
5.2. Transmission of Forces in Pairs
In design of the machine one must know the forces which act on the individual links of the machine so that these links will not fail under the applied loads. In order to do this we must know the manner in which the forces are transmitted through the individual links. These forces are transmitted through the various pairs which connect the links, and the links themselves. For the present we will disregard the effects of friction in the various types of pairing and consider it in a later section.
In general the force transmitted from one link to another is always normal to the surfaces in contact, if friction is not considered. We will consider each type of pair individually and see how the forces are transmitted through these pairs. The turning pair or pin joint in machines we recognize as a bearing composed of a circular pin or shaft fitting in a hole in the link. Ball and roller bearings are also turning pairs. Since the forces transmitted through these bearings are always normal to the surfaces in contact, the resultant always passes through the center of the bearing. This can be seen from the examples shown in Fig. 5.1.
T
Fig. 5.2.
Transmission of forces in a sliding pairFig.
5.1. Transmission of forces in a turning pair
This will be discussed in more detail when we discuss the force analysis of a slider crank mechanism.
I
Fig. 5.3.
Transmission of forces in higher pairs
5.3. Transmission of Forces in Pairs with Friction Included
Friction forces are encountered in machines at all points where there is a relative sliding of two members or where there is rolling contact between two members. In a large majority of machines the friction forces are so small in relation to the static or dynamic forces that they can be ignored in a force analysis. However in some cases the friction forces are of such magnitude that they must be considered in the force analysis. Friction forces are always associated with relative motion between links, or impending relative motion, and the question might arise as to why they are included in static analysis. There are two primary reasons for including a discussion of friction forces in the study of static forces:(1) although friction forces are present only when there is relative motion, or impending motion, between links of a mechanism, the magnitudes of the friction forces are usually considered as independent of the velocity or acceleration and they can therefore be considered as static forces, and (2) in cases where the dynamic forces arc the significant forces, the friction forces arc usually negligible in relation to the dynamic forces. When the dynamic forces are relatively large, the relative velocities are generally of such a magnitude that proper lubrication must be provided, thereby reducing the friction forces to a small value.
In the discussion of friction forces we will assume that the coefficient of friction is known. Consider a block sliding along a rough surface as shown in Fig. 5.4 (a)
Fig. 5.4.
Reaction of a rough surface and the force
,
in the direction of sliding, is just sufficient to balance the
friction force and keep the block sliding with a constant velocity.
It is well known that the relation between the forces
andN is
expressed by the equation
,
where
is the coefficient of friction, a dimensionless quantity. The
coefficient of friction is dependent on the materials in contact, the
lubrication at the contact surfaces, the temperature, the humidity
and other factors, and must be determined experimentally for any
given case. Also it should be pointed out that the static coefficient
of friction is higher than the sliding coefficient of friction. Its
value is usually small where it is encountered in machines, ranging
from a maximum of 0.3 for rough, dry, metal-to-metal sliding, to
0.002 for well lubricated bearings.
The friction force acts at the surfaces in
contact and always in a direction tending to resist the motion. A
free-body diagram of the block is shown in Fig. 5.4 (b). The friction
force is a component of the force of link 2 on 1, and for
equilibrium, the friction force must be equal and opposite to the
external force F.
The normal reaction must be equal and opposite to N.
The resultant of the friction force and the normal component
is shown in Fig. 5.4 (c) and we see that it makes an angle
with the normal component. This angle is dependent only on the
coefficient of friction as can be determined from the relation
.
The angle
is called the friction angle and we will make use of it in our
analysis. It should be born in mind that friction angle is
independent of the magnitudes of the forces so that the direction of
the force
is fixed once the coefficient of friction is known, and it must pass
through the intersection of the lines of action of
and
.
Fig. 5.5. Forces in a rough
turning pair
Consider Fig. 5.5 (a) which shows a pin, link 1,
in a bearing which is part of link 2. The clearance between the pin
and bearing is greatly exaggerated so that the force vectors can be
shown. Assuming that motion or impending motion of link 2 is
clockwise relative to the pin, the friction forces will be as shown
in the Fig. 5.5 (a), tending to oppose the motion. A large view of
the pin is shown in Fig. 5.5 (b) with the summation of the normal
forces and the friction forces as single force vectors, and the
resultant of the two,
The resultant
must cause the same moment about the center of the pin that the
friction force causes. If the moment arm of the resultant isr,
the following condition must exist
where R
is the radius of the pin,
or
.
Then
.
(5.1)
From this we see that the resultant must be
tangent to a circle about the center of the pin of radius
. This circle is called the friction circle and we note that the
friction circle radius is independent of the force, being a function
of the bearing radius and the friction angle only. In an analysis
where we are considering friction, we will always draw in the
friction circle at each pin joint and the forces at the pin joint
must then be tangent to the friction circle instead of passing
through the center of the pin. Since the friction angle is small and
the friction coefficient is never exact, we use an approximation of
the friction circle radius in our analysis. For small angles the sine
of the angle is very nearly equal to the tangent of the angle. Making
this substitution in Eq. (5.1) we have
.
(5.2)
This gives us a quick means of determining the friction circle radius sufficient accuracy once we have selected the coefficient of friction.