- •Public Policy Analysis
- •IMpa Grands exercices de cours
- •1. Introduction 99
- •The Analysis of China’s Policy of Importing Solid Waste Zhanyu Li
- •1. Introduction 99
- •1. Introduction 99
- •8. Conclusion 129
- •Introduction
- •1.1 The choice of policies and countries
- •1.2 Short history of China’s policy of waste importation
- •1.3 Short history of Germany’s policy of waste importation
- •The Political Definition of the Problem
- •2.1 China’s political definition of the problem
- •Intervention hypothesis
- •2.2 Germany’s political definition of the problem
- •Intervention Hypothesis
- •2.3 Comparative studies
- •3.1 Five constituent elements of the pap of China’s policy of waste importation
- •3.2 Five constituent elements of the pap of Germany’s policy of waste importation
- •3.3 Comparative studies
- •China’s paAs
- •The paa of licensing the domestic consignees
- •4.2 Germany’s paAs
- •4.3 Comparative studies
- •5.1 China’s aPs
- •5.2 Germany’s aPs
- •5.3 Comparative studies
- •The outputs
- •6.1 China’s output of licensing enterprises using solid waste
- •6.2 Germany’s output of written consent of shipment of waste
- •6.3 Comparative studies
- •Evaluative Statements
- •7.1 Evaluating China’s output of licensing solid waste
- •7.2 Evaluating Germany’s output of consent
- •7.3. Comparative Studies
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •The Analysis of China’s Policy
- •Of Importing Solid Waste
- •Zhanyu Li
- •Abstract
- •Research Background
- •1.1 The definition of solid waste
- •1.2. The double-edged solid waste
- •1.3. The global waste trade
- •1.4. International conventions and agreements
- •Research Rationale
- •Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
- •3.1 The literatures on solid waste
- •3.2. The literatures on China’s import of solid waste
- •3.3. Conceptual framework
- •Research questions
- •Data Collection and Methodology
- •The overall description of solid waste imported by China
- •The driving force behind China's import of solid waste
- •7.1 The imported solid waste can mitigate the domestic lack of resources.
- •7.2. The cheap labour resources in China
- •7.3. The needs arising from certain industries
- •7.4. The underdeveloped domestic collecting system
- •7.5. Low shipping costs
- •The challenges facing Chinese public authorities
- •8.1. The transferring, renting and faking of import license.
- •8.2. The waste trafficking
- •8.3. The lack of public awareness of significance of imported solid waste
- •8.4. The inadequacy of technologies, personnel and other public resources
- •8.5. The secondary environmental pollution caused by inappropriate use of
- •Imported solid waste
- •The evolution of Chinese policies of importing solid waste
- •The current regimes of regulating import of solid waste
- •10.1. The competent authorities
- •10.2. The legal framework
- •Political agenda setting
- •Policy Programming
- •12.1. Political-administrative programs
- •12.2. Political-administrative arrangements
- •12.3. The actors' games at the stage of policy programming – the example of China's Association of Plastics Processing Industry
- •Policy implementation
- •13.1. Action plans
- •13.2. The operational analysis of aPs of enclosed management zone
- •Implementation acts (outputs)
- •14.1. Operational analysis of implementation acts
- •14.2. The Game of Policy Actors at the Stage of Policy Implementation- The example of the implementation of policy of imported solid waste at Luqiao District of Taizhou City.
- •Evaluating policy effects
- •15.1. The dimensions of evaluating the policy of import of solid waste
- •15.2. Data collections
- •15.3. Other independent variants
- •Appendix I
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Causal Model
- •2.3 Comparative discussions
- •Causal hypothesis
- •Political-administrative Program (pap)
- •Mainland China
- •3.1.1 Concrete objectives
- •3.1.2 Evaluative elements
- •3.1.3 Operational elements
- •3.1.4 Paa and resources
- •3.1.5 Procedural elements
- •Hong Kong
- •3.2.1 Concrete objectives
- •3.2.2 Evaluative elements
- •3.2.3 Operational elements
- •3.2.4 Paa and resources
- •3.2.5 Procedural elements
- •3.3 Comparisons between Mainland China and Hong Kong
- •Political-administrative Arrangement (paa)
- •4.1 Mainland China
- •4.2 Hong Kong
- •4.3 Comparisons between Mainland China and Hong Kong
- •Action plan (ap)
- •5.1 Mainland China
- •5.3 Comparisons between Mainland China and Hong Kong
- •Outputs
- •Mainland China (Beijing)
- •6.1.1 Output one: Restrictions on the last digit of vehicle plate numbers
- •6.1.2 Output two: Lottery systems for new car plates
- •Hong Kong
- •6.2.1 Output one: Improvement of the interchange between private and public transport modes.
- •6.2.2 Output two: Use of Alternative Fuel Vehicles to replace Diesel Vehicles
- •6.3 Comparisons between Mainland China and Hong Kong
- •6.3.1. Strategies
- •6.3.2. Six dimensions of the analysis of the outputs
- •Evaluative statement
- •7.1 The evaluative statement in Beijing
- •7.2 The evaluative statement in Hong Kong
- •7.3 Comparative discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
Research questions
To achieve the purpose of the study, this paper tries to answer the following questions,
What are the PD, PAPs, PAAs, APs, Outputs, and Evaluative Statements of China’s policy of importing solid waste?
What kinds of dimensions can be used to evaluate China’s policy of importing solid waste?
3. How policy actors of China’s policy of importing solid waste employ resources under certain institutional rules so as to influence policy programming and policy implementation?
Data Collection and Methodology
To answer the above three questions, the author would firstly present an overall picture of China’s importation of solid waste, including the current situation of importation, the import regime, and the challenges posed by importation of solid waste, thus enabling readers to fully understand the background as well as the significance of China’s policy of importing solid waste. Then, to answer the first question, the author would like to employ the concepts proposed in Public Policy Analysis to systematically describe the six products of China’s policy of importing solid waste. Therefore, an operational analysis will be conducted for each policy product with the qualitative data collected from the texts of legislations, acts, regulations, announcements or rules. At the same time, the triangle of policy actors will also be formulated to help readers understand the causal hypothesis and intervention hypothesis of this policy. After analyzing the last policy product, that is, evaluative statements, the author tries to propose various dimensions for evaluating the policy and identify several other independent variables that should be excluded in evaluation so as to answer the second research question. Finally, when dealing with the last research question, the author tries to explore the games of policy actors at the stage of policy programming and policy implementation. The first example of China’s Association of Waste Plastics which represents the interests of target groups will be used to illustrate that, under certain institutional rules, how target groups employ resources to influence policy programming, Then, the second example of policy implementation at Luqiao District will be resorted to demonstrate that, under certain institutional rules, how different actors will employ their own resources to influence policy implementation. The data used to answer this question were obtained from semi-formal interviews conducted with relevant people and also from documentations.
Chapter II: China's Import Regime of Solid Waste
The overall description of solid waste imported by China
According to The Annual Report of Quality Inspection, and Quarantine of Imported Solid Waste of 2012 issued by General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection, and Quarantine, in 2012, there are 3662 enterprises located in 21 provinces of China, importing more than 5.89 million of solid waste through more than 200 ports. The total value of imported solid waste reaches 36.594 billion dollars. The source of imported solid waste include 159 countries (regions), among which 14 countries and regions, including the United States, Japan export more than 1 million tons of solid waste to China mainland.
From the year of 2004 to 2012, China's imported volume of trade fluctuated with an overall increasing trend. The weight of imported solid waste reached a peak at 59 million tons in 2009, while the value of imported solid waste is highest at 40.6 billion dollars in 2012.
Figure IV: The trends of imported weight and value of solid waste from the year 2004 to 2012
Based on data provided by The Annual Report of Quality Inspection, and Quarantine of Imported Solid Waste of 2012
During this period, waste and scrap paper and paperboard, this type of waste, took up the largest percentage of all types of waste that China has imported from abroad, which is followed by metals and metal-alloy wastes; waste, parings and scrap of plastics; mixed waste metals. These are the main four types of solid waste China has imported from overseas.
Figure V: The percentage of various types of imported solid waste among the total imported solid waste
There are a total of 23 local customs which can provide the services of inspection and quarantine of solid waste. The import of solid waste is concentrated in coastal regions such as the provinces of Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Shanghai. In particular, whether in terms of the number of batches, the weight or the value of imported solid waste, Guangdong is at first position among all the regions importing solid waste in China. There were about 83.7 thousand batches, and 13.4 million tons of solid waste with the total value of more than 10.91 billion dollars imported in Guangdong.
Table II: The statistics of quality inspection and quarantine of solid waste at local customs in 2012
No. |
Local customs |
Batches (thousand) |
Weight (million tons) |
Value (billion dollars) |
1 |
Guangdon |
83.7(1) |
13.43(1) |
10.9(1) |
2 |
Jiangsu |
14.5(8) |
9.38(2) |
2.75(6) |
3 |
Ningbo |
58.1(3) |
5.809(3) |
5.907(2) |
4 |
Shenzhen |
15(7) |
5.2825(4) |
1.099(8) |
5 |
Shanghai |
63.7(2) |
4.9277(5) |
3.633(3) |
6 |
Zhejiang |
18.1(6) |
4.8235(6) |
2.713(7) |
7 |
Tianjin |
52.1(4) |
4.7397(7) |
3.081(5) |
8 |
Shandong |
30.6(5) |
4.5983(8) |
3.607(4) |
9 |
Fujian |
12.2(9) |
1.3142(9) |
6.64(10) |
10 |
Xiamen |
7.9(10) |
1.2806(10) |
5.11(12) |
11 |
Guangxi |
3(12) |
0.9129(11) |
6.74(9) |
12 |
Liaoning |
5.8(11) |
0.7976(12) |
5.51(11) |
13 |
Anhui |
2.4(13) |
0.6621(13) |
1.43(13) |
14 |
Chongqing |
1.4(14) |
0.6089(14) |
1.30(15) |
15 |
Hunan |
0.6(16) |
0.1433(15) |
0.33(16) |
16 |
Jiangxi |
0.6(17) |
0.0577(16) |
1.32(14) |
17 |
Xinjiang |
1(15) |
0.0540(17) |
0.18(17) |
18 |
Hubei |
0.1(20) |
0.0364(18) |
0.08(19) |
19 |
Hebei |
0.03(22) |
0.0345(19) |
0.08(18) |
20 |
Neimenggu |
0.5(18) |
0.0179(20) |
0.07(20) |
21 |
Heilongjiang |
0.1(19) |
0.0066(21) |
0.01(22) |
22 |
Jilin |
0.03(21) |
0.0015(22) |
0.004(23) |
23 |
Zhuhai |
0.01(23) |
0.0012(23) |
0.021(21) |
Note: The ranking is the number in the quote.
Source: The Annual Report of Quality Inspection, and Quarantine of Imported Solid Waste of 2012
In 2012, China imported solid waste from 159 countries and regions. The main exporters of solid waste to China are developed countries, among which the United States is the biggest one, outputting 21.83 per cent of the world's export of solid waste to China in 2012. It should be noted that the emerging countries in Latin America, Africa, South Asia are also exporting more and more solid waste to China. There were 14 countries and regions exporting more than 1 million tons of solid waste to China in 2012. In 2012, these 14 countries and regions exported 303.8 batches, 50.5 million tons and 29.917 billion dollars of solid waste to China mainland, respectively taking up 81.54%, 85.7% and 81.75% of the world's total export of solid waste to China.
Table III: The world's main exporters of solid waste to China in 2012
Country /region |
Batches |
Weight (million tons) |
Value (million dollars) |
The percentage of the total batches |
The percentage of the total weight |
The percentage of the total value |
The United States |
104964 |
16.7047 |
7987.28 |
28.26% |
28.35% |
21.83% |
Japan |
36756 |
9.84 |
5213.94 |
9.90% |
16.70% |
14.25% |
China Hongkong |
39192 |
4.1336 |
5054.43 |
10.55% |
7.01% |
13.81% |
The United Kingdom |
18061 |
3.8049 |
1743.26 |
4.86% |
6.46% |
4.76% |
Netherlands |
9497 |
2.3594 |
1264.47 |
2.56% |
4% |
3.45% |
Germany |
21085 |
2.1352 |
2131.25 |
5.68% |
3.62% |
5.82% |
Canada |
20581 |
2.1697 |
1103.67 |
5.54% |
3.68% |
3.02% |
Australia |
12564 |
1.9281 |
1401.18 |
3.38% |
3.27% |
3.83% |
India |
1089 |
1.4291 |
256.18 |
0.29% |
2.43% |
0.70% |
Italy |
4791 |
1.3319 |
538.45 |
1.29% |
2.26% |
1.47% |
France |
10121 |
1.3167 |
960.41 |
2.73% |
2.23% |
2.62% |
Spain |
11763 |
1.2326 |
1141.58 |
3.17% |
2.09% |
3.12% |
South Korea |
5843 |
1.0791 |
635.24 |
1.57% |
1.83% |
1.74% |
Belgium |
6518 |
1.0363 |
485.62 |
1.76% |
1.76% |
1.33% |
Others |
68561 |
8.4257 |
6677.29 |
18.46% |
14.30% |
18.25% |
The total |
371386 |
58.9272 |
36594.25 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
(Source: The Annual Report of Quality Inspection, and Quarantine of Imported Solid Waste of 2012)
