Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Wypych Handbook of Solvents

.pdf
Скачиваний:
82
Добавлен:
15.08.2013
Размер:
20.21 Mб
Скачать

332 Vasiliy V. Tereshatov, Valery Yu. Senichev

 

 

V

 

2

 

χ1

= χ1S +

1

(δ1 − δp )

 

[6.4.1]

 

 

 

RT

 

 

where:

 

 

 

 

 

 

χ1S

a lattice constant whose value can be taken as 0.34

 

 

V1

the molar volume of the solvent

 

 

R1

the gas constant

 

 

 

T

the absolute temperature

 

 

δ1 and δp

the solubility parameters of the solvent and the polymer, respectively

 

However, to evaluate χ1 from Eq. [6.4.1], we need accurate data for δ1.

In some cases the negative Mc values are obtained (Tables 6.4.1, 6.4.2). The reason is that the real values of the entropy component of the χ1 parameter can strongly differ from the 0.34 value.

Table 6.4.1. Characteristics of polyurethane-solvent systems at 25oC. [Adapted, by permission, from U.S. Aithal, T.M. Aminabhavi, R.H. Balundgi, and S.S. Shukla, JMS - Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys., 30C (1), 43 (1990).]

Penetrant

Qmax

 

χ1

MC

 

Monocyclic aromatics

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benzene

0.71

 

0.378

630

 

 

 

 

 

Toluene

0.602

 

0.454

790

 

 

 

 

 

p-Xylene

0.497

 

0.510

815

 

 

 

 

 

Mesitylene

0.402

 

0.531

704

 

 

 

 

 

Chlorobenzene

1.055

 

0.347

905

 

 

 

 

 

Bromobenzene

1.475

 

0.347

1248

 

 

 

 

 

o-Dichlorobenzene

1.314

 

0.357

1106

 

 

 

 

 

Anisole

0.803

 

0.367

821

 

 

 

 

 

Nitrobenzene

1.063

 

0.356

835

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aliphatic alcohols

 

 

 

 

 

 

Methanol

0.249

 

1.925

-90

 

 

 

 

 

Ethanol

0.334

 

0.349

172

 

 

 

 

 

n-Propanol

0.380

 

0.421

484

 

 

 

 

 

Isopropanol

0.238

 

0.352

249

 

 

 

 

 

n-Butanol

0.473

 

2.702

-131

 

 

 

 

 

2-Butanol

0.333

 

1.652

-307

 

 

 

 

 

2-Methyl-1-propanol

0.389

 

0.440

535

 

 

 

 

 

Isoamyl alcohol

0.414

 

0.357

398

 

 

 

 

 

6.4 Influence of structure on equilibrium swelling

333

Table 6.4.2. Characteristics of polyurethane-solvent systems at 25oC. [Adapted, by permission, from U.S. Aithal, T.M. Aminabhavi, R.H. Balundgi, and S.S. Shukla, JMS - Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys., 30C (1), 43 (1990).]

Penetrant

Qmax

 

χ1

MC

 

Halogenated aliphatics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chloroform

4.206

 

0.362

3839

 

 

 

 

 

Bromoform

5.583

 

0.435

4694

 

 

 

 

 

1,2-Dibromoethane

1.855

 

0.412

770

 

 

 

 

 

1,3-Dibromopropane

1.552

 

0.444

870

 

 

 

 

 

Dichloromethane

2.104

 

0.34

1179

 

 

 

 

 

Trichloroethylene

1.696

 

0.364

1098

 

 

 

 

 

Tetrachlorethylene

0.832

 

0.368

429

 

 

 

 

 

1,2-Dichlorethane

1.273

 

0.345

728

 

 

 

 

 

Carbon tetrachloride

1.058

 

0.538

860

 

 

 

 

 

1,4-Dichlorobutane

0.775

 

0.348

626

 

 

 

 

 

1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane

5.214

 

0.34

6179

 

 

 

 

 

 

Miscellaneous liquids

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Methyl acetate

0.494

 

0.341

370

 

 

 

 

 

Ethyl acetate

0.509

 

0.422

513

 

 

 

 

 

Ethyl benzoate

0.907

 

0.34

1111

 

 

 

 

 

Methyl ethyl ketone

1.261

 

0.364

2088

 

 

 

 

 

Tetrahydrofuran

2.915

 

0.39

2890

 

 

 

 

 

1,4-Dioxane

2.267

 

0.376

2966

 

 

 

 

 

DMF

1.687

 

1.093

-1184

 

 

 

 

 

DMSO

0.890

 

1.034

-975

 

 

 

 

 

Acetonitrile

0.184

 

0.772

182

 

 

 

 

 

Nitromethane

0.302

 

1.160

5734

 

 

 

 

 

Nitroethane

0.463

 

0.578

382

 

 

 

 

 

n-Hexane

0.069

 

1.62

2192

 

 

 

 

 

Cyclohexane

0.176

 

0.753

287

 

 

 

 

 

Benzyl alcohol

4.221

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the second variant of evaluation of Mc, data on the temperature dependence of volume fraction of polymer, ϕ2 , in the swollen gel were used. Results of calculations of Mc from the Flory-Rehner equation in some cases also gave negative values. The evaluation of

334

Vasiliy V. Tereshatov, Valery Yu. Senichev

Mc in the framework of this approach is not an independent way, and Mc is an adjustment parameter, as is the parameter χ1 of interaction between solvent and polymer.

In the last decades of evaluation of the physical network density of SPU was done on samples swollen to equilibrium in two solvents.2,9,10 Swelling of SPU in toluene practically does not affect hard domains.9,11 Swelling of SPU (based on oligoethers diol) in a tributyl phosphate (a strong acceptor of protons) results in full destruction of the physical network with hard domains.2 The effective network density was evaluated for samples swollen to equilibrium in toluene according to the Cluff-Gladding method.12 Samples were swollen to equilibrium in TBP and the density of the physical network was determined from equation:2,10

(v e / V0 )dx (v e / V0 )x = (v e / V0 )d

[6.4.2]

As the result of unequal influence of solvents on the physical network of SPU, the values of effective density of networks calculated for the “dry” cut sample can essentially differ. The examples of such influence of solvents are given in the work.2 SPU samples with oligodiene soft segments and various concentration of urethane-urea hard blocks were swollen to equilibrium in toluene, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), tetrahydrofuran (THF), 1,4-dioxane and TBP (experiments 1-6, 9, 10, 12). SPU based on oligoether (experiment 7), with urethane-urea hard segments, and crosslinked single-phase polyurethanes (PU) on the base of oligodiene prepolymer with functional isocyanate groups, cured by oligoether triols (experiments 8, 11) were also used. The effective network densities of materials swollen in these solvents were evaluated by the Cluff-Gladding method through the elasticity equilibrium modulus. The data are given in Table 6.4.3 per unit of initial volume.

The data shows that the lowest values of the network density are obtained for samples swollen to equilibrium in TBP. Only TBP completely breaks down domains of hard blocks. If solvents which are acceptors of protons (MEK, THF, 1,4-dioxane) are used in swelling experiment an intermediate values are obtained between those for toluene and TBP.

The network densities of SPU (experiments 8 and 11) obtained for samples swollen in toluene, TBP, 1,4-dioxane and THF coincide (Table 6.4.3).2

Table 6.4.3. Results of the evaluation of equilibrium swelling and network parameters of PUE. [Adapted, by permission, from E.N. Tereshatova, V.V. Tereshatov,

V.P. Begishev, and M.A. Makarova, Vysokomol . Soed., 34B, 22 (1992).]

#

ρ

QV

(ve/V0)

QV

(ve/V0)

QV

(ve/V0)

QV

(ve/V0)

QV

(ve/V0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

kg/m3

Toluene

THF

MEK

1,4-Dioxane

TBP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

996

1.56

1.03

0.46

0.77

1.08

0.41

3.76

0.12

5.12

0.06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

986

2.09

0.53

0.52

0.43

1.40

0.23

6.22

0.04

11.15

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

999

1.74

0.77

0.49

0.73

1.11

0.38

7.88

0.03

18.48

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

1001

2.41

0.44

0.49

 

1.75

0.13

14.3

0.02

 

5

1003

4.46

0.15

0.47

 

3.29

 

 

 

6

984

2.63

0.40

0.57

0.39

1.45

0.19

3.44

0.14

4.21

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

1140

0.86

1.83

2.06

 

1.40

0.73

1.86

0.31

7.22

0.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.4 Influence of structure on equilibrium swelling

 

 

 

 

 

335

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#

ρ

QV

(ve/V0)

QV

(ve/V0)

 

QV

(ve/V0)

QV

(ve/V0)

QV

(ve/V0)

kg/m3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toluene

THF

 

MEK

1,4-Dioxane

TBP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

972

2.42

0.35

1.84

0.36

 

1.01

0.54

2.08

0.34

1.48

0.35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

979

2.26

0.39

1.72

0.37

 

0.98

0.54

1.97

0.35

1.62

0.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

990

2.00

0.63

0.47

 

 

0.99

0.55

2.42

0.29

2.19

0.24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

991

4.11

0.18

2.79

0.18

 

3.98

0.17

3.42

0.18

2.54

0.17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

997

2.42

0.50

1.00

0.32

 

2.68

0.12

4.06

0.13

4.32

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ve/V0), kmol/m3

To understand the restrictions to swelling of SPU caused by the physical network containing hard domains, the following experiments were carried out. Segmented polybutadiene urethane urea (PBUU) on the base of oligobutadiene diol urethane prepolymer with functional NCO-groups (M 2400), cured with MOCA, and SPU-10 based on prepolymer cured with the mixture of MOCA and oligopropylene triol (M 5000) were used. The chemical network densities of PBUU and SPU were 0.05 and 0.08 kmol/m3, respectively. The physical network density of initial sample, (ve/V0)d, of PBUU was 0.99 kmol/m3 and of SPU-10 was 0.43 kmol/m3.

Samples of PBUU and SPU-10 were swollen to equilibrium in solvents of different polarity: dioctyl sebacate (DOS), dioctyl adipate (DOA), dihexyl phthalate (DHP), transformer oil (TM), nitrile of oleic acid (NOA), dibutyl carbitol formal (DBCF), and tributyl phosphate (TBP).

The values of equilibrium swelling of elastomers in these solvents, Q1, (ratio of the solvent mass to the mass of the unswollen sample) are given in Table 6.4.4. After swelling in a given solvent, samples were swollen in toluene to equilibrium. The obtained data for swelling in toluene, QVT , indicate that the physical networks of PBUU and SPU-10 do not change on swelling in most solvents. Equilibrium swelling in toluene of initial sample and the sample previously swollen in other solvents is practically identical. Several other observations were made from swelling experiments, including sequential application of different solvents. If preliminary disruption of the physical network of PBUU and SPU-10 by TBP occurs, swelling of these materials in toluene strongly increases. Similarly, samples previously swollen in TBP have higher equilibrium swelling, Q2, when swollen in other solvents. The value of Q2 is likely higher than equilibrium swelling Q1 of initial sample (Table 6.4.4). Q2 for PBUU is closer to the value of equilibrium swelling of a single-phase crosslinked polybutadiene urethane, PBU, having chemical network density, (ve/V0)x = 0.04 kmol/m3. Thus, the dense physical network of polyurethane essentially limits the extent of equilibrium swelling in solvents, which do not breakdown the domain structure of a material.

336

Vasiliy V. Tereshatov, Valery Yu. Senichev

Table 6.4.4. Equilibrium swelling of SPBUU and SPU-10 (the initial sample and sample after breakdown of hard domains by TBP) and swelling of amorphous PBU at 25oC

 

 

 

SPBUU

 

 

SPU-10

 

Solvent

 

 

 

 

 

 

PBU

Initial structure

After breakdown of domains

Initial structure

After breakdown of domains

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q1

QT

Q2

Q1

QT

Q2

Q3

-

 

1.35

 

 

2.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOS

0.62

1.34

3.97

0.66

2.09

3.04

5.56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOA

0.68

1.34

4.18

0.84

2.05

3.26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DBP

0.60

1.36

3.24

0.90

2.12

3.38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DHP

0.63

1.34

3.71

0.85

2.10

3.22

4.47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TO

0.57

1.35

2.29

0.58

2.07

1.92

1.99

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOA

0.59

1.36

4.03

0.72

2.10

2.86

4.66

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DBCP

0.69

1.37

4.60

0.155

2.96

3.45

5.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TBP

5.01

7.92*

5.01

4.22

5.43

4.22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* The result refers to the elastomer, having physical network completely disrupted

Swelling of SPU can be influenced by changes in elastomer structure resulting from mechanical action. At higher tensile strains of SPU, a successive breakdown of hard domains as well as micro-segregation may come into play causing reorganization.13-15 If the structural changes in segmented elastomers are accompanied by breakdown of hard domains and a concomitant transformation of a certain amount of hard segments into a soft polymeric matrix or pulling of some soft blocks (structural defects) out of the hard domains,14 variation of network parameters, is inevitable. It is known4 that high strains applied to SPU causes disruption of the physical network and a significant drop in its density.

The data of equilibrium swelling of SPU-1 with oligodiene soft segments obtained by curing prepolymer by the mixture of MOCA and oligobutadiene diol (M 2000) with the molar ratio 1/1 are given in Table 6.4.5. The initial density of the SPU-1 network (ve/V0)dx = 0.206 kmol/m3, the physical network density (ve/V0)d = 0.170 kmol/m3. After stretching by 700 % and subsequent unloading, the value (ve/V0)dx = 0.115 kmol/m3 and (ve/V0)d = 0.079 kmol/m3. The density of the chemical network (ve/V0)x = 0.036 kmol/m3 did not change. Samples were swollen to equilibrium in a set of solvents: toluene, n-octane, cyclohexane, p-xylene, butyl acetate, DBCF, DBP, DHP, dihexyl sebacate (DHS), DOA and DOS (the values of density, ρ1, and molar volume of solvents, V1, are given in Table 6.2.5).

The data in Table 6.4.5 shows that, after stretching, the volume equilibrium swelling of samples does not change in DBCF.4 In other solvents equilibrium swelling is noticeably increased.

Swelling experiments of samples previously swollen in solvents and subsequently in toluene have shown that the value of equilibrium swelling in toluene varies only for samples previously swollen in DBCF. The effective network densities evaluated for SPU-1 samples, swollen in DBCF, and then in toluene, have appeared equal (0.036 and 0.037 kmol/m3, respectively) and these values correspond to the value of the chemical network parameter,

6.4 Influence of structure on equilibrium swelling

337

(ve/V0)x, of SPU-1. It means that DBCF breaks down the physical network of elastomer; thus, the values of Qv in DBCF do not depend on the tensile strain. In all other cases, swelling of SPU-1 in toluene differs only marginally from the initial swelling of respective samples in toluene alone. Therefore, these solvents are unable to cause the breakdown of the physical network.

Table 6.4.5. Equilibrium swelling of SPU-1 samples in various solvents before and after stretching at 25oC (calculated and experimental data). [Adapted, by permission, from V.V. Tereshatov, Vysokomol. soed., 37A, 1529 (1995).]

 

ρ1,

V1×10

3

 

QV

 

QV

(ε=700%)

T

T

Solvent

 

,

χ1 (ε=0)

 

 

 

QV

QV

kg/m3

m3/kmol

(ε=0)

calc

 

exp

(ε=700%)

(ε=0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toluene

862

107

 

 

3.54

0.32

5.06

 

4.87

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DBP

1043

266

 

 

1.12

0.56

1.47

 

1.53

4.85

3.49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

n-Octane

698

164

 

 

0.79

0.75

0.90

 

0.93

4.94

3.60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cyclohexane

774

109

 

 

1.46

0.60

1.78

 

1.95

4.99

3.63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p-Xylene

858

124

 

 

2.94

0.36

4.17

 

3.93

4.81

3.52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Butyl acetate

876

133

 

 

2.28

0.44

3.13

 

2.97

5.12

3.69

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOS

912

468

 

 

1.21

0.38

1.60

 

1.71

5.10

3.63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOA

924

402

 

 

1.49

0.32

2.19

 

2.18

5.00

3.61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DHS

923

340

 

 

1.74

0.30

2.55

 

2.44

5.01

3.59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DHP

1001

334

 

 

1.25

0.47

1.71

 

1.74

4.79

3.47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DBCP

976

347

 

 

4.48

 

 

 

4.51

9.92

9.98

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The calculation of equilibrium swelling of SPU-1 (after its deformation up to 700 % and subsequent unloading) in a given solvent was carried out using the Flory - Rehner equation. In our calculations we used values of the χ1 parameter of interaction between solvents and elastomer calculated from experimental data of equilibrium swelling of initial sample (ε=0) in these solvents.

The diference between calculated and experimental data on equilibrium swelling of SPU-1 samples after their deformation does not exceed 9%. Therefore, the increase in swelling of SPU-1 is not related to the change of the χ1 parameter but it is related to a decrease in the (ve/V0)dx value of its three-dimensional network, caused by restructure of material by effect of strain.

The change of the domain structure of SPU exposed to increased temperature (~200oC) and consequent storage of an elastomer at room temperature may also cause a change in equilibrium swelling of material.16

REFERENCES

1V.P. Begishev, V.V. Tereshatov, E.N. Tereshatova, Int. Conf. Polymers in extreme environments, Nottingham, July 9-10, 1991, Univ. Press, Nottingham, 1991, pp. 1-6.

2 E.N. Tereshatova, V.V. Tereshatov, V.P. Begishev, and M.A. Makarova, Vysokomol. Soed., 34B, 22 (1992).

3V.V. Tereshatov, E.N. Tereshatova, V.P. Begishev, V.I. Karmanov, and I.V. Baranets, Polym. Sci., 36A, 1680 (1994).

338

Vasiliy V. Tereshatov, Valery Yu. Senichev

4V.V. Tereshatov, Vysokomol. soed., 37A, 1529 (1995).

5U.S. Aithal, T.M. Aminabhavi, R.H. Balundgi, and S.S. Shukla, JMS - Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys., 30C

(1), 43 (1990).

6 P.J. Flory, Principles of Polymer Chemistry, Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, 1953.

7G.M. Bristow, and W.F. Watson, Trans. Faraday. Soc., 54, 1731 (1958).

8 L.N. Mizerovsky, L.N. Vasnyatskaya, and G.M. Smurova, Vysokomol. Soed., 29A, 1512 (1987).

9D. Cohen, A. Siegman, and M. Narcis, Polym. Eng. Sci., 27, 286 (1987).

10E. Konton, G. Spathis, M. Niaounakis and V. Kefals, Colloid Polym. Sci., 26B, 636 (1990).

11V.V. Tereshatov, E.N. Tereshatova, and E.R. Volkova, Polym. Sci., 37A, 1157 (1995).

12E.E. Cluff, E.K. Gladding, and R. Pariser, J. Polym. Sci., 45, 341 (1960).

13Yu.Yu. Kercha, Z.V. Onishchenko, I.S. Kutyanina, and L.A. Shelkovnikova, Structural and Chemical Modification of Elastomers, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1989.

14Yu.Yu. Kercha, Physical Chemistry of Polyurethanes, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1979.

15V.N. Vatulev, S.V. Laptii, and Yu.Yu. Kercha, Infrared Spectra and Structure of Polyurethanes,

Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1987.

16S.V. Tereshatov, Yu.S. Klachkin, and E.N. Tereshatova, Plastmassy, 7, 43 (1998).

7

Solvent Transport Phenomena

Many industrial processes rely on dissolution of raw materials and subsequent removal of solvents by various drying process. The formation of a solution and the subsequent solvent removal depends on a solvent transport phenomena which are determined by the properties of the solute and the properties of the solvent. Knowledge of the solvent movement within the solid matrix by a diffusion process is essential to design the technological processes. Many of the final properties, such as tribological properties, mechanical toughness, optical clarity, protection against corrosion, adhesion to substrates and reinforcing fillers, protective properties of clothing, the quality of the coated surface, toxic residues, morphology and residual stress, ingress of toxic substances, chemical resistance, depend not only on the material chosen but also on the regimes of technological processes. For these reasons, solvent transport phenomena are of interest to modern industry.

7.1 INTRODUCTION TO DIFFUSION, SWELLING, AND DRYING

George Wypych

ChemTec Laboratories, Inc., Toronto, Canada

Small molecule diffusion is the driving force behind movement of small molecules in and out of the solid matrix. Although both swelling and drying rely on diffusion, these processes are affected by the surfaces of solids, the concentration of small molecules in the surface layers, the morphology of the surface, and the interface between phases in which diffusion gradient exists. For these reasons, swelling and drying are treated as specific phenomena.

7.1.1 DIFFUSION

The free-volume theory of diffusion was developed by Vrentas and Duda.1 This theory is based on the assumption that movement of a small molecule (e.g., solvent) is accompanied by a movement in the solid matrix to fill the free volume (hole) left by a displaced solvent molecule. Several important conditions must be described to model the process. These include the time scales of solvent movement and the movement of solid matrix (e.g. polymer segments, called jumping units), the size of holes which may fit both solvent molecules and jumping units, and the energy required for the diffusion to occur.

The timescale of the diffusion process is determined by the use of the diffusion Deborah, number De, given by the following equation:

De =

τM

[7.1.1]

τD

 

 

340

George Wypych

where:

 

τM

the molecular relaxation time

τD

the characteristic diffusion time

If the diffusion Deborah number is small (small molecular relaxation time or large dif-

fusion time) molecular relaxation is much faster than diffusive transport (in fact, it is almost instantaneous).2 In this case the diffusion process is similar to simple liquids. For example, diluted solutions and polymer solutions above glass transition temperature fall in this category.

If the Deborah number is large (large molecular relaxation time or small diffusion time), the diffusion process is described by Fickian kinetics and is denoted by an elastic diffusion process.1 The polymeric structure in this process is essentially unaffected and coefficients of mutual and self-diffusion become identical. Elastic diffusion is observed at low solvent concentrations below the glass transition temperature.2

The relationships below give the energy required for the diffusion process and compare the sizes of holes required for the solvent and polymer jumping unit to move within the system. The free-volume coefficient of self-diffusion is given by the equation:2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$*

 

$*

 

 

D = D

 

exp

E

 

exp

γ(ω1V1

+ ω2 ξV2 )

 

[7.1.2]

o

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

RT

VFH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

where:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D1

 

self-diffusion coefficient

 

 

 

 

 

Do

 

pre-exponential factor

 

 

 

 

 

Eenergy per molecule required by the molecule to overcome attractive forces

Rgas constant

Ttemperature

γoverlap factor introduced to address the fact that the same free volume is available for more than one molecule

ω

mass fraction (index 1 for solvent, index 2 for polymer)

^

 

V*

specific free hole volume (indices the same as above)

ξthe ratio of the critical molar volume of the solvent jumping unit to the critical molar

$

 

volume of the polymer jumping unit (see equation [7.1.3])

 

 

average hole free volume per gram of mixture.

 

VFH

 

 

$*

$*

$*

$*

[7.1.3]

ξ =V1

/ V2

=V1 M1

/ V2M2

where:

Mmolecular weight (1 - solvent, 2 - polymer jumping unit)

The first exponent in equation [7.1.2] is the energy term and the second exponent is the free-volume term. Figure 7.1.1 shows three regions of temperature dependence of free-volume: I - above glass transition temperature, II - close to transition temperature, and III - below the transition temperature. In the region I, the second term of the equation [7.1.2] is negligible and thus diffusion is energy-driven. In the region II both terms are significant. In the region III the diffusion is free volume-driven.3

7.1 Introduction to diffusion, swelling, and drying

 

 

 

 

 

 

341

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

-7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Region

 

 

 

 

8 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

methanol

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

7 10-7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

acetone

 

units

 

I

II

 

III

 

 

6 10-7

 

 

 

Me acetate

0.5

 

 

1-

 

 

 

benzene

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

arbitrary

 

 

 

 

 

 

cm

-7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

4 10-7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diffusivity,

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

D,

3 10-7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

1 10-7

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

-7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

8

9

10

11

12

 

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

 

7

 

0

 

 

 

103/(K

 

 

 

 

 

Temperature, arbitrary units

 

 

 

 

+ T - T

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

g2

 

Figure 7.1.1. Temperature dependence of the solvent self-diffusion coefficient. [Adapted, by permission, from D Arnauld, R L Laurence, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31(1), 218-28 (1992).]

Figure 7.1.2. Free-volume correlation data for various solvents. [Data from D Arnauld, R L Laurence, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31(1), 218-28 (1992).]

The mutual diffusion coefficient is given by the following equation:

 

D

ω ω

 

 

 

 

 

D =

1

1 2

 

 

1

 

= D Q

[7.1.4]

RT

∂ω

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T , p

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

where:

Dmutual diffusion coefficient

1

chemical potential of a solvent per mole

Qthermodynamic factor.

These equations are at the core of diffusion theory and are commonly used to predict various types of solvent behavior in polymeric and other systems. One important reason for their wide application is that all essential parameters of the equations can be quantified and then used for calculations and modelling. The examples of data given below illustrate the effect of important parameters on the diffusion processes.

Figure 7.1.2 shows the effect of temperature on the diffusivity of four solvents. The relationship between diffusivity and temperature is essentially linear. Only solvents having the smallest molecules (methanol and acetone) depart slightly from a linear relationship due to the contribution of the energy term. The diffusivity of the solvent decreases as temperature decreases. Several other solvents show a similar relationship.3

Figure 7.1.3 shows the relationship between the solvent’s molar volume and its activation energy. The activation energy increases as the solvent’s molar volume increases then levels off. The data show that the molar volume of a solvent is not the only parameter which affects activation energy. Flexibility and the geometry of solvent molecule also affect activation energy.3 Branched aliphatic solvents (e.g., 2-methyl-pentane, 2,3-dimethyl-butane) and substituted aromatic solvents (e.g., toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene) show large departures from free volume theory predictions.

Соседние файлы в предмете Химия