Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
History of greenbacks, Mitchell.doc
Скачиваний:
5
Добавлен:
10.11.2019
Размер:
524.8 Кб
Скачать

In the conviction that they were aiding the Rebellion as truly and

palpably as though they were wielding muskets in the front ranks

of Lee's army. 2

When Congress assembled in December the prevalence

of the feeling that the premium was largely due to specula-

tion, and speculation to treason, manifested itself in proposals

to enact restrictive legislation. But it was some time before

these proposals were given serious attention. In the Senate

Mr. Lane, of Kansas, introduced a bill December 15, 1863,

to prohibit speculative transactions in gold, and another

January 13, prohibiting the sale of gold at a price higher

than that of 6 per cent, federal bonds. Both these measures

1 See money articles of this period.

2 June 15, 1864. More or less similar outbursts can be found in most of the New

York papers at any time that the premium was advancing rapidly. Cf., e. g., New

York Times, money article, February 3, 1864.

SPECIE VALUE OP THE PAPEB CURRENCY 225

were referred to the Committee on Finance and were no more

heard of. 1 A third bill of the same character met a similar

fate, though introduced by so influential a senator as John

Sherman. 2 In the House Mr. Clay's "bill to regulate con-

tracts for gold" was killed by the Committee on Judi-

ciary, to which it had been referred. 3 But while Congress

was not yet ready to attack the business of dealing in gold

directly, it assented to a measure of which the object was the

reduction of the premium.

Just at this time the government was receiving more gold

from customs duties than was required for meeting the inter-

est on the public debt. The excess was accumulating in the

New York subtreasury. It was thought that, if this large

supply could be suddenly thrown on the market, it would

break the "corner" in gold and cause the premium to fall.

With this intent, the secretary of the treasury was author-

Ized to dispose of any surplus gold not required for interest. 4

The passage of this measure, like that of the tax provision of

March, 1863, was followed by a temporary appreciation of

the currency from $59.61 on the 9th of March, when its

defeat was expected, to $62.06 on the 17th, when it was

approved by the president. 5

Mr. Chase, however, was loath to use the power thus

1 Congressional Globe, 38th Cong., 1st Sess., pp. 24, 173. When the committee was

asked what it had done with the bills, Fessenden replied that it still had the

matter under consideration. Ibid., p. 360.

2 Ibid., p. 539. 3 ibid., pp. 730, 2773.

* Joint resolution of March 17, 1864, 13 Statutes at Large, p. 404. For the grounds

on which the bill was urged see Sherman, Congressional Globe, 38th Cong., 1st Sess.,

p. 1023; Hooper, ibid., p. 731 ; Kasson, pp. 707, 737, 738; Garfield, p. 734. On the other

side see Pendleton, pp. 731, 732 ; Brooks, p. 733 ; Hendricks, pp. 1045, 1046 ; Reverdy

Johnson, pp. 1050, 1051. As the bill passed the House, it merely authorized the secre-

tary to anticipate the payment of interest in gold, but the Senate Committee on

Finance reported an amendment permitting the secretary to sell any gold in the

treasury not needed for the payment of interest (p. 1023). This resolution as amended

was adopted by the Senate after a yea and nay vote of 30 to Son March 11 (p. 1052),

and after much discussion was accepted by the House March 16, by 84 votes to 57

(p. 1147).

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]