14. Compounding in English

Word compounding (word composition) is a universal way of deriving new words. It is also one of the most ancient, productive and active types of word-formation in English. About 1/3 of all derived words in modern E. are compounds.

Word compounding – is a kind of word-formation based on combining 2 immediate constituents ( компонент) where each is a derivational base: noun + noun – raincoat; adj +adj – darkblue; adj + noun – bluebell; verb + prep – make-up; obj. group – forget-me-not.

The roof can be joined directly or by the connective from the point of view of meaning they are motivated, part. and non-motivated.

The meaning of mot. is understood directly from the meaning of its components (apple tree)

In part. mot. the meaning of one root is either wickeaned or lost (chatterbox).

In non-mot. the meaning is either lost of ………………. by the new orig. meaning (buttercup – лютик).

From the point of view the form comp. present an intr. study. They may have solid hyphenated or separate spelling. It is not always easy to differentiate compound words from word-combination. There are some criteria of differentiation: 1. Compounds unlike combinations posses one stress. 2. They have a sem …………………. (new meaning differs from their components meaning). 3. They are usually written as one word.

Compounds undergo derivation when der. affixation added to them (typewrite + er, blue-eye +ed).

Compound verbs are derived from nouns (to baby-sit).

Shortening – when spelling is simplified (night – nite). The tendency is proper to all styles: clipping, abbreviation, blending.

Clipping – is a reduction of a word to one or 2 syllables: professor – prof, middle – mid.

Abbreviation – is the way of building new words out of initial letters: NATO, TV.

Blending – is a compounding by means of produced words: fog +smoke -- smog

15. Abbreviation.

Shortening is a comparatively new way of word-building, which has achieved a high degree of productivity nowadays, especially in American English.

Shortenings are produced in two different ways:

1. To make a new word from a syllable of the original word. The word may lose its beginning (phone – from telephone, fence – from defence) , it’s ending (hols – for holidays, vac – for vacation, props – for properties, ad – from advertisement) or both the beginning and the ending (flu – from influenza, fridge – from refrigerator).

2. To make a new word from the initial letters of a word group: a) If the abbreviated written form tends itself to be read as though it were an ordinary English word and sounds like an English word, it will be read like one. The words thus formed are called acronyms,U.N.O. ['ju:neu] from the United Nations Organisation, NATO — the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, SALT—Strategic Arms Limitation Talks.

b) The other subgroup consists of initial abbreviation with the alphabetical reading retained, i.e. pronounced as a series of letters. B.B.C. from the British Broadcasting Corporation, M.P. from Member of Parliament. This type is called initial shortenings. They are found not only among formal words, such as the ones above, but also among colloquialisms and slang. So, g. f. is a shortened word made from the compound girl-friend.

Both types of shortenings are characteristic of informal speech in general and of uncultivated speech particularly. Here are some more examples of informal shortenings: Movie (from moving-picture), gent (from gentleman), specs (from spectacles), exhibish (from exhibition), posish (from position), Billery (Bill+Hillery).

1. Sound Imitation (onomatopoeia - [onemaete'pie]).

Such words are made by imitating different kinds of sounds that may be produced by animals, birds, insects, human beings and inanimate objects.

It is of some interest that sounds produced by the same kind of animal are frequently represented by quite different sound groups in different languages. For instance, English dogs bark (cf. the R. лаять). The English cock cries cock-a-doodle-doo (cf. the R. ку-ка-ре-ку). Semantically, according to the source of sound, onomatopoeic words fall into a few very definite groups. Many verbs denote sounds produced by human beings in the process of communication or in expressing their feelings: babble, chatter, giggle, grunt, grumble, murmur, mutter, titter, whine, whisper and many more. Then there are sounds produced by animals, birds and insects, e.g. buzz, cackle, croak, crow, hiss, honk, howl, moo, mew, neigh, purr, roar and others. Some birds are named after the sound they make, these are the crow, the cuckoo, the whippoor-will and a few others. Besides the verbs imitating the sound of water such as bubble or splash, there are others imitating the noise of metallic things: clink, tinkle, or forceful motion: clash, crash, whack, whip, whisk, etc.

2. Reduplication.

In reduplication new words are made by doubling a stem, either without any phonetic changes as in bye-bye (coll, for good-bye) or with a variation of the root-vowel or consonant as in ping-pong, chit-chat (this second type is called gradational reduplication). Stylistically speaking, most words made by reduplication represent informal groups: colloquialisms and slang. E. g. walkie-talkie ("a portable radio"), riff-raff ("the worthless or disreputable element of society"; "the dregs of society"), chi-chi (sl. for chic as in a chi-chi girl).

3. Back formation.

The earliest examples of this type of word-building are the verb to beg that was made from the French borrowing beggar, to burgle from burglar, to cobble from cobbler. In all these cases the verb was made from the noun by subtracting what was mistakenly associated with the English suffix -er. So, in the case of the verbs to beg, to burgle, to cobble the process was reversed: instead of a noun made from a verb by affixation (as in painter from to paint), a verb was produced from a noun by subtraction. That is why this type of word-building received the name of back-formation or reversion.

Later examples of back-formation are to butle from butler, to baby-sit from baby-sitter, to force-land from forced landing, to blood-transfuse from blood-transfuing.

4. Sound interchange.Sound interchange may be defined as an opposition in which words or word forms are differentiated due to an alternation in the phonemic composition of the root. The change may affect the root vowel, as in food n : : feed v; or root consonant as in speak v : : speech n; or both, as for instance in life n : : live v. It may also be combined with affixation: strong a : : strength n; or with affixation and shift of stress as in 'democrat : : de'mocracy.

The type is not productive. No new words are formed in this way, yet sound interchange still stays in the language serving to distinguish one long-established word from another. Synchronically, it differentiated parts of speech, i.e. it may signal the non-identity of words belonging to different parts of speech: full a : : fill v; food n : : feed v; or to different lexico-grammatical sets within the same part of speech: fall intransitive v : : fell causative v; compare also lie : : lay, sit : : set, rise : : raise.