Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Кубр Милан Консалтинг.pdf
Скачиваний:
2059
Добавлен:
29.05.2015
Размер:
4.76 Mб
Скачать

Management consulting

To many consultants, becoming international is no longer a strategic choice. They made this choice 10–20 years ago, and their current problem is how to be more effective in managing and developing an international consultancy.

Different internationalization strategies have been pursued, depending on factors such as the firm’s general philosophy, organizational culture, resources, creativity, and also sheer luck (e.g. in finding a good local partner firm or an exceptionally talented local manager, or winning an important international contract). Nevertheless, all consultants who have become international stress the need to understand the institutional, economic and cultural characteristics of every national market.

Internationalization has been pursued by:

undertaking foreign assignments from the firm’s headquarters;

establishing local offices, but providing all senior and special expertise from headquarters;

establishing local offices by recruiting and developing local consultants, and gradually phasing out managerial and special expertise provided from headquarters;

acquiring local firms and transforming them to fit the parent firm’s professional and business culture;

acquiring local firms but leaving them almost as they are;

using various networking and alliance building formulas, as described in section 28.4.

A key issue is finding the balance between centralization and decentralization in developing and managing the professional service side of the firm. If a centralist approach prevails, the whole firm operates more or less in the same way, following the same guidelines and using the same type and level of expertise in different countries. Ensuring uniformity and coherence is a key task of management at all levels. In contrast, fully or largely decentralized firms operate as groupings of independent national units, which may be quite different from each other in terms of technical services and consulting style. Professional guidance from the headquarters is limited, and management focuses mainly on common business development policies and issues.

28.6 Profile and image of the firm

The strategic choices discussed in the previous sections concern the principal characteristics of a consulting firm. Taken as a whole, these characteristics constitute a firm’s unique identity or profile. As we have seen, many combinations are possible in choosing the firm’s principal characteristics. As a result, there is an almost infinite range of different profiles among which firms can choose.

636

The consulting firm’s strategy

Consistency between various choices

No firm is totally free in choosing its strategies. The choices must be consistent. Decisions concerning the sort of services that will be offered, or the sort of clients to be served, require corresponding choices in other areas, such as staff recruitment and development, or the firm’s own research programme. Furthermore, strategic choices cannot ignore the firm’s past experience and record of achievement. The future is very much predetermined by the past. Even if the firm has the determination and the resources for major reorientation of its service portfolio and profile, it is important to analyse what can actually be changed, what the cost of the change will be, and how the clients will react.

Typology of firms’ profiles

To help professional firms in better understanding their profile and developing coherent change strategies, several attempts have been made to develop typologies of professional firms (box 28.2). Any such typology has both the disadvantages and advantages of simplification. Seldom would a particular firm’s profile be fully identical with one of the prototypes. Most firms are hybrids, and exhibit many other characteristics. When it comes to specific client

Box 28.2 Five prototypes of consulting firms

Danielle Nees and Larry Greiner suggest five prototypes of consulting firms, based mainly on differences in their professional and organizational culture. They emphasize that consultants from these different firm prototypes bring a preestablished style to the client. Their typology includes:

Natural adventurers (consultants identified with scholarly disciplines, providing leading-edge knowledge and tackling difficult issues requiring a scientific approach).

Strategic navigators (consultants applying models and analytical tools to handling complex issues of the client firms’ future strategies).

Management physicians (consultants focusing on the anatomy and circulatory system of client firms by analysing and improving structures, procedures, culture, leadership and other factors of efficiency and effectiveness, and on implementing the proposals).

System architects (consultants dealing with systems projects requiring technical solutions, often using sets of pre-established tools and procedures; this includes installing the system and training the staff).

Friendly co-pilots (advisers to senior management on business strategies and policies, and other significant issues).

Source: Adapted from D. B. Nees and L. E. Greiner: “Seeing behind the look-alike management consultants”, in Organizational Dynamics, Winter 1985.

637