Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Raeff_Modernity

.pdf
Скачиваний:
9
Добавлен:
26.03.2016
Размер:
4 Мб
Скачать

1230

 

Marc

Raeff

 

 

to lend

to official acts more authority

and free them as much

as possible

from

personal relationships

and influences

by making them more

"objective"

and

regular.

It meant, in

short, to endow the administration

with the arcane

aura of the distinct

and objective,

and hence

the superior.25 It also served

to

instill

in the

population

the

notion

 

of

the

state

as a separate,

 

autonomous

entity with its own-not

merely the ruler's-goals,

 

interests,

 

and

needs.

Inasmuch as the administration

was the source

of the guidance,

 

furtherance,

and control

of all potential

energies,

it had also a didactic

function

 

in famil-

iarizing the people with its designs and goals. To our

eyes, the

minute

and

petty

prescriptions

for the operation

 

of offices and clerkships

to be

found

in

many Polizeiordnungen

 

 

and learned

treatises of cameralist

writers

may seem

naive

or slightly

ridiculous.

But

they

are illustrative

of

the new

concerns

of

government;

the

instruments

of

administration

were

coming

to be as im-

portant

 

as the ends

they

served

or promoted,

and

they were

acquiring

 

a life

of their

own,

becoming

 

an end

in themselves.

The

very routine

of govern-

ment

operations

threatened

to swallow

up the purpose

for which

 

it had been

introduced,

and

the

personnel

 

of

administration-the

 

 

bureaucracy-was

 

evolving

into

 

a

separate

class with

its

own

specific

interests,

interests

that

were

identified

with those of the state rather than with

those of a particular

estate. The arrogance and self-righteousness

of

administrative

 

 

power

that

reached

the extreme degree

we observe

 

in

the

Russia

of Peter the Great or

the Austria of Joseph II take their roots in this development.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What

has

frequently

 

been

considered

 

a

particular

manifestation

of the

brutal

didacticism

of

Peter

I of

Russia,

of his desire

to civilize

his

society

at

one blow and to establish

rigid

and

all-pervading

state

controls

over

all

aspects of public

and private life,

was, in fact, nothing

but

a straight

copying

and translating of earlier German Kanzleiordnungen.26

And

Peter's

rough

and outspoken

style has its match

in the earthy language of the

roi sergeant.

The

didactic

 

success

of

Kanzleiordnungen

 

in

introducing

a

new

adminis-

trative

 

outlook

and

practice

may

be

inferred

from

 

the fact that half a

century

later

 

standard

authors

of treatises

of

administration

did

not

need

to go

into

as much

detail as had

Seckendorff,

for

the

procedures

had

come

to be taken for granted.27 The

process

of assimilation

was slower

in

Russia,

as may be gathered

from the

detailed

regulations

and

forms

still

prescribed

25 Volker Press,

Calvinismus

und

Territorialstaat:

Regieriung

und

Zentralbehorden

der Kur-

pfalz,

I559-16I9

 

(Stuttgart,

1970),

and for the

Russian

case, see

the

suggestive

ideas

of Michael

Cherniavsky, "The Old Believers and the

New

Religion," Slavic Review,

1i

(1966):

1-39.

 

ed.,

26 See,

 

for

instance,

the

 

Kanzleiiordnung

dated

December

 

15,

1684,

in

C.

G.

 

Appel,

Sammlung Fiirstlich-hessischer

Landesordnungen

 

und

Ausschreiben .

. .

,

pt. 3: I671-1729

(Cassel, 1770), no. 409; see also Veit Ludwig von Seckendorff, Teutscher Fiirstenstaat

(1656; rev. cd.,

Jena, 1737; rpt., Aalen, 1972),

pt. 2,

ch. 6. And see Horst

Kraemer, Der deutsche

Kleinstaat

des I7.

Jahrunderts im

Spiegel

von

Seckendorffs

'Teutscher

Fiirstenstaat'

(Darmstadt,

 

1974).

aus

der

27 For

 

example,

Christian

A. Beck,

Versuch einer

Staatspraxis

oder

Canzleiiibung

Politik,

dem

Staat-

und

Volkerrechte

 

(Vienna,

1754).

In

contrast

to Seckendorff,

see

any

of the better-known

treatises

on

Polizeiwissenschaft

by

Johann

Heinrich

Gottlob

von Justi,

Joachim

 

Georg

Darjes,

and

Joseph

von

Sonnenfels.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This content downloaded from 92.242.59.41 on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:01:02 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

 

 

 

The Well-Ordered Police

State

 

1231

by the

imperial administration

at

the

end

of

the eighteenth

century.28

In

addition,

the

same formulas

and

rules

were

repeated

each

time

a new insti-

tution

was set up, although

the basic

pattern

was supposed

to have been

set

once and for

all by the "General'nyi

reglament" of Peter

the

Great.29 The

"enlightened"

absolutism

of Frederick

II or Joseph

II, which

depended

so

much

on

administrative

guidance

and

action,

would

have been inconceiv-

able

without

this

late

 

seventeenthl-century

"rationalization"

 

 

of

chancery

procedures.

Even the notion

of the abstract interest

of the state taking prece-

dence over the prince's private

interests,

which

found

expression

in

the

well-known formula attributed

 

to Frederick

II

that

"the

king

is the

first

servant

 

of

the

state,"

had

its

antecedents

 

in

 

the

chancery

and

 

cameralist

writings

of

the

late

seventeenth

century.30

Peter

I's

similar

statements

are

but a more

explicit

and secular

expression

of sentiments

that have their

root

in the

Protestant

notion

of the

 

prince's

calling

and

Christian

obligation

 

to

the welfare of his subjects.

Of

course there was much self-serving

in

this

rhetoric,

but

its thrust

 

is

to

be

taken

seriously.

"L'etat,

c'est

moi"

did

not

mean only that "I am the

state" but also that "the state is in me," that is, I

am its fullest

expression

and

its principal

organ.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An

increasingly

 

strong

stress on the secular side of public

life

is an

oft-

noticed

characteristic of cameralism and absolutism.

The

wvell-ordered police

state was concerned

with

the promotion

of rational

organization

of all public

activity,

including

the

ecclesiastic

sphere. An interesting

 

illustration

may be

found

in the

very

beginning

of

the

eighteenth

century-long

 

 

before

the

impact

 

of

the

philosophes'

 

writings-in

 

 

the

revised

Church

 

ordinance

 

of

the principality

of

Hessen,

which,

for the

first time

since the

sixteenth

cen-

tury,

concerned

the proper

policing

of

public

worship.

 

In

 

specifying

the

order

of admission

to

 

Holy

Communion

 

the

ordinance

 

stresses

disregard

of social

and official rank. The

reason

given

is the

prevention

 

of arguments

and

quarrels

about

precedence.

But at the same time the ordinance

states

the government's

belief

in the

 

equality

of

all

 

subjects

 

before

 

God

and

the

priority

of

public

order,

so that

precedence

 

should

 

be

based

 

only

on

a

person's

proximity

to

the

altar, with

no

consideration

 

to

status

 

or

rank.32

This

detail, though

admittedly

 

minor,

is notable

since

 

we may

infer

that

in

28 For

example,

order of

A. A. Viazemskii,

Sept. 13, 1784, Central State

 

Archiives of

Old

Charters

in Moscow (hereafter TsGADA), fond

248, no. 6,570,

fols.

8-12.

 

 

sobranzie zakonot3

29 "General'nyi

reglament"

 

(General

Regulation),

Feb. 28,

1720,

in

Polnoe

Rossiiskoi

imperii

(Complete

Collection

of Laws of the Russian Empire),

 

1st

ser. (hereafter

PSZ)

(St.

Petersburg,

1830), vol.

6,

no.

3,534.

dates back to the Reformation.

Seckendorff,

30 And,

of course, the religious motivation

Teutscher

Fiirstenstaat,

and

von

Rohr,

Einleitung

zur

Staats-Klugheit,

give

good

 

formulations.

Their

near contemporary, Jacob

Dopler, still puts the religious motivation

in

almost

medieval

terms

in

Treuer

Herr

/

Treuer

Knecht

(Leipzig,

1694).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31 Fritz

Hartung,

"L'etat

c'est

moi,"

Historische

Zeitschrift,

169

(1949):

1-30.

 

 

 

 

 

 

32 Church ordinance,

Nov. 24, 1702, in Appel, Saminlung

Fiirstlichl-hessiscller Landesordnungen,

1no. 571.

The

ideas

of

religious

toleration

and

the

noninterference

into

basic

Church

matters

by even

the pious ruler are well

developed

by von

Rohr, Einleitung

zur Staats-Klughleit,

260-63.

This content downloaded from 92.242.59.41 on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:01:02 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

1232

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marc

Raeff

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

earlier

regulations

it was taken

for granted

that precedence

would

be based

on traditional

status. The

close

similarity

with

Peter

I's legislation

in replac-

ing

traditional

hierarchies

by

a

more

mechanical

and

rational

"Table

of

Ranks" readily springs to mind.33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Similarly it was thought

that

the state should be concerned

about

 

educat-

ing

its ftuture citizens,

 

especially

 

its future administrators.34

It

is no

accident

that in view of their need for new parish clergy the Protestant

princes

took

the

initiative

in

creating

universities

 

in

German

lands. As a result,

the

six-

teenth

and especially

the

seventeenth

 

centuries

witnessed

the

emergence

of

the

university-trained

 

official

as the

principal

adviser

to

the ruler.35 While

in Catholic countries

the

public

role

of

the uiniversities

was on

the

decline,

the

Protestant

universities

were

modernizing

(aggiornamento

would

be

the

fitting, word) their programs to provide

training

not

only

for their

pastors

but for their jurists, physicians,

and

scholars

as well.

In

this manner,

by the

end of the seventeenth

century

 

many leading

universities

 

had become

major

avenues

for the modernization

 

of public

life.36 The

high

 

point

of this devel-

opment

was the

founding

of the

University

of

Halle-specifically

 

the estab-

lishment

of

a

chair

in

cameral

studies-to

 

prepare

students

for

the

vita

activa

in public

affairs

while

imbuing

 

them

with the

ethical

and

 

spiritual

values

of Pietism

and with their

responsibilities

as leaders

and

teachers. The

Pietist

foundation

in

Halle

stimulated

 

the reform of other

universities,

par-

ticularly

at Leipzig

and Frankfurt

an der

Oder

and paved

the

way for

the

new creation

of G6ttingen.

All

of

these

universities

were

to become

impor-

tant centers of natural law doctrines

as expounded

by Christian

Thomasius

and Christian Wolff and of the subsequent

 

German Aiifkldrung.37

 

 

 

 

We note that this development

in

 

German

intellectual

life

has a seven-

teenth-centtury

origin;

 

the university

 

ordinances

for Marbuirg, for

instance,

show an awareness of the need

for professional

training

for

state

 

service.38

If

we

compare

 

the

language

of these

Hessian

university

ordinances

with

33 "Tabel' o rangakh" (Table

of

Ranks),

Jan. 24, 1722,

in

PSZ, vol. 6,

no.

3,890.

 

 

 

 

 

34

For example, consider the creation of a collegium

illustre

in Tuibingen,

Marburg, and Cassel;

and for the less well-known

academic

gymnasium

at

Zerbst,

see Franz

Kindscher,

"Das

hoch-

fiirstlichie anhaltische akademische

Gesammtgymnasium

zu Zerbst

unter

Kannengiesser

(1662-

1680)," in

Mittheilungen

des

Vereins

fiur anhaltische

Geschichte

und

Alterthumskunde,

vol. 6,

pt. 2 (1892):

284-301.

 

may

be

gleaned

 

from

the

several

essays collected

in Guinther Franz,

ed.,

35

Interesting

data

 

Beamtentum und

Pfarrertum, 1400-I800

 

(Limburg

an der

Lahn,

1972), and in

Helmut Rdssler

and Gunther Franz, eds., Universitiit

 

und

Gelehrtenstand

(Limburg

an

der

Lahn,

1970). For

legal education

at

universities, see

first of all

histories of

the major

universities;

see

also

Erich

Dohring, Geschichte der deutschen Rechtspflege (Berlin,

1953), and Alfred de Curzon, L'enseigne-

nent du droit fran!(ais dans

les

universite's de France

aux

XVIIe

et

XVIIIe siecles

(Paris,

1920).

36 For the situation

in Hessen, see Wolfgang

Metz, "Das Eindringen

des Burgertums

in die hes-

sische Zentralverwaltung,"

 

typescript

(Gottingen,

1947).

 

 

 

 

 

(Polizeiwvissenschlaft): Ein

37 Hans Maier, Die altere deutsche

Staats-

und Verwaltungslehre

Beitrag zur Geschichte der politischen

 

W'issenschaft in

Deutschland)

(Neuwied,

1966); Notker

Hammerstein, Jus und Historie: Ein

 

Beitrag

 

zur

Geschichte

des

historischen

Denkens an

deutschen

Universitdten

im

spaten

I7.

und

im

 

I8.

Jahrhundert

(Gottingen, 1972).

 

 

 

 

 

38

University

ordinance,

 

1684, in

Appel,

Sammlung

Furstlich-hessischer

Landesordnungen,

no.

410.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This content downloaded from 92.242.59.41 on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:01:02 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Well-Ordered Police State

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1233

that

of

later Russian

edicts

on education

we

detect

an

unmistakable

simi-

larity in

tone.

True,

in

the

 

Russian

case

stress is on

the

development

of

"4useful"

noble

subjects,

as

well

 

as

trained

 

personnel,

 

while

at Marburg

there still is an emphasis

on

the

preparation

of pastors. But we must not

forget the secular functions of the Protestant

minister,

especially

in the coun-

tryside. And we are again on familiar

territory

when we compare the Hessian

ordinances

with some

 

of

the

proposals

for

reforming

ecclesiastical

schools

and the training

of priests in the reign

of Catherine

11.39The

time

lag should

not surprise us in view

of Russia's

condition.

We

clearly

are in

the

presence

of a continuum

in

time

for over

a century

 

and

in space

from

the Rhine

to

the

Volga,

rather than

of discrete

periods

and

regions

 

defined

in

terms

of

the spread of the ideas of the French Enlightenment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Even a hasty perusal

of collections

of

police

ordinances

indicates

that

the

major

elements

of what

we

usually

subsume

under

Enlightenment

notions

were, in the latter decades of the seventeenth

century,

being

introduced

prag-

matically,

in competition

to the earlier

regulatory

and

directive

approaches.

Thus, for instance, we note rational persuasion and

appeal to

individual

initiative and self-interest in

the

Hessian

regulations

concerning

reforesta-

tion

and

the planting

 

of

fruit trees.40 Similar

elements

 

of

freedom

of

indi-

vidual

activity

as a prerequisite

of

individual

 

self-development

 

can be

de-

tected

in legislation

affecting

 

such

areas as health,

military

recruitment,

and

the

regulation

of trades

and

crafts. To

be

sure,

in

every

case

the

political

unit

is rather limited,

 

and it is still conceived

as part of a system of separate

and discrete units rather than as part of an all-European

polity,

or

even

humanity

as a whole,

 

as was

the

case

in the

second

half

of

the

eighteenth

century.4'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As a rule the German ordinances

concerning

the police

(in the seventeenth-

and

eighteenth-century

 

sense of the term, of

course) relied for their imple-

mentation

on

existing

corporate

bodies

and

functionaries

or

on

officials

already

in

place. And

 

if

a new

office was

created, it was

usually

staffed

by

someone

representing

 

the corporate

 

or constituted

body

most

directly

af-

fected by the new regulation,

 

as for example

in the

Hessian

ordinances

con-

cerning

the French

Huguenot

refugees:

police

and judiciary

functions

with

39 On

Russian education

in the eighteenth

century,

see

in particular

Mikhail

F. Vladimirskii-

Budanov, Gosudarstvo i narodnoe obrazovanie v Rossii XVIII-go veka (The State and Public

Education in Eighteenth-Century

 

Russia) (Yaroslavl, 1874), and Pavel N.

Miliukov,

Ocherki

po

istorii

russkoi kul'tury

(Essay on

the History of Russian Culture), 3 (Paris,

1930). For ecclesiastical

schools specifically, see Petr V. Znamenskii, Dukhovnye

shkoly

v

Rossii

do

reformy

I8o8

g.

(Ecclesiastical Schools in Russia Prior to the Reforms of i8o8) (Kazan, i88i).

Catherine's notions

for the education and

role of the

parish

clergy are

briefly discussed

in my study, "The Empress

and the Vinerian Professor," Oxford Slavonic Papers, n.s. 7 (Oxford,

1974):

18-41.

 

 

in

 

40See especially the edicts of

1707, 1713, 1721,

1722,

and

1724 on the

planting

of

trees,

Hessische

Polizey

Verordnungen

 

die Hude,

Garten und

Plantagen

betreffend,

I647-I745

(n.d.,

n.p.),

not

paginated,

a partly

handwritten

collection

for

didactic

purposes.

considerer toute

 

41 A

certain August

Witzman

writes

around

1790: "Il faut pour

ainsi

 

dire

l'Europe comme une grande ville commer ante et les differents etats

comme

autant

de

magasins

de

marchandises."

Memorandum,

n.d.,

Leningrad

Section

of

Institute

 

of

History,

Academy

of

Sciences of the

USSR, Leningrad, fond

36,

no.

451,

fol.

i6o.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This content downloaded from 92.242.59.41 on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:01:02 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

1234

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marc

RaefJ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

respect

to the

reftugees were

to be

taken

care of in

part by existing

Hessian

officials and in part by functionaries

 

selected

from am-ong the French

Hugue-

nots

tlhemselves.42 A

very

different

 

sittuation

obtained

 

in

Russia,

especially

with the regular police functions

that had already been

developed

in 'Western

and Central

European states. Introducing

modern

administration

and police,

the Petrine

state had to create new

 

officials for the

purpose. True,

they were

frequently

 

drawn

from

the social grotup most directly

 

affected

by

the

legis-

lation,43 but

it

was a compulsory

 

draft

that

 

transformed

them

into

virtual

state servants and made them responsible

for

the

actions

of

their

fellows.

The

paradoxical

consequence

was that there

 

was, simultaneously,

a delay

in

the

formation

of a

professional

 

bureauicracy

for

the

local

instittutions

and

the

prevention

 

of

the restructuring

of

social

groups

 

along

self-governing,

corporate

principles.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In essence, Peter I and his successors were closely

 

following

the

model

offered to them by the

police

 

ordinances

of

the

German

states.

But

the

interesting

 

differences

in

 

the

 

consequiences

and

subsequent

 

evolution

stemmed from the means that

were

at

the

disposal

of

the

Russian rulers.

The

explanation

was not in the more

impulsive,

direct,

and brutally

coercive

Russian wvays.The

main

point

 

is that the

Russian sovereigns could

not

rely

on

those social resources that were available

to

their

European

models,

largely

as a result

of sixteenth-century

policies

and

 

development.44

They

had

to create

the

social

matrix,

 

which

already

existed

in

the

West,

as well

as the

instruments,

as

did

their

 

models,

in

order

to

 

make

their

reforms

stick.

But

 

in

pursuing

both

ends

they

undermined

 

the

effective

growth

potential

of

each.

In Central

 

Europe

the

old

estates

were firmly

set

and

could be put to use, even though

in

the

final

analysis

the

new

policies

and

developments

were to threaten

 

their nature and very survival. But

in Russia

the

old "estates,"

to

the

extent

 

that

they

existed

at all,45 could

not

be

used,

42

Hessian ordinances concerning Huguenot refugees,

i688

and

Oct.

13,

1700,

in

 

Appel,

Sammilung Fiirstlich-hessischer

Landesordmangen,

nos. 437, 439,

531.

These may be

contrasted

to the bureaucratic approach of Catherine in setting up a chanceiy

for

the guardianship of

foreign

settlers. "Kantseliariia

po

opekunstvu

inostrannykh

kolonistov,"

July

22,

1763,

in

PSZ,

vol.

i6,

no.

ii,88i.

merchants

were

selected

for membership

in

the

Glavnyi

Magistrat,

a

sort

43

For example,

of city

council.

See

"Reglament

 

ili

ustav

Glavno-go Magistrata"

(Regulation

or Statute

of

the

Main Magistracy), Jan. i6, 1721,

 

in PSZ, vol. 6, no.

3,708.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and

Max Seycdel,

44

Herman Rehm, "Die rechtliche Natur

des Staatsdienstes,"

in Georg

Hirth

eds.,

Annalen

des

deutschen

Reiches, vol. 17, nos. 10-12

 

(Munich,

1884):

565-792;

Georg

von

Below, "Die Neuorganisation der Verwaltung

in den deutschen

Territorien

des

i6. Jahrhunderts,"

in his Territoriuni

 

und

Stadt

(2d

ed.;

Munich,

1923), 194-208; Heinz

Dollinger,

Stiudien zur

Finanzreforin

Maximnilians I von

Bayern

in

den jahren

1598-I6I8:

 

 

Ein

Beitrag

zurGesclhichte

des Friihabsolutism Us

(G6ttingen,

1968).

Russia,

see, for example,

J. L. Keep,

"The

Moscovite

45

On

the

vexed

question of

estates

in

Elite

and the Approach to Pluralism," Slavonic and East

Eauropean Review,

47

(1970):

201-31;

Guinther Stokl, "Gab es im

Moskauer

Staat

St3nde?"

 

jahrbicher

 

fJiT Geschiichlte Osteuropas,

11 (i963): 321-42;

 

and, most

impressively, Hans-Joachim Torke,

Die

staatsbedingte

Gesellschaft

iin Moskauer Reich: Zar unizdZemlja in

der altrussischeuz Herrschaftszerfassung,

I6I3-I689

(Leiden,

1974).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This content downloaded from 92.242.59.41 on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:01:02 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

FULL PRACTICAL

The Well-Ordered Police State

1235

and it was necessaryto create a social matrix from which the ministers of the new administrative apparatus might be drawn. If the problem was not entirely clear to Peter I, it was to become quite obvious to his later successors.

THE FORMULATION of the principal aspirations and thrust of what we are wont to call the well-ordered police state can be found not only in the words and deeds of such energetic rulers as Frederick William I of Prussia46 but also in a treatise that was widely read and used by administratorsthroughout the eighteenth century. It is the firsttreatise on police (in the early eighteenth-century meaning of the term) by Nicolas de LaMare.47 First it should be noted that de LaMare acknowledges fully the debt contemporary police notions and practices owed to medieval precedents. He sees a straight line of development in police legislation from the early Valois rulers to Louis XIV, and in a sense the well-ordered police state is for him little more than the medieval urban community writ large on a territorial scale. LaMare correctly underscored the atomized nature of the contemporary system of states with each state a self-contained, autarkical unit. But he also gave expression to the more modern, dynamic conceptions of government that had been introduced in the seventeenth century, pragmatically in France, more systematically in the German states. The purpose of all government is to, maximize resources and unfold the potential of energies of a nation, and to this end the government should have concern for the general welfare, both spiritual and material, of the population. Police is the mneansby which this goal is best pursued.48But the implication clearly seems to be that where the pattern of traditional institutions has broken down or is nonexistent, the function of police is to create or re-create it; this was the voluntaristic implication and modern thrust to be derived from

a reading of the

Traite' de police.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46

R. A. Dorwart,

The Administrative Reforms

 

of Frederick William I of Prussia (Cambridge,

Mass., 1953); Dorwart, The Prussian

Welfare State

before 1740

(Cambridge,

Mass., 1971). For

the

broader context of the baroque world, see

Hinrichs, Friedrich

Wilhelm

I.

 

47

Nicolas de LaMare, Traite de police

(Paris,

1722;

2d ed.,

expanded,

Amsterdam,

1729).

48

"J'ay ensuite

montre que son [poilice] unique

objet

consiste a conduire

lthomme a sa plus par-

faite

felicite dont

il

puisse jouir en

cette

vie.

.

.

On y decouvre

en

meme temps

combien

cette Police que nous suivons a de conformit6 avec les Loix du Droit naturel et qui ont com-

menc6 d'etre suivies des le premier

Age du

monde.

. .

. Les Loix . . . ont la droite raison

pour

cause efficiente,

le bonheur

des Peuples,

le

bien et le

repos des Etats pour fin. Les

Loix

n'ont

pas seulement

pour

objet

de

punir

les

vices, mais

encore d'exciter h la

pratique de

toutes

les

vertus."

De LaMare,

Traite

de police (2d ed.), preface, pp. 4, 240. And

note a

later

statement,

derived

from de LaMare, of much more sweeping import: "La police . . . renferme l'universalite

des soins relatifs a l'administration

du

bien

public, le

choix et

l'emploi

des moyens

propres a

le procurer, a l'accroitre, a le perfectionner.

Elle

est,

on peut

le dire,

la science de

gouverner

les hommes et de leur faire du bien, la maniere

de les rendre, autant qu'il est possible,

ce

qu'ils doivent etre pour l'inte&r&general de la

soci&et." J. B. Ch. LeMaire,

"La

police

de

Paris en 1770: Memoire redige par les ordres de

Mr. de Sartine," in A. Gazier, ed.,

Memoires

de la societe de l'histoire de Paris et

de

l'Ile

de France,

5 (Paris,

1879): 27-28.

 

 

 

 

This content downloaded from 92.242.59.41 on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:01:02 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

1236

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marc

Raeff

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Catherine

II of

Russia

was one

of

the treatise's readers.49 It

is interesting

to note

 

the

way she

approached

the

problem

of

a well-ordered

 

police

state

and

in what manner

she differed

in doing so from

her imperial

predecessor

Peter

I. Catherine

II is frequently

seen

as one

of the

exemplars

of enlight-

ened

absolutism,

 

the

enlightenment

 

elements

being

inferred

 

from

 

the

rhetoric of her famous instruction

to

the commission

 

on

legislation

(1767)

and

her correspondence

with

Voltaire

 

and

Baron

Grimni.

 

But

with

equal

justification,

 

to

my

mind,

she

may

be

ranked

among

the

great cameralist

rulers,

alongside

the

late

seventeenth-

 

and early

eighteenth-century

German

princes

from whom

she stemmed,

 

but

with

some

interesting

 

qualifications.50

In

her

legislation

we

find

the logical

extension

of

a

social policy

paving

the

way

for

modernization

while

 

also

displaying

all

the

ambiguities

of

the

Polizeistaat

approach.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The

 

well-known,

but

still

inadequately

 

studied,

"Ustav

blagochiniia"

(1782), echoes the approach of an earlier

century

while

also

drawing

on

more recent German models.51 Like its earlier sixteenth-century

German

antecedents,

it has a strong

moralistic

bias

indicating

 

the

ruler's

awareness

of a

special

responsibility

for

the

spiritual

well-being

and

progress

of

her

subjects.

 

In

Catherine's

statute

 

there

is

a

combination

 

of

moral

obiter

dicta

and of modern

Western

European

and scriptural

precepts,

a combina-

tion

we

find

readily

duplicated

in the

ordinances

of

Protestant

princes

in

the

age of Reformation.

While

conceivably

some of

the

language

of

Cath-

erine's didactic section-the

 

 

so-called

"Mirror"-may

 

have

indeed

been

derived

from

de

LaMare,

in

this

respect

the

latter

also

reflects

an

earlier

tradition.52

As a matter

of

fact,

Catherine's

"Mirror"

is a worthy

successor

of the moral and didactic

preambles

and

disquisitions

to

be

found

in

the

legislation

 

of

Peter

I, and

it would

seem to

indicate

that

neither

ruler

nor

ruled in Russia had progressed

very

far since

the early eighteenth

century.

In the rather

comprehensive

articles

of the "Ustav

blagochiniia"

concern-

ing

the

policing

of towns, Catherine

followed

cameralist

ideas and the

prac-

49

Vladimnir Grigor'ev,

"Zertsalo

upravy

blagochiniia

(epizod

iz

istorii

Ustava

blagochiniia

1782 g.)" (The

Mirror of

the Police

Administration [An Episode

from the

History

of the

Police

Statute]),

Russkii istoricheskii

zhurnal

(Russian

Historical

Journial),

1917, nos.

3-4,

pp.

73-103.

50 On Catherine's sources for her instruction,

see Catherine II, Nakaz

inperalritsy

Ekateriny

II,

dannyi

kommnissii o

sochinenii

proekta

novogo

ulozheniia

(The

Instruction

of

Empress

Catherine II to the Commission on the Compilation

of

a Proposed

Ncw

Law Code), ed. N. D.

Chechulin

(St. Petersburg,

1907),

and

F.

V.

Taranovskii,

"Politicheskaia

doktrina

v

nakaze

imperatritsy Ekateriny II" (The Political

Doctrine

in

the

Instruction

 

of

Empress

Catherine

II), in M. N. Iasinskii, ed., Sbornik stat'ei po istorii prava, posveshchennye

M. F. Vladimirskonzu-

Budanovu

(Collection

of Articles on the History of Law Dedicated to M. F. Vladimirskii-Budanov)

(Kiev,

1904),

44-86.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in PXYZ,vol.

 

 

 

 

15,379.

 

 

51 "Ustav

blagochiniia"

(Statute

on

Police),

Apr. 8,

1782,

21, no.

Police

52 Article 41 of the "Statute oii Police" (include(l

in

section

D,

"Instrwuctions to the

Administration")

is

generally

called zertsalo

(or

"Mirror"),

in

imitation

of the moral-didactic

genre of

the Fiirstenspiegel.

It contains general

moral

injunctions

and rules

of civilized

behavior.

Catherine's

sour-ces for this

section

are

discussed

by

Grigor'ev,

"Zertsalo

upravy blagocliiniia."

In

my

opinion,

Grigor'ev

focuses

too

narrowly on possible

verbatim

borrowvings from de

LaMare's TraitWde police.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This content downloaded from 92.242.59.41 on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:01:02 UTC

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

The

Well-Ordered Police State

1237

tice of seventeenth-century

German ordinances.55 The

"Ustav blagochiniia,"

as it attempts to regulate

and supervise all aspects of urban life, lhas the

same

comprehensiveness;

it also

exhibits

the

same

intention

 

to

provide

security and

to

maximize

the

creative

potential

of the

urban

 

population,

so that it can play its assigned

role

in

the

total

economy

 

of

the

state. On

the other hand, the Russian statute

has an inordinately

long section

(almost

one-half of the

articles)

detailing

the

punishments

 

for

 

every

 

infraction

of the rules. To enable

the

urban

population

to

play

its

constructive

role,

Catherine

 

attempted

to

lay

the

foundations

of

a gild

 

system.54 In

so doing

she followed

German

 

models,

in

particular

by assigning

urban

police

func-

tions to the gilds, as did the administrative

statute

of

Berlin

of Frederick

II.

The towns

and cities

were

to be subdivided

into

districts

and

qla,rtiers,

with

a hierarchy

of police

functionaries

for each and auxiliaries

to be drawn

from

the

local

population.

 

But

here

we

encounter

an

essential

difference:

 

while

for the setup in Berlin

Frederick

II relied

on existing

gild

functionaries

 

and

the

traditional

system

of

corporate

 

participation

in

the

police,

 

there

were

no such bodies in Russia.55

The

Russian

police

officials

had

to

be

drafted

from

the

population

 

in

a

way

strongly

reminiscent

 

of

 

the

sluzhba

 

(com-

pulsory state service) practices of

Muscovite

and

Petrine

times

 

that

offered

no

counterpart

advantages

to

those

impressed

 

and

straightjacketed

 

them

in

the

rigid

network

of

state

service.56 It

also

made

the

police

 

very

costly,

while

 

subjecting

it

to

excessive

 

bureaucratization

and

 

centralized

state

control.57

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The

reason for this approach

is not far to seek, and it brings

us to, a second

vital

aspect

of

Catherine's

legislation.

It

is

precisely

 

the

corporate

bodies

and

autonomous

social

institutions-Montesquieu's

 

 

famous

corps

inter-

merdiaires-that

provided

the essential

framework

for cameralism

 

and police

in

Central

and

Western

Europe and that were most

conspicuously

absent

in Russia. Russian rulers, Peter

I as well

as Catherine

II,

were

well

aware

of

this

absence.

Peter

I's heavy-handed

 

efforts

at forcing

merchants

to

con-

53

Catherine

also

planned

a

police statute for the countryside (i.e.,

the

state

peasants).

It

was

not

implemented

in

full,

though

it

affected

some

lo;cal legislation

in

the

Ukraine.

See

"Proekt

imperatritsy

Ekateriny

II

oh

ustroistve

svobodnykh

sel'skikh

obyvatelei"

(The

Project

of Empress

Catherine

II

concerning

the

Administration of

Free Rural

Inhabitants),

ed.

V. I.

Veshniakov,

in

Sbornik imnperatorskogo russkogo

istoricheskogo

obslhchestva

(Collection

of

the

Imper-ial Russian Historical

Society),

20

(St. Petersburg, 1877): 447-98.

 

 

 

 

 

1785, in

 

 

54 "Zhalovannaia gi-amota gorodam" (Charter Granted to the

TownIs), Apr. 21,

 

PSZ,

vol. 22,

no. i6,i88.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55"0

 

sochinenii

reglamenta

politsii"

(On

Drafting

the

Regulation

for

Police),

Oct. 23,

1763,

TsGADA, fond

248, bk. 3,411, n10.45, fol. 936-42.

See also I. T. Tarasov,

"Istoriia russkoi politsii i

otnosheniiia

eia

k iustitsii"

(The

History of the Russian Police and Its Relationship

to Justice),

Iuridiclieskii

 

Vestnik

(Judicial

Courier),

i6

(1884):

nos.

2-4,

pp.

 

177-212,

383-411,

551-74.

56

'Ustav

blagochiniia,'

section B.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57 For

instance, implementing

the

Uprava

Blagochiniia,

 

the

police

a(dministration,

in

Tula-

Kaluga

cost

27,728 rubles,

 

 

 

kopecks, a very large sum for the time and for administrative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8o1V2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

anid Ryazan'

expenses. "Report of Governor-General Mikhail Krechetnikov

on the Kaluga, Tula,

Provinces, 1774-91: Report on the Establishment

of Police

Administrations

in Tula

and Kaluga,"

n.d., TsGADA,

razriad i6,

no. 729,

pt. 2, fols.

1o-11.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This content downloaded from 92.242.59.41 on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:01:02 UTC

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

1 238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mllarc Raeff

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

stitute corporations

to perform the many services that

the

state

demanded

from

them-for

 

 

example,

 

the

 

Glavnyi

 

Magistrat-resulted

 

 

 

in

failure.

The

 

most

 

energetic

and progressive urban elements withdrew

 

and

avoided

the newvinstitutions,

wvhile the administrative

bodies

of the cities

were

trans-

formed

into

the

reluctant

agents

of

the bureaucracy,

losing

 

their

 

spirit of

enterprise

 

and

social

 

autonomy.58

Catherine

 

II

had,

therefore,

 

to

return

to the task; to implement

 

her

"Ustav

blagochiniia,"

as

well

as

to

create

the socioinstitutional

 

matrix

for the modernization

of Russia's

economic

and

cultural

life

that

she

 

aimed

for,

she

had

to

develop

estates.

This

was

the

main

thrust

of

her

two

charters

 

of

1785,

to

the

nobility

and

to

the

towns,

as well

as of the third

 

charter,

planned

 

and drafted

but

never

implemented,

for the state peasants.59 All

of

these

legislative

acts

aimed

at

 

stimulating

local

administrative

 

participation

 

and

responsibility

by providing

 

security

and a corporate

structure

 

for the urban and noble

sectors

of

society.60

 

In

the

short

run,

from

the

point

of

view

I am

considering,

 

Catherine's

legislation

 

did

have

some

success. It helped

to

promote

the

estate

 

organiza-

tion

and

participation

 

on

the

local

level

and

made possible

 

the

extension

of Polizeiordnming

to all

urban

centers

as well

as to some

significant

aspects

of country

life. But

the

ambiguity

of

the

enterprise

soon

became

apparent:

tlhe effort

to create

by

the

sovereign's

fiat and

legislation

an

estate

 

structure

capable

of

autonomous

life

foundered

 

on

the

state's

maintenance

 

of direc-

tion

and

control.6'

This

in

turn

 

meant

handicapping

 

the

development

of

individual

 

initiative

and autonomous

action

on the part of estate institutions.

And if this was indeed

the

case,

the

entire

conception

of

both

cameralism

and

enlightened

absolutism--that

 

 

is,

 

the

state's

fostering

of

progress

and

modernization-was

 

 

put

in

question.

The

equivocal

results

of

this concep-

tion

were

 

fully

experienced

by

 

Josepl

II

in

hiis realm,

for

 

his

imposition

of

a

uniform

and

rational pattern provoked the resistance

of

those

very

constituted

bodies

whose

 

creative

energies

he

would

have

wanted

 

to

foster.

In any event, and paradoxically

perhaps, the interventionist

 

and active

policy

of

the

cameralist

Polizeistaat

and

enlightened

absolutism,

 

whether

it relied

on

existing

estate

structures

or tried

to develop

them,

resulted

 

in

a greater

58 Aleksandr

A. Kizevetter,

Posadskaia

obshchina

v

Rossii

XVIII

stoletiia

 

(The

Urban

Com-

munie in

Eighteenth

Century

Russia)

(Moscow,

 

1903).

 

 

 

 

 

Nobility),

Apr. 21,

1785, in

59

"Zihalovannaia gramota

dvorianstvu"

(Charter

Granted to the

PSZ, vol. 22,

no.

i6,187; "'Zhalovanniaia gramota

gorodam";

"Proekt

imperatritsy

Ekateriniy II

ob ustroistve svobodnykh scl'skikh obyvatelci." A detailed analysis

of

the

composition

and

souIrces of the charter to towns was madei by Aleksan(dr A. Kizevetter, Gorodovoe

I)olozhenie

Ekateriny

II

1785

g. Opyt

istoricheskogo

kommentariia

(The

Urban

Statute

of

Catherine II

in 1785: An Essay in Historical

Commentary)

(Moscow,

ioo).

For

an

originial interpretation

of Catherinc's

social

legislation,

see Dietrich Geyer, "Gesellschaft als

staatliche

 

V'cranistaltung,"

jahrbucher

 

ffir Geschichlte

Osteuropas,

 

14 (1966): 21-50.

 

I

follow

an(d illustrate

further

Pro-

fessor Gcyer's

argument

in

"The

Empress

anid tlhc Vinerian

Professor'."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60Robert E. Jones, The

Emancipation

of

the

Russian

Nobility, 1762-1785

 

 

(Prillcetoll, 1973).

61 For

the

nobility

the

story

has bcen told by Sergei

A. Korf,

Dvorianstvo

 

i ego

soslovnoe

upravlentie za

stoletie

I762-I885

 

gg.

(The

Nobility

andl Its

Corporate

Administration

for the

Century

1762-1855)

(St. Petersburg,

i9o06).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This content downloaded from 92.242.59.41 on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:01:02 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

 

 

 

 

 

The

WI'ell-Ordered Police

State

 

 

 

 

1239

awareness on the part of the

members

of

society

of

the

desirability

of

maximizing

their

own

creative

 

energies.

This

led

to

the

transformation

of traditional

status

solidarities

into

an emerging

class-consciousness

deter-

mined

by individual

self-interest

 

and

active economic

and cultural

involve-

ment. In turn, it stimulated

questioning

of

the

legitimacy

 

of absolutism

and cameralism, while

at the same time

pushing

society

and its active

mem-

bers

onto the road

of

modernity

and

individualism.62

 

 

 

 

 

 

As THE

PRECEDING

REMARKS

have

made

clear,

it

is diffictult to

break

up

the

web

of

administrative

history

 

into

discrete,

sharply

defined

periods:

the

web

is seemless, and a specific

pattern arises out

of the

immanent

dynamics

of ends and means set long before. Some key ideas that we associate with

modernity

and ascribe to the Enlightenment

came into existence

and reached

practical significance long before the impact of the writings

of the philosophes.

Such, for example,

is the notion

of felicity. The

eudaemonism

of seventeenth-

century cameralism and police contained

in

nmice this

notion

of

general

welfare

and

happiness,

only

at that time

both

welfare

and

happiness

 

were

considered

to

be the means for the attainment

of the

primary

aim

of

any

polity:

the

maximizing

of

potential

energies

to

further

the

power,

inde-

pendence,

and

influence

of

the state. What

may

be

called

the

"enlighten-

ment

amendment"

to

this

conception

was

the transformation

of

felicity

from

a mere

instrument

of

a

transcendental

political

goal

into an

end

to

be achieved

for

its own

sake. Furthermore-especially

 

in

France,

less

so

in Gerinany whose Auifkldrung retained

much

of

the

earlier

communal

outlook-the

 

stress was put

on

the felicity

of the

individual,

 

leading

up

to

the Utilitarian

slogan of the greatest happiness

for the greatest

number.

 

This

individualistic

emplhasis

fostered

a

"possessive

individualism"

 

that

 

gave

priority

to

the

pursuit

of

private

material

interest over the general welfare

of the community.

Politically

it

legitimized

resistance

to

the

claims

of

the

state (or ruler) and fostered the resort to

a new rhetoric.

This

rhetoric,

in

turn,

generated

attitudes

that

eventually

 

endowed

modernization

 

with

its

contemporary

dynamic

force and transmuted

it into

a transcendent

absolute

that

became

a normative

standard,

similar

to the

abstract

notions

of justice

embodied

in modern codes of law.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In one respect, at least, the enlightened

 

despots

crowned

the

work

begun

by their cameralist predecessors. The quantity

of

ordinances

had

grown

to

such

an extent

that they

threatened

 

to

stifle

the proper operation

 

of

the

very

institutions

 

they

regulated.

 

With

the

readjustments

of

borders

and

the

expansion

 

of

economic

units

there

 

was great need for regular and

uniform procedures to facilitate a freer flow of goods

and to provide

security

62 The

implicit

 

mniodel was

England.

But

what

 

seems

to

have

bceii

therc an

autonomiious

social

developmenit

was

the

ircsult

of

state

policy

on

the

Conitinent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This content downloaded from 92.242.59.41 on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:01:02 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]