
- •Sociolinguistics Class: Lectures, Questions, Handouts and Articles Written and compiled by Todd m. Ferry Starobilsk Department of Lugansk National Pedagogical University
- •Introduction to the topic:
- •Sociolinguistics: syllabus
- •Introduction:
- •Use at least three sources.
- •Footnote all citations.
- •Language and culture
- •Doctrine of linguistic relavtivity
- •Chomsky
- •Sapir_whorf hypothesis
- •The point
- •In summation
- •Sociolinguistics—again
- •Language definition part II.
- •What is a variety? slide#2
- •Slide #3
- •Slide #4 and #5
- •Slide #6
- •Slide #7
- •**Please look at your hand out
- •Regional dialects
- •Isoglosses
- •Variables
- •Bet and better, sometimes pronounced without the “t” like be-h and be-hher
- •He don’t mean no harm to nobody
- •Idiolect: redirect to slide # 5
- •Problems with accent
- •Lecture 3: When Languages Collide
- •Review: code/language
- •Slide 1: code switching
- •Review: speech community
- •Code-mixing
- •Slide 4: surzhyk
- •Borrowing
- •Languages collide
- •Pidgins
- •Slide 5: pidgin
- •Slide 5.5 and slide 6
- •Slide 10: Hawaiian Pidgin-Creole
- •Hawiian Pidgin-Creole
- •Slide 11: hawaiian pidgin-creole history History
- •Slide 13: hawiian pidgin-creole grammar/pro. Pronunciation
- •Grammatical Features
- •Slide: 14 gullah language
- •African origins
- •Lorenzo Turner's research
- •Slide 15: gullah verbal system Gullah verbs
- •Gullah language today
- •Slide 18: language shift language shift
- •Language planning and policy
- •Implicit language policy
- •Language planning in ukraine
- •Ukrainian language (1917-1932) Ukrainianization and tolerance
- •Russian language (1932-1953)
- •Russian language 1970’s-1980’s
- •Independence to the present
- •Slide 23: census data
- •Social interaction
- •Speech acts
- •Or for example ordering food at a restaurant
- •Now, taking it a step farther, what if your speech act fails? What if you do not say, “It is getting cold in here,” so that your friend understands your meaning?
- •Speech as skilled work
- •Norms governing speech
- •1. Norms governing what can be talked about: taboos and euphemism.
- •2. Norms governing non-verbal communication: body language
- •What does eye contact mean?
- •Conversational structure
- •Turn-taking
- •4. Norms governing the number of people who talk at once:
- •5. Norms governing the number of interruptions
- •We can say it more clearly as: I respect your right to…
- •Solidarity and power
- •Greetings and farewells
- •Labov, linguistic variable, middle class
- •English poll
- •Pronunciation and class dropping the g
- •Norwich, england
- •Los angeles
- •Dropping the h
- •Dropping the r or r-lessness—intrusive r—rhoticity
- •Labov’s new york department store
- •British english r-Lessness
- •Other r-variations
- •Various social dialects
- •In britain cockney—london, england (class based social dialect)
- •Characteristics
- •Aspect marking
- •New York English and Southern American English
- •You and me and discrimination
- •Aave in Education
- •Gender discrimination
- •History
- •Affirmative positions
- •Neutral positions
- •Negative positions
- •Articles
- •Sociolinguistics
- •Walt Wolfram
- •Language as Social Behavior
- •Suggested Readings
- •Which comes first, language or thought? Babies think first
- •Americans are Ruining English
- •American English is ‘very corrupting’
- •One way Americans are ruining English is by changing it
- •A language - or anything else that does not change - is dead
- •Both American and British have changed and go on changing
- •Sociolinguistics Basics
- •What is dialect?
- •Vocabulary sometimes varies by region
- •People adjust the way they talk to their social situation
- •State of American
- •Is English falling apart?
- •Sapir–Whorf hypothesis From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] History
- •[Edit] Experimental support
- •[Edit] Criticism
- •[Edit] Linguistic determinism
- •[Edit] Fictional presence
- •[Edit] Quotations
- •[Edit] People
- •[Edit] Further reading
- •[Edit] External links Speech act From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] Examples
- •[Edit] History
- •[Edit] Indirect speech acts
- •[Edit] Illocutionary acts
- •[Edit] John Searle's theory of "indirect speech acts"
- •[Edit] In language development
- •[Edit] In computer science
- •Performative utterance From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] Austin's definition
- •[Edit] Distinguishing performatives from other utterances
- •[Edit] Are performatives truth-evaluable?
- •[Edit] Sedgwick's account of performatives
- •[Edit] Naming
- •[Edit] Descriptives and promises
- •[Edit] Examples
- •[Edit] Performative writing
- •[Edit] Sources
- •Intas Project: Language policy in Ukraine
- •Resolution On The Oakland "Ebonics" Issue Unanimously Adopted at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America Chicago, Illinois January 3, l997
- •Selected references (books only)
- •From “Ukrainian language” in Wikipedia Ukrainianization and tolerance
- •[Edit] Persecution and russification
- •[Edit] The Khrushchev thaw
- •[Edit] The Shelest period
- •[Edit] The Shcherbytsky period
- •[Edit] Gorbachev and perestroika
- •[Edit] Independence in the modern era
- •Dialects of Ukrainian
- •[Edit] Ukrainophone population
- •Questions from articles for seminars
- •Sociolinguistics Discussion Questions for Seminar Two:
- •Sociolinguistics Discussion Questions for Seminar Three:
- •Handouts Lecture 1. Definitions, Chomsky and Sapir-Whorf
- •Social interaction
- •The norms governing speech
- •We can say it more clearly as: I respect your right to…
- •Aave aspectual system
- •Additional materials Dialect Map of American English
- •Southeastern dialects:
Social interaction
All aspects of communicative behavior through which people influence and react to each other. Examples are speech and body language.
Speech is only one part of social interaction—but it is a very important part.
Speech plays many roles in social interaction, and in that, it is more than just sounds and grammar—it can be considered a human activity, a mode of action.
SPEECH MAKES THINGS HAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!
The book gives an excellent example of this with people moving furniture:
If two people were moving a really big desk from one room to another, their conversation might go something like this:
To you…up a little higher…up a bit more…okay, to the left…no no no…to the right…almost there…okay, let’s set it down.
Speech in this case acts to control a person’s physical activity.
Contrast that with listening to this lecture.
Here the speech is intended to influence your thoughts about language…that is, if you are listening.
WE CAN CLASSIFY SPEECH ACCORDING TO ITS FUNCTION.
FOR EXAMPLE THESE VARIOUS CATEGORIES:
To obtain information: Where is the toilet?
For expressing emotions: I am so angry with you!
Requests: Will you bring me a cup of tea please?
Give orders: Move your car!
Give thanks: Thank you so much.
Offer apologies: I’m so sorry I scratched your CD.
Small talk: nice day out, isn’t it?
Speech acts
One approach to the classification of speech is based on what are called SPEECH ACTS. J. L. Austin in his book, “How to do things with words,” was the first to really describe what a speech act is and does.
How to Do Things With Words is Austin's most influential work. In it he attacks the view that the chief business of sentences is to state facts, and thus to be true or false based on the truth or falsity of those facts. In contrast to this common view, he argues, true or false sentences form only a small part of the range of utterances.
After introducing several kinds of sentences which he assumes are indeed not truth-evaluable, he turns in particular to one of these kinds of sentences, which he deems performative utterances. These he characterises by two features:
First, to utter one of these sentences is not just to "say" something, but rather to perform a certain kind of action.
Second, these sentences are not true or false; rather, when something goes wrong in connection with the utterance then the utterance is, as he puts it, "unhappy."
The action which performative sentences 'perform' when they are uttered belongs to what Austin later calls a speech act :
The most cited example is:
If you say “I name this ship the Queen Elizabeth," and the circumstances are appropriate in certain ways, then you will have done something special, namely, you will have performed the act of naming the ship.
Other examples include:
"I take this man as my lawfully wedded husband," used in the course of a marriage ceremony,
or
"I bequeath this watch to my brother," as occurring in a will.
In all three cases the sentence is not being used to describe or state what one is 'doing', but being used to actually 'do' it.
IN EACH SENTENCE THE WORDS ARE ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING.
HERE IS A MORE OBVIOUS EXAMPLE:
“EVERYONE STAND UP!”
Now, by saying those words, in the circumstances of a classroom AND a teacher-student relationship, my words actually had the effect of making you stand up.
SPEECH ACTS:
The theory of speech acts aims to do justice to the fact that even though words (phrases, sentences) encode information, people do more things with words than convey information, and that when people do convey information, they often convey more than their words encode.
The words in a SPEECH ACT are called the Utterance. The actions are called the Performance. Almost any speech act is really the performance of several acts at once, distinguished by the speaker’s intentions. Austin calls these:
PERFORMANCE:
Locutionary act: This is the act of saying the words.
Illocutionary act: What one does in saying the words.
Perlocutionary act: What one does by saying the words, or how the words affect the audience or are intended to affect the audience.
In general speech acts are acts of communication. To communicate is to express a certain attitude and the type of speech act being performed corresponds to the type of attitude being expressed. For example, a statement expresses a belief, a request expresses desire, and an apology expresses regret.
A speech act succeeds if the audience identifies, in accordance with the speaker’s intentions, the attitude, meaning, and action being expressed. It fails if someone does not understand the whole attitude, meaning, and action of the sentence.
For example:
Let’s say, a bartender utters the words, “Last call! The bar will be closed in five minutes.”
Using Austin’s categories we can say that he is simultaneously:
Locutionary act: Saying that the bar (the one he tends) will be closed in five minutes (from the time of the utterance).
Illocutionary act: The bartender is informing the patrons that the bar will close soon and perhaps also the act of urging them to buy one last drink.
Prelocutionary act: Causing the patrons to believe that the bar is about to close and getting them to want and to order one last drink.
The bartender is performing all these speech acts, at all three levels, just by uttering certain words.
Similarly, pretend you are in a cold room and you say to your friend: “It’s getting cold in here.”
Locutionary act: you, saying the words “It’s getting cold in here.”
Illocutionary act: Notifying your friend that the temperature is dropping and that you have noticed it.
Prelocutionary act: Making the suggestion that someone should close the window.