
- •Intonation and prosody
- •5.1. Basic concepts: definitions, components
- •5.2. Functions of intonation
- •5.2.1. Syntactic function
- •5.2.2. Accentual function
- •5.2.3. Attitudinal function
- •5.2.4. Semantic function
- •5.2.5. Discourse function
- •5.3. Functions of prosodic features
- •5.3.1. Structural function
- •5.3.2. Social function
- •5.4. Universal, typological, specific features
- •Intonation of emotions
- •Intonation acquisition
- •5.4.1. Intonation grouping
- •5.4.2. Nucleus placement
- •5.4.3. Nuclear tones
- •5.4.4. Declination
- •5.4.5. Intonation of emotions
- •5.4.7. Intonation acquisition
- •5.5. Comparing English and Russian
- •5.6. New trends in English intonation
- •Summary
5.4.2. Nucleus placement
There is one most prominent word which is normally placed at the end of the intonation group; intonation together with word order is used as a form of focusing attention. There is undoubtedly a tendency to prefer nouns to verbs as location of a nucleus: more often than not it is the final noun or, strictly speaking, noun phrase.
Specifics: Many languages are like English in allowing the nucleus (focus) to move up and down an intonation group according to the demands of contrast and of new/old information. Thus contrastivity and new/old information may be expressed in German and Russian in almost identical way. French hasn't got that potential, it has a fixed nucleus placement. This limitation also applies to Portuguese.
5.4.3. Nuclear tones
It would be ideal to compare abstract meanings of fall vs. rise dichotomy as assertion vs. appeal ox finality vs. tentativeness, giving new information vs. referring to the old one. However the use of nuclear tones is usually associated with certain grammatical sentence types. The major sentence types are:
a) declaratives
Dwight Bolinger (Bolinger 1978) in a consideration of 57 non-tone languages found that 38 have a terminal fall at the end of a declarative with the implication that the terminal fall begins on the last pitch accent.
In non-final intonation groups a level, a rise and a non-low fall are generally reported.
b) yes-no interrogatives
D. Bolinger found that in 36 non-tone languages all except 4 are reported as having "a rise or a higher pitch somewhere". Another research (Ultan 1978) based on the survey of 53 languages brought similar results: 61% — terminal rise, 34% — higher pitch somewhere, 5.7% — a fall or a rise, 5.7% — a fall only (2 tone languages, only 1 clear exception).
The data show that even in tone languages a terminal rise is usual in yes-no questions.
Specifics: In tone languages where lexical tones are resistant to change there is a possibility to change intensity or to slightly modify the pitch level of the existing rise.
Another specific feature consists in the configuration of pitch movement. Alan Cruttenden describes the Russian rising tone as having a rising-falling pattern in the question: Ее зовут Наташа ? — In the word На'таша the stressed syllable goes up while the unstressed syllable goes down.
c) WH-questions
According to Ultan, in a sample of 53 languages (Ultan 1978) 52.1% have falls, 47.9% — a rise or a higher pitch. Other samples give evidence that in special questions falls are the dominant pattern, like in declaratives, but they may have a rise as an alternative when showing interest, kindness, sympathy, liveliness.
d) imperatives and exclamations
It has been found that exclamations may be associated with any syntactical structure, as with statements, for instance. However, exclamations are expressive while statements are just informative. That accounts for a wider pitch range as the most characteristic feature of exclamations, and a high falling tone as dominant.
Commands call for a falling tone pattern as well, while requests are associated with a rise.
Specifics: Pre-nuclear patterns are more specific than the basic nuclear tones, they contribute largely to the unique sound of a particular language. Thus, for instance, a series of slides is typical of Scottish intonation; Danish is reported to have rise-falling pitch movement in each accentual group or word, RP is known to have a gradually descending stepping head, while Russian intonation flavour is associated with the scandent ("zigzag") head.