
- •Передмова
- •Speech Act Functions and Subfunctions Classification of Illocutionary Acts
- •Felicity Conditions
- •Preparatory conditions
- •Sincerity conditions
- •Essential condition
- •Propositional content conditions
- •Explicit and Nonexplicit Illocutionary Acts.
- •The Performative Hypothesis
- •I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.
- •Direct and Indirect Illocutionary Acts
- •Expressed and Implied Locutionary Acts
- •Literal and Nonliteral Locutionary Acts
- •Speech Events
- •Examples of Speech Events Request
- •Compliment
- •Complaint
- •Oral, Written, and Oral-Written Speech Acts
- •Speech Acts and Events Across Cultures: Universality and Ethnospecificity
- •Directives
- •Classification of refusals
- •Representatives
- •Declaratives
- •For each of the following utterances, state (1) the syntactic form, (2) the illocutionary act (I.E. Representative, commissive, etc.) it performs.
- •Assume that each of the following utterances constitutes a nonfelicitous (I.E. Invalid) act of apologizing. Which type of felicity condition is violated by each one?
- •Which of the performative verbs is used in its performative sense in the following utterances.
- •Directives
- •Do you agree with the following strength continuum? Why? Why not? Ask English-speaking instructors or students to rank these sentences.
- •Commissives
- •Speech Events
- •Discourse Completion Practice
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the following:
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the requests taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the offers taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the suggestions taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Supply an appropriate response to each of the invitations taking into consideration the refuser’s status.
- •Miscellaneous
- •Ask English-speaking instructors or students to make up a list and rank the expressions for politeness for
- •Analyze directives and negative commissives in the following extracts.
- •(O.Wilde, Dorian Gray: 166)
- •(O.Wilde, Dorian Gray: 34)
- •Speech Acts in Written Communication
- •Analyse the structure of the following letters. What devices are used to make them polite?
- •Institutional Acts
- •Bernard Shaw (ShWh)1
- •Ib 100 422 Widowers’ Houses. Mrs Warren’s Profession (99). – Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1950.
- •Bernard Shaw (ShL)
- •Augustus does his bit
- •B. Shaw “Man and Superman”2 London: Penguin Books 1957 (ShMs)
- •William Archer. Three Plays. (watp)3
- •New York: Henry Holt and Company.
- •Ford, The Good Soldier (Ford,gs)4
- •S f Tender is the Night (sftn)5
- •Gadfly, 29
- •Well, good luck to you. (smt, 57)
- •W. S. Maugham. Painted Veil (mpv)8
- •W. S. Maugham. Cakes and Ale (mca)9
- •W.S. Maugham . Rain and Other Stories (mros)10
- •A Fearless Champion11
- •I guess
- •M. Laurence The Stone Angel (lsa)
- •I wish – 80, 119, 145, 254
- •Good-bye- 92, 256
- •Foster a Room with a View (farwav)13
- •May I ask you what you intend to gain by this exhibition ? farwav 178
- •Farwav , 196
- •Emma and I
- •Galsworthy I, II, III
- •338 I wish - ?
- •“But why not tell them ? They can’t really stop us, Fleur ?”
- •Percieve – 182
- •Dorian, 34
- •Dorian, 167
- •I beg your pardon… Dorian, 48
- •Dorian, 166
- •I believe – 23, 31, 42, 53, 55, 65,107, 119, 145, 150!, 173, 177
- •Hemingway. Farewell 15
- •I hope - 111, 126, 135, 141, 164, 187, 231, 259
- •Primary
- •Secondary (in English)
- •Atiyah p.S.A. Promises & the law of contract. Mind, 1979, 88: 410-418.
- •Ayres Elenn. I daresay! Language lh 1974, 5/3, 454-456.
- •Bates Elizabeth Language & context. Academic Press New-York, 1976. Series: Language, Thought & Culture. Advances in the study of cognition.
- •Bierwiseh Manfred. Semantic strcture and illocutinary force.
- •Boer Steven e, Lycan William g. A performadox in truth-conditional semantics. Lingvistics and Philosophy. N 4/1 41-100
- •Downes William The imperative and pragmatics. Journal of linguistics, 1977, 11/3 77 – 97.
- •Ginet Carl Performativity Linguistic & philosophy 1979, 3/2 245-265
- •(In Russian and Ukrainian)
- •Навчальне видання
- •2 B. Shaw “Man and Superman” London: Penguin Books 1957
- •10 W.S. Maugham . Rain and Other Stories
- •13 Foster a Room with a View
Classification of refusals
(After Pragmatic Transfer in ESL Refusals
by L.M. Beebe, T.Takahashi, R. Uliss-Weltz)
Direct
Performative (I refuse …)
Nonperformative statement
"No"
negative willingness/ability (I cant. I won't. I don't think so)
Indirect
Statement of regret (I'm sorry… I feel terrible…)
Wish (I wish I could)
Excuse, reason, explanation
Statement of alternative
I can do X instead of Y (I'd rather… I'd prefer…)
Why don't you do X instead of Y (Why don't you ask someone else?)
Set conditions for future or past exceptence (If you had asked me earlier, I would …)
Promise of future acceptance (I'll do it next time. I promise I will. Next time perhaps.)
Statement of principle (I never do business with friends)
Statement of philosophy (One can't be too careful)
Attempt to dissuade interlocutor
Threat or statement of negative consequences to the requester (I won't be any help tonight)
Guilt trip (waitress to customers who want to sit a while "I can't make a living off people who just order coffee")
Criticize the request/requester (statement of negative feeling or opinion; insult/attack (Who do you think you are? That's a terrible idea!)
Request for help, empathy, and assistance by dropping or holding the request.
Let interlocutor off the hook (Don't worry about it. )
Self-defense (I'm trying my best. I'm doing all I can)
Acceptance that functions as a refusal
Unspecific or indefinite reply
Lack of enthusiasm
Avoidance
Nonverbal
Silence
Hesitation
Do nothing
Physical departure
Verbal
Topic switch
Joke
Repetition of part of request, etc. (Monday?)
Postponent (I'll think about it)
Hedging (Gee, I don't know. I'm not sure)
Representatives
Assert, reassert, negate, deny, correct, claim, affirm, state, disclaim, declare, tell, suggest, guess, hypothesize, conjecture, postulate, predict, forecast, foretell, prophesy, vaticinate, report, retrodict, warn, forewarn, advise, alert, alarm, remind, describe, inform, reveal, divulge, divulgate, notify, insinuate, sustain, insist, maintain, assure, aver, avouch, certify, attest, swear, testify, agree, disagree, asent, dissent, acquisce, object, recognize, acknowlwdge, admit, confess, concede, recant, criticize, blame, accuse, calumniate, reprimand, castigate, denounce, boast, complain, lament |
Declaratives
declare, renounce, disclaim, disown, resign, repudiate, disavow, retract, abdicate, abjure, deny, disinherit, yield, surrender, capitulate, approve, confirm, sanction, ratify, homologate, bless, curse, dedicate, consecrate, disapprove, stipulate, name, call, define, abbreviate, nominate, authorize, license, install, appoint, establish, institute, inaugurate, convene, convoke, open, close, suspend, adjourn, terminate, dissolve, denounce, vote, veto, enact, legislate, promulgate, decree, confer, grant, bestow, accord, cede, rule, adjudge, adjudicate, condemn, sentence, damn, clear, acqui, disculpate, exonerate, pardon, forgive, absolve, cancell, annul, abolish, abrogate, revoke, repeal, rescind, retract, sustain, bequeath, baptize, excommunicate. |
Expressives
approve, compliment, praise, laud, extol, plaudit, appaud, acclaim, brag, boast, complain, disapprove, blame, reprove, deplore, protest, grieve, mourn, lament, rejoice, cheer, boo, condole, congratulate, thank, apologize, greet, welcome. |
|
|
|
|
Research & Application |
|
|
|
|
Theory
Give your own definition of
a speech act;
a speech event.
Give examples of various speech events in business/ nonbusiness environment.
Describe Searle’s classification of illocutionary acts.
Speak on felicity conditions.
Give examples of felicity conditions on different types of speech acts.
What is typical of a performative utterance?
Speak on direct and indirect illocutionary acts.
Explain the difference between explicit and implicit locutionary acts.
Compare Austin’s and Searle’s functions with those of writers in applied linguistics. How do these relate to each other? How do they link speech acts to research on human communication?
Find the mistakes (if any) in the following.
Speech acts have two facets: an illocutionary act (what is done) and a locutionary act (what is said). The illocutionary act can be achieved either with an explicit performative (a performative verb used in its performative sense) or a nonexplicit performative. A nonexplicit illocutionary act can be performed either directly (syntactic form matches illocutionary force) or indirectly. On the other hand, the illocutionary act can be either expressed (articulates propositional content condition) or implied. Likewise, the locutionary act can be expressed either literally (does not require a nonliteral interpretation) or nonliterally.
The illocutionary part of a speech act is what the utterance does rather than what it says. Illocutionary acts are generally grouped into seven types: representatives, directives, verdicatives, commissives, questions, expressives and declarations. Illocutionary acts are valid only if their felicity conditions are met. These conditions can be grouped into four categories: prepararory, sincerity, essential, and propositional content. Illocutionary acts can be achieved through either an explicit or an implicit performative. An implicit performative can be either direct or indirect.
Analysis