
Linguistics and Language Teaching
The aim of this unit
To make you think about what is a language
To reflect upon what is actually taught and learnt as a language
To analyze language theories that are used in language teaching
What do you have to do in this unit?
A Input reading
B Self-assessment questions (SAQ)
C Exploratory tasks
D Materials analysis task
E Integrated task
Warming up discussion 0
Agree or disagree with the following statements by marking T (true), F (false) and D (debatable)
Statements |
T F D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Input reading 1
Pre-communicative language theories
One of the first language theories was classical normative grammar. It put the emphasis on the studies of correct written language and succeeded in analysing it into the definitive number of forms and rules. Traditional grammar labelled words in sentences as grammatical categories of “Subject”, “Predicate”, “Object”, “Attribute” etc. It dealt with traditional categories of “agreement”, “number”, “person”, “tense”, “voice”, and “gender”. Classical normative grammar was consistent with grammar-translation method (Olendorf) aiming at contrastive analysis of the written samples in the native and foreign/second language (L1 and L2). Grammar-translation instruction was based on deducing the language from the rules. In this instruction setting the learners acquired mostly deductive grammar. Within the framework of classical normative grammar developed direct method of second/foreign language instruction (Berlitz). These were naive and amateur attempts to apply the ideas enlightened by the first insights into the child language learning. Within this method the learners acquired inductive grammar, which was based on the language examples.
SAQ 1.1
Match the concepts in the left-hand column with the features of language teaching in the right-hand column. Two features of teaching are extra. Why?
Concepts |
Features |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prescriptive approach to grammar set out rules for the “proper” use of the language. The claim was that the English sentences should be like those in Latin. Some familiar examples of prescriptive rules for the English sentences are: “You must not split the infinitive and therefor you can’t say “to quickly do”, “You must not end a sentence with a preposition”, “You must not begin a sentence with “and” or “but”. Sentences such as “Who did you see?” was corrected by the teachers to “Whom did you see?”.
Exploratory task 1.1
Write in the correct elements in the space provided for the erroneous sentences.
Phrases |
Correct element |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptive approach was more lenient to the conversational style. It consisted in collecting samples of the living English language and describing the structures, which were regularly used in communication. A type of descriptive approach is structural linguistics. The goal was to describe the inventory of essential English structures. The focus of attention in learners shifted to the acquisition of speech patterns. Structuralism was also applied in audio-lingual approach to language instruction (R. Lado). The idea was to provide intensive practice of speech patterns through continuous reinforcement in dialogues and drills. (Adapted from Yule, G. 1996. The Study of Language. CUP).
Exploratory task 1.2
Descriptive approach studies the ways language is used in the real world situations. Match the following conjunctions and sentences, in which they are best used
Sentences |
Conjunctions |
|
|
(Flower, J. 1996. First Certificate Organiser. Language Teaching Publications. P. 100)
A mighty wave of pre-communicative linguistics was sent by the ideas of mentalism (Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. N.Y.) This approach to language drew interest to the rules of the “universal grammar” in the speaker's mind. One of the moor fruitful of all the ideas put forward by linguistic mentalism was that of linguistic competence and performance (compare this dichotomy to “langue” and “parole” by F.de Saussure). “Competence” was understood as the knowledge of language grammar. “Performance” was interpreted as the use of language for communicative purposes. It came to be understood increasingly clearly by linguists that the language as an "inventory of items and rules" is not the same as the language in the process of communication. Language competence and performance have become the two distinctive aspects of language studies. This brought language studies very close to communicative linguistic theory.
Exploratory task 1.3
Listen to the following language performance and turn this conversational piece into a well organised written text, which is based on your knowledge of English grammar
Spoken performance |
Competence based written text |
|
|