Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
668
Добавлен:
03.06.2015
Размер:
8.25 Mб
Скачать

Appendix D. Information Criteria

As part of the output for most regression procedures, EViews reports various information criteria. The information criteria are often used as a guide in model selection (see for example, Grasa 1989).

The Kullback-Leibler quantity of information contained in a model is the distance from the “true” model and is measured by the log likelihood function. The notion of an information criterion is to provide a measure of information that strikes a balance between this measure of goodness of fit and parsimonious specification of the model. The various information criteria differ in how to strike this balance.

Definitions

The basic information criteria are given by:

Akaike info criterion (AIC)

– 2

(l § T) + 2(k § T)

 

 

 

Schwarz criterion (SC)

– 2

(l § T) + klog(T) § T

Hannan-Quinn criterion (HQ)

– 2

(l § T) + 2klog(log(T)) § T

 

 

 

Let l be the value of the log of the likelihood function with the k parameters estimated using T observations. The various information criteria are all based on –2 times the average log likelihood function, adjusted by a penalty function.

For factor analysis models, EViews follows convention (Akaike, 1987), re-centering the criteria by subtracting off the value for the saturated model. The resulting factor analysis form of the information criteria are given by:

Akaike info criterion (AIC)

(T k)D § T (2 § T)df

 

 

Schwarz criterion (SC)

(T k)D § T (log(T) § T)df

Hannan-Quinn criterion (HQ)

(T k)D § T (2 ln(log(T)) § T)df

 

 

where D is the discrepancy function, and df is the number of degrees-of-freedom in the estimated dispersion matrix. Note that EViews scales the Akaike form of the statistic by dividing by T .

In addition to the information criteria described above, there are specialized information criteria that are used in by EViews when computing unit root tests:

Modified AIC (MAIC)

– 2(l § T) + 2((k + t) § T)

 

 

772—Appendix D. Information Criteria

 

Modified SIC (MSIC)

 

– 2

(l § T) + (k + t)log(T) § T

 

 

Modified Hannan-Quinn (MHQ)

 

– 2

(l § T) + 2(k + t)log(log(T)) § T

 

where the modification factor t is computed as:

 

 

 

t =

a2Ây˜ t2

– 1 § j2

 

(D.1)

 

 

 

t

 

 

 

 

for y˜ t yt when computing the ADF test equation (30.7), and for y˜ t

as defined in

(“Autoregressive Spectral Density Estimator,” beginning on page 389) when estimating the frequency zero spectrum (see Ng and Perron, 2001, for a discussion of the modified information criteria).

Note also that:

The definitions used by EViews may differ slightly from those used by some authors. For example, Grasa (1989, equation 3.21) does not divide the AIC by T . Other

authors omit inessential constants of the Gaussian log likelihood (generally, the terms involving 2p ).

While very early versions of EViews reported information criteria that omitted inessential constant terms, the current version of EViews always uses the value of the full likelihood function. All of your equation objects estimated in earlier versions of EViews will automatically be updated to reflect this change. You should, however, keep this fact in mind when comparing results from frozen table objects or printed output from previous versions.

For systems of equations, where applicable, the information criteria are computed using the full system log likelihood. The log likelihood value is computed assuming a multivariate normal (Gaussian) distribution as:

l =

TM

(1

+ log2p)

T

Q

 

(D.2)

2

2 log

 

 

---------

 

 

 

---

ˆ

 

 

where

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ˆ

 

 

 

 

ˆ ˆ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q

 

 

=

det

Âee¢ § T

 

 

(D.3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

i

 

 

 

 

M is the number of equations. Note that these expressions are only strictly valid when you there are equal numbers of observations for each equation. When your system is unbalanced, EViews replaces these expressions with the appropriate summations.

The factor analysis forms of the statistics are often quoted in unscaled form, some-

times without adjusting for the saturated model. Most often, if there are discrepancies, multiplying the EViews reported values by T will line up results.

References—773

Using Information Criteria as a Guide to Model Selection

As a user of these information criteria as a model selection guide, you select the model with the smallest information criterion.

The information criterion has been widely used in time series analysis to determine the appropriate length of the distributed lag. Lütkepohl (1991, Chapter 4) presents a number of results regarding consistent lag order selection in VAR models.

You should note, however, that the criteria depend on the unit of measurement of the dependent variable y . For example, you cannot use information criteria to select between a model with dependent variable y and one with log(y ).

References

Grasa, Antonio Aznar (1989). Econometric Model Selection: A New Approach, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Akaike, H. (1987). “Factor Analysis and AIC,” Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332.

Lütkepohl, Helmut (1991). Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis, New York: Springer-Verlag.

Ng, Serena and Pierre Perron (2001). “Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power,” Econometrica, 69(6), 1519-1554.

774—Appendix D. Information Criteria

Соседние файлы в папке EViews Guides BITCH