
- •§ 2. From the point of view of their structure, sentences can be:
- •The simple sentence
- •Elliptical (incomplete) sentences
- •The Structural Types of Sentence
- •Communicative types of sentences
- •Declarative sentences
- •Interrogative sentences
- •§ 14. Pronominal questions are often used as short responses. They usually consist of (a) a question word or (b) a question word followed by a preposition.
- •Imperative sentences
- •§ 19 In the case of first person plural and third person singular and plural subjects, the imperative let is followed by a personal pronoun in the objective case.
- •§ 20. The imperative of some verbs may acquire interjectional force. Thus the forms listen, look (here), see (here) (Am.) - are used to attract attention.
- •Verbless Commands
- •§ 21. Commands are sometimes expressed without an imperative verb as in:
- •Exclamatory sentences
- •§ 22. The main distinctive feature of this communicative type of sentence is a specific intonation; structurally it is variable.
- •§ 23. There are utterances which do not constitute sentences (non-sentence utterances). They are:
- •The subject
- •§ 41. The subject is expressed by:
- •§ 42. From the point of view of its grammatical value the subject may be either notional or formal.
- •§ 43. The notional subject denotes or points out a person or non-person, that is, various kinds of concrete things, substances, abstract notions or happening.
- •§ 44. The formal subject expressed by it is found in two patterns of sentences: those with impersonal it and those with introductory it.
- •Grammatical types of subject
- •The predicate
- •§ 46. The predicate is the second main part of the sentence and its organizing centre, as the object and nearly all adverbial modifiers are connected with, and dependent on, it.
- •Structural classification of the predicate
- •The simple predicate The simple verbal predicate
- •§ 48. The simple verbal predicate is expressed by:
- •The simple nominal predicate
- •The compound predicate
- •§ 50. The compound predicate consists of two parts: the notional and the structural. The structural part comes first and is followed by the notional part.
- •The compound verbal predicate
- •The compound nominal predicate
- •§ 55. Among the class of link verbs we may distinguish:
- •§ 56. The predicative can be expressed by:
- •§ 57. The three most typical semantic characteristics of a predicative are: identification, classification and characterization.
- •Mixed types of compound predicate
- •§ 59. Compound predicates can combine elements of different types. Thus we have:
- •The composite sentence
- •The scheme of the above compound-complex sentence
- •The scheme of a complex sentence with homogeneous clauses
- •The compound sentence
- •§ 140. Copulative coordination implies that the information conveyed by coordinate clauses is in some way similar.
- •§ 142. Disjunctive coordination implies a choice between two mutually exclusive alternatives. The disjunctive conjunctions are or, either... Or, the conjunctive adverbs are else (or else), otherwise.
- •The complex sentence
- •Formal indicators of subordination (connectors)
- •Functional classification of subordinate clauses
- •§ 151. Complex sentences with subject clauses may be of two patterns:
- •§ 153. Predicative clauses may occur as parts of two structurally different kinds of sentences:
- •It seems that there is no cure. (a predicative clause) It seems evident that there is no cure. (a subject clause, the predicate 'seem evident' is complete)
- •§ 155. Like objects in a simple sentence, object clauses may vary in their relation to the principal clause and in the way they are attached to, the word they refer to or depend on.
- •§ 158. Attributive clauses fall into two types, depending on the degree of connection and the relation they bear to the antecedent:
- •§ 160. Attributive clauses may be joined to the main clause without a relative word, that is, asyndetically. They are called contact clauses.
- •§ 164. According to their semantics we distinguish adverbial clauses of place, time, manner, comparison, condition, concession, purpose, cause, result.
- •§ 166. An adverbial clause of time characterizes the action expressed in the main clause from the temporal point of view. The action may be expressed by a finite or non-finite form of the verb.
- •I. Adverbial clauses of manner may modify the predicate of the main clause by attributing some quality to it.
- •II. They may refer to attributes or predicatives characterizing a state or quality of a person or non-person.
- •III. They may refer to an adverbial modifier, giving additional information or explanation concerning it.
- •§ 168. Adverbial clauses of comparison characterize the action expressed by the predicate in the main clause by comparing it with some real or hypothetical circumstance or action.
- •§ 169. Adverbial clauses of this type contain some condition (cither real or unreal) which makes the action in the main clause possible.
- •§ 170. Depending on the relation between the subordinate and the main clauses and on the use of tense and mood forms, complex sentences with conditional clauses may be subdivided into three types:
- •In the main clause In the subordinate clause
- •In the main clause In the subordinate clause
- •§ 171. A complex sentence with a conditional clause may be built on clauses of both type II and III, thus forming a mixed type of conditional relationship. For instance:
- •§ 174. Adverbial clauses of cause (or causative clauses) express the reason, cause, or motivation of the action expressed in the main clause or of its content as a whole.
- •§ 175. An adverbial clause of result denotes some consequence or result of the action expressed in the main clause. It may be introduced by the conjunction so that, or simply that.
- •§ 176. In complex sentences of this type it is impossible to differentiate which of the clauses is the main one and which is subordinate. We shall consider two patterns of such sentences.
- •Pseudo-complex sentences
- •§ 180. These sentences in their turn fall into three patterns, in all of which the form of the complex sentence is used to emphasize some part of the sentence.
- •Appended clauses (повторы с уточнением)
- •Absolute (or indendent) subordinate clauses
- •§ 182. Subordinate clauses may be used absolutely as independent exclamatory sentences. They may have the form of a conditional or comparative clause.
- •Parenthetical clauses (parentheses)
- •§ 183. A parenthetical clause (parenthesis) interrupts another sentence with which it is either not connected syntactically or is only loosely connected with separate parts of the sentence.
Formal indicators of subordination (connectors)
When clauses are joined by connectors they are said to be joined syndetically. If no special linking element is used they are said to be joined asyndeficalty. In some cases inversion is employed as a signal to indicate the subordination of one clause to another.
Some subordinating conjunctions are homonymous with prepositions (like, till), some with both prepositions and adverbs (after, since, before). Some are homonymous with participles (supposing, provided), some resemble nouns and nominal phrases denoting time (the very moment, the next time, the instant, the second) or adverbs (immediately, directly, once).
§ 146. Although the relationship of subordination requires only two members, a complex sentence may consist of more than two clauses. It may form a hierarchy of clauses. This is called consecutive or successive subordination.
I see [that you have lost the key (which I gave you)]
Accordingly tlie structure of the sentence is:
Main clauses<——Subordinate clauses<——Subordinate clause
The main clause may have several subordinate clauses of equal rank, that is coordinated with one another. This kind of relationship is called parallel subordination or co-subordination, and the subordinate clauses are homogeneous.
I know that you are afraid of me and that you suspect me of something.
In this case the structure of the sentence is:
The main clause may have several subordinate clauses with different functions.
All she saw was that she might go to prison for a robbery she had committed years ago.
Occasionally the two ways of joining clauses may result in a sentence of great complexity, when two or more main clauses are coordinated, each of them being the ''main" in relation to their subordinate clauses.
The walls were panelled, because this was the office of the department chairman, and because this department was physics, the panels held small engraved portraits of Newton, Leibnitz, Faraday, and other scientists.
§ 147. Subordination is used to join clauses with a different degree of interdependence or fusion, in the same way as parts of the sentence are joined to one another with a different intensity of connection. Therefore some clauses ‑ subject, predicative, most object clauses ‑ are obligatory for the completeness of main parts, which are otherwise deficient. For instance, in the sentence I think you are right it is impossible to drop the object clause, as the part *I think makes no sense. In the same way if we drop the predicative clause in the sentence My opinion was that there was something behind, the part left *My opinion was is ungrammatical.
As can be seen from the examples given above, the role of a subordinate clause for the completeness of the main clause is closely connected with the function of the former.
Most adverbial clauses are optional, not essential for the completeness of the main clause. Thus if we drop the subordinate part in the following sentence, the part left will be identical with a simple sentence.
We'll have dinner at 8 o'clock, when you come.
We'll have dinner at 8 o'clock.
According to its syntactic function and the word it refers to, the subordinate clause may be placed before, after, or in the middle of the main clause. Punctuation also depends on these factors: if closely connected, a clause may be joined without any punctuation mark.
I know he is here.
This is the man I told you about.
If the connection is rather loose the clause may be commad off.
Should you see him, give him my regards.
In some cases, especially in the case of asyndetic connection, a Subordinate clause may be separated by a dash to mark the borderline between the clauses.
The evil simply was ‑ he had missed his vocation: he should have been a soldier, and circumstances had made him a priest.
Semantically the main clause generally dominates the subordinate clause, as it contains the main information of the utterance. However, there are cases when one part is as important as the other, and even cases when the subordinate clause is the central informative part of the sentence and the main clause is less important, introductory, maintaining only the immediate communicative connection with the listener:
I asked him if he knew the man.
There are cases when the main clause is relegated to a link-verb only:
What he says is not what he thinks.
Complex sentences are classified according to the function of the subordinate clauses (that is, according to their meaning and position in i elation to the main clause).