
- •Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine
- •V. N. Pavlysh
- •1. Sets, sequences and functions
- •1.1 Some Special Sets
- •Exercises 1.1
- •1.2 Set Operations
- •Note the use of the “exclusive or” here. It follows from the definition that
- •Figure 1
- •Figure 2
- •Figure 3
- •Figure 4
- •Figure 5
- •Figure 7
- •Figure 7
- •Exercises 1.2
- •1.3 Functions
- •Figure 1
- •Figure 2
- •Figure 3
- •Figure 4
- •Figure 5
- •1.4 Inverses of Functions
- •Figure3
- •Sequences
- •Value of n The sum
- •Figure 1 example 4 (a) We will be interested in comparing the growth rates of familiar
- •Example 6 (a) At the beginning of this section we mentioned general sums
- •Figure 3
- •Figure 4
- •Figure 1
Figure 2
EXAMPLE 2 (a) If the universe is N, and if A and E are as in Example l(a), then
A c= {nN :n l2} and Ec = {n N :n is odd}.
(b) If the universe is R, then [0.1]c = (- , 0) u (1, ), (0, 1)c = (- , 0]
[1, ) and {0, 1}c = (- , 0) (0,1) (1, ). For any a R,
[a, )c = (- , a) and (a, )c = (- , a]. ■
Note that the last two Venn diagrams in Figure 2 show that Ac Bc = (A B)c. This set identity and many others are true in general. Table 1 lists some basic identities for sets and set operations. Don't be overwhelmed by them; look at them one at a time. As some of the names of the laws suggest, many of them are analogs of laws from algebra. The idempotent laws are new [certainly, a + a = a fails for most numbers], and there is only one distributive law for numbers. Of course, the laws involving complementation are new. All sets in Table 1 are presumed to
TABLE 1. Laws of Algebra of Sets
-
1a AB =BA
b AB =BA
2a (AB)C =A(BC)
b (AB)C =A(BC)
3a A(BC)=(AB)(AC)
b A(BC)=(AB)(AC)
4a AA = A
b AA = A
5a A=A
b AU =U
c A=
d AU =A
6 (Ac)c =A
7a AAc =U
b AAc =
8a Uc =
b c =U
9a (AB)c =AcBc
b (AB)c =Ac Bc
be subsets of some universal set U. Because of the associative laws, we can write the sets A B C and A B C without any parentheses and cause no confusion.
The identities in Table 1 can be verified in either of two ways. One can shade in the corresponding sets of a Venn diagram and observe that they are equal. Alternatively, one can show that sets S and T are equal by showing that S T and T S; these inclusions can be verified by showing that x S implies x T and by showing that x T implies x S. We give examples of both sorts of arguments, leaving most of the verifications to the interested reader.
EXAMPLE 3 The DeMorgan law 9a is illustrated by Venn diagrams in Figure 2.
Here is a proof in which we show first that (A B)c Ac Bc
and then that
Ac Bc (A B)c.
To show that (A B)c Ac Bc , we consider an element x in
(A B)c. Then x A B. In particular, x A, so we must have
x Ac. Similarly, x B, and so x Bc. Therefore, x Ac Bc.
We have shown that x (A B)c implies x Ac Bc; hence
(A B)c Ac Bc.
To show the reverse inclusion, Ac Bc (A B)c , we
consider x in Ac Bc. Then x Ac, so x A. Also, x Bc, and so
x B. Since x A and x B, we conclude that x A B, i.e.,
x (A B)c. Hence Ac Bc (A B)c. ■
EXAMPLE 4 The Venn diagrams in Figure 3 show the distributive law 3b. The
picture of the set A (B C) is double-hatched in the diagram
on the left; on the right, (A B) (A C) is represented by the
set that is single- or double-hatched.