Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Саржина - теоретическая фонетика английского.doc
196.61 Кб

7 Lecture 17.10.11

1St aspect. Material, real and objective.

A phoneme has a material aspect in the sense that it is represented by concrete material sounds. And that is its allophones. In other words the phoneme exists in speech in the material form of speech sounds. What is material is at the same time real. The phoneme is a linguistic reality, because it exists in actual speech. The phoneme is objective, because it exists independently of the will of individuals.

2Nd aspect. Abstractional and generalized.

The phoneme is abstracted from its allophones, but at the same time its characterized by the features common to all of them. E.g. /b/ - occlusive, bilabial, lenis, some allophones can be partially devoiced, can lose bilabial character, but most important characteristics remain.

3Rd aspect. Functional unit.

This aspect is reflected in the definition by Vasilyev as the smallest language unit, capable of differenciating words and their grammatical forms. The 3 linguistic functions of the phoneme are 1) the distinctive function; 2) the constitutive function; 3) the recognitive function (identificatory).

  1. Distinctive function consists in the differenciation of the language units higher than the phoneme itself. The distinctive function of the phoneme may be subdivided into the following: 1) morpheme-distinctive (teach – teacher), 2) word or form distinctive (/pen/ - /ten/, ask - asks); 3) sentence-distinctive (It was cold. It was gold. It was bold). The distinctive function is the principle function of the phoneme.

  2. Constitutive function. Though the phoneme in isolation has no meaning, it is linguistically important because in its material form it constitutes words, morphemes which are meaningful.

  3. Recognitive (identificatory) function. The recognitive function consists in making words with their grammatical forms and then whole sentences easily recognizable as the result of the use of the right phoneme in the right place.

  1. The Phoneme Theory

The phoneme theory came into being in Russia. It was founded by professor I.A. Baudoin de Courtenay (1845 – 1929), who was the founder of the Kazan linguistic school. The fundamental principles of the phoneme theory were worked out by him during the 1870s. His teaching eventually became known in Western Europe primarily through his disciples. He was a representer of the so-called psychological school of linguistics, which was current in his time. According to his theory a speech sound is a sound of a definite acoustic quality, produced by the organs of speech. Any given speech sound is incapable of variation. A Phoneme is defined by him as a group of related sounds of a given language, which are so used in connected speech, that no one of them ever occurs in positions, which any other can occupy. Speech sounds which belong to the same phoneme cannot distinguish one word from another, but phonemes distinguish one word from another in the same language.

Baudoin de Courtenay's point of view was later developed by his disciple Lev Scherba (1880 – 1944). He separated phonetics from phonology and stated that sounds are not only articulatory and acoustic units, but they also possess functional qualities. Scherba noticed that in actual speech we pronounce a greater variety of sounds than we are aware of. In every language all these sounds are united in a comparatively small number of sound types. This sound types are capable of distinguishing meanings and forms of words. They serve the purpose of social intercourse. These sound types are called phonemes. And the actual speech sounds that we pronounce and the individual representing the universal are called phonemic variant or allophones. Scherba's conception is a truly materialistic theory of the phoneme. He was the first to define the phoneme as a real independent distinctive unit, which manifests itself in the form of its allophones.

There are some other views on the nature of the phoneme. From physical point of view the phoneme is a family of related sounds in which various members of the family must show articulatory similarity to one another and at the same time no member of the family may occur in the same phonetic context. This approach overestimates the material aspect of the phoneme since it views the phoneme as a group of articulatory similar sounds without any regard to its functional and abstract aspects. The physical point of view was put forward by Daniel Johnes, he was the head of London school of phonology. A similar approach is expressed by the French linguist Ferdinant de Saussure. He viewed the phoneme as a sum of acoustic impressions and articulatory movements.

The opposite approach is reflected in the so-called functional view. It regards the phoneme as the minimal sound unit by which meanings may be differenciated without much regard to actually pronounced speech sounds. According to this conception the phoneme is not a family of sounds since in every sound not all the articulatory features are involved in the differenciation of meanings. Only the features helping differenciate meanings are called distinctive and they make the phoneme corresponding to them. That's why the approach excludes non-distinctive features from the phoneme. The approach was first expressed by Nikolay Trubetskoy, the head of the Prague linguistic school. He defines phoneme as a unity of phonologically relevant features. He wrote that when the phoneme is neutralized it becomes an archiphoneme, which is an abstraction combining the distinctive features common to two phonemes (лук — луг, k and g are one archiphoneme). According to his view-point both 'k' and 'g' in the Russian words 'luk' and 'lug' represent the archiphoneme 'k', which is neither voiced, nor voiceless.

A similar view is expressed by American phoneticians, who define the phoneme as a bunch of distinctive features and as an abstractional fiction.