
Advanced Wireless Networks - 4G Technologies
.pdf
438 ADAPTIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Solving for Pk leads to
|
|
|
|
Q |
Q |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
||
Pk = λ1Gkk − |
|
λ2 |
|
|
|
Gi j Pj + n |
|
|
|
|
(12.116) |
||||||
Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q |
|
|
|
||||||
|
i =k |
Gii Pi i=1 |
j =i |
|
|
|
λ1Gkk |
r =k |
Q |
Grk |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j=r |
Gr j Pj +n |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
and further to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q |
Q |
Gi j Pj (t) + n |
|||
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
λ2 |
i=1 |
|
|
||||||
Pk (t + 1) = |
|
|
|
|
− |
|
j =i |
||||||||||
Q |
|
|
Grk |
|
|
|
|
Q |
|
Q |
Grk |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
λ1Gkk |
Gii Pi (t) |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q |
|||||||
|
r =k |
|
Gr j Pj (t)+n |
|
|
i =k |
r =k |
Gr j Pj (t) + n |
|||||||||
|
|
|
j=r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j=r |
(12.117) For λ2 = 0, the problem is reduced to maximizing the throughput and Equation (12.118) reduces to Equation (12.78). Without power constraints Equation (12.78) is rewritten as
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Pk (t + 1) |
= |
|
|
|
(12.118) |
Q |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Grk |
|
|
|
r =k |
Q |
|||
|
Gr j Pj (t) + n |
||||
|
|
|
j=r |
and Equation (12.118) can be rewritten in a more compact form as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pk (t + 1) = |
|
Pk (t + 1) |
, t = 0, 1, . . . |
(12.119) |
|||
|
|
|
|||||
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
λ2 |
Pk (t+1) |
|
||||
|
|
λ1 |
Q i (t) |
|
|
i=1
where Pk [Pmin, Pmax], k = 1, . . . , Q. From Equation (12.119), the new transmitted power is a scaled value of the transmitted power in the case of the maximum throughput algorithm. To compare the two-algorithms, the numerical example from References [85, 87] is used. Consider the system with Q = 5 users and the path gain matrix, G, shown below.
−5.8 −18.2 −55.3 −20.3 −33.6
−36.0 |
−9.7 |
−43.5 |
−22.2 |
−15.9 |
G(dB) = −41.6 |
−30.9 |
−9.3 |
−38.6 |
−36.5 |
−14.2 |
−20.6 |
−38.5 |
−6.8 |
−36.6 |
−22.6 |
−23.9 |
−20.1 |
−16.4 |
−10.8 |
The tradeoff factors have been set to {λ1, λ2} = {0.9999, 0.0001}. In this case we penalize power usage. From Table 12.9, we can see that the summation of the SINR (dB) of the users [which is related to the total throughput as in Equation (12.78)] has not changed very much in both schemes (only 0.04 %), but the power has been reduced by more than 98 % in the case of MTMPC method. Additional information on the topic can be found in References [88–90].
|
|
DYNAMIC SPECTRA SHARING IN WIRELESS NETWORKS |
439 |
|||||
|
|
Table 12.9 Comparison of MTPC and MTMPC algorithms |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
MTMPC algorithm |
|
MTPC algorithm |
|
|||
|
|
λ1 = 0.0001 and λ2 = 0.9999 |
|
|
λ1 = 1 and λ2 = 0 |
|
||
User |
|
P(dBw) |
SINR(dB) |
|
p(dBw)¯ |
SINR(dB) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
−13.9789 |
16.8345 |
|
|
−0.5580 |
16.9295 |
|
2 |
|
−16.8918 |
−0.8548 |
|
−6.6072 |
−0.9234 |
||
3 |
|
−4.6187 |
36.0956 |
|
13.4264 |
36.8300 |
||
4 |
|
−12.8725 |
8.6383 |
|
1.2111 |
8.5561 |
||
5 |
|
−14.3460 |
−5.9278 |
|
−1.5289 |
−6.5922 |
||
|
Average power |
Sum[SINR(dB)] |
Average power |
Sum[SINR(dB)] |
||||
|
|
(W) = 0.1 |
= 54.78 |
|
|
(W) = 5 |
= 54.80 |
|
12.6 DYNAMIC SPECTRA SHARING IN WIRELESS NETWORKS
In this section we present schemes for interference suppression in UWB-based WPAM systems when sharing the same band as other communications networks. The scheme can be used to significantly improve the performance of UWB systems in the presence of interference from mobile communication systems such as GSM and WCDMA. It is also effective in the presence of WLAN systems which are nowadays based on OFDMA technology or in military communications where the interference is generated by intentional jamming. The section also discuss the effectiveness of the scheme to suppress MC CDMA, which is a candidate technology for 4G mobile communications. In order to demonstrate the relevancy of these results we first provide a systematic review of the existing work in this field and then present specific scheme. The results show that significant suppression gain up to 40 dB can be achieved in the presence of OFDM, WCDMA and MC CDMA, enabling coexistence of different networks in the same frequency bandwidth. The effectiveness decreases if the number of subcarriers is increased.
The online source [91] gives historical perspective to UWB technologies. It lists down the early UWB references and patents from the 1960s and 1970s. In [92] a comprehensive overview of UWB wireless systems is given. It discusses the FCC allocation of 7.5 GHz (3.1–10.6 GHz) unlicensed band for the UWB devices. Potential UWB modulation schemes, multiple access issues, single vs multiband implementation and link budgets are also discussed. Paper [93] is a very frequently referenced one giving a brief introduction to the basics of impulse radio systems. It describes the characteristics of impulse radio and gives analytical estimates of the multiaccess capability under idealistic channel conditions.
12.6.1 Channel capacity
Some new channel capacity results for M-ary pulse position modulation (M-PPM) time hopping UWB systems are presented in [94]. It is demonstrated that the previous results based on the ‘pure PPM model’ have overestimated the real UWB capacity. The proposed model is extended with the correlator and soft decision decoding. The capacity is evaluated in the single-user case and with asynchronous multiple user interference (MUI) when the
440 ADAPTIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
inputs are equiprobable. It is found that larger M leads to increased capacity only at the high bit SNR region. Furthermore, optimal time offset values for each M are independent of the bit SNR. The MUI influence is detrimental for the capacity, especially at high bit SNRs.
12.6.2 Channel models
Paper [95] focuses on the UWB indoor channel modeling issues. The measurement data is collected from an extensive campaign in a typical modern office building with a 2 ns delay resolution. The model is formulated as a stochastic tapped delay line (STDL). The energy statistics due to small-scale effects seem to follow a Gamma distribution for all bins. Large-scale parameters can be modeled as stochastic parameters that can change, e.g., from room to room. UWB propagation channels are also discussed in [96]. Based on the modified CLEAN algorithm, estimates of time-of-arrival, angle-of-arrival, and waveform shape are derived. Key parameters of the model are intercluster decay rate, intracluster decay rate, cluster arrival rate, ray arrival rate and standard deviation of the relative azimuth arrival angles. Intercluster signal decay rate is generally determined by the architecture of the building. Intracluster decay rate, on the other hand, depends on the objects close to the receive antenna (e.g. furniture). Relative azimuth arrival angles were best fit to a Laplacian probability density function. Saleh and Valenzuela [97] present a model that has become a frequently referenced and adopted source in indoor multipath propagation channel modeling. They propose a statistical indoor radio channel model that (1) has flexibility to reasonable fit with the measured data, (2) is simple enough to be used in simulation and analysis, and (3) can be extended by adjusting parameters to represent various buildings. In the developed statistical model the rays of the received signal arrive in clusters.
The ray amplitudes are independent Rayleigh random variables with exponentially decaying variances with respect to the cluster delay and the ray delay. The clusters and the rays within the cluster form Poisson arrival processes with different, fixed rates. Paper [98] characterizes measurement-based UWB wireless indoor channels from the communications theoretic viewpoint. The bandwidth of the signal used in the measurement is over 1 GHz, resulting in the less than 1 ns time resolution. Robustness of the UWB signal to multipath fading is quantitatively evaluated through histograms and cumulative distributions. Two rake structures are introduced: the all rake serves as the best-case (benchmark) receiver and the maximum-energy-capture selective rake is a realistic sub-optimal approach. Multipath components of the measured waveforms are detected using a maximum-likelihood estimator based on a separable specular multipath channel model.
12.6.3 Diversity reception
Performance of PPM and on–off keying (OOK) binary block-coded modulation formats using a maximal ratio combining rake receiver is studied analytically in [99]. The trade-off between receiver complexity and performance is examined. Several suboptimal receivers in indoor multipath AWGN channels have been employed. Results indicate the robust performance may require an increase in rake complexity. This implies allocation of more rake fingers and tracking of the strongest multipaths to help in the selection combining. Rake performance for a pulse-based high data rate UWB system in an Intel Labs indoor channel model is addressed in [100]. It is noted that, at low input SNR values (0–10 dB) and small
DYNAMIC SPECTRA SHARING IN WIRELESS NETWORKS |
441 |
number of rake fingers, it is more beneficial to add rake taps for energy capture rather than for intersymbol interference (ISI) mitigation. In the presence of channel estimation errors, equal gain combining can be more robust than maximal ratio combining, and therefore yield better performance. In order to quantify the trade-off between rake receiver energy capture and diversity order [101] presents partly quasi-analytical and partly experimental analysis suited to dense multipath propagation environments. Numerical results show that a diversity level of less than 50 is adequate in typical indoor office conditions.
12.6.4 Performance evaluation
In [102] a method to evaluate the BER performance of time hopping (TH) PPM in the presence of multiuser interference and AWGN channel is proposed. Gaussian quadrature rules are used in this approach. Paper [103] concentrates on the signal design for binary UWB communications in dense multipath channels. The aim is to find signals with good distance properties leading to good BER performance that both depend on the time shift parameter τ . Performance of UWB correlation receivers for equal mean power Gaussian monocyles is studied in [104]. Channel conditions vary among ideal single user AWGN, nonideal synchronous, multipath fading and multiple access interference. It is shown that the pulse shape has a notable impact on the correlation receiver performance. The effects can be seen in the autocorrelation function, especially in the mainlobe. The autocorrelation is highly related to the SNR gain of the output and to interference resistance properties. Special characteristics of the Gaussian monocycles include: (1) higher order derivatives have higher SNR gain in single user and asynchronous multiple access channel but are less robust to interference than lower order derivatives; (2) narrower pulses have higher SNR gain in asynchronous multiple access channel at the cost of inferior interference resistance ability. Exact bit error rate performance of TH-PPM UWB systems in the presence of multiple access interference (MAI) is analyzed and simulated in [105]. Furthermore, it is shown that, with a moderate number of MAI sources, the standard Gaussian approximation becomes inaccurate at high SNRs.
12.6.5 Multiple access techniques and user capacity
The main principles for multiaccess in UWB systems are discussed in [106]. A functional medium access, radio link and radio resource control architecture is proposed and open issues for future activities are addressed. Numerical throughput and delay performance results in radio resource sharing are shown. Uncoded and coded performance analysis for TH-UWB systems is covered in [107]. A practical low-rate error correcting coding scheme is presented that requires no bandwidth expansion. Gaussian assumption for multiuser interference is shown to be invalid for high uncoded data rates. The user capacity is shown to increase radically with the proposed coding scheme. M-ary signals ranging from M = 2 up to M = 256 are used in [108] together with PPM signal formats in the UWB multiple access capacity analysis. Performance is analyzed in free-space propagation conditions. The number of supported users is dependent on the given bit error rate, SNR, transmission rate and modulation alphabet size. Performance and receiver complexity trade-off is discussed. Upper bounds are derived for the combinations of user capacity and total transmission rate. According to the numerical examples it is possible to achieve a system with
442 ADAPTIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
high capacity and data rate, low bit error probability, and yet only moderate receiver complexity. Reference [109] is one of the first public and widely cited papers outlining the potential of time hopping impulse radio multiple access communications. It describes the basic building blocks of the impulse transmitter and receiver and their mathematical formulations. It also shows an example for the bit error vs user capacity estimate at variable data rates. Finally, some drawbacks of the high time-resolution impulse radio systems are mentioned: (1) the need for up to thousands of rake fingers in the multipath receiver; and
(2) complex initial clock acquisition. In [110] a comprehensive overall description of the time-hopping UWB system physical layer issues is given. Achievable transmission rates and multiple access capacities are estimated for analog and digital modulation formats. Numerical results indicate that the digital implementation has the potential for nearly one order of magnitude higher user densities than the analog one.
12.6.6 Multiuser detection
Reference [111] is focused on the multiuser detection (MUD) possibilities for direct sequence UWB systems. It is demonstrated that the adaptive minimum mean squared error (MMSE) MUD receiver outperforms the rake receiver both in energy capture and in interference rejection sense. Studied interference sources are narrowband IEEE 802.11a interference and wideband multiuser UWB interference. Ideally, MMSE receiver can achieve AWGN bit error rate within a 1–2 dB margin even in dense multipath channels. In heavily loaded conditions the penalty of 6 dB is experienced, but at the same time the rake receivers suffer from unbearable error floors. Iterative partial parallel multiuser interference cancellation (PIC) is applied to the UWB multiuser system in [112]. Matched filter, maximum-likelihood, and linear minimum mean squared error receivers are also used in the performance comparison. In this paper, multiuser detection is combined with error control coding. The UWB system includes only one pulse per symbol and AWGN channel is assumed. Numerical results show that it is possible to attain the coded single user BER bound for eight to 15 users in a heavily loaded system without any processing gain. As the number of users increases and the bandwidth to pulse repetition frequency decreases, MAI is expected to adversely affect system capacity and performance. As a consequence, a framework for the design of multiuser detectors for UWB multiple access communications systems is presented in [113]. An optimum multiuser detector is also proposed.
12.6.7 Interference and coexistence
Coexistence of UWB system with some other radio systems is studied in [114]. This means the evaluation of interference caused by the UWB system to the other radio systems and vice versa. The coexisting radio concepts are GSM900, UMTS/WCDMA and GPS. Several short Gaussian-based UWB pulses are employed. According to the numerical results, convenient selection of pulse waveform and width leads to interference resistance up to a certain limit. The pulse shape is in interaction with the data rate. High-pass filtered waveforms are preferred in the case of short UWB pulses, whereas generic Gaussian ones are favorable if long pulses are utilized. Interference caused by narrowband systems is the most detrimental to UWB if it is located at the UWB system’s nominal center frequency. In the GPS band the DS based UWB system interfered less than the time hopping system.
DYNAMIC SPECTRA SHARING IN WIRELESS NETWORKS |
443 |
12.6.8 Channel estimation/imperfections
Channel estimation for time hopping UWB communications is dealt with in [115]. Multipath propagation and MAI are taken into consideration. Maximum-likelihood estimation is applied in data-aided and nondata-aided scenarios. Numerical results show that the performance is reasonable if the number of simultaneous users is below 20. The impact of the timing jitter and tracking to the impulse radio system performance is investigated in [116]. Binary and 4-ary modulations are used. According to these studies both modulations suffer from the jitter, however 4-ary is better. Timing jitter is also discussed in [117]. Static and Rayleigh fading channels are assumed. Orthogonal PPM, optimum PPM, OOK and BPSK modulations are compared in performance evaluation. Similar performance degradation is noted for BPSK and PPM schemes, while OOK is more susceptible to large jitter. The probability density function of timing jitter due to rake finger estimation is simulated. The results depend on the pulse shape and SNR. Worst case distribution is shown to provide an upper bound for BER performance. The above survey of issues in UWB communications indicates a need for special attention to interference avoidance or interference suppression due to extremely wide signal bandwidth and the possibility of interference with other systems operating in the same bandwidth. One way to deal with the problem is to design the pulse shape in such a way that the signal has no significant spectral component in the occupied frequency bands. Pulse shapes respecting the FCC spectral mask were proposed in References [118–120]. The drawback of such a solution is the need for over sampling and lack of flexibility in the case that the interfering signal is not stationary like in military applications.
Another approach is to use adaptive interference suppression like the schemes summarized in the previous sub-section entitled interference and co-existence. The solution discussed in this section belongs to the latter category. We will demonstrate the advantages of this approach with a number of numerical results. The solution is adaptive and can be implemented with no over-sampling, unlike other schemes.
12.6.9 Signal and interference model
In general the signal transmitted by the desired user is modeled as: |
|
||
s(t) = |
b[t − i N Tf − (1 − ai ) ] cos ωct |
(12.120) |
|
|
i |
|
|
where |
|
|
|
b(t) = |
N −1 |
|
|
g[t − nTf − h(n)Tc] |
(12.121) |
||
|
|
n=0 |
|
The signal can also be transmitted in the baseband with no carrier. In Equation (12.121), g(t) represents the basic pulse shape (monocycle pulse) and Tf represents frame duration during which there is only one pulse Tc seconds wide. The sequence h(n) is the user’s timehopping code and its elements are integers taking values in the range 0 ≤ h(n) ≤ N − 1. The parameter Tc is the duration of an addressable time bin within a frame. In other words, the right-hand side of Equation (12.121) consists of a block of N time-hopped monocycles. ai represents information bits (0,1). Equation (12.121) says that, if ai were all zero, the signal would be a repetition of b(t)-shaped blocks with period N Tf. may be viewed as
444 ADAPTIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
the time shift impressed by a unit data symbol on the monocycles of a block. It is clear that the choice of affects the detection process and can be exploited to optimize system performance. In summary, the transmitted signal consists of a sequence of b(t)-shaped position-modulated blocks.
The code sequence restarts at every data symbol. This ‘short-code’ assumption is made here for the sake of simplicity and is in keeping with some trends in the design of thirdgeneration CDMA cellular systems. Longer codes are conceivable and perhaps more attractive but lead to more complex channel estimation schemes. The OFDM interference, generated for example by a WLAN user, is modeled as
N −1 |
|
|
|
i |
|
|
|
j(t) = |
di+ |
t |
Ji cos 2π fc + fc + |
|
t + ϕi |
(12.122) |
|
Tj |
|||||||
T j |
|
||||||
i=0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
where N is the number of channels, di is the FDM interference information bits, fc + fc is the first channel carrier frequency, Ji is the OFDM interference amplitudes, ϕi is the channel phase at the receiver input and Tj is the bit interval.
The MC CDMA interference can be modeled as
K |
N −1 |
|
i |
|
|
j(t) = |
dk (t) ck (i) Jk,i cos 2π |
fc + fc + |
|
t + ϕk,i |
(12.123) |
Tj |
|||||
k=1 |
i=0 |
|
|
|
|
where N is the number of channels, dk (t) is the kth user interference bit, ck (i) is the PN sequence of the kth user and the ith channel, K is the number of users, fc + fc is the first channel carrier frequency, Jk,i is the interference amplitude, ϕk,i is the channel phase at the receiver input and Tj is the bit interval.
12.6.10 Receiver structure
The receiver block diagram is shown in Figure 12.22. There are two interference rejection circuits, A and B . The first one (A) processes signal if logic one is sent, and the other
(B) processes signal for logic zero. When several time-hopping signals are simultaneously received over a channel with Lc paths, the composite waveform at the output of the receiver antenna may be written as:
Lc |
|
r(t) = [γ Il s(t − τl ) cos ωct + γ Ql s(t − τl ) sin ωct] + n(t) + j(t) |
(12.124) |
l=1 |
|
where n(t) is noise, and j(t) is total interference, γl = γ Il + jγ Ql is the complex attenuation and τ l is the delay in the lth path. If we consider signal sampled at chip interval Tc we have:
r(k) = r I (k) + jr Q(k) |
(12.125) |
||
where |
|
||
r I (t) = r(t) cos ωct |
(12.126a) |
||
r Q(t) = r(t) sin ωct |
(12.126b) |
||
k = |
t |
(12.127) |
|
Tc |
|


446 ADAPTIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
The weight of the I branch in the lth finger is:
T I l (i) = |
D AI l (i) + D B I l (i) |
(12.135) |
and the weight of the Q branch in the lth finger is:
T Ql (i) = |
D AQl (i) + D B Ql (i) |
(12.136) |
12.6.11 Interference rejection circuit model
Interference rejection at UWB radio system may be performed by a transversal filter employing LMS algorithm. Basically, in the first step, the interfering signal is estimated in the presence of the UWB signal which is at that stage considered as an additional noise.
The estimated interference ˆ is subtracted from the overall input signal , creating the input j r
signal = − ˆ = + + − ˆ = + + to the standard UWB receiver. In order r r j s n j j s n j
to predict the interference signal, sampling is performed at frame rate, and the adaptation of filter weights using LMS algorithm is performed at bit rate. It is already known that the changes of the symbol in the interfering signal will disrupt the estimation process. Curve 3, in Figure 12.23, shows the detection variable at the output of the transversal filter when there
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d(i) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
204 |
208 |
212 |
216 |
220 |
224 |
228 |
|
|
|
|
i |
|
|
|
Figure 12.23 Detection variable: 1, no interference; 2, interference with J:S = 40 dB, with interference rejection circuit; 3, interference with J : S = 40 dB, with transversal filter using classical LMS algorithm, PSK interference, M = 4,= 5 ns, vbJ = 100 Msymbol/s, vbTH = 5 Mbt/s, Tframe = 10 ns, fc = 800 MHz.
