Page 22 ETR 364 (GSM 03.30 version 5.0.0): November 1996
Annex C: Path Loss vs Cell Radius
|
220 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
Suburban |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
Urban |
|
(dB) |
170 |
|
|
|
Urban Indoor |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
loss |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
path |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rural (quasi open) |
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rural (open) |
|
110 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
1 |
10 |
100 |
Cell radius (km)
Figure1: Path loss vs Cell Radius, BS height = 50 m, MS height = 1.5 m (GSM 900)
|
220 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
180 |
Suburban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
Urban |
|
(dB) |
|
|
|
160 |
Urban indoor |
|
|
|
|
||
loss |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
Path |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rural (quasi open) |
|
120 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rural (open) |
|
100 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
1 |
10 |
100 |
Cell radius (km)
Figure 2: Path loss vs Cell Radius, BS height = 100 m, MS height = 1.5 m (GSM 900)
Page 23 ETR 364 (GSM 03.30 version 5.0.0): November 1996
Page 24
ETR 364 (GSM 03.30 version 5.0.0): November 1996
|
220 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
Rural indoor (quasi open) |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
180 |
Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
Urban indoor |
|
(dB) |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
Loss |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
Path |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Rural (quasi open) |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
Rural (open) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
1 |
10 |
100 |
|
|
Cell Radius ( km) |
|
Figure 3: Path loss vs Cell Radius, Urban BS height = 50 m, Rural BS height = 60 m, MS height = 1.5 m (DCS 1800)
P a t h
l o s s
d B
1 7 0 .0
1 6 0 .0
D C S 1 800 (m etropo lita n cen tres)
1 5 0 .0
1 4 0 .0
1 3 0 .0 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
1 2 0 .0 |
G S M 90 0 |
|
|
||
1 1 0 .0 |
D C S 180 0 (m e dium sized cities |
|
a nd su burb an cen tre s) |
||
|
||
1 0 0 .0 |
|
|
|
0 .1 0 .5 1 .0 3 .0 C e ll R ad iu s (km )
Figure 4: Path loss vs Cell Radius for small cells (see section 3.4.2)
Page 25 ETR 364 (GSM 03.30 version 5.0.0): November 1996