- •Part I. The theory of person’s system diagnostics 9
- •3.1.1. General description 43
- •7.2.1. General description 75
- •§ 1. The diagnostics of regulating and self-regulating influences on
- •§ 2. The diagnostics of regulating and self-regulating influences
- •8.2.6. Working up of the results 84
- •Literature 88
- •Introduction
- •§ 1. The principles of classical system approach and their role in a person’s system diagnostics
- •1.1.1. The principle of physics
- •1.1.2. The principle of modeling
- •1.1.3. The principle of purposefulness
- •1.1.4. The principle of purpose conditionality
- •1.1.5. The principle of controllability
- •1.1.6. The principle of relativity
- •1.2.4. A person’s system diagnostics is used to solve the Following tasks:
- •Socio-psychological qualities
- •1.3.2. The legitimacy of system organization of the structure of a person’s qualities
- •§1. Typical disadvantages of methods and the equipment concerning
- •§2. The principles of selection and creation of the methods, techniques and equipment for a person’s system diagnostics
- •Chapter 1. Device «activationmeter aTs-6»
- •§ 1. «Activationmeter aTs-6», general organization
- •§2. «Activationmeter aTs-6” diagnostic possibilities
- •Table 3. System diagnostics of a humane with the help of «Activationmeter -аts-6»
- •Chapter II System somatic diagnostics
- •§1. Acupuncture diagnostics
- •2.1.1. General information about acupuncture
- •2.1.2. General features of acupuncture diagnostics on the device ats-6
- •2.1.3. The procedure of diagnostics
- •2.1.4. Working up of the results
- •2.1.5. The interpretation of the results
- •2.1.6. Some possible ways of practical usage of the method and results of the diagnostics
- •2.1.7. Acupuncture therapy
- •§2. Testing by method of Voll
- •2.2.1. General description
- •2.2.2. The procedure of diagnostics
- •2.2.3. Working up of the results
- •2.2.4. The interpretation of results
- •2.2.5. Some possible ways of practical usage of the results of testing by method of r.Voll
- •Chapter III the diagnostics of psycho – physiological characteristics
- •§1. The diagnostics of activation and functional
- •Asymmetry of cerebral hemispheres
- •3.1.1. General description
- •3.1.2. The procedure of diagnostics
- •In order to get situational indexes of ah and fah you should:
- •3.1.3. Working up of the results
- •3.1.3.1. Calculating the situational index of fah.
- •3.1.4. The interpretation of results
- •3.1.5. Some possible ways of practical usage of the method and the results of diagnostics
- •§ 2. The diagnostics of mobility-inertness of nervous system
- •3.2.1. General description
- •3.2.2. The procedure of diagnostics
- •3.2.3. Working up of the results
- •3.2.4. The interpretation of results
- •§ 3. The diagnostics of balance of nervous processes
- •3.3.1. General description
- •3.3.2. Working up of the results
- •3.3.3. The interpretation of results
- •3.3.4. Some possible ways of practical usage of the results of diagnostics
- •4. The diagnostics of force-weakness of nervous system
- •3.4.1. General description
- •3.4.2. The procedure of diagnostics
- •3.4.3. Working up of the results
- •3.4.4. The interpretation of results
- •3.4.5. Some possible ways of practical use of the diagnostics results
- •Chapter IV the diagnostics of psychic states
- •§1.The diagnostics of psycho-emotional states
- •4.1.1. General description
- •4.1.2. The procedure of diagnostics
- •4.1.3. Working up of the results
- •4.1.4. The interpretation of results
- •4.1.5. Some possible ways of practical use of methods and results of diagnostics
- •Chapter V the diagnostics of psychic processes
- •§1. The diagnostics of sensations and sensitivity
- •5.1.1. General description
- •5.1.2.1. The procedure of diagnostics
- •5.1.2.2. Working up of the results
- •5.1.2.3. The interpretation of results
- •5.1.3. The diagnostics of differential threshold of sensations
- •In motive analyzer
- •5.1.3.1. The procedure of diagnostics and working up of the results
- •5.1.3.2. The interpretation of results
- •5.1.4. The diagnostics of differential sensitivity
- •In visual analyzer
- •5.1.4.1. The procedure of diagnostics
- •5.1.4.2. Working up of the results
- •5.1.4.3. The interpretation of results
- •5.1.5. The diagnostics of somatic sensitivity
- •5.1.5.1. General description
- •5.1.5.2. The procedure of diagnostics
- •5.1.5.3. Working up of the results
- •Bapc – control index of bap, bapb – background index of bap.
- •5.1.5.4. The interpretation of results
- •5.1.6. The diagnostics of emotional sensitivity
- •5.1.6.1. The procedure of diagnostics
- •5.1.6.2. Working up of the results
- •5.1.6.3. The interpretation of results
- •5.1.7. Some possible ways of practical usage of methods and results of the diagnostics
- •§ 2. The diagnostics of spatial segments perception (estimation by eye)
- •5.2.1. General description
- •5.2.2. The procedure of diagnostics
- •5.2.3. Working up of the results
- •5.2.4. The interpretation of results
- •5.2.5. Some possible ways of practical use of methods and results of diagnostics
- •§ 3. The diagnostics of motive memory
- •5.3.1. General description
- •Motive memory is diagnosed on the device ats-6 on cinematometer with the help of e.P. Ilyin’s technique (1981).
- •5.3.2. The procedure of diagnostics
- •5.3.3. Working up of the results
- •5.3.4. The interpretation of results
- •5.3.5. Some possible ways of practical use of methods and results of diagnostics
- •§ 4. The diagnostics of movement coordination
- •5.4.1. General description
- •5.4.2. The procedure of diagnostics
- •5.4.3. Working up of the results
- •5.4.4. The interpretation of results
- •5.4.5. Some possible ways of practical use of methods and results of the diagnostics
- •§ 5. The diagnostics of leading hand
- •5.5.1. General description
- •5.5.2. The procedure of diagnostics
- •5.5.3. Working up of the results
- •5.5.4. The interpretation of results
- •5.5.5. Some possible ways of practical use of the method and results of the diagnostics
- •§ 6. The diagnostics of thinking
- •5.6.1. The dependence of the type of thinking on the functional asymmetry of cerebral hemispheres
- •5.6.2. The dependence of the type of thinking on the leading hand
- •5.6.3. Putting the diagnosis
- •5.6.4. Some possible ways of practical use of methods and results of the diagnostics
- •5.6.4.2. The formation of individual style of activity.
- •Chapter VI the diagnostics of psychological characteristics of personality
- •§1. The diagnostics of psycho-emotional steadiness
- •6.1.1. General description
- •6.1.2. The procedure of the diagnostics
- •6.1.3. Working up of the results
- •6.1.4. The interpretation of the results
- •6.1.5. Some possible ways of practical usage of methods and results of the diagnostics
- •§2. The diagnostics of reliability in extreme situations
- •6.2.1. General description
- •6.2.2. The procedure of the diagnostics
- •6.2.3. Working up of the results
- •6.2.4. The interpretation of the results
- •6.2.5. Some possible ways of practical usage of the method and the diagnostics results
- •§3. Stability diagnostics
- •6.3.1. General description
- •6.3.2. Working up of the figures
- •6.3.3. The interpretation of the results and making a diagnosis
- •6.3.4.Some possible ways of practical usage of the results of the diagnostics
- •Chapter VII the diagnostics of socio-psycological and social characteristics
- •§1. The diagnostics made with the help of a universal diagnostic scale
- •7.1.1. General description
- •7.1.2. The procedure of the diagnostics
- •7.1.2.1. The procedure of the diagnostics of socio-psychological and social characteristics using the method of expert estimations.
- •7.1.2.2. The procedure of the diagnostics with the help of a questionnaire.
- •7.1.3. Working up of the results
- •7.1.4. The interpretation of the results
- •7.1.5. Some possible ways of practical use of methods and results of the diagnostics
- •§2. The diagnostics of characteristics by the method of self-appraisal and the diagnostics of self-appraisal adequacy
- •7.2.1. General description
- •7.2.2. The procedure of the diagnostics
- •7.2.2.1.The procedure of the diagnostics using the method of self-appraisal.
- •7.2.2.2. The procedure of the diagnostics of self-appraisal adequacy.
- •7.2.3 Working up of the results
- •7.2.4. The interpretation of the results
- •7.2.5. Some possible ways of practical usage of the diagnostic method and its results
- •Chapter VIII the diagnostics of regulating and self-regulating influences
- •§1. The diagnostics of regulating and self-regulating
- •Influences on somatic characteristics
- •8.1.1. General description
- •8.1.2. The procedure of the diagnostics
- •8.1.3. Working up of the results and their interpretation
- •8.1.3.1. Working up of the results.
- •8.1.4. Some possible ways of practical usage of the method and the results of the diagnostics
- •§2. The diagnostics of regulating and self-regulating influences on psycho-physiological and psychological characteristics
- •8.2.1. The procedure of the diagnostics of regulating and self-regulating
- •Influences on psycho-physiological characteristics
- •8.2.2. The procedure of the diagnostics of regulating and self-regulating influences on psychic states (pSt.)
- •8.2.3. The procedure of the diagnostics of bioenergy influences
- •8.2.4. The procedure of the diagnostics of regulation and self-regulation of psychic processes
- •8.2.5. The procedure of the diagnostics of regulation and self-regulation of personality psychological characteristics
- •8.2.6. Working up of the results
- •Ah contr. – ah backgr.
- •8.2.7. The interpretation of the results
- •8.2.8. Some possible ways of practical use of the methods and the results of the diagnostics
- •The conclusion
- •Literature
- •The translation is not finished yet
- •2.2. Diagnostic scale of nervous system mobility
- •2.3. Diagnostic scale of sensitivity
- •2.4. Universal diagnostic scale of sensations, estimation by eye and motor functions
- •2.5. Universal diagnostic scale of manifestations
- •In extreme situation
- •2.6. Diagnostic scale of self-appraisal adequacy
- •2.7. Diagnostic scale of psycho-emotional states
- •2.8. Diagnostic scale of sensitivity in visual analyzer
- •2.9. Diagnostic scale of sensitivity in motor analyzer
2.2.3. Working up of the results
2.2.3.1. Calculate the relative index of Voll effect (FER in %) between maximal and minimal indexes of background measurement of BAP, i.e. between the indexes of columns 3 and 4, table 6 according to formula 2 (see the item 2.1.4.3.).
Put down the result into column 5, table 6.
2.2.3.2. Calculate FER in % between the indexes of control measurement of BAP, i.e. between the indexes of columns 6 and 7, table 6 by analogy.
2.2.3.3. Then calculate the difference between maximal quantities of control and background indexes of BAP, i.e. between the indexes of columns 6 and 3, table 6.
Put down the result into column 9, table 6.
2.2.3.4. Then calculate the difference between the relative indexes of Voll effect, i.e. between the indexes of columns 5 and 8, table 6.
Put down the result into column 10, table 6.
2.2.4. The interpretation of results
For the interpretation of the results of testing by method of Voll it is necessary to compare among themselves the results of control and background indexes of BAP presented in table 4. To define the degree of significance of the results of comparing these indexes ( in %) you should use a universal diagnostic scale of asymmetries and deltas presented in table 2.1, appendix 2.
The first diagnostic criterion is the results of comparison of maximal quantities of control and background indexes of BAP within each other.
2.2.4.1. If the reading of the indicator increased in comparison with a background index (the index of column 6, table 6 is bigger than the index of column 3) after putting the investigated substance into the ditch, it testifies to an activating, energizing influence of the investigated substance on the function of the organ interconnected with the investigated BAP. When interpreting such influence it is necessary to take into account the quantity of a background index.
2.2.4.1.1. If the background index is lower than norm (which testifies to a hypofunction of a corresponding organ), the activating influence of substance is considered as a positive one, because it normalizes (brings nearer to the norm) the function of an organ.
2.2.4.1.2. If the background index is higher than norm (which testifies to a hyperfunction of a corresponding organ), the activating influence of substance is considered as a negative one, because it even more raises a boosted function of an organ as it is.
2.2.4.1.3. If the background index is equal to the norm, then the activating influence of substance, which is withdrawing it in the direction of hyperfunction, is also considered as undesirable (though to a smaller extent than that in the previous case).
2.2.4.2. If the reading of the indicator decreased in comparison with the background index (the index of column 6, table 6 is less than the index of column 3) after putting the investigated substance into the ditch, it testifies to a calming, overwhelming influence of the investigated substance on a corresponding organ (function).
When interpreting such influence it is necessary to take into account the quantity of the background index.
2.2.4.2.1. If the background index is higher than the norm (which testifies to a hyperfunction of the organ), the calming influence of the substance is positive, because it normalizes the function of the organ.
2.2.4.2.2. If the background index is lower than the norm (which testifies to a hypofunction of the organ), the calming influence of the substance is negative, because it even more decreases (depresses) the decreased function of the organ as it is.
2.2.4.2.3. If the background index is equal to the norm, then the calming influence of substance, which is withdrawing it in the direction of hypofunction, is also considered as undesirable (though to a smaller extent than that in the previous case).
2.2.4.3. If the maximal indexes of control and background measurements are equal with each other, it testifies to an indifferent influence of the investigated substance on the corresponding organ (function).
2.2.4.4. The second diagnostic criterion is the results of comparison of control and background indexes of Voll effect (FER) with each other.
2.2.4.4.1. If the control index of FER is bigger than the background one (i.e. the index of column 8, table 6 is bigger than the index of column 5), it testifies to a negative influence of the investigated substance on the corresponding organ (function). It happens because this substance causes the appearance of Voll effect or intensifies it, i.e. the substance provokes different undesirable changes on the organic level.
2.2.4.4.2. If the control index of FER is less than the background one (i.e. the index of column 8, table 6 is less than the index of column 5), it testifies to a positive influence of the investigated substance on the corresponding organ (function). It happens because this substance depresses FER, i.e. the substance provokes negative changes on the organic level.
2.2.4.4.3. If the control index of FER is equal to the background one (i.e. the indexes of columns 8 and 5, table 6 are equal with each other), it testifies to an indifference of organic influence of the investigated substance on the corresponding organ (function).
2.2.4.5. Among two above-stated diagnostic criteria the first is more connected with the influence of the investigated substance on the function, whereas the second criterion is concerned with the influence of the investigated substance on the organics of the corresponding organ. That’s why:
2.2.4.5.1. The quantity of percentage correlation of maximal indexes of control and background measurements is directly proportional to the force of influence of the investigated substance on the function of corresponding organ.
2.2.4.5.2. The quantity of percentage correlation of FER indexes of control and background measurements is directly proportional to the force of influence of the investigated substance on the organics of corresponding organ.