
- •Передмова
- •Speech Act Functions and Subfunctions Classification of Illocutionary Acts
- •Felicity Conditions
- •Preparatory conditions
- •Sincerity conditions
- •Essential condition
- •Propositional content conditions
- •Explicit and Nonexplicit Illocutionary Acts.
- •The Performative Hypothesis
- •I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.
- •Direct and Indirect Illocutionary Acts
- •Expressed and Implied Locutionary Acts
- •Literal and Nonliteral Locutionary Acts
- •Speech Events
- •Examples of Speech Events Request
- •Compliment
- •Complaint
- •Oral, Written, and Oral-Written Speech Acts
- •Speech Acts and Events Across Cultures: Universality and Ethnospecificity
- •Directives
- •Classification of refusals
- •Representatives
- •Declaratives
- •For each of the following utterances, state (1) the syntactic form, (2) the illocutionary act (I.E. Representative, commissive, etc.) it performs.
- •Assume that each of the following utterances constitutes a nonfelicitous (I.E. Invalid) act of apologizing. Which type of felicity condition is violated by each one?
- •Which of the performative verbs is used in its performative sense in the following utterances.
- •Directives
- •Do you agree with the following strength continuum? Why? Why not? Ask English-speaking instructors or students to rank these sentences.
- •Commissives
- •Speech Events
- •Discourse Completion Practice
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the following:
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the requests taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the offers taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the suggestions taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the invitations taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Miscellaneous
- •Ask English-speaking instructors or students to make up a list and rank the expressions for politeness for
- •Analyze directives and negative commissives in the following extracts.
- •(O.Wilde, Dorian Gray: 166)
- •(O.Wilde, Dorian Gray: 34)
- •Speech Acts in Written Communication
- •Analyse the structure of the following letters. What devices are used to make them polite?
- •Institutional Acts
- •Bernard Shaw (ShWh)1
- •Ib 100 422 Widowers’ Houses. Mrs Warren’s Profession (99). – Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1950.
- •Bernard Shaw (ShL)
- •Augustus does his bit
- •B. Shaw “Man and Superman”2 London: Penguin Books 1957 (ShMs)
- •William Archer. Three Plays. (watp)3
- •New York: Henry Holt and Company.
- •Ford, The Good Soldier (Ford,gs)4
- •S f Tender is the Night (sftn)5
- •Gadfly, 29
- •Well, good luck to you. (smt, 57)
- •W. S. Maugham. Painted Veil (mpv)8
- •W. S. Maugham. Cakes and Ale (mca)9
- •W.S. Maugham . Rain and Other Stories (mros)10
- •A Fearless Champion11
- •I guess
- •M. Laurence The Stone Angel (lsa)
- •I wish – 80, 119, 145, 254
- •Good-bye- 92, 256
- •Foster a Room with a View (farwav)13
- •May I ask you what you intend to gain by this exhibition ? farwav 178
- •Farwav , 196
- •Emma and I
- •Galsworthy I, II, III
- •338 I wish - ?
- •“But why not tell them ? They can’t really stop us, Fleur ?”
- •Percieve – 182
- •Dorian, 34
- •Dorian, 167
- •I beg your pardon… Dorian, 48
- •Dorian, 166
- •I believe – 23, 31, 42, 53, 55, 65,107, 119, 145, 150!, 173, 177
- •Hemingway. Farewell 15
- •I hope - 111, 126, 135, 141, 164, 187, 231, 259
- •Primary
- •Secondary (in English)
- •Atiyah p.S.A. Promises & the law of contract. Mind, 1979, 88: 410-418.
- •Ayres Elenn. I daresay! Language lh 1974, 5/3, 454-456.
- •Bates Elizabeth Language & context. Academic Press New-York, 1976. Series: Language, Thought & Culture. Advances in the study of cognition.
- •Bierwiseh Manfred. Semantic strcture and illocutinary force.
- •Boer Steven e, Lycan William g. A performadox in truth-conditional semantics. Lingvistics and Philosophy. N 4/1 41-100
- •Downes William The imperative and pragmatics. Journal of linguistics, 1977, 11/3 77 – 97.
- •Ginet Carl Performativity Linguistic & philosophy 1979, 3/2 245-265
- •(In Russian and Ukrainian)
- •Навчальне видання
- •2 B. Shaw “Man and Superman” London: Penguin Books 1957
- •10 W.S. Maugham . Rain and Other Stories
- •13 Foster a Room with a View
Explicit and Nonexplicit Illocutionary Acts.
IFID
One of Austin’s important insights was that the most obvious device for indicating the illocutionary force (the Illocutionary Force Indicating Device, or IFID) is an expression of the type
[I (Vp) you that...]
where a verb explicitly names the illocutionary act being performed.
Eg.:
I warn you to stop cheating.
May I inquire where you got those stolen goods?
Your presence is requested
Our order is hereby cancelled.
Consequently, Austin showed that English contains a set of verbs, each of which names the illocutionary force of that verb, and called such verbs performative verbs (VP).
In order for a performative verb to have its performative sense (to perform the illocutionary act it names), it must
be positive,
be present tense,
have a first-person agent,
refer to a specific event.
Eg.:
I admit my mistake.
We cordially invite you to take part in the conference.
We acknowledge receipt of your letter.
Not all verbs are VPs. For example, know is not a PV because the PVs meet the following criteria:
a PV describes a voluntary act (one can’t choose to know or not know smth),
a PV describes an act that can only be performed with words (one can know smth without saying s/he knows it),
a PV can be used with the performative indicator hereby
An utterance that contains a PV (used in its performative sense) is called an explicit performative; an utterance that does not contain a PV (used in its performative sense) is called a nonexplicit/ implicit performative.
Clean up this mess!
I hereby order you that you clean up this mess.
The work was done by Elaine and myself.
I hereby tell you that the work was done by Elaine and myself.
Examples like [2, 4] (normally without 'hereby'), are used by speakers as explicit performatives. Examples like [1, 3] are implicit performatives, sometimes called primary performatives.
Speech act verbs can differ from one another as to the "degree" of their performativity. For example, we can say I order you but I threaten you and I boast are unacceptable. However, I have to boast that X is a normal form. Speech act verbs differ from one another in the range of modals which they can occur with: I would suggest/ recommend /advise but I must confess /admit/ though I must/would ask.
Utterances can be polyfunctional. Utterances with one illicutionary force can be called simple performatives, and utterances with two and more illicutionary forces can be called complex performatives (Почепцов О.1986: 25)
Complex performatives can be explicit and implicit. Explicit complex performatives describe n+1 illocutionary act. Examples of explicit complex performatives are as follows:
Eg.: Let me ask you how old are you?
Let me tell you that you are wrong.
Implicit complex performatives don't describe the illocutionary act n+1. Utterances like Can you feel a draft? used as a directive can be an example of this type.