
- •Preface
- •Part IV. Basic Single Equation Analysis
- •Chapter 18. Basic Regression Analysis
- •Equation Objects
- •Specifying an Equation in EViews
- •Estimating an Equation in EViews
- •Equation Output
- •Working with Equations
- •Estimation Problems
- •References
- •Chapter 19. Additional Regression Tools
- •Special Equation Expressions
- •Robust Standard Errors
- •Weighted Least Squares
- •Nonlinear Least Squares
- •Stepwise Least Squares Regression
- •References
- •Chapter 20. Instrumental Variables and GMM
- •Background
- •Two-stage Least Squares
- •Nonlinear Two-stage Least Squares
- •Limited Information Maximum Likelihood and K-Class Estimation
- •Generalized Method of Moments
- •IV Diagnostics and Tests
- •References
- •Chapter 21. Time Series Regression
- •Serial Correlation Theory
- •Testing for Serial Correlation
- •Estimating AR Models
- •ARIMA Theory
- •Estimating ARIMA Models
- •ARMA Equation Diagnostics
- •References
- •Chapter 22. Forecasting from an Equation
- •Forecasting from Equations in EViews
- •An Illustration
- •Forecast Basics
- •Forecasts with Lagged Dependent Variables
- •Forecasting with ARMA Errors
- •Forecasting from Equations with Expressions
- •Forecasting with Nonlinear and PDL Specifications
- •References
- •Chapter 23. Specification and Diagnostic Tests
- •Background
- •Coefficient Diagnostics
- •Residual Diagnostics
- •Stability Diagnostics
- •Applications
- •References
- •Part V. Advanced Single Equation Analysis
- •Chapter 24. ARCH and GARCH Estimation
- •Basic ARCH Specifications
- •Estimating ARCH Models in EViews
- •Working with ARCH Models
- •Additional ARCH Models
- •Examples
- •References
- •Chapter 25. Cointegrating Regression
- •Background
- •Estimating a Cointegrating Regression
- •Testing for Cointegration
- •Working with an Equation
- •References
- •Binary Dependent Variable Models
- •Ordered Dependent Variable Models
- •Censored Regression Models
- •Truncated Regression Models
- •Count Models
- •Technical Notes
- •References
- •Chapter 27. Generalized Linear Models
- •Overview
- •How to Estimate a GLM in EViews
- •Examples
- •Working with a GLM Equation
- •Technical Details
- •References
- •Chapter 28. Quantile Regression
- •Estimating Quantile Regression in EViews
- •Views and Procedures
- •Background
- •References
- •Chapter 29. The Log Likelihood (LogL) Object
- •Overview
- •Specification
- •Estimation
- •LogL Views
- •LogL Procs
- •Troubleshooting
- •Limitations
- •Examples
- •References
- •Part VI. Advanced Univariate Analysis
- •Chapter 30. Univariate Time Series Analysis
- •Unit Root Testing
- •Panel Unit Root Test
- •Variance Ratio Test
- •BDS Independence Test
- •References
- •Part VII. Multiple Equation Analysis
- •Chapter 31. System Estimation
- •Background
- •System Estimation Methods
- •How to Create and Specify a System
- •Working With Systems
- •Technical Discussion
- •References
- •Vector Autoregressions (VARs)
- •Estimating a VAR in EViews
- •VAR Estimation Output
- •Views and Procs of a VAR
- •Structural (Identified) VARs
- •Vector Error Correction (VEC) Models
- •A Note on Version Compatibility
- •References
- •Chapter 33. State Space Models and the Kalman Filter
- •Background
- •Specifying a State Space Model in EViews
- •Working with the State Space
- •Converting from Version 3 Sspace
- •Technical Discussion
- •References
- •Chapter 34. Models
- •Overview
- •An Example Model
- •Building a Model
- •Working with the Model Structure
- •Specifying Scenarios
- •Using Add Factors
- •Solving the Model
- •Working with the Model Data
- •References
- •Part VIII. Panel and Pooled Data
- •Chapter 35. Pooled Time Series, Cross-Section Data
- •The Pool Workfile
- •The Pool Object
- •Pooled Data
- •Setting up a Pool Workfile
- •Working with Pooled Data
- •Pooled Estimation
- •References
- •Chapter 36. Working with Panel Data
- •Structuring a Panel Workfile
- •Panel Workfile Display
- •Panel Workfile Information
- •Working with Panel Data
- •Basic Panel Analysis
- •References
- •Chapter 37. Panel Estimation
- •Estimating a Panel Equation
- •Panel Estimation Examples
- •Panel Equation Testing
- •Estimation Background
- •References
- •Part IX. Advanced Multivariate Analysis
- •Chapter 38. Cointegration Testing
- •Johansen Cointegration Test
- •Single-Equation Cointegration Tests
- •Panel Cointegration Testing
- •References
- •Chapter 39. Factor Analysis
- •Creating a Factor Object
- •Rotating Factors
- •Estimating Scores
- •Factor Views
- •Factor Procedures
- •Factor Data Members
- •An Example
- •Background
- •References
- •Appendix B. Estimation and Solution Options
- •Setting Estimation Options
- •Optimization Algorithms
- •Nonlinear Equation Solution Methods
- •References
- •Appendix C. Gradients and Derivatives
- •Gradients
- •Derivatives
- •References
- •Appendix D. Information Criteria
- •Definitions
- •Using Information Criteria as a Guide to Model Selection
- •References
- •Appendix E. Long-run Covariance Estimation
- •Technical Discussion
- •Kernel Function Properties
- •References
- •Index
- •Symbols
- •Numerics

Appendix D. Information Criteria
As part of the output for most regression procedures, EViews reports various information criteria. The information criteria are often used as a guide in model selection (see for example, Grasa 1989).
The Kullback-Leibler quantity of information contained in a model is the distance from the “true” model and is measured by the log likelihood function. The notion of an information criterion is to provide a measure of information that strikes a balance between this measure of goodness of fit and parsimonious specification of the model. The various information criteria differ in how to strike this balance.
Definitions
The basic information criteria are given by:
Akaike info criterion (AIC) |
– 2 |
(l § T) + 2(k § T) |
|
|
|
Schwarz criterion (SC) |
– 2 |
(l § T) + klog(T) § T |
Hannan-Quinn criterion (HQ) |
– 2 |
(l § T) + 2klog(log(T)) § T |
|
|
|
Let l be the value of the log of the likelihood function with the k parameters estimated using T observations. The various information criteria are all based on –2 times the average log likelihood function, adjusted by a penalty function.
For factor analysis models, EViews follows convention (Akaike, 1987), re-centering the criteria by subtracting off the value for the saturated model. The resulting factor analysis form of the information criteria are given by:
Akaike info criterion (AIC) |
(T – k)D § T – (2 § T)df |
|
|
Schwarz criterion (SC) |
(T – k)D § T – (log(T) § T)df |
Hannan-Quinn criterion (HQ) |
(T – k)D § T – (2 ln(log(T)) § T)df |
|
|
where D is the discrepancy function, and df is the number of degrees-of-freedom in the estimated dispersion matrix. Note that EViews scales the Akaike form of the statistic by dividing by T .
In addition to the information criteria described above, there are specialized information criteria that are used in by EViews when computing unit root tests:
Modified AIC (MAIC) |
– 2(l § T) + 2((k + t) § T) |
|
|

772—Appendix D. Information Criteria
|
Modified SIC (MSIC) |
|
– 2 |
(l § T) + (k + t)log(T) § T |
|
||
|
Modified Hannan-Quinn (MHQ) |
|
– 2 |
(l § T) + 2(k + t)log(log(T)) § T |
|
||
where the modification factor t is computed as: |
|
|
|||||
|
t = |
a2Ây˜ t2 |
– 1 § j2 |
|
(D.1) |
||
|
|
|
t |
|
|
|
|
for y˜ t ∫ yt when computing the ADF test equation (30.7), and for y˜ t |
as defined in |
(“Autoregressive Spectral Density Estimator,” beginning on page 389) when estimating the frequency zero spectrum (see Ng and Perron, 2001, for a discussion of the modified information criteria).
Note also that:
•The definitions used by EViews may differ slightly from those used by some authors. For example, Grasa (1989, equation 3.21) does not divide the AIC by T . Other
authors omit inessential constants of the Gaussian log likelihood (generally, the terms involving 2p ).
While very early versions of EViews reported information criteria that omitted inessential constant terms, the current version of EViews always uses the value of the full likelihood function. All of your equation objects estimated in earlier versions of EViews will automatically be updated to reflect this change. You should, however, keep this fact in mind when comparing results from frozen table objects or printed output from previous versions.
•For systems of equations, where applicable, the information criteria are computed using the full system log likelihood. The log likelihood value is computed assuming a multivariate normal (Gaussian) distribution as:
l = – |
TM |
(1 |
+ log2p) – |
T |
Q |
|
(D.2) |
|||
2 |
2 log |
|
||||||||
|
--------- |
|
|
|
--- |
ˆ |
|
|
||
where |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ˆ |
|
|
|
|
ˆ ˆ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Q |
|
|
= |
det |
Âee¢ § T |
|
|
(D.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i |
|
|
|
|
M is the number of equations. Note that these expressions are only strictly valid when you there are equal numbers of observations for each equation. When your system is unbalanced, EViews replaces these expressions with the appropriate summations.
•The factor analysis forms of the statistics are often quoted in unscaled form, some-
times without adjusting for the saturated model. Most often, if there are discrepancies, multiplying the EViews reported values by T will line up results.

References—773
Using Information Criteria as a Guide to Model Selection
As a user of these information criteria as a model selection guide, you select the model with the smallest information criterion.
The information criterion has been widely used in time series analysis to determine the appropriate length of the distributed lag. Lütkepohl (1991, Chapter 4) presents a number of results regarding consistent lag order selection in VAR models.
You should note, however, that the criteria depend on the unit of measurement of the dependent variable y . For example, you cannot use information criteria to select between a model with dependent variable y and one with log(y ).
References
Grasa, Antonio Aznar (1989). Econometric Model Selection: A New Approach, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Akaike, H. (1987). “Factor Analysis and AIC,” Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332.
Lütkepohl, Helmut (1991). Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ng, Serena and Pierre Perron (2001). “Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power,” Econometrica, 69(6), 1519-1554.

774—Appendix D. Information Criteria