Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Polysemy and Homonymy.doc
Скачиваний:
10
Добавлен:
19.08.2019
Размер:
51.71 Кб
Скачать
  • Several Homonyms are creation of echronomy (initial letters): Mass (modern army supply system) – масса, груда. CAD – cash against documents - платежа наличными против грузовых документов; cad - невоспитанный, грубый человек; can - бидон, лачуга, банка консервов. The last 2 sources are minor and not so extensive as the first 3.

    • Do you serve the fish here?

    • We serve anyone, sit down, please.

    • It’s tough when you pay 40 pounds for meat!

    • It’s tougher when you pay less than 20!

    • Allow me present your wife to you.

    • Many thanks, but I have one!

    • A tailor guarantees each of his customers a perfect fit.

    • A clean fast is better than a dirty breakfast.

    • Who feasts till he is seek, must fast till he is well.

    • Is life worth living?

    • It depends upon the lives.

    • Waiter!”

    • Yes, sir.

    • What’s this?

    • It’s bean soup, sir.

    • Never mind what it has been, I want to know, what it is now!

Summery and Conclusion.

  1. Homonyms are words (word forms) that sound alike, but have different semantic structure. The problem of Homonymy is mainly the problem of differentiation of 2 different semantic structures of identically sounding cords.

  2. Homonymy of cords and Homonymy of individual word forms may be regarded as full and partial Homonymy. Cases of full Homonymy are generally observed in words belonging to the same part of speech. Partial Homonymy is usually to be found in word forms of different parts of speech.

  3. Homonymous words and word forms may be classified by the type of meaning that serves to differentiate between identical sound forms. Lexical Homonyms are different in lexical meaning, lexico-grammatical – in both lexical and grammatical meaning, whereas grammatical Homonyms are those that differ in grammatical meaning only.

  4. Lexico – grammatical Homonyms are not homogeneous. Homonyms, arising from conversion have some related lexical meanings in their semantic structure.Though some individual meanings may be related, the whole of the semantic structure of the Homonyms is essentially different.

  5. If the graphic form of Homonyms is taken into account, they are classified on the basis of 3 aspects sound form, graphic form and meaning – into 3 big groups: homographs (identical graphic form), homophones (identical sound form), and perfect homonyms (identical sound and graphic form).

  6. The 2 main sources of Homonyms are: diverging meaning development of one polysemantic word, convergent sound development of 2 or more different words.

  7. The most debatable problem of Homonymy is the demarcation line between Homonymy and Polysemy i.e. between different meanings of one word and the meaning of 2 or more phonemically different words.

  8. The criteria used in the synchronic analysis of Homonyms are:

the semantic criterion of related or unrelated meanings

the criterion of spelling

the criterion of distribution

the criterion of context.

9. The problem of discriminating between Polysemy and Homonymy in theoretical linguistics is closely connected with the problem of the basic unit at the semantic level of the analysis.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]