
- •Английский язык для заочников по специальности «Юриспруденция»
- •Содержание
- •Часть I. Грамматика……………………………………………..9
- •Часть II. Лексика………………………………………………….47
- •Часть III. Домашнее чтение…………………………..……..64
- •Предисловие
- •Прочитайте текст и выполните задания text
- •Часть 1. Грамматика word order (Порядок слов)
- •Word order. Тренировочные упражнения
- •Word order. Контрольный тест
- •8. I ____ to change it.
- •9. We were sitting in the garden ____.
- •10. The plane was making a strange noise, and ____.
- •Verb (Глагол)
- •Irregular Verbs (неправильные глаголы)
- •Времена группы simple (Простые времена) the present simple (Настоящее простое время)
- •The past simple (Прошедшее простое время)
- •Used to
- •The future simple (Будущее простое время)
- •Simple tenses. Тренировочные упражнения
- •Simple tenses. Контрольный тест
- •Времена группы progressive (Продолженные времена)
- •1. Обозначает действие, которое происходит в момент речи
- •2. Обозначает действие, происходящее в данный момент, но которое будет происходить в течение ограниченного периода времени
- •3. Обозначает будущее запланированное действие, чаще с указанием места и (или) времени
- •The past progressive (Прошедшее продолженное время)
- •Be going to
- •Progressive tenses. Тренировочные упражнения
- •Progressive tenses. Контрольный тест
- •Времена группы perfect (Совершенные времена) the present perfect (Настоящее совершенное время)
- •The past perfect (Прошедшее совершенное время)
- •Perfect tenses. Тренировочные упражнения
- •Perfect tenses. Контрольный тест
- •The passive voice (Пассивный залог)
- •Passive voice. Тренировочные упражнения
- •Passive voice. Контрольный тест
- •Pronouns (Местоимения)
- •Pronouns. Тренировочные упражнения
- •Pronouns. Контрольный тест
- •Prepositions (Предлоги)
- •Prepositions . Тренировочные упражнения
- •Prepositions . Контрольный тест
- •Conjunctions (Союзы)
- •Conjunctions. Тренировочные упражнения
- •Conjunctions. Контрольный тест
- •Итоговый тест (final grammar test)
- •Часть II. Лексика Text 1. Perm State University
- •Text 2. The Faculty of Law
- •Text 3. The Corpus Delicti of a Crime
- •Часть 3. Домашнее чтение
- •1. Investigation
- •2. Fighters' Image Boosted by Terrorists
- •3. Police Crack Down on Crime in Togliatti
- •4. Join Forces or Lose Out to Terrorists
- •5. Justice
- •6. Unjust Laws
- •7. Justice In Applying Laws
- •8. Criminal law
- •9. Crimes. The state and private vengeance
- •10. Crimes and torts
- •11. What type of conduct amounts to a crime?
- •12. When is it fair to hold someone guilty of a crime?
4. Join Forces or Lose Out to Terrorists
Moscow News
Are special services in a position to deal with a wave of terrorism?
A new wave of terrorism — international, nationalist, or purely criminal — has swept Russia. Is our law enforcement system in a position to operate effectively and efficiently in these conditions? Taking an impartial view of the situation, it has to be said that in recent years the power structures have learned good deal. They have learned to fight organized crime, extortion rackets, and hostage taking as well as to untangle hitherto unknown hard-nut-to-crack crime in the economy. They have even learned to cooperate with foreign special services — moreover, often leaving them in the dust.
Today, however, the impression is that the crime situation is beginning to slip out of control.
Why? I believe that the main reason is lack of coordination in the activity of all power structures. What I mean is, above all, that there is no integrated crime data bank in the country. All law enforcement agencies have been developing independently, in isolation from each other. Information search and retrieval systems storing data on criminal communities, their leaders, their links with government officials, their armed units, and international contacts, exist in the numerous agencies engaged in what is known as operational and investigative activities: the Interior Ministry (MVD), the Federal Security Service (FSB), the Federal Tax Police Service (FSNP), the State Customs Committee (GTK), the Federal Border Service (FPS), the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU), the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), the Federal Government Communications and Information Agency (FAPSI), the Federal Protection Service (FSO), and the Ministry of Justice. All of these data banks are not linked with each other in any way; they are based on different principles without regard for international standards. If various special services are asked to provide information on the location of organized crime groups, their numerical strength, weapons and equipment, connections with government and administrative agencies, and contacts with large financial groups, they will come up with conflicting sets of data. The most lamentable thing is that no one is even trying to build a Russia-wide mafia paradigm. There is no standardization even within individual agencies themselves: different subdivisions set up incompatible information systems. Meanwhile, inventorying of the mafia, so to speak, is the main precondition for a successful struggle against it.
What is the situation now? Each act of terrorism and each high-profile contract killing sparks off an internal and interagency rivalry to beat the others to crime clearance. And only when all of them come to a dead end do they start talking about interaction and coordination.
Similar lack of coordination can be observed in comparing information of capital flight in possession of various power structures with Central Bank and Finance Ministry data.
Under current laws, the Prosecutor General's Office is supposed to ensure general coordination in the law enforcement sphere. And this is absolutely right. Yet general coordination should not be confused with tackling specific problems involved in creating an integrated interagency operational/ investigative data bank on the real crime situation in the country.
It is high time to set up a supra-departmental agency to coordinate the fight against organized crime, corruption, and terrorism. This agency should be not a power instrument, but a single think-tank for all special services. It could be created within the framework of the RF Security Council or the Presidential Staff. This agency should not be mistaken for the existing Security Council's Interagency Anti-Organized Crime and Corruption Commission which is a purely advisory body.
It should be a real super-special service whose priorities should be as follows: streamlining the crime data bank; eliminating senseless and harmful rivalry between the agencies; putting in place rigorous mechanisms for interaction on related criminal cases; working out an effective technology to eliminate specific crime groups; and defining a uniform strategy to fight the mafia in Russia.
Predictably, all heads of the power structures without exception will resist the creation of such a coordinating body, citing considerations of confidentiality and secrecy. No one has ever wanted — nor will ever want — to work according to uniform standards. That would prevent them from playing according to their own rules. Yet, if effective order is to be ensured in the country, this game must give way to a common cause.