1.7 Rhythm
It is impossible fully describe English intonation without reference to speech rhythm. Prosodic components (pitch, loudness, tempo) and speech rhythm work interdependently. Rhythm seems to be a kind of framework of speech organization. Linguists sometimes consider rhythm as one of the components of intonation. D. Crystal, for instance, views rhythmicality as one of the constituents of prosodic systems. Rhythm is a very general term. It is understood as periodicity in time and space. We find it everywhere in life. The work of all kinds of machinery is said to be rhythmical. In nature rhythm is observed in the successions of seasons, days and nights, the changes of the moon phases, high and low tide. The most evident illustration of rhythm in the physiology of living beings, is the heart beating and breathing. Most of human activities appear to be rhythmitical-swimming, running, skiing, knitting and other muscular movements. We very feel and appreciate the artisticrhythm in music, dunce and other fields of art. Rhythm as a linguistic notion is realized in lexical, syntactical and prosodic means and mostly in their combination. For instance, such figures of speech as sound or word repetition, Syntactical parallelism, intensification and others are perceived as rhythmical on the lexical, syntactical and prosodic levels. Here the syntactical parallelism of the homogeneous clauses is correlated with the identical prosodic contour if the intonation groups in the phrase and is strengthened by the repetition of the conjuction “and”, a stylistic device known as polysyndeton. In this section will be described the prosodic aspect of rhythm. Speech production us naturally closely connected with the process of breathing. So speech activity as well as any other and is characterized by rhythm. From the materialistic point of view rhythm is one the means of matter organization. I. Lehiste claims that is ochrony is largely a perceptual phenomenon. Whenever short rhythmic groups are mixed with longer ones the speaker minimizes the differences by means of changes in his rate of delivery. [11,58] Any number of unstressed syllables occurring between the stressed ones are actually compressed to allow the next stressed syllable to come on the regular beat. Now the listener tends to equalize the groups he perceives. In other words the length of the intervals is perceived by the listener as equal despite the changing number of unstressed syllables between the peaks of the rhythmic groups. Learners of English should be recommended to beat the rhythmic while reading sentences of this kind. The most frequent type of a rhythmic group includes 2-4 syllables, one of them stressed, others unstressed.
American-Based Pronunciation Standards of English
Vowels
1. There is no strict division of vowels into long and short in GA, though some American phoneticians suggest that certain GA vowels are tense and likely to be accompanied by relative length: [i:] in seat, [u:] in pool.
They also admit that a slight rise in tongue position during the pronunciation of tense vowels leads to a diphthongal quality of tense vowels which contrasts to a monophthongal quality of lax vowels.
2.
Classification of vowels according to the stability of articulation
is the most controversial subject in GA. Some diphthongs are treated
in GA as biphonemic combinations. The inventory of GA diphthongs
varies from three to twelve phonemes. Following D.A.Shakhbagova (73)
we distinguish here five diphthongs in GA: [eI],
[aI],
[
],
[
],
[
].
3. Another very important feature that causes different interpretations of diphthongs and vowel length in GA is the pronunciation of [r] sound between a vowel and a consonant or between a vowel and a silence: turn (t3:m], bird [bs^d], star [star].
It has been estimated that 2/3 of American population pronounce [r] and 1/3 omit it. Thus OA is rhotic in words like far, core, etc. (when [r] follows the voxels and ends the word), this sound is consonantal and non-syllabic according to Ch. Thomas. It involves the characteristic hindering of the free flow of breath which we associate with consonants. The sound [r] in far closes the syllable more definitely than in British Received Pronunciation of the word [fa:]. On the other hand, there is a vocalic, or vowel-like and syllabic [r], that occurs in words like bird, murmur (after a vowel and before a consonant). Ch.Thomas writes that in such cases we should better transcribe the words bird and murmur like [brd] and [mrmr]. In such cases [r] is responsible for the characteristic vowel-like quality within the syllable; it is responsible for syllabic quality as well. That's why Ch.Thomas says that [r] syllabic in bird and [r] non-syllabic in far should be transcribed differently. According to V.A.Vassilyev it is still the vowel of the word .that forms a syllable ([3:] in bird, [o:] in com, etc.), not the syllabic [r] sound. He mentioned although that all the vowel sounds in pre-[r] position sound more like [ә]. [r] gives the preceding vowel a retroflex colouring. It means that the tip of the tongue glides to the retroflex position without, however, staying there long enough to produce a full-fledged retroflex [r] sound, [r] also prolongs the vowel a little. V.A.Vassilyev uses the term "[r]- compefitoting" vowels {suggested by A.LTrakhterov) for the vowels in such words in British Received Pronunciation.
4. One more peculiar feature of pronunciation of vowels in American English is their nasalization, when they are preceded or followed by a nasal consonant (e.g. m such words as take, small, name, etc.). Nasalization is often called an American twang. It is incidental and need not be marked in phonemic transcription.
5. GA front vowels are somewhat different from RP. Vowels [i:], [I] are distributed differently in GA and RP.
In words like very, pity GA has [i:] rather than [I]. In word final position it is often even diphthongized.
Vowel
[e] is more open in GA. It also may
be diphthongized before [p],
[t], [k]: let
[
].
6.
There are
four mixed or central vowels
in GA: [з],
[ә],
[
],
[a].
They differ
markedly from RP vowels in
articulation and distribution.
7.
The three RP vowels [
],
[
],.
[
]
correspond to only two vowels in GA — [a] and [
].
This
combined
with the articulatory differences between RP {d]
and
GA [a] and a difference in vowel distribution in many sets of words
makes it very complicated. The following chart vividly shows it:
|
RP |
GA |
Dad |
[ ] |
[ ] |
dog |
[ ] |
[a] |
path |
[ ] |
[ ] |
dance |
[ ] |
[ ] |
half |
[ ] |
[ ] |
Besides,
word distribution of [
],
[
]
in
RP and GA is completely different. GA [
]
is
intermediate in quality between the RP [
:]
and [
].
In
its
production the lips are considerably
less rounded.
8. Now to the qualities of GA diphthongs.
a) the diphthong [eI] is closer in GA as opposed to RP;
b)
very front realization of [
]
such as in RP is not found in GA;
c)
the nucleus of [
]
tends to be more advanced in GA;
d)
since GA is a rhotk accent with non-prevocalic [r], it has the
consequence that the following RP vowels (derived historically
from vowel + [r]) do not occur in GA: [Iә]
in dear
—
GA [dir], [
]
in dare
—
GA [deIr],
[
]
in tour
—
GA [tur].
Consonants
1. The RP allophonic differentiation of [l] does not exist in GA. In all positions [1] is fairly dark.
2. Intervocalic [t] as in pity is most normally voiced. The result is neutralization of the distribution between [t] and [d] in this position, i.e. latter, ladder. The original distinction is preserved through vowel length with the vowel before [t] being shorter.
In words like twenty, tittle [t] may even drop out. Thus winner and winter, for example, may sound identical.
3. GA [r] is articulated differently from RP one. The impression is one of greater retroflexion (the tip of the tongue is curled back further than in RP).
4.
The "whw
spelling is represented in GA by [
]
sound
(or sometimes transcribed as [hw].
So most American speakers make a clear distinction between "wh"
and "w" words: where
— ware, which
—
witch.
5.
The sonorant [j] is usually weakened or omitted altogether in GA
between a consonant (especially a forelingual one) and [u:] as in the
words: news
(nu:z),
Tuesday
['tu:zdI],
student
['stu:dәnt],
suit
[su:t],
tube
[tu:b],
stupid
['stu:pId],
during
[
].
Non-systematic Differences between General American and Received Pronunciation
A. 1. Many differences involve the pronunciation of individual words or groups of words. Here are some of these:
|
RP |
GA |
Asia |
[ |
[ |
cordial |
[ |
[ |
either |
[ |
[ |
leisure |
[ |
[ |
lever |
[ |
[ |
schedule |
[ |
[ |
shone |
[ |
[ |
tomato |
[ |
[ |
vase |
[ |
[ |
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]2. Words apparatus, data, status can be pronounced with either [ ] or [eI] in GA, but only with [eI] in RP.
3. Words like hostile, missile, reptile have final [ail] in RP. In GA they may have [әl],
8. Stress Differences ,
1. In words of French origin GA tends to have stress on the final syllable, while RP has it on the initial one:
RP GA
baflet
[
]
[
]
beret
[
]
[
]
2. Some words have first-syllable stress in GA whereas in RP the stress may be elsewhere.
RP GA
address |
[ |
[ |
cigarette |
[ |
[ |
magazine |
[ |
[ |
research |
[ |
[ |
adult |
[ |
[ |
inquiry |
[ |
[ |
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]3. Some compound words have stress on the first element in GAand in RP they retain it on the second element: weekend, icecream, hotdog, New Year.
4.
Polysyllabic
words ending in -ory,
-ary, -monyh&ve secondary
stress in GA, often called "tertiary": laboratory
[
],
dictionary
[
],
secretary
[
],
testimony
[
].