
- •Preface
- •DESIGN FEATURES
- •STRUCTURED PROGRAMMING TECHNIQUES
- •PROGRAMMING TASKS
- •WINDOW SYSTEMS, COMMUNICATIONS, AND DISPLAYS
- •DATA STRUCTURES AND ALGORITHMS
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •PostScript is Not Like C
- •COMPARISON OF LANGUAGE MECHANISMS
- •EXPRESSING AN ALGORITHM AS A PROGRAM
- •THE UNIX SHELL AND OPERATING SYSTEM
- •INPUT, OUTPUT, AND THROUGHPUT
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Foundations
- •POSTSCRIPT LANGUAGE SYNTAX
- •SIMPLE PROGRAM STRUCTURE
- •Make Definitions First
- •Indentation Style
- •SETTING UP TEMPLATES
- •DECLARING AND USING VARIABLES
- •Arithmetic with Numeric Variables
- •Using the // Notation for Constants
- •ALLOCATING MEMORY
- •GETTING MEMORY BACK
- •OPENING AND CLOSING FILES
- •COMPARISONS AND EQUALITY OF OBJECTS
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Some Typical Programs
- •A TYPICAL PAGE DESCRIPTION PROGRAM
- •FONT PROGRAMS
- •PROGRAMS THAT READ DATA
- •QUERY PROGRAMS
- •ENCAPSULATED POSTSCRIPT PROGRAMS
- •PERSISTENTLY RESIDENT PROGRAMS
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Understanding the Stack
- •A QUICK OVERVIEW OF DATA TYPES
- •NAME LOOKUP
- •HOW OPERATORS USE THE STACK
- •GROUPING AND VISUAL CHUNKING
- •THINKING BACKWARD AND SIDEWAYS
- •COMPOSITE OBJECTS
- •THE OTHER STACKS
- •The Dictionary Stack
- •The Execution Stack
- •The Graphics State Stack
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Trusting the Stack
- •SAFETY OF DATA ON THE STACK
- •WHERE ARE THE DATA GOING?
- •REARRANGING THE STACK
- •Using the dup and index Operators
- •Using the roll Operator
- •CONDITIONALS AND LOOPS
- •RECURSION AND LOCAL VARIABLES
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Building Conditional Statements
- •SIMPLE CONDITIONALS
- •SETTING UP THE CONDITION
- •CONDITIONALS ARE NOT MAGIC
- •NESTED CONDITIONALS AND ELSE CLAUSES
- •COMPOUND CONDITIONALS
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Using Looping Constructs
- •LOOP BASICS
- •USING THE LOOP INDEX
- •LOOPS ARE PROCEDURE BODIES
- •LOOPS OF INSTRUCTIONS
- •EXITING LOOPS PREMATURELY
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Procedures
- •WHAT EXACTLY IS A PROCEDURE?
- •PARAMETER PASSING
- •CONSTRUCTING GOOD PROCEDURES
- •What to Name Your Procedure
- •A Useful Naming Convention
- •SELF-MODIFYING PROCEDURES
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Using Dictionaries
- •DICTIONARIES FOR NAME SCOPING
- •LOCAL DICTIONARIES
- •GLOBAL DICTIONARIES OF PROCEDURES
- •MAINTAINING THE DICTIONARY STACK
- •INTO AND OUT OF DICTIONARIES
- •LOOKING INTO DICTIONARIES
- •Using the forall Operator
- •Using the where and known Operators
- •REDEFINING OPERATORS
- •Changing the Behavior of Operators
- •Debugging with Redefined Names
- •Proper Nesting of Redefinitions
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Creating and Manipulating Data
- •CONSTRUCTING AN ARRAY
- •CONSTRUCTING A STRING
- •MANIPULATING DATA WITH PUT AND GET
- •CONCATENATING ARRAYS AND STRINGS
- •INPUT AND OUTPUT OF STRING DATA
- •ARRAYS VERSUS DICTIONARIES
- •ADVANCED TECHNIQUES
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Storing and Using Data
- •Data and the Operand Stack
- •Data and Algorithms for Underlining
- •CLASSICAL DATA STRUCTURES
- •Linked Lists
- •Using Arrays to Form Lists
- •Using Dictionaries to Form Lists
- •Queues, Trees, and Other Data Structures
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Program Data and Instructions
- •TURNING DATA INTO INSTRUCTIONS
- •TURNING INSTRUCTIONS INTO DATA
- •DATA CONVERSIONS
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •File Objects
- •Streams and Files
- •PostScript File Operators
- •OPENING AND CLOSING FILES
- •READING AND WRITING FILES
- •Reading from a File
- •Writing to a File
- •Copying and Renaming Files
- •WRITING FORMATTED DATA TO FILES
- •Writing Out Various Data Types
- •Spaces, Tabs, Returns, and Special Characters
- •FILE STATUS INFORMATION
- •RANDOM VERSUS SEQUENTIAL ACCESS
- •CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- •Appendix
- •Answers to Exercises

operators in-line versus grouped into a procedure is not particularly great. The differences amount to the ordering of operands and whether data are interleaved with instructions or pushed as a series of operands before the procedure is invoked. This difference is crucial only for readability, organization, and efficiency, and it is never required to define a procedure for good program flow.
EXPRESSING AN ALGORITHM AS A PROGRAM
If you start with a flowchart to represent an algorithm, the components of the flowchart are somewhat abstract. They represent actions and objects that are traditionally found in programming languages, and the structure and control flow of the program are represented symbolically. The use of a flowchart is predicated on the notion that the program’s algorithm can be embodied in a diagram showing the steps required to carry out the task.
Each program’s implementation is affected strongly by the language itself. Design decisions must be made based on the inherent strengths and weaknesses of the language, and the details of the implementation must ultimately be expressed using the native language constructs.
In order to represent your flowcharted algorithm as a program in some programming language, you must apply the language elements appropriately, within a structure you design. To do this, the language you are using must be fully general and must allow conditional expressions and be able to transfer control to other parts of the program. Yet each programming language was created with a particular purpose in mind, and each programming task is bent and shaped by the language in which it is implemented. The language provides the foundation. Beyond that, it is your skill as a programmer that creates a working program from the building blocks of the language. This is the art of programming.
Although it is possible to start with an abstract algorithm and then implement it in whatever programming language is handy, it is probably more realistic to assume that algorithms are developed in light of a particular language, and in such a way as to take advantage of that language’s features. For example, the kinds of data structures that exist (or are easy to implement) in a language can greatly affect the approach to solving the programming problem. PostScript has a specialized dictionary data structure that can provide entirely new approaches to problems
12 |
Chapter 2: POSTSCRIPT IS NOT LIKE C |