Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Куликова О.В. ППК для студентов-экономистов стр...doc
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.05.2025
Размер:
455.17 Кб
Скачать

When dancing elephants trip up

When stodgy European firms decide they, too, can become agile, they sometimes come to grief. ICI and GEC—at the time the twin pillars of Britain's manufacturing industry—both tried it in the mid-1990s. ICI spun off its profitable pharmaceutical business (now part of AstraZeneca) rather than build it up by acquisition. It then decided to get out of bulk chemicals and borrowed and paid too much to buy the specialty chemicals bit of Unilever. Its shares collapsed, and the company that for 70 years had been the bellwether of British industry dropped out of the index of leading companies.

John Mayo, the dealmaker who advised ICI on the Zeneca deal, also helped wreck GEC. Its defensive strategy had been to ally its power engineering and telecoms businesses with France's Alsthom and with Siemens. Guided by Mr Mayo, GEC sold its defence arm to British Aerospace and bought internet-equipment firms in America at the height of the telecoms bubble. When that burst, this supposedly agile strategy turned out to be nothing more than a flawed financial deal. BAE Systems has proved nimbler on its feet: it is reinventing itself as an American defence contractor, selling its minority stake in Airbus Industrie so it can add to its transatlantic portfolio of businesses. The attraction is that America is by far the biggest defence market, whereas the European defence business is fragmented and nationalistic.

Mr Sull observes that many European businesses are able to soldier on thanks to their bulk and solidity rather than their capacity for innovation. Many European telecoms companies are part-owned by governments to protect them. Under a special law, voting shares in Volkswagen have long been limited to 20% and a regional government has held a stake to keep the company safe (though that is set to change this year). Banks such as HSBC and ABN Amro are diversified as well as too big to fail. Europe's pharma giants—GSK, Novartis and AstraZeneca—survive as much because of their past patent rights than by virtue of their current research producing big new earners. Increasingly, however, they are moving research to America because the rewards there are greater and the environment is more stimulating.

The absorption approach works well in mature industries, but emerging economies are producing nimble companies that may prove capable of shaking up slow-moving sectors. As well as Arcelor, consider Cemex, a Mexican company that took over RMC, a British-based building-materials company; or the folding of Belgium's Interbrew into Brazil's Ambev in 2004 to form InBev. In aviation the market for regional passenger aircraft (up to 100 seats) has been taken over by two companies, Bombardier Aerospace of Canada and Embraer of Brazil. They have seen off Fairchild Dornier, Fokker and Saab from Europe because they have been prepared to introduce more innovative aircraft using modern jet technology.

Only a few years ago the railway-locomotive industry in Europe was spread among a handful of regional companies. Today, after several rounds of consolidation, it is dominated by Bombardier Transportation, another part of the Canadian group. It has based its worldwide train business in Berlin, becoming, in effect, a European global company—another example of the tide of globalisation lapping on Europe' s shores.

Forty years ago the late Jean-Jacques Servan-Schreiber, in an influential book, “Le Défi Américain”, warned Europeans that the American multinationals such as IBM, Ford and General Motors would confront them in Europe. Today it is not just American firms that are moving into Europe but companies from all over the world. And yet Europe's big companies seem to be rising to the challenge.

Howard Read

Feb 8th 2007 From The Economist print edition

Read again to do the assignments that follow.

II. Vocabulary.

2.1. Give Russian equivalents for the following terms and expressions all found in the article above.

Europe's biggest steelmaker; a Dutch-registered company run from London; to scrap a bid for the London Stock Exchange; to win with a bid of ... billion to become the world's fifth-largest steel producer; a shareholding; high-value-added industries; to diversify out of the core business; mature industries; slow-moving sectors.

2.2. Give English equivalents (all found in the text above) for the following Russian terms.

Совместное предприятие; активные действия акционеров; рыночная ниша; предприятия малого и среднего бизнеса; конкурент; основной бизнес; ассортимент продукции; ходовые товары повседневного спроса; неудачная финансовая сделка; права на владение патентом; источник дохода; акции с правом на большее число голосов при голосовании.

2.3. In the text, find terms corresponding to the following definitions.

a) an increase in the nominal price of a company's shares, by combining a specified number of lower-price shares into one higher-priced share;

b) a combination of two or more businesses on an equal footing that results in the creation of a new reporting entity formed from the combining businesses;

c) an owner of shares in a limited company or limited partnership;

d) an approach by one company to buy the share capital of another; an attempted takeover;

e)a corporation that has production operations in more than one country for various reasons, including securing supplies of raw materials, utilizing cheap labour sources, servicing local markets, and bypassing protectionist barriers.