
- •Introduction
- •Chapter 1: Theory of Interpretation
- •1.1. Background of interpretation theory (it)
- •1.2. First translation of the Bible as a milestone in the history of interpretation and the development of world civilization. A bit of later history of interpretation
- •1.3. Deciphering the inscriptions on the Rosetta stone
- •1.4. A brief history of interpretation in the 20th Century
- •Chapter 2: Interpretation and Contemporary Life
- •2.1. XX century as a “golden age” of interpretation
- •2.2. Conference interpreting, professional training and diplomatic interpretation in XX century
- •2.3. Stagnation in economy – boom of interpretation
- •2.4. Interpretation in the new millennium
- •2.5. The very beginning of simultaneous interpretation
- •Chapter 3: Problems of Translating Idioms
- •3.1. Knowing idioms is the way to speak like a native
- •3.2. Grammatical nature of idioms
- •3.3. Etymology of idioms
- •3.4. How to learn idioms and practice them
- •Chapter 4: Levels and Components of Interpretation. Interpreter’s Challenges. Conference Interpreting
- •4.1. Communication during two-way interpretation
- •I nterpreter
- •4.2. Two levels of interpretation
- •4.3. Triad of interpretation process
- •4.4. Specifics and situations in interpreting process
- •4.5. Factor of time
- •Chapter 5: Precision and Basis Information, Their Distinctions and Importance for Interpretation Adequacy
- •5.1. Constituents of precision and basis information
- •5.2. Rendering pi in the process of interpretation
- •5.3. Undesirable situations of two-way interpretation. Interpretation pitfalls and traps – how to avoid them
- •Chapter 6: Characteristic peculiarities of professional interpretation
- •6.1. Intellectual requirements
- •6.2. Requirements to interpretation adequacy
- •6.3. Memory and interpretation
- •Chapter 7: Analysis and Synthesis during Interpretation Process
- •7.1. Two stages of interpretation process
- •7.2. Understanding and extraction of meaningful units
- •7.3. Hearing and the types of noises
- •7.4. Guess and intuition
- •7.5. To see a speaker
- •7.6. Automatism of synthesis
- •7.7. Complicated is simpler
- •7.8. Interpretation typology
- •7.9. Constituents of training interpretation
- •7.10. Constituents of real interpretation and ways of achieving adequacy
- •7.11. Subtypes of professional interpretation
- •Chapter 8: Ability to Hear as the Basic Requirement to Understanding
- •8.1. Hearing
- •8.2. The language of the original speech
- •8.3. The country of the speaker
- •8.4. The case of the speaker who uses a foreign language
- •8.5. Accents
- •8.6. Provincialisms
- •8.7. Subject matter
- •8.8. General culture
- •Chapter 9: Basic Types of Professional Two-way Interpretation (pti)
- •9.1. Dialogue translation
- •9.2. Informal two-way interpretation without note-making
- •9.3. Official two-way interpreting without note-taking (Liaison formal interpreting)
- •9.5. Consecutive discourse interpreting
- •Chapter 10: Combined Types of Interpretation
- •10.1. Sight translation
- •10.2. Sight translation with the help of dictaphone
- •10.3. Cinema/video/tv-translation
- •10.4. Cinema/video/tv-translation without preparation
- •10.5. Cinema/video/tv-translation with preliminary preparation
- •Chapter 11: Specialized Interpretation
- •11.1. Details of working in different spheres of professional communication
- •11.2. Forms of initial voice information (for all genres)
- •11.3. General-political informational (diplomatic) discourse/dialogue interpreting
- •11.4. Phraseology in interpretation
- •Chapter 12: Specialized Interpretation (Continued)
- •12.1. Scientific and technical translation (performances, seminars, lectures, reports)
- •12.2. Special terminological abbreviations
- •12.3. Scientific-popular translation (lecture, conversation, etc.)
- •Chapter 13: Specialized Interpretation (Continued)
- •13.1. Judicial two-way interpreting
- •13.2. Sermon (religious genre)
- •13.3. Art criticism genre (lecture, excursion, report)
- •Chapter 14: Language, Speech and Presentation Skills
- •14.1. Culture of language and speech
- •14.2. Culture of language and general culture
- •14.3. Literary language norm
- •14.4. External culture of speech in the process of interpretation
- •14.5. Some recommendations
- •14.6. Typical mistakes in the process of interpretation
- •14.7. Interpretation Traps. Pitfalls and gaffes in grammar, style and lexis
- •14.8. Paradoxical mistakes. Paralysis by analysis
- •Chapter 15: Theory of Interpreter’s Note-Taking
- •15.1. General ideas
- •15.2. Type of notes
- •15.3. Logical analysis
- •15.4. Language of the notes
- •15.5. Symbols and Abbreviations
- •Chapter 16: Theory of Interpreter’s Note-Taking (Continued)
- •16.1. Interrelation of ideas
- •16.2. Preparation
- •16.3. Rearrangement of the speech
- •16.4. Poetry
- •Список літератури
3.2. Grammatical nature of idioms
The interesting fact about most of these idioms is that they can easily be identified with the familiar parts of speech. Thus some idioms are clearly verbal in nature, such as get away with, get up, work out, and turn in. It’s appropriate here to speak about phrasal verbs. The postposition they acquire makes them idiomatic. An equally large number are nominal in nature. Thus hot dog and cool cat are nouns or noun groups. Many are “adjectives” (parts of speech in the function of adjective), as in pepper and salt meaning “black hair mixed with grey”. Many are adverbial, as the examples like the breeze “easily, without effort”, hammer and tongs “violently” (as in she ran after him hammer and tongs). These idioms which correlate with the familiar parts pf speech can be called lexemic idioms.
The other most important group of idioms is of larger size. Often these idioms are an entire clause in length: fly off the handle, “lose control over oneself”, and to blow one’s stack, “to become very angry”. Some of the most famous ones are: to kick the bucket “die”, to be up the creek “to be in a predicament or a dangerous position”, to be caught between the devil and deep blue sea “to have to choose between two equally unpleasant alternatives”, to seize the bull by the horns “to face the problem and deal with it squarely”. Idioms of this sort have been called tournures (from French), meaning “turns of phrases”, or simply phraseological idioms. What they have in common is that they do not readily correlate with a given grammatical part of speech and require a paraphrase longer than a word.
Their form is set and only a limited number of them can be said or written in any other way without destroying the meaning of the idiom. Many of them are completely rigid and cannot show up in any other form whatever. Consider the idiom kick the bucket, for example. In the Passive Voice, we get an unacceptable form such as the bucket has been kicked by the cowboy, which no longer means that the “cowboy died”. Rather it means that he struck a pail with his foot. Idioms of this type are regarded as completely frozen forms. Notice, however, that even this idiom can be inflected for tense, e.g., it is all right to say the cowboy kicked the bucket, the cowboy will kick the bucket; he has kicked the bucket, etc. Speakers disagree as much as do grammarians whether or not, for example, it is all right to use this idiom in the Gerund form in His kicking the bucket surprised us all. It is best to avoid this form.
The next largest class of idioms is that of well established sayings and proverbs. These include the famous types of don’t count your chickens before they’re hatched (meaning “do not celebrate the outcome of an undertaking prematurely because it is possible that you will fail in which case you will look ridiculous”); don’t wash your dirty linen in public (meaning “do not complain of your domestic affairs before strangers as it is none of their business”), and so forth. Many of these originate from some well known literary sources or come to us from the earliest English speakers in Great Britain and the North American Continent.
Lack of predictability of meaning (or precise meaning) is not the only criterion of idiomaticity. Set phrases or phraseological units are also idiomatic, even though their meanings may be transparent. What is idiomatic (unpredictable) about them is their construction. Examples include How about a drink? What do you say, Joe? (as a greeting); as a matter of fact, just in case, just to be on the safe side, and many more.
Another important case of idiomaticity is the one-word idiom that occurs when a word is used in a surprisingly different meaning from the original one. Examples include lemon, said of bad watches, cars, or machines in general; and dog, said of a bad date or a bad exam (My car is a lemon, my math exam was a dog).