
- •Sociolinguistics Class: Lectures, Questions, Handouts and Articles Written and compiled by Todd m. Ferry Starobilsk Department of Lugansk National Pedagogical University
- •Introduction to the topic:
- •Sociolinguistics: syllabus
- •Introduction:
- •Use at least three sources.
- •Footnote all citations.
- •Language and culture
- •Doctrine of linguistic relavtivity
- •Chomsky
- •Sapir_whorf hypothesis
- •The point
- •In summation
- •Sociolinguistics—again
- •Language definition part II.
- •What is a variety? slide#2
- •Slide #3
- •Slide #4 and #5
- •Slide #6
- •Slide #7
- •**Please look at your hand out
- •Regional dialects
- •Isoglosses
- •Variables
- •Bet and better, sometimes pronounced without the “t” like be-h and be-hher
- •He don’t mean no harm to nobody
- •Idiolect: redirect to slide # 5
- •Problems with accent
- •Lecture 3: When Languages Collide
- •Review: code/language
- •Slide 1: code switching
- •Review: speech community
- •Code-mixing
- •Slide 4: surzhyk
- •Borrowing
- •Languages collide
- •Pidgins
- •Slide 5: pidgin
- •Slide 5.5 and slide 6
- •Slide 10: Hawaiian Pidgin-Creole
- •Hawiian Pidgin-Creole
- •Slide 11: hawaiian pidgin-creole history History
- •Slide 13: hawiian pidgin-creole grammar/pro. Pronunciation
- •Grammatical Features
- •Slide: 14 gullah language
- •African origins
- •Lorenzo Turner's research
- •Slide 15: gullah verbal system Gullah verbs
- •Gullah language today
- •Slide 18: language shift language shift
- •Language planning and policy
- •Implicit language policy
- •Language planning in ukraine
- •Ukrainian language (1917-1932) Ukrainianization and tolerance
- •Russian language (1932-1953)
- •Russian language 1970’s-1980’s
- •Independence to the present
- •Slide 23: census data
- •Social interaction
- •Speech acts
- •Or for example ordering food at a restaurant
- •Now, taking it a step farther, what if your speech act fails? What if you do not say, “It is getting cold in here,” so that your friend understands your meaning?
- •Speech as skilled work
- •Norms governing speech
- •1. Norms governing what can be talked about: taboos and euphemism.
- •2. Norms governing non-verbal communication: body language
- •What does eye contact mean?
- •Conversational structure
- •Turn-taking
- •4. Norms governing the number of people who talk at once:
- •5. Norms governing the number of interruptions
- •We can say it more clearly as: I respect your right to…
- •Solidarity and power
- •Greetings and farewells
- •Labov, linguistic variable, middle class
- •English poll
- •Pronunciation and class dropping the g
- •Norwich, england
- •Los angeles
- •Dropping the h
- •Dropping the r or r-lessness—intrusive r—rhoticity
- •Labov’s new york department store
- •British english r-Lessness
- •Other r-variations
- •Various social dialects
- •In britain cockney—london, england (class based social dialect)
- •Characteristics
- •Aspect marking
- •New York English and Southern American English
- •You and me and discrimination
- •Aave in Education
- •Gender discrimination
- •History
- •Affirmative positions
- •Neutral positions
- •Negative positions
- •Articles
- •Sociolinguistics
- •Walt Wolfram
- •Language as Social Behavior
- •Suggested Readings
- •Which comes first, language or thought? Babies think first
- •Americans are Ruining English
- •American English is ‘very corrupting’
- •One way Americans are ruining English is by changing it
- •A language - or anything else that does not change - is dead
- •Both American and British have changed and go on changing
- •Sociolinguistics Basics
- •What is dialect?
- •Vocabulary sometimes varies by region
- •People adjust the way they talk to their social situation
- •State of American
- •Is English falling apart?
- •Sapir–Whorf hypothesis From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] History
- •[Edit] Experimental support
- •[Edit] Criticism
- •[Edit] Linguistic determinism
- •[Edit] Fictional presence
- •[Edit] Quotations
- •[Edit] People
- •[Edit] Further reading
- •[Edit] External links Speech act From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] Examples
- •[Edit] History
- •[Edit] Indirect speech acts
- •[Edit] Illocutionary acts
- •[Edit] John Searle's theory of "indirect speech acts"
- •[Edit] In language development
- •[Edit] In computer science
- •Performative utterance From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] Austin's definition
- •[Edit] Distinguishing performatives from other utterances
- •[Edit] Are performatives truth-evaluable?
- •[Edit] Sedgwick's account of performatives
- •[Edit] Naming
- •[Edit] Descriptives and promises
- •[Edit] Examples
- •[Edit] Performative writing
- •[Edit] Sources
- •Intas Project: Language policy in Ukraine
- •Resolution On The Oakland "Ebonics" Issue Unanimously Adopted at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America Chicago, Illinois January 3, l997
- •Selected references (books only)
- •From “Ukrainian language” in Wikipedia Ukrainianization and tolerance
- •[Edit] Persecution and russification
- •[Edit] The Khrushchev thaw
- •[Edit] The Shelest period
- •[Edit] The Shcherbytsky period
- •[Edit] Gorbachev and perestroika
- •[Edit] Independence in the modern era
- •Dialects of Ukrainian
- •[Edit] Ukrainophone population
- •Questions from articles for seminars
- •Sociolinguistics Discussion Questions for Seminar Two:
- •Sociolinguistics Discussion Questions for Seminar Three:
- •Handouts Lecture 1. Definitions, Chomsky and Sapir-Whorf
- •Social interaction
- •The norms governing speech
- •We can say it more clearly as: I respect your right to…
- •Aave aspectual system
- •Additional materials Dialect Map of American English
- •Southeastern dialects:
[Edit] Sedgwick's account of performatives
When performative utterances are explicit, then they are usually in the first person present tense. Those features are indexical, reflecting features of the immediate context. The particular verbs used in performative utterances tend to be verba dicendi—verbs of speaking—or "metapragmatic verbs," verbs that draw attention to a particular relation between the utterance or speech form and context. While some linguists and theorists might describe explicit performative utterances as rare occurrences, Eve Sedgwick argues that there are performative aspects to nearly all words, sentences, and phrases. (Notice, however, Sedgwick does not use Austin's notion in a really accurate manner and thus is -- despite of her use of Austin's term -- most probably speaking about a subject matter different from Austin's.) According to Sedgwick, performative utterances can be 'transformative' performatives, which create an instant change of personal or environmental status, or 'promisory' performatives, which describe the world as it might be in the future. These categories are not exclusive, so an utterance may well have both qualities. Some performative speech may be socially contested. For instance, two gay men saying "I do" in a wedding ceremony may be accepted as a performative act by some, but not by others. As Sedgwick observes, performative utterances can be revoked, either by the person who uttered them ("I take back my promise"), or by some other party not immediately involved, like the state (for example, gay marriage vows).
Words on a list can be either descriptive or performative. 'Butter' on a shopping list implies that "I will buy butter" (a promise to yourself). But 'Butter' printed on your till receipt means "you have purchased butter" (simply a description).
[Edit] Naming
Naming can also be both performative and descriptive, in certain superstitious circles. Macbeth is a simple name that describes the Shakespeare character and is the title of the play. But uttering the name Macbeth among actors who are performing the play is thought to trigger instant ill fortune in the production. The well known phrase "Speak of the devil and he will appear" follows similar superstitious logic. It is a relic of magical thinking, along with, and much like, the idea that making utterances over a representative fragment (a lock of a person's hair) will cause something to happen in the wider world (the person will fall in love).
[Edit] Descriptives and promises
Even descriptive utterances can be construed as being 'promisory' performative. For instance, someone standing on a street corner and describing to you a place you are trying to get to. Their description of the place takes the form of a 'promise' - the words are the place for you, for the moment - but you only know if the 'promise' of the words have been fulfilled when you personally reach the place in question.
[Edit] Examples
"I now pronounce you man and wife." (conferred personal status change)
"I christen you" (conferred personal status change)
"I accept your apology" (conferred personal status change)
"I divorce you, I divorce you, I divorce you" (conferred personal status change) (Islamic: see: Talaq-i-Bid'ah or triple Talaq)
"I do" – wedding (self-actuated personal status change)
"I swear to do that" (self-actuated personal status change - you are now bound)
"I promise to be there" (self-actuated personal status change - you are now bound)
"I apologize" (self-actuated personal status change)
"This meeting is now adjourned" (conferred environment status change)
"The court is now in session" (conferred environment status change)
"This church is hereby de-sanctified" (conferred environment status change)
"War is declared" (conferred environment status change)
"I sentence you to death" (conferred, will prove true or false in the future)
"I promise to be there" (self-actuated, will prove true or false in the future)
"I swear to do that" (self-actuated, will prove true or false in the future)
"I apologize" (self-actuated, will change your status if the apology is accepted)