Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

CFA Level 1 (2009) - 3

.pdf
Скачиваний:
713
Добавлен:
08.04.2015
Размер:
9.18 Mб
Скачать

Study Session 10

Cross-Reference to CFA Institute Assigned Reading 1139 - Financial Analysis Techniques

Sample Balance Sheet

Current Previous

--- --- ----- ---------- ------~-~____~I_-

Assets

Cash and marketahle securities

$105

$')S

Receivables

205

195

Inventories

310

290

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SRO

Total curreut assets

620

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross propeny, planr, and equipmelll

1,800

$1,700

Accunlldated depreciation

360

340

 

Net propeny, plant, and cquipmclll

1,440

1,36U

To tal assets

$2,060

$1,940

 

Liahilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

--- ~ -----

 

Payables

$110

.s9 ()

Short-tCl"IIl debt

160

1'1()

Currenr portion of long-teflll ,lcbt

 

55

45

 

Current liabilities

 

325

$275

 

Long-term debt

610

%90

 

Defen-ed taxes

105

95

 

Common stock

300

300

 

Additional paid in capital

400

400

 

Retained earnings

 

320

IRO

 

Common shareholders equiry

1,020

8RO

 

Total liabilities and equity

$2,060

$1,940

 

Sample Income Statement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

 

 

----------~

 

 

Sales

$4,000

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

3,000

 

 

 

Gross profit

1,000

 

 

 

Operating expenses

 

650

 

 

 

Operating profit

350

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

50

 

 

 

Earnings before taxes

300

 

 

 

Taxes

 

100

 

 

 

Net income

 

200

 

 

 

Common dividends

 

60

 

 

Page 270

©2008 Kaplan Schweser

SllIdy Session 1()

Cross-Rdcrcncc to CFA Institutc Assigncd Reading #39 - Financial Analysis Tcchnicilics

Financial Ratio TCITll)latc

 

 

 

 

 

(:,IJ'l'CI1I YC""

Last Year

Inc! usery

 

 

---------- .

 

 

 

(~urrellt ratill

 

 

 

 

2.1

1.5

 

Quick ralin

 

 

 

 

1.1

D.')

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1R.'J

I R.D

Days of sales outslanding

 

Invcnlory lurnover

 

 

 

 

I D. 7

12.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

'J(l!al aSSCl

lurnovcr

 

 

 

 

2.3

Vi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.5

11.8

 

Working capilallurnover

 

 

Cross profit margin

 

 

 

 

27.4%

2').3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nel profit margin

 

 

 

 

').8%

6.5°;b

 

 

 

 

RClurn on

LOul L.lpilal

 

 

 

 

2 I. I'M,

22.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24.1%

l'U\o\,

RClllrll 011

cOl1ll1lon "'[lIil)'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

')<).4%

35. 7~'()

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[nlncsl coverage

 

 

 

 

') t)

9.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

• curren t ratio =

current assets

 

 

 

current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

current ratio

620 = 1.9

 

 

 

 

 

325

 

 

 

 

 

The current ratio indicates lower liquidity levels when compared to last year and

more liquidity than the industry average.

.

 

 

 

cash + receivables + marketable securities

 

 

• quick ratio = ----------

_

 

 

 

 

 

 

current liabilities

 

 

 

quick ratio =

(105+205)

'.

 

 

 

.

 

=0.95

 

 

 

 

.

325

 

 

 

 

 

The quick ratio is lower than last year and is in lin~with the industry average.

• DSO (days of sales outstanding) =

365

revenue/

/ average receivables

365

DSO = ---,-4---=-,0-=-00-::--;-1---- = 18.25

/[(205+195)/2]

©2008 Kaplan Schwcser

Page 271

Study St:ssion 10

CrossReference to erA Institute Assigned Reading #39 - Financial Analysis Techniques

The DSO is a bit lower relative to thc company's past performance but slightly higher than the industry average.

lI1ventory turnovcr =

COSt of goods sold

avcragc inventories

 

inventory turnover =

3,000

= 10.0

(310+290)/2

 

 

Inventory turnovcr is much lower than last year and the industry average. This suggests that the company is not managing inventory efficiently and may have obsoletc stock.

total assct turnover = __re_v_c_n_u_e_ average assets

total asset turnover =

4_,_0_0_0

= 2.0

 

(2,060 + 1,940) 1 2

 

Total asset tUrnover is sligh r1y lower than last year and the industry average.

·

. I

turnover =

 

revenue

 

 

workmg capita

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

average working capital

 

beginning working capital = 580 -

275 = 305

 

 

ending working capital = 620 -

325 = 295

 

 

 

'

.

I

4000

=

13.3

 

work109 capita

turnover =

. ,

 

 

 

 

(305 + 295) / 2

 

 

Working capital turnover is lower than last year, but still above the industry average.

gross profit margin = gross profit

revenue

gross profit margin = 1,000 =25.0% 4,000

Page 272

©2008 Kaplan Schweser

 

Scully Session ] 0

 

Cross-Referell\;e to eFA Institutc Assigned Re,tding #39 - Financial Analysis Techniqucs

The gross profit margin is lower than last year and much lower than the industry

average.

 

net pro fiIt margin =

net income

_

 

revenue

.

200

net pro fiIt margin = -- = 5.0% 4,000

The net profit margin is lower than last year and much lower than the industry average.

return on totol copi tol =

EBIT

 

shortand long-term debt + equity

 

beginning total capital =

140 + 45 + G90 + 880 = 1,755

ending total capital = 1GO + 55 + GIO + 1,020 = 1,845

return on total capital =

3_5_0

= 19.4%

 

(1,755 + 1,845) /2

 

The return on total capital is below last year and below the industry average. This suggests a problem stemming from the low asset turnover and low profit margin.

.

net income - preferred dividends

return on common equity =

--'--

 

_

 

 

average common equity

 

 

return on common equity =

200

=21.1%

 

 

(1,020 + 880) /2

 

 

 

 

 

The return on equity is lower than last year but better than the industry average. The reason it is higher than the industry average is probably because of greater use of leverage.

• debt-to-eq uity ratio =

total debt

 

total equity

debt-to-equity ratio =

GI0 +160 +55 = 80.9%

 

1,020

Note that preferred equity would be included in the denominator if there were any, and that we have included short-term debt and the current portion of long-term debt in calculating total (interest-bearing) debt.

©2008 Kaplan Schwcser

Page 2Tl

Sludy Session 10

Cross-Reference to CI'A Institute Assigned Reading #39 - Financial Analysis Techniques

The deDr-ro-equiry rario is lower rhan lasr year bur srill much higher rhan rhe indusrry average. This suggesrs rhe company is rrying [0 ger irs debr level marc in line wirh rhe industry.

inreresr coverage =

-

EBJT

_

 

 

Inreresr payments

inreresr coverage =

350

= 7.0

 

 

50

 

 

The il1leresr coverage is Derrer rhan lasr year bur sri II worse rhan rhe indusrry average. This, along wirh rhe slip in profir margin and relllrn on assers, miglll cause some concern.

lOS .)CJ.c: Dcmonsrrarc the application or and intcrprd changes in the

('ol11pol1cnt part' uf ,he DuPont :ll1;dysis (Ill<.' decompositio1i of rc(urn 011

('(Illill')'

. _ ---------- -- _ .

The DuPonr sysrem of analysis is an approach rhar can be used [0 analyze rClllrn on equiry (ROE). Ir uses basic algebra lO break down ROE inro a funcrion of different rarios, so an analyst can sec the impact of leverage, profir margins, and turnover on shareholder returns. There are rwo varial1ls of rhe DuPonr system: The original threeparr approach and the exrended five-ran s)'srem.

For rhe original approach, sran wirh ROE de!-ined as:

.

[ ner ll1come J

rerum on equIty =

.

 

. eqUIty

Average or year-end values for equiry can be used. Multiplying ROE by (revenue/revenue) and rearranging rerms produces:

.

[ner lllcome) [ reven ue 1

return on eqUlry =

 

.

 

revenue

equllY

The firsr rerm is rhe profit margin and the second rerm is rhe equity lUrnover:

.

(ncr profir)[

equiry )

return on equity =

.

rurnover

 

margm

We can expand this furrher by multiplying rhese rerms Dy (assers/assers), and rearranging rerms:

rerurn on equiry = [ ner income) [~1[ ass~rs 1

sales

assers) equity

Professor's Note: For the exam, remember that (net income / sales) x

(sales / assets) = return on assets (ROA).

Page 274

©2008 Kaplan Schweser

Study Session 10

Cross-Reference to CrA Institute Assigned Reading #39 - Financial Analysis Techniques

The first term is still thc profit margin, thc sccond tcrm is now asset turnover, and the third tcrm is a f-inanciallevcrage ratio that will increase as the use of debt financing Incrcases:

rct urn 0/1 cq UI ry =

(

nct pr~fitJ(

assct

)(Icverage)

 

marglll

turnovcr

ratio

This is the original DuPont equation. It is arguably thc most important equation in ratio analysis, since it breaks down a very important ratio (ROE) into three key componcnts. If ROE is relatively low, it must be that at Icast one of the following is true: The company has a poor profit margin, thc company has poor asset turnover, or the firm has lOa little leverage.

Proj{'ssor's Note: Often candidates gct confilsed and think the DuPont method is a way to calculate ROE. While you can calculatc ROE given the components of either the originf/I or extolt/cd DuPolit cqllatio/IJ, this im't IIccessal:Y lyoll halle the .fi'nancial statcments. Ifyoll hallc lIet income and equity, yon Ctln clllcttlilte

ROF. Ihc DuPont ml'thod is a lUay to decomposc ROE, to !Jetter sec lI!hflt change) are drilling the changes in ROE.

Example: Decomposition of ROE with original DuPont

Staret Inc. has maintained a stable and relatively high ROE of approximately 18% over the last three years. Use traditional DuPont analysis to decompose this ROE into its three components and comment on trends in company performance.

Staret Inc. Selected Balance Sheet and Income Statemmt Items (MiffiollS)

Year

20X3

20X4

20X5

Net Income

21.5

22.3

21.9

Sales

305

350

410

Equity

119

124

126

Assets

230

290

350

 

 

 

 

©2008 Kaplan Schweser

Page 275

Study Session 10

Cross-Reference to CFA Institute Assigned Reading #39 - Financial Analysis Techniques

Answer:

ROE 20X3: 21.5 / 119 = 18.1% 20X4: 22.3 / 124 = 18.0% 20X5: 21.9/ 126 = 17.4%

DuPont 20X3: 7.0% x 1.33 x 1.93 20X4: 6.4% x 1.21 x 2.34 20X5: 5.3% x 1.17 x 2.78

(some rounding in values)

While the ROE has dropped only slightly, both the total asset turnover and the net profit margin have declined. The effects of declining net margins and turnover on ROE have been offset by a significant increase in leverage. The analyst should be concerned aboU[ the net margin and find our what combination of pricing pressure and/or increasing expenses have caused this. Also, the analyst must nore that the company has become more risky due to increased debt financing.

Example: Computing ROE using original DuPont

A company has a net profit margin of 4%, asset turnover of 2.0, and a debt-to-assets ratio of 60%. What is the ROE?

Answer:

Oebt-to-assets =60%, which means equity to assets is 40%; this implies assets to equity (the leverage ratio) is 1 /0.4 = 2.5

ROE = (net pr~firJ(totalassetJ[ assets 1= (0.04)(2.00)(2.50) = 0.20, or 20% margll1 turnover equity

The extended (5-way) DuPont equation takes the net profit margin and breaks it down further.

ROE = rnet incomel[ EBT J(

EElT )(

revenue

)[ toral assets)

l EBT I EBIT

revenue

total assers

total cq uiry

Page 276

©2008 Kaplan Schweser

Study Session 10

Cross-Reference to CFA Institute Assigned Reading #39 - financial Analysis Techniques

Note that the first term in the 3-pan DuPont equation, net profit margin, has been

decomposed into three terms:

I

 

net ll1come

(1 - tax rate).

 

 

is called the ta.x burden and is equal to

 

 

EST

[~BT

is called the intaest burden.

EBIT

EBIT

 

 

 

--- is called the EBIT margin.

 

 

revenue

 

 

 

We then have:

 

 

 

ROE ~-= ( tax

J(interestJ( EBlT J[

asset

J(financialJ

~ .burden

burden margin

turnover

leverage

An increase in interest expensc as proportion of £BIT will increase the interest burdcll. Increases in either the tax burdcll or the interest burden will lend to decreasc ROE.

EBIT in the second two expressions can be replaced by operating earnings. In this case, we have the operating margin rather than the EBIT margin. The interest burden term would then show the effects of nonoperating income as well as the effect of interest expense.

Note that in general, high profit margins, leverage, and asset turnover will lead to high levels of ROE. However, this version of the formula shows that more leverage does not always lead to higher ROE. As leverage rises, so does the interest burden. Hence, the positive effects of leverage can be offset by the higher interest payments that accompany more debt. Note that higher taxes will always lead to lower levels of ROE.

Example: Extended DuPont analysis

An analyst has gathered data from two companies in the same industry. Calculate the ROE for both companies and use the extended DuPont analysis to explain the critical factors that account for the differences in the two companies' ROEs.

Selected Income and Balance Sheet Data

 

 

Company A

Company B

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

$500

$900

 

 

EBIT

35

100

 

 

In terest expense

5

0

 

 

EBT

30

100

 

 

Taxes

10

40

 

 

Net income

20

60

 

Total assets

250

300

 

 

Total debt

100

50

 

 

Owners' equity

$150

$250

 

©2008 Kaplan Schweser

Page 277

Study Session 10

Cross-Reference to CFA Institute Assigned Reading #,,9 - Financial Analysis Techniques

Answer:

EBIT = EBIT I revenue

Company A: EBIT margin = 35 I 500 = 7.0%

Company B: EBIT margin = 100 I 900 = 11.1 %

asset turnover'"' revenue I assets

Company A: asset turnover = 500 1250 = 2.0 Company B: asset turnover = 900 I 300 = 3.0

interest burden = EBT I EBIT

Company A: interest burden = 30 I 35 = 85.7% Company B: interest burden = 100 I 100 = 1

financial leverage = assets I equity

Company A: financial leverage = 250 I 150 = 1.67 Company B: financial leverage = 300 I 250 = 1.2

tax burden = net income I EBT

Company A: tax burden = 20 I 30 = 66.7% Company B: tax burden = 60 /100 = 60.0%

Company A: ROE = 0.667 x 0.857 x 0.07 x 2.0 x 1.67 = 13.4%

Company B: ROE = 0.608 x 1.0 x 0.111 x 3.0 x 1.2 = 24%

Company B has a higher tax burden but a lower interest burden (a lower ratio indicates a higher burden). Company B has better EBIT margins and better asset utilization (perhaps management of inventory, receivables, or payables, or a lower cost basis in its fixed assets due to their age), and less leverage. Its higher EBIT margins and asset turnover are the main factors leading to its significantly higher ROE, which it achieves with less leverage than Company A.

LOS .19.f: Calculate ~1Ilc\ inlerpret the ratios w.cd in Clluii)' analysis, credil analysis, and segmellt an:dysis.

Valuation ratios are used in analysis for investment in common equity. The most widely used valuation ratio is the price-to-earnings (PIE) ratio, the ratio of the current market price of a share of stock divided by the company's earnings per share. Related measures based on price per share are the price-to-cash flow, the price-to-sales, and the price-to-book value ratios.

Professor's Note: The use ofthe above valuation ratios is covered in detail in the review ofprice multiples in the Study Session on Equity Securities.

Per-share valuation measures include earnings per share (EPS). Basic EPS is net income available to common divided by the weighted average number of common shares

outstanding.

Page 278

©2008 Kaplan Schwcser

j:BliDJj pIT

Study Scssion 1()

Cross-Refercncc to CFA Institute Assigned Reading 11.19 - Financial Analysis Tcchni']llCS

/Jiluted FPS is a "what if' value. Ie is calculated co be the lowest IlllssilJle EPS that coldd have been reponed if all lin11 securities that can be converLeo into cOl11l11on sLOck, allLl that would decrease basic FPS if they had been, were converted. Thai is, if all dilutive securities h;ld been converted. Potentially dilutive securities include convertible debt and convcrtible preferred stock, as well as options and warrants issued by the company. The 11l1l1lcraror of diluted EPS is increased by the after-tax intcrest savings on any dilutive debt securities and by the dividends on ;1Il)' dilutive convertible preferred stock. The denominator is increased by the cOl11mon shares that would result from conversion or exchange of dillltive securities into cOl11mon shares.

~\ j)roji'ssor'r NII/I~: Re/i'l" !Jilek to our /lipic I"l'l'il'lIl lin UlIl/en/fllidillg t!Je Incollle \":!J!~ S!fl/ell/I'll! .liJr detilils illld ('Xf/illp/n 1Ij'!JOW /0 CtdCll/illi~ /}(/sic ilnd di/llted I:'PS.

Other per-share measures include: cilsh/loU' /'('/" ,!Jare, FBIFpeF shilre, and

iI'flre. Per-sh;lre measures for differcnt conlpanil's cannot he comparl'd. A flrm with ;1

S1()() share price un he expectl·d 10 [.',enCl;lle much greater earnings, cash Ilow, FBlll );\. ami EBiT pl'l'share than a firm wit haS I () sh:1re pricc.

Dividends

Divioends are declared on a per-common-share hasis. Tot;ll dividends on a firm-wide basis are referred co as dilJidends dec/a red. Neither EPS nor net income is reduced by the payment of common stock dividends. Net income minus dividends c1ecbred is retained earnings, the e;lrnings th;lt ;lre used to grow the corporation rather th;ln being disrribllted to equit)' holders. Thc proportion of a firm's net income that is ret;lined to fUl1d glOwth is an imp0rL<l1ll oettrminanr of the firm's .iUs/flillabie growth mte.

'1'0calculate I he sustainahle growth rate for a firm, the ratc of retllll1 on resources is measured as the return on equity capital, or the ROE. The proportion of earnings reinvested is known as the retention ratc (RR).

©2008 Kaplan Schweser

Page 27')

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]