
- •Передмова
- •Speech Act Functions and Subfunctions Classification of Illocutionary Acts
- •Felicity Conditions
- •Preparatory conditions
- •Sincerity conditions
- •Essential condition
- •Propositional content conditions
- •Explicit and Nonexplicit Illocutionary Acts.
- •The Performative Hypothesis
- •I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.
- •Direct and Indirect Illocutionary Acts
- •Expressed and Implied Locutionary Acts
- •Literal and Nonliteral Locutionary Acts
- •Speech Events
- •Examples of Speech Events Request
- •Compliment
- •Complaint
- •Oral, Written, and Oral-Written Speech Acts
- •Speech Acts and Events Across Cultures: Universality and Ethnospecificity
- •Directives
- •Classification of refusals
- •Representatives
- •Declaratives
- •For each of the following utterances, state (1) the syntactic form, (2) the illocutionary act (I.E. Representative, commissive, etc.) it performs.
- •Assume that each of the following utterances constitutes a nonfelicitous (I.E. Invalid) act of apologizing. Which type of felicity condition is violated by each one?
- •Which of the performative verbs is used in its performative sense in the following utterances.
- •Directives
- •Do you agree with the following strength continuum? Why? Why not? Ask English-speaking instructors or students to rank these sentences.
- •Commissives
- •Speech Events
- •Discourse Completion Practice
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the following:
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the requests taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the offers taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the suggestions taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the invitations taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Miscellaneous
- •Ask English-speaking instructors or students to make up a list and rank the expressions for politeness for
- •Analyze directives and negative commissives in the following extracts.
- •(O.Wilde, Dorian Gray: 166)
- •(O.Wilde, Dorian Gray: 34)
- •Speech Acts in Written Communication
- •Analyse the structure of the following letters. What devices are used to make them polite?
- •Institutional Acts
- •Bernard Shaw (ShWh)1
- •Ib 100 422 Widowers’ Houses. Mrs Warren’s Profession (99). – Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1950.
- •Bernard Shaw (ShL)
- •Augustus does his bit
- •B. Shaw “Man and Superman”2 London: Penguin Books 1957 (ShMs)
- •William Archer. Three Plays. (watp)3
- •New York: Henry Holt and Company.
- •Ford, The Good Soldier (Ford,gs)4
- •S f Tender is the Night (sftn)5
- •Gadfly, 29
- •Well, good luck to you. (smt, 57)
- •W. S. Maugham. Painted Veil (mpv)8
- •W. S. Maugham. Cakes and Ale (mca)9
- •W.S. Maugham . Rain and Other Stories (mros)10
- •A Fearless Champion11
- •I guess
- •M. Laurence The Stone Angel (lsa)
- •I wish – 80, 119, 145, 254
- •Good-bye- 92, 256
- •Foster a Room with a View (farwav)13
- •May I ask you what you intend to gain by this exhibition ? farwav 178
- •Farwav , 196
- •Emma and I
- •Galsworthy I, II, III
- •338 I wish - ?
- •“But why not tell them ? They can’t really stop us, Fleur ?”
- •Percieve – 182
- •Dorian, 34
- •Dorian, 167
- •I beg your pardon… Dorian, 48
- •Dorian, 166
- •I believe – 23, 31, 42, 53, 55, 65,107, 119, 145, 150!, 173, 177
- •Hemingway. Farewell 15
- •I hope - 111, 126, 135, 141, 164, 187, 231, 259
- •Primary
- •Secondary (in English)
- •Atiyah p.S.A. Promises & the law of contract. Mind, 1979, 88: 410-418.
- •Ayres Elenn. I daresay! Language lh 1974, 5/3, 454-456.
- •Bates Elizabeth Language & context. Academic Press New-York, 1976. Series: Language, Thought & Culture. Advances in the study of cognition.
- •Bierwiseh Manfred. Semantic strcture and illocutinary force.
- •Boer Steven e, Lycan William g. A performadox in truth-conditional semantics. Lingvistics and Philosophy. N 4/1 41-100
- •Downes William The imperative and pragmatics. Journal of linguistics, 1977, 11/3 77 – 97.
- •Ginet Carl Performativity Linguistic & philosophy 1979, 3/2 245-265
- •(In Russian and Ukrainian)
- •Навчальне видання
- •2 B. Shaw “Man and Superman” London: Penguin Books 1957
- •10 W.S. Maugham . Rain and Other Stories
- •13 Foster a Room with a View
Expressed and Implied Locutionary Acts
The locutionary act is concerned with the propositional content of the utterance, which is what follows the performative verb in an explicit performative and the entire utterance in a nonexplicit performative. In the following example, the propositional content is in italics.
Explicit: I promise I’ll write the report tomorrow.
Nonexplicit: I’ll write the report tomorrow.
The propositional content of a locutionary act can be either expressed directly or implied via implicature. The propositional content is expressed if the utterance actually contains an expression of the propositional content condition for the illocutionary act involved. For example, consider a warning, which is a type of directive. The propositional content condition on all directives is to predicate a future act of the hearer. Thus a warning such as I warn you to stop doing this constitutes an expressed locutionary act because its propositional content predicates a future act of the hearer.
On the other hand, the propositional content is implied if the utterance does not contain an expression of the propositional content condition for the illocutionary act involved. For example, the utterance I warn you that your actions are unreasonable constitutes an implied locutionary act (reconsider your actions) because its propositional content does not predicate a future act of the hearer; instead it predicates a quality of the hearer.
Some types of illocutionary acts don’t have any specific propositional content conditions. Questions can have any proposition as their propositional content. Therefore, a common method for implying a locution is for the speaker to express a pre-condition for the proposition of interest. For example Do you have a watch? Expresses a pre-condition for having the time.
The same utterance may contain an implied locution on one occasion but an expressed locution on another. For example, if you ask your friend Do you have a watch? In order to help you decide what to get him/her for the birthday party, then the proposition of interest is expressed by the utterance. However, if the same utterance is used to ask the time, the proposition of interest is only implied by the utterance.
Literal and Nonliteral Locutionary Acts
A locutionary act can be either literal or nonliteral, depending upon whether the speaker actually means what is said or not.for example a warning Cigarette smoking is dangerous to your health means exactly what it says; thus, it constitutes a literal locutionary act. On the other hand, the locution I could eat a horse is nonliteral. Nonliteral locutionary acts are those for which a literal interpretation is either impossible or absurd within the context of the utterance. Nonliteral locutionary acts can be analysed as flouting Grice’s maxim of Quality as hey involve someone saying something that is blatanly false under the circumstances.
Consider some other examples that require nonliteral interpretation:
If you want your wheel clamped, park here.
Why don’t you shout so everyone can hear?
I am sure it will kill you to turn down the TV.