
- •Its aims and significance
- •Semasiology
- •Referential approach to meaning
- •Types of meaning
- •Grammatical meaning
- •Lexical meaning
- •Diachronic approach to polysemy
- •Synchronic approach to polysemy
- •Change of meaning
- •Causes of Semantic Change
- •Nature of Semantic Changes
- •Results of Semantic Change
- •Homonymy
- •Classification of homonyms
- •Arnold I.V.
- •And other linguists
- •II. R.S. Ginsburg and others
- •Intralinguistic relations of words
- •Conceptual (semantic) fields
- •Synonymy
- •Antonymy
- •Structure of word-groups
- •Meaning of word-groups
- •Motivation in word-groups
- •Classification of phraseological
- •Classification of phraseological units by a.I. Smirnitsky
- •Classification of phraseological units by
- •Some Debatable Points
- •Classification of phraseological units by a.V. Koonin
- •Word-structure
- •Principles of morphemic analysis
- •Classification of morphemes
- •The procedure of morphemic analysis
- •Morphemic types of words
- •Derivative structure
- •The main requirements to deivational analysis
- •Derivational bases
- •A derivational base differs from a morphological stem
- •Derivational аffiхеs
- •Semi-affixes
- •Derivational patterns
- •Derivational types of words
- •Word-formation
- •Various ways of forming words
- •Affixation
- •Prefixation
- •Classification of Prefixes
- •Suffixation
- •Classification of Suffixes
- •Polysemy and Homonymy
- •Synonymy
- •Productivity
- •Origin of Derivational Affixes
- •Conversion
- •"Stone-wall" problem
- •Typical Semantic Relations
- •1. Verbs converted from nouns (denominal verbs).
- •II. Nouns converted from verbs (deverbal substantives)
- •Basic Criteria of Semantic Derivation
- •Word-composition
- •Structural meaning of the pattern
- •Classification
- •Means of composition
- •Local varieties in the british isles and in the usa
- •Main types of english dictionaries
The procedure of morphemic analysis
The procedure generally employed for the purposes of segmenting words into the constituent morphemes is the method of Immediate and Ultimate Constituents.
This method is based on a binary principle, i.e. each stage of the procedure involves two components the word immediately breaks into. At each stage these two components are referred to as the Immediate Constituents. (IC). Each 1C at the next stage of analysis is, in turn, broken into two smaller meaningful elements. The analysis is completed when we arrive at constituents incapable of further division, i.e. morphemes. These morphemes are referred to as the Ultimate Constituents (UC). E.g., the noun friendliness is first segmented into the 1C friendly — recurring in the adjectives friendly — looking and friendly and — ness found in a countless number of nouns, such as happiness, darkness. The IC — ness is at the same time a UC of the noun, as it cannot be broken into any smaller elements possessing both sound-form and meaning. The IC friendly is next broken into the ICs friend — and — ly recurring in friendship, unfriendly, on the one hand, and wifely, brotherly, on the other. The ICs friend-, -ly are both UCs of the word under analysis.
The procedure of morphemic analysis may be presented with the help of a box-like diagram.
-
friend
li
ness
The shaded boxes represent the ICs which are at the same time the UCs of the noun.
Morphemic types of words
.According to the number of morphemes words are classified into monomorphic and polymorphic. Monomorphic or root-words consist of only one root-morpheme (small, dog). Polymorphic words according to the number of root-morphemes are classified into monoradical (one-root words) and polyradical, i.e. words consisting of two or more roots. Monoradical words fall into three subtypes:
1) radical-suffixal words, i.e. words that consist of one root-morpheme and one or more suffixal morphemes (e.g. acceptable, acceptability);
2) radical-prefixal words, i.e. words that consist of one root-morpheme and a prefixal morpheme (outdo, unbutton);
3) prefixo-radical-suffixal words, i.e. words which consist of one root, prefixal and suffixal morphemes (disagreeable).
Polyradical words fall into two types: 1) polyradical words which consist of two or more roots with no affixational morphemes (book-stand);
2) words which contain at least two roots and one or more affixational morphemes (e.g. safety — pin, pen-holder, light-minded).
Derivative structure
The morphemic analysis does not aim at finding out the nature and arrangement of ICs which underlie the structural and the semantic type of the word. E.g. the words unmanly and discouragement morphemically are referred to the same type as both are segmented into three UCs representing one root, one prefixational and one. suffixational morpheme. However, the arrangement and the nature of ICs and the relationship of morphemes in these words are different. The meaning of the word "unmanly" is derived from the relations between the ICs un-and-manly ("not manly"), whereas, discouragement rests on the relations of the ICs discourage — and — ment (smth that discourages). Hence we may infer that these three — morpheme words should be referred to different derivational types: unmanly to a prcfixational and discouragement to a suffixational derivative. The nature, type and arrangement of the ICs of the word are known as its derivative structure.