Making off without payment – factors to take into consideration

Key factors

(a)The starting points and sentencing ranges in this guideline are based on the assumption that the offender was motivated by greed or a desire to live beyond his or her means. To avoid double counting, such a motivation should not be treated as a factor that increases culpability.

(b)When assessing the harm caused by this offence, the starting point should be the loss suffered by the victim. In general, the greater the loss, the more serious the offence. However, the monetary value of the loss may not relect the full extent of the harm caused by the offence. The court should also take into account the impact of the offence on the victim, any harm to persons other than the direct victim, and any harm in the form of public alarm or erosion of public conidence.

(c)The following matters of offender mitigation may be relevant to this offence:

(i)Offender motivated by desperation or need

The fact that an offence has been committed in desperation or need arising from particular hardship may count as offender mitigation in exceptional circumstances.

(ii)Voluntary return of stolen property

Whether and the degree to which the return of stolen property constitutes a matter of offender mitigation will depend on an assessment of the circumstances and, in particular, the voluntariness and timeliness of the return.

(iii)Impact on sentence of offender’s dependency

Many offenders convicted of acquisitive crimes are motivated by an addiction, often to drugs, alcohol or gambling. This does not mitigate the seriousness of the offence, but an offender’s dependency may properly inluence the type of sentence imposed. In particular, it may sometimes be appropriate to impose a drug rehabilitation requirement or an alcohol treatment requirement as part of a community order or a suspended sentence order in an attempt to break the cycle of addiction and offending, even if an immediate custodial sentence would otherwise be warranted.1

1See para.2 on p.163. The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the approach to making drug treatment and testing orders, which also applies to imposing a drug rehabilitation requirement in Attorney General’s Reference No. 64 of 2003 (Boujettif and Harrison) [2003] EWCA Crim 2514 and Woods and Collins [2005] EWCA Crim 2065 summarised in the Sentencing Guidelines Council Guideline Judgments Case Compendium (section (A) Generic Sentencing Principles) available at: www.sentencing-guidelines.gov.uk

Triable either way:

Maximum when tried summarily: Level 5 ine and/or 6 months

Maximum when tried on indictment: 2 years

Offence seriousness (culpability and harm)

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on irst time offender pleading not guilty

Offence seriousness (culpability and harm)

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors (other than those within examples above)

Common aggravating and mitigating factors are identiied in the pullout card

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence, then consider offender mitigation

Common factors are identiied in the pullout card – see also note (c) opposite

Consider a reduction for a guilty plea

Consider ancillary orders, including compensation

Refer to pages 168-174 for guidance on available ancillary orders

Decide sentence

Give reasons

Triable only summarily:

Maximum: Level 3 ine and/or one month

Offence seriousness (culpability and harm)

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on irst time offender pleading not guilty

Offence seriousness (culpability and harm)

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors (other than those within examples above)

Common aggravating and mitigating factors are identiied in the pullout card – the following may be particularly relevant but these lists are not exhaustive

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence, then consider offender mitigation

Common factors are identiied in the pullout card

Consider a reduction for a guilty plea

Consider ancillary orders

Refer to pages 168-174 for guidance on available ancillary orders

Decide sentence

Give reasons

Triable either way:

Maximum when tried summarily: Level 5 ine and/or 6 months

Maximum when tried on indictment: 5 years

The offence of obtaining services dishonestly may be committed in circumstances that otherwise could be charged as an offence contrary to section 1 of the Fraud Act 2006 or may be more akin to making off without payment, contrary to section 3 of the Theft Act 1978. For this reason, it has not been included speciically within any of the guidelines for fraud, and one of the following approaches should be used:

•where it involves conduct which can be characterised as a fraud offence (such as obtaining credit through fraud or payment card fraud), the court should apply the guideline for the relevant type of fraud (see pages

62b-62i); or

•where the conduct could be characterised as making off without payment (that is, where an offender, knowing that payment on the spot for any goods supplied or service done is required or expected, dishonestly makes off without having paid and with intent to avoid payment), the guideline for that offence should be used (see pages 77-78).