
- •List of exam questions for Theory of Language Communication
- •Define existing approaches to communication.
- •Information theory
- •Speak about the notion of inference.
- •Indicate approaches to definition of communication.
- •Indicate the functions of communication.
- •Describe the basic models of communication.
- •Explain the nature of the relations between language, speech and communication.
- •Define the pre-linguistic stages of communication.
- •Define the notion of context and its types.
- •Verbal context
- •Social context
- •Indicate the differentiating features of discourse.
- •Introduce the term discourse and the scope of its expertise, cross-linguistic approaches in discourse studies.
- •Show the relations between communication and discourse.
- •Speak about types of discourse.
- •Define the features and categories of non-verbal communication.
- •Explain the notions of reference.
- •Speak about types of presupposition.
- •1) Existential presupposition:
- •Define a dialogue and describe its structure.
- •Speak about conversational analysis.
- •Define speech acts and speech events.
- •Describe the structure and nature of a speech act.
- •Explain j.Austin's approach and classification of speech acts.
- •Explain g.Searle's approach to speech acts and his classification.
- •Speak about the notion of deixis and its importance for communication.
- •Speak about person deixis,
- •Speak about spatial deixis and temporal deixis.
- •Speak about conversational style.
- •Speak about the maxims of communication and conversational implicatures.
- •Define the notion inference.
- •Speak about the input of culture in communication.
Define speech acts and speech events.
Actions performed via utterances are generally called speech acts and, in English, are commonly given more specific labels, such as apology, complaint, compliment, invitation, promise, or request.
These descriptive terms for different kinds of speech acts apply to the speaker's communicative intention in producing an utterance. The speaker normally expects that his or her communicative intention will be recognized by the hearer. Both speaker and hearer are usually helped in this process by the circumstances surrounding the utterance. These circumstances, including other utterances, are called the speech event. In many ways, it is the nature of the speech event that determines the interpretation of an utterance as performing a particular speech act. On a wintry day, the speaker reaches for a cup of tea, believing that it has been freshly made, takes a sip, and produces the utterance in [3]. It is likely to be interpreted as a complaint.
[3] This tea is really cold!
Changing the circumstances to a really hot summer's day with the speaker being given a glass of iced tea by the hearer, taking a sip and producing the utterance in [3], it is likely to be interpreted as praise. If the same utterance can be interpreted as two different kinds of speech act, then obviously no simple one utterance to one action correspondence will be possible. It also means that there is more to the interpretation of a speech act than can be found in the utterance alone.
Speech acts
On any occasion, the action performed by producing an utterance will consist of three related acts. There is first a locutionary act, which is the basic act of utterance, or producing a meaningful linguistic expression. If you have difficulty with actually forming the sounds and words to create a meaningful utterance in a language (for example, because it's foreign or you're tongue-tied), then you might fail to produce a locutionary act. Producing 'Aha mokofa' in English will not normally count as a locutionary act, whereas [4] will.
[4] I've just made some coffee.
Mostly we don't just produce well-formed utterances with no purpose. We form an utterance with some kind of function in mind. This is the second dimension, or the illocutionary act. The illocutionary act is performed via the communicative force of an utterance. We might utter [4] to make a statement, an offer, an explanation, or for some other communicative purpose. This is also generally known as the illocutionary force of the utterance.
We do not, of course, simply create an utterance with a function without intending it to have an effect. This is the third dimension, the perlocutionary act. Depending on the circumstances, you
n\\ utter [4] on the assumption that the hearer will recognize the effect you intended (for example, to account for a wonderful
mell or to get the hearer to drink some coffee). This is also generally known as the perlocutionary effect.
Of these three dimensions, the most discussed is illocutionary force. Indeed, the term 'speech act' is generally interpreted quite larrowly to mean only the illocutionary force of an utterance. The illocutionary force of an utterance is what it 'counts as'. The same locutionary act, as shown in [5a.], can count as a prediction kb.], a promise [5c], or a warning [56..]. These different analyses kb.-d.] of the utterance in [5a.] represent different illocutionary forces.
[5] a. I'll see you later. (= A)
b. [I predict that] A.
c. [I promise you that] A.
d. [I warn you that] A.
One problem with the examples in [5] is that the same utterance can potentially have quite different illocutionary forces (for example, promise versus warning). How can speakers assume that the intended illocutionary force will be recognized by the hearer? That question has been addressed by considering two things: Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices and felicity conditions.
We can look at the set of utterances produced in this kind of situation as a speech event. A speech event is an activity in which participants interact via language in some conventional way to arrive at some outcome. It may include an obvious central speech act, such as 'I don't really like this', as in a speech event of 'complaining', but it will also include other utterances leading up to and subsequently reacting to that central action. In most cases, a 'request' is not made by means of a single speech act suddenly uttered.
According to this trichotomy, a speech act is, first of all, a locutionary act, that is, an act of saying something. Saying something can also be viewed from three different perspectives: (i) as a phonetic act: uttering certain noises; (ii) as a phatic act: uttering words “belonging to and as belonging to, a certain vocabulary, conforming to and as conforming to a certain grammar”; and (iii) as a rhetic act: uttering words “with a certain more-or-less definite sense and reference” (Austin).
Speech Event
can be defined by aunified set of
components through out:same purpose of communication
same participantssame language variety (generally).
For example
: exchanging greetings, telling jokes, giving speeches.
Speech Acts
Speech Acts are group of utterances with a single interactional function.For example: a request, a command,
a greating, a promise, an apology.
BASIC CONCEPTS
Speakers can perform actions while making utterances
Situation: At work, boss has great deal of power
You're fired
more than just a statement, actually ends your employment
Other examples:
You're so fantastic (compliment)
You're welcome (acknowledgement of thanks)
You're crazy! (expression of surprise)
Actions performed via utterances are called speech acts (e.g., apology, complaint,
compliment, invitation, promise, request)
The speaker normally expects that his or her communicative intention will be recognized by the hearer -
both speaker and hearer are helped by the circumstances surrounding the utterance.
These circumstances (including other utterances) are called the speech event
The tea is really cold!
Situation A: On a wintry day, the speaker reaches for a cup of tea, believing that it has been freshly
made, takes a sip, and produces the utterance complaint
Situation B: On a really hot summer's day the speaker is being given a glass of iced tea, takes a sip,
and produces the utterance praise
No simple utterance-to-action correspondence is possible!!!
According to this trichotomy, a speech act is, first of all, a locutionary act, that is, an act of saying something. Saying something can also be viewed from three different perspectives: (i) as a phonetic act: uttering certain noises; (ii) as a phatic act: uttering words “belonging to and as belonging to, a certain vocabulary, conforming to and as conforming to a certain grammar”; and (iii) as a rhetic act: uttering words “with a certain more-or-less definite sense and reference” (Austin).
Speech Event
can be defined by a unified set of components through out: same purpose of communication
same participants учасник same language variety (generally).
For example
: exchanging greetings, telling jokes, giving speeches.
A speech event is an activity in which participants interact via language in some conventional way to arrive at some outcome.
- may include one obvious central speech act
- may include other utterances leading up to and subsequently reacting to that central action
A: Oh, Mary, I'm glad you're here.
B: What's up?
A: I can't get my computer to work. the request is the whole speech event,
B: Is it broken? not a single speech act.
A: I don't think so.
B: What's it doing? no actual request is made
A: I don't know. I'm useless with computers.
B: What kind is it?
A: It's a Mac. Do you use them?
B: Yeah.
A: Do you have a minute?
B: Sure.
A: Oh, great
- the question 'Do you have a minute?' could be characterized as a pre-request, allowing the hearer to
say that she's busy or that she has to be somewhere else.
- the response 'Sure' is taken to be an acknowledgement not only of having time available, but a
willingness to perform the unstated action.
Speech Acts
Speech Acts are group of utterances with a single interactional function.For example: a request, a command,
a greating, a promise, an apology.
SPEECH ACT CLASSIFICATION I
declarations: - speech acts that change the world via their utterance
- the speaker has to have a special institutional role, in a specific situation
Priest: I now pronounce you husband and wife
Referee: You're out
Jury Foreman: We find the defendant guilty
the speaker changes the world via words
representatives:- speech acts that state what the speaker believes to be the case or not
- statements of fact, assertions, conclusions and descriptions are all
examples of the speaker representing the world as he/she believes it is
The earth is flat
Chomsky didn't write about peanuts
It was a warm sunny day
the speaker makes words fit the world (of belief)
expressives: - speech acts that state what the speaker feels
- they express psychological states and can be statements of pleasure, pain,
likes, dislikes, joy, sorrow ...
I'm really sorry
Congratulations!
Oh yes, great, mmmmm!!
the speaker makes words fit the world (of feeling)
SPEECH ACT CLASSIFICATION II
directives: - speech acts that speakers use to get someone else to do something
- they express what the speaker wants, they are commands, orders, requests,
suggestions and can be positive or negative
Gimme a cup of coffe. Make it black
Could you lend me a pen, please?
Don't touch that
the speaker attempts to make the world fit the words via the hearer
commissives: - speech acts that speaker use to commit themselves to some future action
- they express what the speaker intends, they are promises, threats, refusals, pledges
- they can be performed by the speaker alone, or by as a member of a group
I'll be back
I'm going to get it right next time
We will not do that
the speaker undertakes to make the world fit the words via the speaker
Speech acts
NATURE: Speech act is a technical term in linguistics and the philosophy of language. The contemporary use of the term goes back to John L. Austin's doctrine of locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts. Speech acts are commonly taken to include such acts as promising, ordering, greeting, warning, inviting and congratulating.
The philosopher J.L. Austin (1911-1960) claims that many utterances (things people say) are equivalent to actions. When someone says: “I name this ship” or “I now pronounce you man and wife”, the utterance creates a new social or psychological reality. We can add many more examples:
Sergeant Major: Squad, by the left… left turn!
Referee: (Pointing to the centre circle) Goal!
Groom: With this ring, I thee wed.
Speech act theory broadly explains these utterances as having three parts or aspects: locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary acts.
Locutionary acts are simply the speech acts that have taken place. Illocutionary acts are the real actions which are performed by the utterance, where saying equals doing, as in betting, plighting one’s troth, welcoming and warning. Perlocutionary acts are the effects of the utterance on the listener, who accepts the bet or pledge of marriage, is welcomed or warned.
Some linguists have attempted to classify illocutionary acts into a number of categories or types. David Crystal, quoting J.R. Searle, gives five such categories: representatives, directives, commissives, expressives and declarations. (Perhaps he would have preferred declaratives, but this term was already taken as a description of a kind of sentence that expresses a statement.)
Representatives – here the speaker asserts a proposition to be true, using such verbs as: affirm, believe, conclude, deny, report
Directives – here the speaker tries to make the hearer do something, with such words as: ask, beg, challenge, command, dare, invite, insist, request
Commissives – here the speaker commits himself (or herself) to a (future) course of action, with verbs such as: guarantee, pledge, promise, swear, vow, undertake
Expressives – the speaker expresses an attitude to or about a state of affairs, using such verbs as: apologize, appreciate, congratulate, deplore, detest, regret, thank, welcome
Declarations – the speaker alters the external status or condition of an object or situation, solely by making the utterance: I now pronounce you man and wife, I sentence you to be hanged by the neck until you be dead, I name this ship “Titanic”.
Performatives
These are speech acts of a special kind where the utterance of the right words by the right person in the right situation effectively is (or accomplishes) the social act. In some cases, the speech must be accompanied by a ceremonial or ritual action. Whether the speaker in fact has the social or legal (or other kind of) standing to accomplish the act depends on some things beyond the mere speaking of the words. These are felicity conditions, which we can also explain by the “hereby” test. But let’s look, first, at some examples.