Molecular Sieves - Science and Technology - Vol. 6 - Characterization II / 06-Isomorphous Substitution in Zeolites
.pdf
Table 1 (continued)
Zeolite |
Substituting |
Synthesis |
Si/T or |
Techniques of |
Precursors |
Refs. |
||||
|
element |
|
T content |
characterization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
MFI |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
25 |
TA, XPS, Catalysis |
GaO(OH) |
|
[96] |
|||
MFI |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
280 |
TPD, C3H8 oxidation |
Ga(NO3)3 |
|
[103] |
|||
MFI |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
30 |
IR, ESR, C3H8 aromatization |
Ga2(SO4 )3 |
|
[106] |
|||
MFI |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
30–180 |
Acidity, Catalysis |
Ga(NO3)3 |
|
[107] |
|||
MFI |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
18–21 × 1019 atom. g–1 |
Diffusion of benzene |
|
|
|
|
|
[108] |
MFI |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
39–212 |
XRD, SEM, ion exchange |
Ga2(SO4 )3 |
|
[109] |
|||
MFI |
Ga |
Exchange |
1.7 wt % Ga |
XRD, TA, Catalysis |
Ga2O3 |
|
|
[110] |
||
MFI |
Ga |
Impregnation |
2, 4, 6 wt % Ga |
Catalysis |
Ga(NO3)3 |
|
[111] |
|||
MFI |
Ga |
Exchange |
(1.80 wt %) 3–18 |
Catalysis |
NaGaO2 |
|
|
[112] |
||
MFI |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
38, 61, 127 |
FAAS: framework and |
Ga(NO3)3 |
|
[113] |
|||
|
|
|
|
extra-framework Ga |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFI |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
Si/Ga=50 |
NMR, TPD, SEM, Catalysis |
|
|
|
|
|
[114] |
MFI |
Ga |
Exchange |
|
XPS, IR |
Ga2O3 + NaOH |
[115] |
||||
MFI |
Ga2O3 |
Mechanical |
5–25 wt % |
Catalysis |
|
|
|
|
|
[116] |
MFI |
Ga |
Hydrothermal or |
|
ESR, 71Ga NMR, 29Si NMR, |
Ga |
O |
|
|
[117] |
|
|
|
Modification |
|
Catalysis |
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
MFI |
V |
Hydrothermal |
270 |
TPD, C3H8 oxidation |
VCl3 |
|
|
|
[103] |
|
MFI |
V |
Hydrothermal |
Si/V=50 |
UV-Vis, Catalysis |
|
|
|
|
|
[118] |
MFI |
V |
Hydrothermal |
|
UV-Vis, EPR, NMR, IR, Raman |
V2O5 , NH4 VO3, |
[119] |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
NaVO3, VO(OPri)3, |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
VO(acac)2 |
|
|
|||
MFI(VS1) |
V |
Hydrothermal |
95.977/0.023 |
ESR, ESEM |
VOSO4 |
|
|
[120–122] |
||
MFI |
V |
Hydrothermal or |
|
ESR, 51V NMR, 29Si NMR, |
VCl |
; V |
O |
5 |
[117] |
|
|
|
Modification |
|
Catalysis |
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zeolites in Substitution Isomorphous
375
Table 1 (continued)
Zeolite |
Substituting |
Synthesis |
Si/T or |
Techniques of |
Precursors |
Refs. |
|
|
element |
|
T content |
characterization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFI |
V |
Hydrothermal |
29.41 mmol (100 g)–1 |
ESR, Catalysis |
VOCl3 |
|
[123] |
MFI |
V |
Hydrothermal |
42 |
ESR, IR, adsorption catalysis |
VO(COO)2 |
[124] |
|
MFI |
V |
Hydrothermal |
98, 120 |
ESR, 51V-, 29Si NMR, EPMA |
VOSO |
|
[125] |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
MFI |
V |
|
|
XRD, NMR, ESR, TA, IR, |
VOSO4 |
|
[126] |
|
|
|
|
XRF, SSIMS |
|
|
|
MFI |
V |
Exchange |
|
ESR, IR, UV-Vis, TPD |
V2O3 + HZSM-5 |
[127] |
|
MFI |
Zn |
Hydrothermal |
|
XRD, SEM, XPS |
|
|
[128] |
MFI |
Sn |
Hydrothermal |
0.8–3.3/u.c. |
29Si-, 119Sn NMR, Catalysis |
SnCl4 |
|
[129] |
MFI |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
14–42 14–23; 45 9.25 |
27Al NMR, FTIR |
|
|
[105] |
MFI |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
|
Gas diffusion and permeance |
|
|
[86] |
membrane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFI |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
9 |
Catalysis |
|
|
[89] |
MFI |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
25 |
TA, XPS, Catalysis |
Fe(NO3)3 |
[96] |
|
MFI |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
50 |
FTIR, UV-Vis, NO probe |
|
|
[130] |
MFI |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
0.08–0.40 mol kg–1 |
29Si NMR, Acidity (TPD), |
Fe(NO ) |
3 |
[131] |
|
|
|
|
ESR, BET |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFI |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
0.08 wt % Fe2O3 |
C6H6 + N2O = C6H5 OH |
|
|
[132] |
MFI |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
250 |
TPD, C3H8 oxidation |
Fe(NO3)3 |
[103] |
|
MFI |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
50–150 |
SEM, IR, Acidity, Catalytic |
FeCl3 |
|
[133] |
|
|
|
|
activity |
|
|
|
MFI |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
|
UV res. Raman, XRD, ESR |
|
|
[134] |
MFI |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
Si/Fe = 54 |
NMR, TPD, SEM, Catalysis |
|
|
[114] |
MFI |
Ge |
Hydrothermal |
10–25 |
SEM, Catalysis |
GeO2 |
|
[144] |
MFI (TS1) |
Ti |
Hydrothermal |
2.8% TiO2 |
Oxidation of C3H8, C4H10 |
|
|
[135] |
376
.al et Nagy.B .J
Table 1 |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Zeolite |
Substituting |
Synthesis |
Si/T or |
Techniques of |
Precursors |
|
|
|
Refs. |
||||
|
element |
|
T content |
characterization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFI |
Ti |
Gas-solid |
|
FTIR, UV-Vis, XRD, |
TiCl4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[136] |
|
|
|
reaction |
Si/Ti 50 |
ICP-AES, Catalysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFI |
Ti |
Hydrothermal |
UV-Vis, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[118] |
|
|
|
|
|
Catalysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFI |
Fe-Mo-B |
Hydrothermal |
4.6% Mo 1.41% Fe |
C6H6 + N2O = C6H5OH |
BET, TPD |
|
|
|
[104] |
||||
|
|
CVD 0.15% B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFI |
Mo |
Impregnation |
3.6 wt % MoO3 |
XRD, FTIR, TPR, SEM |
MoO3 + HZSM-5 |
|
|
[137] |
|||||
MFI |
Be |
Treatment of |
2280 |
9Be NMR |
(NH ) |
|
BeF |
4 |
|
|
[138] |
||
|
|
NH4-ZSM-5 |
|
|
|
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
3 wt % In2 O3 |
SEM |
In2O3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[139] |
||
MFI |
In |
Exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
MFI |
In |
Hydrothermal or |
|
ESR, 115In NMR, 29Si NMR, |
In O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[117] |
|
|
|
Modification |
|
Catalysis |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
MFI |
Cr |
Hydrothermal |
370 |
ESR |
Cr2O3 (NaF medium) |
|
[140] |
||||||
MFI |
Pt-Ga |
Exchange |
|
XPS, IR |
NH4-[Ga]-ZSM-5 |
|
|
[115] |
|||||
|
|
|
0.3–0.6 mmol g–1 |
|
+ Pt[NH3)4]Cl2 |
|
|
|
|||||
MFI |
Mn |
Exchange |
IR, ESR, Mass Spectrometry |
MnCl |
|
, MnSO , Mn O , |
[141] |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mn(CH3COO)2 |
|
|
|
|||||
MFI |
Ru |
Hydrothermal |
10–33 |
XRD, IR, SEM, XPS |
K2RuO4, Pr4NRuO4 |
|
|
[142] |
|||||
Zeolites in Substitution Isomorphous
377
Table 2 Isomorphous substitution in BEA zeolites
Zeolite |
Substituting |
Synthesis |
Si/T or |
Techniques of |
Precursors |
|
|
|
Refs. |
||||
|
element |
|
T content |
characterization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
BEA |
B |
Alkaline Exchange |
36.6–37.6 14.0–15.7 |
XRD, FTIR, MAS NMR, BET |
NaBO2 |
|
|
|
|
[143] |
|||
BEA |
B |
Hydrothermal |
|
11B NMR, REDOR |
B(OH) |
3 |
, Na |
B |
O |
7 |
[87] |
||
|
|
|
|
Acidity, n-butene, isomerization |
|
|
|
2 |
4 |
|
|
||
BEA |
B |
Hydrothermal |
0.85 wt % |
H3 BO3 |
|
|
|
|
[102] |
||||
BEA |
Al |
Hydrothermal |
14–42 14–23; 45 9.25 |
27Al NMR, FTIR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[105] |
BEA |
B, Al |
Hydrothermal |
0.85 wt % |
Acidity, n-butene, isomerization |
H3 BO3 |
|
|
|
|
[102] |
|||
BEA |
Ga, Al |
Hydrothermal |
13.4–24.0 |
XRD, TA, SEM, IR |
Ga(NO3)3 |
|
|
|
[145] |
||||
BEA |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
10, 28, 57 |
FTIR, TPD, adsorption |
Ga2(SO4)3 |
|
|
|
[146] |
||||
BEA |
Ga |
Exchange |
12.4, 16.1, 18.7 |
29Si NMR, 27Al NMR, XRD, |
Ga |
O |
3 |
+ HZSM-5 |
[147] |
||||
|
|
(Galliation) |
|
FTIR |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
BEA |
Ga |
Alcaline Exchange |
14.0–15.7 |
XRD, FTIR, MAS NMR, BET |
NaGaO2 |
|
|
|
[143] |
||||
BEA |
V |
Adsorption in |
0.05–0.5–1.5 wt % |
UV-Vis, Photoluminescence |
NH4 VO3 |
|
|
|
[148] |
||||
|
|
hydroxyl nests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEA (CIT-6) |
Zn |
Hydrothermal |
32 |
Multi NMR, BET |
Zn(CH3COO)2 |
|
|
[149] |
|||||
BEA |
Sn |
Hydrothermal |
1.6 wt % |
IR, Baeyer-Villiger oxidation |
SnCl4 |
|
|
|
|
|
[150] |
||
BEA |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
20–23 |
IR, SEM, Sorption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[151] |
BEA |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
14–42 14–23; 45 9.25 |
27Al NMR, FTIR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[105] |
BEA |
Ti |
Hydrothermal |
|
XRD, Raman, IR, UV-Vis, |
Ti(SO4)2 |
|
|
|
[152] |
||||
|
|
|
|
XPS, adsorption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEA |
Ge |
Hydrothermal |
|
Adsorption Synchrotron |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[153] |
|
|
|
|
Powder Diffraction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378
.al et Nagy.B .J
Table 3 Isomorphous substitution in various zeolites
Zeolite |
Substituting |
Synthesis |
Si/T or |
Techniques of |
Precursors |
Refs. |
|
|
element |
|
T content |
characterization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TsG-1 |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
22/10 |
Sr2+ Ion Exchange |
|
|
[154] |
AST |
Ge |
Hydrothermal, |
|
XRD, MAS NMR, SEM |
GeO2 |
|
[155] |
|
|
F-medium |
|
|
|
|
|
AV-1 |
Y |
Hydrothermal |
8 |
Multi NMR, FTIR |
Y2 (SO4)3 |
[156] |
|
CIT-6 (BEA) |
Zn |
Hydrothermal |
32 |
Multi NMR, BET |
Zn(CH3COO)2 |
[149] |
|
ETS-10 |
V |
Hydrothermal |
V/Ti = 0.87 |
MAS NMR, XRD, UV-Vis |
VOSO4 |
|
[157] |
ETS-10 |
Cr |
Hydrothermal |
Si/(Cr + Ti) = 4.5 |
EDX, XRD, SEM, BET, UV-Vis, |
Cr2O3 |
|
[158] |
|
|
|
|
EPR, MAS NMR |
|
|
|
EUO |
B |
Hydrothermal |
13–15 |
XRD, TG, MAS NMR |
H3 BO3 |
|
[159] |
FER |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
2–7 Ga/u.c. |
27Al-, 29Si-, 71Ga NMR, XRD, |
Ga(NO ) |
3 |
[160] |
|
|
|
|
SEM |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FER |
B |
Hydrothermal |
4–19 |
XRD, MAS NMR |
H3 BO3 |
|
[179] |
H,Na-Y |
Fe |
Ion Exchange |
|
ESR |
FeCl3 |
|
[161, 162] |
LEV |
B |
Hydrothermal, |
9–27 |
XRD, MAS NMR, SEM |
B2O3 |
|
[163] |
|
|
F-medium |
|
|
|
|
|
LTL |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
27.3–3.5 |
IR, TA, XPS, EM, Magnetic |
K2FeO4 |
|
[164] |
|
|
|
|
susceptibility |
|
|
|
MEL |
B-B,Al |
|
0.25 wt % |
51V NMR, ESR, UV-Vis, IR |
|
|
[102] |
MEL |
V |
Hydrothermal |
100–400 |
VOSO |
|
[165] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
[166, 167] |
MEL |
V |
Hydrothermal |
40, 80, 160 |
XRD, IR, ESR, NMR, Catalysis |
VOSO4 |
|
|
MOR |
B, Al, Ga |
Theoretical Study |
— |
— |
— |
|
[168] |
MOR |
Al, Fe |
Hydrothermal |
9.25 |
27Al NMR, FTIR |
— |
|
[105] |
MTT |
Al, Fe |
Hydrothermal |
14–42 |
27Al NMR, FTIR |
— |
|
[105] |
MTW |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
70 |
XRD, IR, 29Si-, 74Ga NMR, |
Ga(NO ) |
3 |
[169] |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Acidity
Zeolites in Substitution Isomorphous
379
380
Table 3 |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zeolite |
Substituting |
Synthesis |
Si/T or |
Techniques of |
Precursors |
|
|
|
|
Refs. |
|
element |
|
T content |
characterization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MTW |
Fe |
Hydrothermal |
40–90 |
XRD, FTIR, SEM |
Fe(NO3)3 |
|
|
|
|
[170] |
NCL-1 |
V |
Hydrothermal |
80–250 |
IR, ESR, NMR, Catalysis |
|
|
|
|
|
[171] |
Sil-1 |
Mn |
Hydrothermal |
258 |
FTIR, XANES, EXAFS |
MnO |
|
|
|
|
[172] |
SSZ-24 |
B |
Hydrothermal |
|
11B NMR, REDOR |
B(OH) , Na |
B |
O |
7 |
[87] |
|
|
|
|
|
27Al NMR, FTIR |
3 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
TON |
Al, Fe |
Hydrothermal |
14–23; 45 |
— |
|
|
|
|
[105] |
|
TS-1 |
Ti |
Hydrothermal |
8–256 |
XRD, FTIR, MAS NMR, |
Ti(OBu)4 |
|
|
|
|
[173] |
|
|
|
|
UV-Vis, ESR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y |
Ce, Co, Cu, |
Exchange |
|
Acylative cyclization |
chlorides |
|
|
|
|
[174] |
|
Cr, La |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y |
Fe |
CVD |
— |
XRD, FTIR, TA, BET |
[(C5H5 )Fe(CO)2]2 |
[175] |
||||
Y |
Si |
Solid-Solid |
— |
IR, MAS NMR, XRD, TA |
(NH4)2SiF6 |
|
|
|
|
[176] |
Y |
Ga |
Hydrothermal |
1.85–2.18 |
MAS NMR, FTIR |
Ga2O3 |
|
|
|
|
[177] |
ZSM-12 |
V |
Hydrothermal |
88, 158, 322 |
ESR, NMR (29Si, 51V, 1H) |
VOSO |
|
|
|
|
[178] |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
.al et Nagy.B .J
Isomorphous Substitution in Zeolites |
381 |
2.1.2 [Ga]-MFI
The initial gels have a general composition of 10SiO2 – xMF – yGa(NO3)3 – 1.25TPABr – 330H2O where M = NH4, Na, K or Cs with x = 9, 18 and y = 0.1 and 0.3. The reactants were mixed in the following order: MF (M = NH4, Na, K, Carlo Erba and M = Cs, Sigma), distilled water, Ga(NO3)3 (Aldrich), tetrapropylammonium bromide (TPABr, Fluka) and fumed silica (Sigma) [183, 184].
2.1.3 [Fe]-MFI
2.1.3.1 Fluoride Route
The reactants were ammonium fluoride (Carlo Erba, RPE), sodium fluoride (Carlo Erba, RPE), potassium fluoride (Carlo Erba, RPE), cesium fluoride (Aldrich, purum), tetrapropyl ammonium bromide (TPABr, Fluka, purum), iron nitrate (Fe(NO3)3 · 9H2O, Merck, purum), fumed silica (Sigma) and distilled water [185, 186]. The molar composition of the starting mixture was:
10SiO2 – xFe(NO3)3 · 9H2O – yMF – 1.25TPABr – 300H2O
where 0.1 ≤ x ≤ 0.3, y = 3 – 24 and M = NH4, Na, K or Cs.
The starting mixtures were prepared by adding the fluoride salt, iron nitrate, TPABr and the fumed silica to the distilled water in this order. After complete homogenization the resulting gels were placed in PTFE-lined 25 cm3 stainless-steel autoclaves. The samples were obtained by hydrothermal synthesis at 170 ◦C for predetermined times. After quenching the autoclaves, the products were recovered, filtered, washed with distilled water and dried at 80 ◦C overnight. The crystallization time was ca. 7 days for the sample with the smallest crystallization rate.
2.1.3.2 Alkaline Route
Batch composition: 1.0SiO2 – (xAl2O3 + yFe2O3) – 0.13Na2O – 52.0H2O – 0.125 template for [Fe,Al]-ZSM-5: x = 0.0025; y = 0.0025, 0.005, 0.01 and 0.002, for [Al]-ZSM-5: x = 0.01; y = 0, for [Fe]-ZSM-5: x = 0; y = 0.01 and 0.01333 [187–192].
Source materials: distilled water; waterglass (Aldrich, vide supra); colloidal silica (Aldrich, Ludox 40); iron(III) oxide (Aldrich, 99.98%); iron(III) oxide enriched in 57Fe to 80%; iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate (Aldrich > 98%); aluminum powder (Aldrich, 20 micron, > 99%); aluminum oxide trihydrate
382 |
J. B.Nagy et al. |
(Hungarian origin); sodium hydroxide (Reanal, reagent grade); TPA bromide as template (Aldrich, 98%); perchloric acid, 70% (Aldrich, reagent grade); sodium perchlorate (Aldrich, 99%); hydrochloric acid 37% (Reanal, reagent grade); sulphuric acid 97% (Reanal, reagent grade).
Batch preparation recipe (for about 12–14 g volatile-free zeolite): Prepare stock-solutions of iron (dissolve known amount of iron (III) oxide, or iron tracer in concentrated HCl at 120 ◦C in a closed Teflon autoclave; or dissolve iron(III) nitrate in acidified water) and aluminum (dissolve aluminum powder in HCl diluted to 1 : 1). Save the Feand Al-contents, respectively, per gram of solution.
In order to simplify the description of recipes the exact amounts for the variable components will be summarized in Table 4 for various Si/Fe, etc., ratios.
Sixteen grams Aldrich-type waterglass (see Aldrich catalogue) + 140.9 g distilled water; stir and keep it in refrigerator overnight (solution 2). Blend appropriate amounts of stock-solution for iron (or aluminum, or iron and aluminum) with 5.8 g of 70% perchloric acid; keep in refrigerator overnight (solution 3). Under vigorous mixing add to (solution 3) so much of (solution 2) to reach pH = 4.5 (use pH paper). Admix to remaining (solution 2) 19.2 g cool Ludox 40 and continue the neutralization of (solution 3) while maintaining agitation. The meanwhile solidified gel should be broken up. Add 6.7 g TPA bromide, 2 g sodium chloride as solid and 0.2 g ZSM-5 seed (the best choice is silicalite-1 in the as-synthesized (AS) state, ground carefully in a porcelain mortar using a few drops of water).
The pH of the slurry should be between 10.5 and 11.0. Adjust the pH by either a few drops of perchloric acid or 50% sodium hydroxide. In a stainlesssteel shaker, mill the slurry for at least 5 h using similar balls. Check (and adjust if necessary) the pH.
Crystallization vessel: Teflon-lined autoclave(s); temperature: 160 ◦C; time: depending on the degree of substitution 6–12 h, without agitation. Product recovery: after cooling, filter and wash with warm water (to pH = 10.5). Dry
Table 4 Amounts (g) of Al and/or Fe per batch at various slurry compositions
Sample |
|
|
Fe [g] |
|
|
Al [g] |
|
Si/Fe = 200 Si/Fe = 100 Si/Fe = 50 |
Si/Fe = 37.5 |
Si/Al = 200 Si/Al = 50 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Fe,Al]-ZSM-5 0.057 |
— |
— |
— |
0.027 |
— |
|
|
— |
0.114 |
— |
— |
0.027 |
— |
|
— |
— |
0.228 |
— |
0.027 |
— |
[Fe]-ZSM-5 |
— |
— |
0.228 |
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
0.342 |
— |
— |
[Al]-ZSM-5 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
0.108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isomorphous Substitution in Zeolites |
383 |
in air thermostat at 110 ◦C. Save the zeolite product as such or apply “caring calcination” [193]. Besides the zeolitic crystals, the cool mother liquor contains 2–3 cm-long needle-like crystals of sparingly soluble TPA perchlorate. It is easy to separate them by a tea-strainer. Another method of preparation was used in the alkaline route [188].
Two different hydrogel systems were studies. The first system was prepared from the following initial reaction mixture:
(A) xNa2O–yTPABr–zAl2O3 –SiO2 –qFe2O3 –pHA–20H2O,
where x = 0.1 – 0.32; y = 0.02 – 0.08; z = 0 – 0.05; q = 0.005 – 0.025; the ratio p/q = 3 and HA stands for H2C2O4 or H3PO4.
The second system was prepared from the following initial reaction mixture:
(B) 0.16Na2O–xTPABr–yEG–zAl2O3 –SiO2 –qFe2O3 –pHA–10H2O,
where x = 0 – 0.08, y = 0 – 6.0; z = 0 – 0.05; q = 0.005 – 0.1; the ratio p/q = 3 and HA stays for H2C2O4 or H3PO4.
2.1.4 [Fe]-BEA
The following reagents were used: 20% tetraethylammonium hydroxide (TEAOH), in H2O (Aldrich), 25% TEAOH, in methanol (Aldrich), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Aldrich) as silicon source, Fe(NO3)3 · 9H2O (Merck), Al(OH)3 (Pfaltz & Bauer), NaOH (Carlo Erba) and ultradistilled water [194]. The following general composition was used for [Fe]-BEA:
40SiO2 – xFe(NO3)3 · 9H2O – yTEAOH – 4NaOH – 676H2O, with x = 0.38, 0.40, 0.44, 0.45, 0.49, 0.51, 0.60, 1.02, and y = 10.88, 13.6, 16.3 and 19.04.
The experimental procedure was carried out as follows: solution A was prepared by adding TEOS to aqueous solution of 20% TEAOH under magnetic stirring during 1 h. Solution B was prepared by adding NaOH to 20% aqueous TEAOH solution under magnetic stirring: Solution C was obtained by introducing Fe(NO3)3 · 9H2O into ultradistilled water under magnetic stirring during 10 min.
Solution A is added dropwise to solution C. It is important to fully dissolve solution A in solution C. The obtained solution is solution D. Finally, solution D is added slowly to solution B under magnetic stirring leading to a light yellow gel: The system is stirred for 24 h. This allowed the ethanol formed during the hydrolysis of TEOS to evaporate.
384 |
J. B.Nagy et al. |
2.1.5 [Fe]-MOR
The zeolite samples [Al]-BEA and [Fe,Al]-BEA were also prepared starting from the following molar composition [195]:
(B) xNa2O–0.2TEAOH–yAl2O3 –zFe2O3 –wC2H2O4 –SiO2 –20H2O,
where TEAOH stands for tetraethylammonium hydroxide, C2H2O4 is oxalic acid; 0.1 ≤ x ≤ 0.15; 0.015 ≤ y ≤ 0.02; 0 ≤ z ≤ 0.015, w/z was constantly equal to 3.
The zeolite samples of [Al]-MOR and [Fe,Al]-MOR were prepared starting from the following molar composition:
(A) xNa2O–0.2TEABr–yAl2O3 –zFe2O3 –wC2H2O4 –SiO2 –20H2O,
where TEABr stands for tetraethylammonium bromide, C2H2OO4 is oxalic acid; 0.1 ≤ x ≤ 0.27; 0.015 ≤ y ≤ 0.025; 0 ≤ z ≤ 0.025, w/z was constantly equal to 3.
The hydrogels were obtained by adding precipitated silica (BDH) to a previously prepared homogeneous solution consisting of the organic compound (Fluka), sodium hydroxide (Carlo Erba), sodium aluminate (Carlo Erba) and distilled water. In another beaker, a solution of an iron complex with oxalic acid was prepared, starting from iron nitrate (Carlo Erba) and oxalic acid (Carlo Erba). This solution was slowly added to the hydrogel, which, after 1 h of homogenization, was transferred into autoclaves.
2.1.6 [Co]-MFI
Two different gels were prepared [196, 197]. For the first series of gels (A), sodium silicate was used and the final batch compositions were: 35SiO2 – xNa2O – yCo(CH3COO)2 · 4H2O – 3.4TPABr – 8.4H2OSO4 – 808H2O with x = 11, 12.9 and 15 and y = 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2. The second type of gels (B) was prepared using colloidal silica with a global composition: 35SiO2 – xNa2O – Co(CH3COO)2 – 3.4TPABr – 808H2O with x = 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12. The gels, after complete homogenization, were placed in PTFE-lined 25 cm3 stainless-steel autoclaves. The Co-containing samples were obtained by hydrothermal synthesis at 170 ◦C after 2 days. After quenching the autoclaves, the products were recovered, filtered, washed with distilled water and finally dried at 80 ◦C overnight. The samples were characterized by various physico-chemical techniques such as XRD, chemical and thermal analysis, XPS and diffuse reflectance UV-visible spectroscopy.
