
- •1)The 2 branches of Grammar, their interconnection. Links of Gr. With other
- •2) Hierarchical structure of l. Segmental and supra-segmental levels.
- •3) The plane of content and the plane of expression. Polysemy, homonymy,
- •4) Notion of the morpheme. Types of morpheme. Suffixes and inflexions.
- •5)Distributional analysis in studying morphemes. Types of distribution.
- •6) Grammatical meaning, form, categories.
- •7)Different aspects of English Syntax.
- •8)Semantic, morphological, and syntactic categories. Notional categories and their
- •9) Textual Grammar.
- •10) Parts of speech. The criteria applied in discriminating parts of speech. The
- •11)The field theory approach to parts-of-speech classification. Classification of parts
- •12) The noun as a part of speech. The problem of the category of gender.
- •13) The category of number of the noun.
- •15) The article.
- •16) The adjective. Degrees of comparison. Substantivization of adjectives.
- •17) The pronoun. The categories of case and number. Subclasses of pronouns.
- •19) The category of aspect of the verb.
- •20) The composite sentence. Compound sentence.
- •21) The principal parts of the sentence:the subject & the predicate. Types of
- •22) The adverb and the structural parts of speech: prepositions, conjunctions,
- •23) The status of verbals in modern English.
- •24) Grammatical semantics of Participle II.
- •25) Word order in English.
- •26) The category of tense of the verb. The problem of perfect forms.
- •27) The complex sentence.
- •28) The category of mood of the verb.
- •29) The category of voice of the verb.
- •30) The phrase, its definition. The study of the phrase in Russian and foreign
- •31) Complicated sentences.
- •32) Types of phrases. Syntactic relations between the components of a phrase.
- •33) Notion of the sentence. Classification of sentence. Types of sentences.
- •34) The secondary parts of the sentence: the object, the attribute, the adverbial
26) The category of tense of the verb. The problem of perfect forms.
Ilyish: The tense category is universally recognized. The category of tense is a verbal
category which reflects the objective category of time and expresses on this
background the relations between the time of the action and the time of the utterance.
à Past, Present and Future. Some doubts have been expressed about the existence
of a future tense in English. O.Jespersen believes that shall and will preserve some
of their original meaning à English has no means of expressing “pure futurity”,
free from modal shades of meaning, i.e. it has no form standing on the same
grammatical level as the forms of the past and present tenses. It is also well known
that a present tense form and present continuous may also be used when the action
belongs to the future (as planned action). Besides the 6 forms of the English verb
there are 2 more, namely, the future-in-the-past and the future-continuous-in-the-past.
These forms are used chiefly in subordinate clauses depending on a main clause
having its predicate verb in one of the past tense, however they can be found in
independent clauses as well. The future-in-the-past and future-continuous-in-the-past
do not easily fit into a system of tenses represented by a straight line running out of
the past into the future. They are a deviation from this straight line: their starting point
is not the present, from which the past and the future are reckoned, but the past itself.
With reference to these tenses it may be said that the past is a new center of the system.
Blokh: 2 stages of the grammatical expression of verbal time: I.Absolutive stage:
Category of primary time (present & past) II. Relative stage:category of prospective
time (non-future(non-afteraction) & future (afteraction)
The problem of the perfect forms.
Ilyish: The ME perfect forms have been the subject of a lengthy discussion which has
not so far brought about a definite result.
1.The category of perfect is a peculiar tense category, i.e. a category which should be
classed in the same list as the categories “present” and “past” (O.Jespersen).
2.The category of perfect is a peculiar aspect category, i.e. one which should be
given a place in the list comprising “common aspect” and “continuous aspect”
(prof. G.Vorontsova) à “retrospective”, “resultative”, “successive’.
1)The category of perfect is neither one of tense, nor one of aspect but a specific
category different from both (prof. A.Smirnitsky). He took the perfect to be
a means of expressing the category of “time relation”.
??? TENSE CATEGORY. If we consider perfect to be a tense category, then the
present perfect would be a union of 2 different tenses (present and perfect), which
is impossible. If a form already belongs to a tense category it cannot simultaneously
belong to another tense category à the category of perfect cannot be a tense category.
??? ASPECT CATEGORY.
Is writing – has been writing
Will be writing – will have been writing
All these forms belong to the continuous aspect, they cannot be said to differ from
each other on an aspect line à perfect is not an aspect.
è Prof. Smirnitsky: perfect is “the category of time relation” à “correlation”
(to eliminate the undesirable term “time”).
à Opposition: Perfect (marked)/Non-Perfect (unmarked).
USES OF THE PERFECT FORMS.
1.The lexical meaning of the verb.
He has broken the cup (change in the state of the object à result).
He has lived in this city since 1945 (process).
2)The tense category of the form, i.e. whether it is the present perfect, past perfect,
or future perfect. The present perfect form may produce the meaning of a result to be
seen at the very moment the sentence is uttered. The past perfect would mean that the
result was there at a certain moment in the past. 3)The syntactical context, i.e.
whether the perfect form is used in a simple sentence, or the main clause, or in a
subordinate clause of a complex sentence. The syntactical context in which the perfect
form is used is occasionally a factor of the highest importance in determining the
ultimate meaning of the sentence. -The action denoted by the past perfect in this
sentence is not thought of as preceding the action denoted by the past tense.
e.g. But before he had answered, she made a grimace which Mark understood.
-The difference does not lie in the meanings of the perfect form, but depends on the
situation in which the sentence is used:
e.g. How long have you been here? à “Present (past) perfect inclusive)”
Where have you been, Vivie? à “Present (past) perfect exclusive)”
4.The situation in which the perfect form is used.