VI. Correct the statements if necessary using the phrases of agreement or disagreement:

1. The volume of both industrial and domestic waste has not increased dramatically over the past 50 years.

2. The largest single cause of industrial air pollution is disused machinery, plastic sheets and wire netting.

3. Air pollution from industrial accidents occasionally causes major health problems.

4. Water pollution from industry can occur intentionally, when accidents cause leakage of toxic waste into the water supply, or unintentionally, when factories discharge their effluents directly into rivers, lakes and oceans.

5. Factory effluents also discharge large pieces of solid waste such as disused machinery, plastic sheets and wire netting.

6. Without dissolved oxygen, the sea can support any life at all.

7. Industries argue that it would cost too much money to cool the water down before releasing it into the environment.

VII. Answer the following questions:

1. How has the volume of industrial and domestic waste increased over the рast 50 years?

2. What are greenhouse gases?

3. What chemicals is the cause of acid rain?

4. What is the largest cause of industrial air pollution?

5. How can water pollution from industry occur?

6. Is oil one of the greatest pollutants of water?

7. What is thermal pollution?

8. How does thermal pollution influence aquatic ecosystem?

9. What do industries argue about?

VIII. Translate the sentences into English:

1. Об’єм промислових та побутових відходів значно збільшився за останні 50 років.

2. Найзначніша причина промислового забруднення повітря – електроенергетична промисловість.

3. Забруднення повітря через нещасні випадки спричиняє значну кількість проблем із здоров’ям.

4. Уламки пластику, металобрухт не тільки жахливі на вигляд, морські тварини та кораблі можуть заплутатися у цих відходах.

5. Нафта вкриває пір’я морських птахів, луску риб.

6. Море не може підтримувати жодної з форм життя без розчиненого у воді кисню.

7. Теплове забруднення одразу вбиває деяких тварин і різні види рослин.

8. Підприємства, які використовують воду для охолодження (такі, як атомні електростанції), збільшують температуру близько розташованих річок та озер на 5–10 градусів.

IX. Read the dialogue again and write down the key points of the conversation. Act the dialogue out.

Leila Markham is an environmentalist. She is being interviewed on the radio by Tony Hunt, a journalist.

Tony: One of the most important issues faced by the people is the ques­tion of pollution. So tell me, Leila, what exactly is pollution?

Leila: Well, I would say that pollution is the accumulation, to a level intolerable to the ecosystem, of undesirable elements in any one of the diverse aspects of the physical environment. Pollution becomes especially important when it significantly alters the natural environment or when it threatens normal growth and reproduction or the normal functioning of all life forms, including human beings.

Tony: I see. Are there any classifications of pollution?

Leila: Actually, the scientists distinguish between natural pollution and man-made one. Natural pollution is for instance lime, iron, or sulphur in water supplies, smoke from forest fires, or dust from the eruption of volcanoes.

Tony: And manmade?

Leila: Manmade pollution includes those wastes in the water, air, or other aspects of the environment for which humans are responsible. I have got some statistics which I would like to share with you.

Tony: That will be great.

Leila: According to the World Health Organization 3 million people are killed worldwide by outdoor air pollution annually. Most are in poor countries. Diseases carried in water are responsible for 80 % of illnesses and deaths in developing countries, killing a child every eight seconds.

Tony: Those are terrifying figures. It looks like developing countries are suffering from the pollution more than developed countries.

Leila: It is true. For example, developing countries are sometimes used for dumping pesticides. But on the other hand, the developed countries are also paying the price. For example, contaminated land is a problem in industrialized countries, where former factories and power stations can leave waste like heavy metals in the soil. Agriculture can pollute land with pesticides, nitraterich fertilizers. And when the contamination reaches rivers it damages life there, and can even create dead zones off the coast, as in the Gulf of Mexico.

Tony: The pesticide DDT, for example, does great damage to wildlife and can affect the human nervous system, but can also be effective against malaria. Where do you think, Leila, the priority lies?

Leila: The industrialized world has not yet cleaned up the mess it created, but it is reaping the benefits of the pollution it has caused. It can hardly tell the developing countries that they have no right to follow suit. Another complication in tackling pollution is that it does not respect political frontiers. Perhaps the best example to illustrate this – is climate change. The countries of the world share one atmosphere, and what one does can affect everyone.

Tony: Well, chemicals seem to be a frequent pollutant. When we think of chemical contamination it is often images of events like Bhopal that come to mind.

Leila: Oh, yes. That was a horrible disaster. But the problem is widespread. One study says 7–20 % of cancers are attributable to poor air and pollution in homes and workplaces. Some man-made chemicals are blamed for affecting some animals. And the chemicals climb the food chain, from fish to mammals – and to us. About 70000 chemicals are on the market but at least 30000 are thought never to have been tested for their possible risks to people. The snag is that modern society demands many of them, and some are essential for survival.

Tony: OK. And last, but not the least question. Who should pay for pollution?

Leila: One of the principles that is to be applied here is simple – the polluter pays.

Tony: That is quite reasonable if it is obvious who is to blame and who must pay the price. But it is not always straightforward to work out who is the polluter, or whether the rest of us would be happy to pay the price of stopping the pollution. Do you think that there are any solutions of the problem?

Leila: I am convinced it is up to us, the public, to solve the problem. As far as the problem of pollution is concerned «there is no such place as «away» and there is no such person as the «other»». You can start by taking your unwanted waste to a recycling center, instead of just throwing it away. A good way to influence big companies is to boycott any products which are harmful to the environment. This forces the companies to change their method of production. Also, try to use unleaded petrol because the exhaust fumes given off are less harmful to the environment. If you are traveling in the city, don’t use the car, but take public transport instead.

Tony: In conclusion I would like to say that the problem of pollution concerns all people living on the Earth. Thank you, Leila, and good luck in your campaign.

Leila: Thanks for attention.