
- •Sociolinguistics Class: Lectures, Questions, Handouts and Articles Written and compiled by Todd m. Ferry Starobilsk Department of Lugansk National Pedagogical University
- •Introduction to the topic:
- •Sociolinguistics: syllabus
- •Introduction:
- •Use at least three sources.
- •Footnote all citations.
- •Language and culture
- •Doctrine of linguistic relavtivity
- •Chomsky
- •Sapir_whorf hypothesis
- •The point
- •In summation
- •Sociolinguistics—again
- •Language definition part II.
- •What is a variety? slide#2
- •Slide #3
- •Slide #4 and #5
- •Slide #6
- •Slide #7
- •**Please look at your hand out
- •Regional dialects
- •Isoglosses
- •Variables
- •Bet and better, sometimes pronounced without the “t” like be-h and be-hher
- •He don’t mean no harm to nobody
- •Idiolect: redirect to slide # 5
- •Problems with accent
- •Lecture 3: When Languages Collide
- •Review: code/language
- •Slide 1: code switching
- •Review: speech community
- •Code-mixing
- •Slide 4: surzhyk
- •Borrowing
- •Languages collide
- •Pidgins
- •Slide 5: pidgin
- •Slide 5.5 and slide 6
- •Slide 10: Hawaiian Pidgin-Creole
- •Hawiian Pidgin-Creole
- •Slide 11: hawaiian pidgin-creole history History
- •Slide 13: hawiian pidgin-creole grammar/pro. Pronunciation
- •Grammatical Features
- •Slide: 14 gullah language
- •African origins
- •Lorenzo Turner's research
- •Slide 15: gullah verbal system Gullah verbs
- •Gullah language today
- •Slide 18: language shift language shift
- •Language planning and policy
- •Implicit language policy
- •Language planning in ukraine
- •Ukrainian language (1917-1932) Ukrainianization and tolerance
- •Russian language (1932-1953)
- •Russian language 1970’s-1980’s
- •Independence to the present
- •Slide 23: census data
- •Social interaction
- •Speech acts
- •Or for example ordering food at a restaurant
- •Now, taking it a step farther, what if your speech act fails? What if you do not say, “It is getting cold in here,” so that your friend understands your meaning?
- •Speech as skilled work
- •Norms governing speech
- •1. Norms governing what can be talked about: taboos and euphemism.
- •2. Norms governing non-verbal communication: body language
- •What does eye contact mean?
- •Conversational structure
- •Turn-taking
- •4. Norms governing the number of people who talk at once:
- •5. Norms governing the number of interruptions
- •We can say it more clearly as: I respect your right to…
- •Solidarity and power
- •Greetings and farewells
- •Labov, linguistic variable, middle class
- •English poll
- •Pronunciation and class dropping the g
- •Norwich, england
- •Los angeles
- •Dropping the h
- •Dropping the r or r-lessness—intrusive r—rhoticity
- •Labov’s new york department store
- •British english r-Lessness
- •Other r-variations
- •Various social dialects
- •In britain cockney—london, england (class based social dialect)
- •Characteristics
- •Aspect marking
- •New York English and Southern American English
- •You and me and discrimination
- •Aave in Education
- •Gender discrimination
- •History
- •Affirmative positions
- •Neutral positions
- •Negative positions
- •Articles
- •Sociolinguistics
- •Walt Wolfram
- •Language as Social Behavior
- •Suggested Readings
- •Which comes first, language or thought? Babies think first
- •Americans are Ruining English
- •American English is ‘very corrupting’
- •One way Americans are ruining English is by changing it
- •A language - or anything else that does not change - is dead
- •Both American and British have changed and go on changing
- •Sociolinguistics Basics
- •What is dialect?
- •Vocabulary sometimes varies by region
- •People adjust the way they talk to their social situation
- •State of American
- •Is English falling apart?
- •Sapir–Whorf hypothesis From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] History
- •[Edit] Experimental support
- •[Edit] Criticism
- •[Edit] Linguistic determinism
- •[Edit] Fictional presence
- •[Edit] Quotations
- •[Edit] People
- •[Edit] Further reading
- •[Edit] External links Speech act From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] Examples
- •[Edit] History
- •[Edit] Indirect speech acts
- •[Edit] Illocutionary acts
- •[Edit] John Searle's theory of "indirect speech acts"
- •[Edit] In language development
- •[Edit] In computer science
- •Performative utterance From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] Austin's definition
- •[Edit] Distinguishing performatives from other utterances
- •[Edit] Are performatives truth-evaluable?
- •[Edit] Sedgwick's account of performatives
- •[Edit] Naming
- •[Edit] Descriptives and promises
- •[Edit] Examples
- •[Edit] Performative writing
- •[Edit] Sources
- •Intas Project: Language policy in Ukraine
- •Resolution On The Oakland "Ebonics" Issue Unanimously Adopted at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America Chicago, Illinois January 3, l997
- •Selected references (books only)
- •From “Ukrainian language” in Wikipedia Ukrainianization and tolerance
- •[Edit] Persecution and russification
- •[Edit] The Khrushchev thaw
- •[Edit] The Shelest period
- •[Edit] The Shcherbytsky period
- •[Edit] Gorbachev and perestroika
- •[Edit] Independence in the modern era
- •Dialects of Ukrainian
- •[Edit] Ukrainophone population
- •Questions from articles for seminars
- •Sociolinguistics Discussion Questions for Seminar Two:
- •Sociolinguistics Discussion Questions for Seminar Three:
- •Handouts Lecture 1. Definitions, Chomsky and Sapir-Whorf
- •Social interaction
- •The norms governing speech
- •We can say it more clearly as: I respect your right to…
- •Aave aspectual system
- •Additional materials Dialect Map of American English
- •Southeastern dialects:
Norms governing speech
Skilled speaking requires a number of factors, including a knowledge of the relevant rules governing speech. These are often termed the speech norms. The rules vary from one society to another, and as we said, they can be very different.
We call these speech norms, because they define the normal behavior for social interaction, and thus speech interaction in a given society.
The book does a good job of discussing these. I will deal with each of these norms, one at a time, and try to elaborate on what is said.
1. Norms governing what can be talked about: taboos and euphemism.
The first speech norm we will discuss is NOT mentioned in your book, but it is an important norm. It is what we are allowed to talk about. Topics that people do not discuss are called taboos. They exist in every culture, but they can be very different depending on the culture.
Taboo:/ B tbu / noun [count] something that people in a given society or culture do not do or talk about because it is very offensive or shocking
There are a number of subjects people do not talk about at certain times or with certain people, for example in the U.S.A we usually are careful about who we talk to about politics, religion, and sex. Are these different in Ukraine?
Similarly, in the U.S.A people never talk about how much money they are making, and it is considered impolite to ask someone…is that the case in Ukraine?
Take the next ten seconds to think about all those terrible things you are not supposed to talk about in public—Good. Those are your examples of language taboos.
2. Norms governing non-verbal communication: body language
The second social norm governing speech is non-verbal communication. Diversity in norms is matched in the area of non-verbal communication or what is sometimes called body language. Different actions can have different meanings in different societies, or be non-existent.
SMILE
For example, a smile, in the U.S. is normal. We smile to be polite, so smiling at a stranger is not strange at all.
ASK STUDENTS: What does a smile mean in Ukraine?
Similarly, some people you smile at, some people you don’t. If someone does not “look” friendly, whether stranger or friend, you would not smile at him or her. If you do it will likely be taken the wrong way.
RAISING EYEBROWS
The book offers the example of raising the eyebrows. In any given culture, it can mean: a greeting, an invitation, a warning, skepticism, disdain, doubt, interest, intrigue, or disgust. In America, it can mean interest, skepticism, and invitation, depending on how it is done and its context.
ASK STUDENTS: What does it mean in Ukrainian culture?
What does eye contact mean?
ASK STUDENTS: What about eye-contact? What does it say between strangers? What about at a disco between a man and a woman?
PHYSICAL DISTANCE
Another non-verbal norm governing speech is the physical space between people in a conversation.
Your status in society or your social closeness or solidarity to another person is also reflected in the physical distance between speakers. It is safe to say that in most cases the physical distance between speakers is proportional to social distance, so that people who feel “close” to each other socially, generally stand physically nearer to each other in conversation than people who are not close, or if there is a difference in their power relationships.
What varies, often from culture to culture is the distance that is appropriate for a particular degree of solidarity. For instance Arabs generally set the distance much lower than Americans.
It is not strange to see two men who have a close relationship holding hands while walking down the street. This is only suggestive that they know each other well as friends.
In America, our distance between people, even people who are close, is much greater. I will always give even my closest male friend about an arms length of space. The distance is of course greater if I do not know the person.
ASK STUDENTS: What about in Ukraine?