system
- •Additional materials Dialect Map of American English
- •Southeastern dialects:
[Edit] The Khrushchev thaw
While Russian was a de facto official language of the Soviet Union in all but formal name, all national languages were proclaimed equal. The name and denomination of Soviet banknotes were listed in the languages of all fifteen Soviet republics. On this 1961 one-ruble note, the Ukrainian for "one ruble", один карбованець (odyn karbovanets’), directly follows the Russian один рубль (odin rubl’).
After the death of Stalin (1953), a general policy of relaxing the language policies of the past was implemented (1958 to 1963). The Khrushchev era which followed saw a policy of relatively lenient concessions to development of the languages on the local and republican level, though its results in Ukraine did not go nearly as far as those of the Soviet policy of Ukrainianization in the 1920s. Journals and encyclopedic publications advanced in the Ukrainian language during the Khrushchev era.
Yet, the 1958 school reform that allowed parents to choose the language of primary instruction for their children, unpopular among the circles of the national intelligentsia in parts of the USSR, meant that non-Russian languages would slowly give way to Russian in light of the pressures of survival and advancement. The gains of the past, already largely reversed by the Stalin era, were offset by the liberal attitude towards the requirement to study the local languages (the requirement to study Russian remained). Parents were usually free to choose the language of study of their children (except in few areas where attending the Ukrainian school might have required a long daily commute) and they often chose Russian, which reinforced the resulting Russification. In this sense, some analysts argue that it was not the "oppression" or "persecution", but rather the lack of protection against the expansion of Russian language that contributed to the relative decline of Ukrainian in 1970s and 1980s. According to this view, it was inevitable that successful careers required a good command of Russian, while knowledge of Ukrainian was not vital, so it was common for Ukrainian parents to send their children to Russian-language schools, even though Ukrainian-language schools were usually available. While in the Russian-language schools within the republic, the Ukrainian was supposed to be learned as a second language at comparable level, the instruction of other subjects was in Russian and, as a results, students upon graduation had a superior command in Russian than in Ukrainian. Additionally, in some areas of the republic, the attitude towards teaching and learning of Ukrainian in schools was relaxed and it was, sometimes, considered a subject of secondary importance and even a waiver from studying it was sometimes given under various, ever expanding, circumstances.
Soviet Union's order in general contributed greatly to the brain drain from the national republics, particular to the two major cities of Russia: Moscow (a Soviet capital) and Leningrad. These cities had the best-stocked stores, top theaters and museums, better financed scientific and educational institutions and better exposure to whatever scarse international exchange of ideas. Thus, moving there was usually advantegeous for the careers not just for politicians (as in free countries), but also for artists, engineers, and scientists alike. All parts of the USSR have lost many of their brightest to this brain drain, Ukraine is not alone in this, of course.
The complete suppression of all expressions of separatism or Ukrainian nationalism also contributed to lessening interest toward Ukrainian. Some people who persistently used Ukrainian on a daily basis were often perceived as though as they were expressing sympathy towards, or even being members of, the political opposition. This, combined with advantages given by the Russian fluency and usage, made Russian a primary language of choice for many Ukrainians, while Ukrainian was more of a hobby. In any event, the mild liberalization in Ukraine and elsewhere was stifled by new suppression of freedoms at the end of the Khrushchev era (1963) when a policy of gradually creeping suppression of Ukrainian was re-instituted.
Later, the Soviet Ukrainian language policy was divided into two eras: first, the Shelest period (early 1960s to early 1970s), which was relatively liberal towards the development of the Ukrainian language. The second era, the policy of Shcherbytsky (early 1970s to early 1990s), was one of gradual suppression of the Ukrainian language.