
- •Preface
- •1.1. Problems of stylistic research
- •1.1. Problems of stylistic research
- •1.1. Problems of stylistic research
- •1.2. Stylistics of language and speech
- •1.2. Stylistics of language and speech
- •1.3. Types of stylistic research and branches of stylistics
- •1.4. Stylistics and other linguistic disciplines
- •1.4. Stylistics and other linguistic disciplines
- •1.5. Stylistic neutrality and stylistic colouring
- •1.5. Stylistic neutrality and stylistic colouring
- •1.5. Stylistic neutrality and stylistic colouring
- •1.6. Stylistic function notion
- •1.6. Stylistic function notion
- •1.6. Stylistic function notion
- •2.1. Expressive means and stylistic devices
- •2.1. Expressive means and stylistic devices
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2.2. Stylistic theory and classification of expresssive means by g. Leech
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2.4. Classification of expressive means and stylistic devices by y. M.Skrebnev
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •2.2. Different classifications of expressive means
- •3.1. The theory of grammatical gradation.
- •3.2. Grammatical metaphor and types of grammatical transposition
- •3.2. Grammatical metaphor and types of grammatical transposition
- •3.2. Grammatical metaphor and types of grammatical transposition
- •3.3. Morphological stylistics.
- •3.3.1. The noun and its stylistic potential
- •3.3.2. The article and its stylistic potential
- •3.3.3. The stylistic power of the pronoun
- •3.3.4. The adjective and its stylistic functions
- •3.3.5. The verb and its stylistic properties
- •3.4. Stylistic syntax
- •3.4. Stylistic syntax
- •3.4. Stylistic syntax
- •3.4. Stylistic syntax
- •4.1. The notion of style in functional stylistics
- •4.1. The notion of style in functional stylistics
- •4.2. Correlation of style, norm and function in the language
- •4.2. Correlation of style, norm and function in the language
- •I.V.Arnold presents these relations as a system of oppositions:
- •4.2. Correlation of style, norm and function in the language
- •4.3. Language varieties:
- •4.3. Language varieties: regional, social, occupational
- •4.3. Language varieties: regional, social, occupational
- •4.4. An overview of functional style systems
- •4.4. Ал overview of functional style systems
- •The Style of Official documents:
- •4.4. An overview of functional style systems
- •1. Literary or Bookish Style:
- •2. PVee («Colloquial») Style:
- •Literary colloquial style;
- •Familiar colloquial style.
- •4.4. An overview of functional style systems
- •1. Colloquial Styles:
- •4.4. An overview of functional style systems
- •Official business style.
- •Scientific-professional style.
- •Publicist style.
- •Literary colloquial style.
- •Familiar colloquial style.
- •4.4. An overview of functional style systems
- •4.4. An overview of functional style systems
- •4.5. Distinctive linguistic features of the major functional styles of English
- •4.5.1. Literary colloquial style
- •4.5.2. Familiar colloquial style
- •4.5.3. Publicist (media) style
- •4.5.4. The style of official documents
- •4.5.5. Scientific/academic style
- •5.1. Stylistics of the author and of the reader. The notions of encoding and decoding
- •5.2. Essential concepts of decoding stylistic analysis and types of foregrounding
- •5.2. Essential concepts of decoding stylistic analysis
- •5.2. Essential concepts of decoding stylistic analysis
- •5.2.1. Convergence
- •5.2. Essential concepts of decoding stylistic analysis
- •5.2.2. Defeated expectancy
- •5.2. Essential concepts of decoding stylistic analysis
- •5.2.3. Coupling
- •5.2. Essential concepts of decoding stylistic analysis
- •5.2.4. Semantic field
- •5.2. Essential concepts of decoding stylistic analysis
- •5.2. Essential concepts of decoding stylistic analysis
- •5.2.5. Semi-marked structures
1.6. Stylistic function notion
Accordingly stylistics is first and foremost engaged in the study of connotative meanings.
In brief the semantic structure (or the meaning) of a word roughly consists of its grammatical meaning (noun, verb, adjective) and its lexical meaning. Lexical meaning can further on be subdivided into denotative (linked to the logical or nominative meaning) and connotative meanings. Connotative meaning is only connected with extra-linguistic circumstances such as the situation of communication and the participants of communication. Connotative meaning consists of four components:
emotive;
evaluative;
expressive;
stylistic.
A word is always characterised by its denotative meaning but not necessarily by connotation. The four components may be all present at once, or in different combinations or they may not be found in the word at all.
1. Emotive connotations express various feelings or emotions. Emotions differ from feelings. Emotions like ./ay, disappointment, pleasure, anger, worry, surprise are more short-lived. Feelings imply a more stable state, or attitude, such as love, hatred, respect, pride, dignity, etc. The emotive component of meaning may be occasional or usual (i.e. inherent and adherent).
It is important to distinguish words with emotive connotations from words, describing or naming emotions and feelings like anger or
Chapter
1. The
Object of Stylistics
fear, because the latter are a special vocabulary subgroup whose denotative meanings are emotions. They do not connote the speaker's state of mind or his emotional attitude to the subject of speech.
Thus if a psychiatrist were to say You should be able to control feelings of anger, impatience and disappointment dealing with a child as a piece of advice to young parents the sentence would have no emotive power. It may be considered stylistically neutral.
On the other hand an apparently neutral word like big will become charged with emotive connotation in a mother's proud description of her baby: He is a BIG boy already!
2. The evaluative component charges the word with negative, positive, ironic or other types of connotation conveying the speaker's attitude in relation to the object of speech. Very often this component is a part of the denotative meaning, which comes to the fore in a specific context.
The verb to sneak means «to move silently and secretly, usu. for a bad purpose» (8). This dictionary definition makes the evaluative component bad quite explicit. Two derivatives a sneak and sneaky have both preserved a derogatory evaluative connotation. But the negative component disappears though in still another derivative sneakers (shoes with a soft sole). It shows that even words of the same root may either have or lack an evaluative component in their inner form.
3. Expressive connotation either increases or decreases the expres siveness of the message. Many scholars hold that emotive and expressive components cannot be distinguished but Prof. I.A.Arnold