- •Public Policy Analysis
- •IMpa Grands exercices de cours
- •1. Introduction 99
- •The Analysis of China’s Policy of Importing Solid Waste Zhanyu Li
- •1. Introduction 99
- •1. Introduction 99
- •8. Conclusion 129
- •Introduction
- •1.1 The choice of policies and countries
- •1.2 Short history of China’s policy of waste importation
- •1.3 Short history of Germany’s policy of waste importation
- •The Political Definition of the Problem
- •2.1 China’s political definition of the problem
- •Intervention hypothesis
- •2.2 Germany’s political definition of the problem
- •Intervention Hypothesis
- •2.3 Comparative studies
- •3.1 Five constituent elements of the pap of China’s policy of waste importation
- •3.2 Five constituent elements of the pap of Germany’s policy of waste importation
- •3.3 Comparative studies
- •China’s paAs
- •The paa of licensing the domestic consignees
- •4.2 Germany’s paAs
- •4.3 Comparative studies
- •5.1 China’s aPs
- •5.2 Germany’s aPs
- •5.3 Comparative studies
- •The outputs
- •6.1 China’s output of licensing enterprises using solid waste
- •6.2 Germany’s output of written consent of shipment of waste
- •6.3 Comparative studies
- •Evaluative Statements
- •7.1 Evaluating China’s output of licensing solid waste
- •7.2 Evaluating Germany’s output of consent
- •7.3. Comparative Studies
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •The Analysis of China’s Policy
- •Of Importing Solid Waste
- •Zhanyu Li
- •Abstract
- •Research Background
- •1.1 The definition of solid waste
- •1.2. The double-edged solid waste
- •1.3. The global waste trade
- •1.4. International conventions and agreements
- •Research Rationale
- •Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
- •3.1 The literatures on solid waste
- •3.2. The literatures on China’s import of solid waste
- •3.3. Conceptual framework
- •Research questions
- •Data Collection and Methodology
- •The overall description of solid waste imported by China
- •The driving force behind China's import of solid waste
- •7.1 The imported solid waste can mitigate the domestic lack of resources.
- •7.2. The cheap labour resources in China
- •7.3. The needs arising from certain industries
- •7.4. The underdeveloped domestic collecting system
- •7.5. Low shipping costs
- •The challenges facing Chinese public authorities
- •8.1. The transferring, renting and faking of import license.
- •8.2. The waste trafficking
- •8.3. The lack of public awareness of significance of imported solid waste
- •8.4. The inadequacy of technologies, personnel and other public resources
- •8.5. The secondary environmental pollution caused by inappropriate use of
- •Imported solid waste
- •The evolution of Chinese policies of importing solid waste
- •The current regimes of regulating import of solid waste
- •10.1. The competent authorities
- •10.2. The legal framework
- •Political agenda setting
- •Policy Programming
- •12.1. Political-administrative programs
- •12.2. Political-administrative arrangements
- •12.3. The actors' games at the stage of policy programming – the example of China's Association of Plastics Processing Industry
- •Policy implementation
- •13.1. Action plans
- •13.2. The operational analysis of aPs of enclosed management zone
- •Implementation acts (outputs)
- •14.1. Operational analysis of implementation acts
- •14.2. The Game of Policy Actors at the Stage of Policy Implementation- The example of the implementation of policy of imported solid waste at Luqiao District of Taizhou City.
- •Evaluating policy effects
- •15.1. The dimensions of evaluating the policy of import of solid waste
- •15.2. Data collections
- •15.3. Other independent variants
- •Appendix I
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Causal Model
- •2.3 Comparative discussions
- •Causal hypothesis
- •Political-administrative Program (pap)
- •Mainland China
- •3.1.1 Concrete objectives
- •3.1.2 Evaluative elements
- •3.1.3 Operational elements
- •3.1.4 Paa and resources
- •3.1.5 Procedural elements
- •Hong Kong
- •3.2.1 Concrete objectives
- •3.2.2 Evaluative elements
- •3.2.3 Operational elements
- •3.2.4 Paa and resources
- •3.2.5 Procedural elements
- •3.3 Comparisons between Mainland China and Hong Kong
- •Political-administrative Arrangement (paa)
- •4.1 Mainland China
- •4.2 Hong Kong
- •4.3 Comparisons between Mainland China and Hong Kong
- •Action plan (ap)
- •5.1 Mainland China
- •5.3 Comparisons between Mainland China and Hong Kong
- •Outputs
- •Mainland China (Beijing)
- •6.1.1 Output one: Restrictions on the last digit of vehicle plate numbers
- •6.1.2 Output two: Lottery systems for new car plates
- •Hong Kong
- •6.2.1 Output one: Improvement of the interchange between private and public transport modes.
- •6.2.2 Output two: Use of Alternative Fuel Vehicles to replace Diesel Vehicles
- •6.3 Comparisons between Mainland China and Hong Kong
- •6.3.1. Strategies
- •6.3.2. Six dimensions of the analysis of the outputs
- •Evaluative statement
- •7.1 The evaluative statement in Beijing
- •7.2 The evaluative statement in Hong Kong
- •7.3 Comparative discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
1.3. The global waste trade
In 2007, the world traded more than 191 million tons of waste.48 Moreover, the annual physical weight of waste traded in international markets grew by 67% in five short years, from 114 million tons in 2002 to 191 million tons in 2007.49 According to the reports handed over to the Basel Convention Committee, between 1993 and 2001, the amount of waste crisscrossing the globe increased from 2 million tons to more than 8.5 million tons.50 It should be noted that not all the countries report to the Basel Convention Committee.
There are four main types of possible drivers behind this big business of movement of waste.51 Economic factors includes different prices for treatment or disposal of the waste, different prices on secondary raw materials, national waste taxes, and transport costs. Legislative factors include national legislations, waste policies or principles concerning shipment of waste, and the differences in terms of law enforcement. Technical factors include the lack of treatment technologies or capacities on the part of exporting member states, and special industrial structure. Moreover, there are still some demography and infrastructure factors including geography and population size, long borders or many sea ports.
As the economy develops dramatically, China imports a large amount of solid waste every year. The reasons behind China great importation of waste are as follows: domestic demand of raw materials far surpasses domestic supply; the global price of raw materials are going up continuously; the imported waste is of higher quality and at lower price than domestic collected waste; the environmental pollution of producing materials from waste is less that of directly exploiting the mineral stones.52 In 2011, the total amount of imported solid waste was more than 57 million tons, and the total output of imported solid waste valued at least 40 billion dollars.53
Figure I: China’s imported amount of solid waste from 2006 to 2011
Source: The Annual Report of Inspection and Quarantine of the Imported Solid Waste Used As Raw Material, 2011
According to the report issued by Basel Convention Secretariat, China is the world’s biggest importer of waste and secondary raw materials.54 Imported solid waste has nourished entire sectors of the local economy with the supply of scraps and disassembled materials in many cities of China. For example, in Xintang, a village in the province of Guangdong, there are more than 800 enterprises specialized in processing plastic waste, which consume about 1.8 million tons of plastic waste per year. 55
While the imported solid waste has made up an indispensable part of China’s recycling industry, negative news about the imported solid waste frequently draw the attention of the public. For example, the scandal of the illegal shipment of waste from the United Kingdom in 2006,56 and the cases of the lead poisoning of children happened in several Chinese cities, including Shanghai, Shantou, Taizhou.57 Therefore, To better take advantage of the imported solid waste while protecting environment and ensuring the public health, Chinese governments has issued a series of laws, measures, regulations, which constitute China’s policy of importing solid waste since 1980s.
Figure II: Ten main non-OECD destinations for EU exports of non-hazardous waste in 2011
The source of data: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/import-and-export-rules/export-from-eu/waste-shipment/
