Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Мочекаменная_болезнь_Клинические_рекомендации_МЗ_РФ_2020
.pdf
89. Yilmaz E., Batislam E., Basar M.M., Tuglu D., Ferhat M., et al. The comparison and efficacy of 3
different alpha1-adrenergic blockers for distal ureteral stones. J Urol. 2005; №173 (6): с.2010-2. doi:
10.1097/01.ju.0000158453.60029.0a.
90. Zehri A.A., Ather M.H., Abbas F., Biyabani S.R. Preliminary study of efficacy of doxazosin as a
medical expulsive therapy of distal ureteric stones in a randomized clinical trial. Urology. 2010; №75
(6): с.1285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.069.
91. Mohseni M.G., Hosseini S.R., Alizadeh F. Efficacy of terazosin as a facilitator agent for expulsion
of the lower ureteral stones. Saudi Med J. 2006; №27 (6):838-40.
92. Agrawal M., Gupta M., Gupta A., Agrawal A., Sarkari A., et al. Prospective randomized trial
comparing efficacy of alfuzosin and tamsulosin in management of lower ureteral stones. Urology.
2009; №73 (4):706–709. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.013.
93. Pedro R.N., Hinck B., Hendlin K., Feia K., Canales B.K., et al. Alfuzosin stone expulsion therapy
for distal ureteral calculi: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Urol. 2008; № 179 (6):2244-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.141.
94. Ahmed A.F., Al-Sayed A.Y. Tamsulosin versus Alfuzosin in the Treatment of Patients with Distal
Ureteral Stones: Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study. Korean J Urol. 2010; №51 (3):193-7.
doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.3.193.
95. Chau L.H., Tai D.C., Fung B.T., Li J.C., Fan C.W., et al. Medical expulsive therapy using alfuzosin
for patient presenting with ureteral stone less than 10mm: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Int J Urol. 2011; №18 (7):510-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02780.x.
96. Tsuzaka Y., Matsushima H., Kaneko T., Yamaguchi T., Homma Y. Naftopidil vs silodosin in
medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: a randomized controlled study in Japanese male patients.
Int J Urol. 2011; №18 (11): с.792-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02850.x.
97. Itoh Y., Okada A. Yasui T. Hamamoto S. Hirose M. et al. Efficacy of selective α1A adrenoceptor
antagonist silodosin in the medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones. Int J Urol. 2011; № 18
(9):672-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02810.x.
98. Sairam K. Should we SUSPEND MET? Not really. Cent European J Urol. 2016; №69 (2):183. doi:
10.5173/ceju.2016.864.
99. Rodman J.S., Williams J.J., Peterson C.M. Dissolution of uric acid calculi. J Urol. 1984; № 131
(6):1039-44.
100. Becker G. The CARI guidelines. Kidney stones: uric acid stones. Nephrology (Carlton). 2007; 12
(1):21-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2007.00774.x.
101. Bultitude M., Rees J. Management of renal colic. BMJ. 2012; 345:e5499. doi:
10.1136/bmj.e5499.
Рекомендовано к изучению редакторами сайта МедУнивер - https://meduniver.com/
102. El-Gamal O., El-Bendary M., Ragab M., Rasheed M. Role of combined use of potassium citrate
and tamsulosin in the management of uric acid distal ureteral calculi. Urol Res. 2012; №40 (3):219-24.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0406-6.
103. Preminger G.M., Tiselius H.G., Assimos D.G., Alken P., Buck A.C., et al. 2007 Guideline for the
management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007; №52 (6):1610-31.
104. Skolarikos A., Laguna M.P., Alivizatos G., Kural A.R., de la Rosette J.J. The role for active
monitoring in urinary stones: a systematic review. J Endourol. 2010; № 24 (6):923-30. doi:
10.1089/end.2009.0670.
105. Skolarikos A., Mitsogiannis H., Deliveliotis C. Indications, prediction of success and methods to
improve outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal and upper ureteral calculi. Arch Ital Urol Androl.
2010; №82 (1):56-63.
106. Pearle M.S., Pierce H.L., Miller G.L., Summa J.A., Mutz J.M., et al. Optimal method of urgent
decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi. J Urol.
1998; №160 (4):1260-4.
107. Mokhmalji H., Braun P.M., Martinez Portillo F.J., Siegsmund M., Alken P., et al. Percutaneous
nephrostomy versus ureteral stents for diversion of hydronephrosis caused by stones: a prospective,
randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2001; №165 (4):1088-92.
108. Yoshimura K., Utsunomiya N., Ichioka K., Ueda N., Matsui Y., et al. Emergency drainage for
urosepsis associated with upper urinary tract calculi. J Urol. 2005; № 173 (2):458-62. doi:
10.1097/01.ju.0000150512.40102.bb.
109. Ramsey S., Robertson A., Ablett M.J., Meddings R.N., Hollins G.W., et al. Evidence-based
drainage of infected hydronephrosis secondary to ureteric calculi. J Endourol. 2010; №24 (2):185-9.
doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0361.
110. Иванов В.Ю., Малхасян В.А., Семенякин И.В., Гаджиев Н.К., Тедеев А.В., и др. Выбор
оптимального метода дренирования верхних мочевых путей при остром обструктивном
пиелонефрите. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2017; №1:58-67.
111. Marien T., Mass A.Y., Shah O. Antimicrobial resistance patterns in cases of obstructive
pyelonephritis secondary to stones. Urology. 2015; №85 (1):64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.007.
112. Mariappan P., Loong C.W. Midstream urine culture and sensitivity test is a poor predictor of
infected urine proximal to the obstructing ureteral stone or infected stones: a prospective clinical study.
J Urol. 2004; №171 (6):2142-5.
113. Naboka Y.L., Gudima I.A., Mitusova E.V., Bedzhanyan S.K., Morgun P.P. Antimicrobial
resistance of uropathogens in patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis. Urologiia. 2017; 4:27-31.
Рекомендовано к изучению редакторами сайта МедУнивер - https://meduniver.com/
114. Pasiechnikov S., Buchok O., Sheremeta R., Banyra O. Empirical treatment in patients with acute
obstructive pyelonephritis. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2015; №15 (3):163-70.
115. Vahlensieck W., Friess D., Fabry W., Waidelich R., Bschleipfer T. Long-term results after acute
therapy of obstructive pyelonephritis. Urol Int. 2015; №94 (4):436-41. doi: 10.1159/000368051.
116. Wagenlehner F.M., Tandogdu Z., Bjerklund Johansen T.E. An update on classification and
management of urosepsis. Curr Opin Urol. 2017; № 27 (2):133-137. doi:
10.1097/MOU.0000000000000364.
117. Wagenlehner F.M., Lichtenstern C., Rolfes C., Mayer K., Uhle F., et al. Diagnosis and
management for urosepsis. Int J Urol. 2013; №20 (10):963-70. doi: 10.1111/iju.12200.
118. Wagenlehner F.M., Pilatz A., Weidner W. Urosepsis – from the view of the urologist. Int J
Antimicrob Agents. 2011; №38:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.007.
119. Dellinger R.P., Levy M.M., Carlet J.M. et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines
for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008; №36 (1):296-327.
120. Малхасян В.А., Иванов В.Ю., Ходырева Л.А., Дударева А.А., Куприянов Ю.А., и др.
Анализ оказания специализированной медицинской помощи пациентам с острым
обструктивным пиелонефритом в урологических стационарах г. Москвы. Экспериментальная и
клиническая урология. 2016; №4:26-30.
121. Cui X., Ji F., Yan H., Ou T.W., Jia C.S., et al. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave
lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.
Urology. 2015; №85 (4):748-56. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.041.
122. Drake T., Grivas N., Dabestani S., Knoll T., Lam T., et al. What are the Benefits and Harms of
Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A
Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 2017; №72 (5):772-786. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016.
123. Aboumarzouk O.M., Kata S.G., Keeley F.X., McClinton S., Nabi G. Extracorporeal shock wave
lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev. 2012; №16 (5):CD006029.
124. Xu Y., Lu Y., Li J., Luo S., Liu Y., et al. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of ureteroscopic
lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on ureteral calculi. Acta Cir Bras. 2014; № 29
(5):346-52.
125. Ishii H., Couzins M., Aboumarzouk O., Biyani C.S., Somani B.K. Outcomes of Systematic
Review of Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease in the Obese and Morbidly Obese Population. J Endourol.
2016; №30 (2):135-45. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0547.
126. Delakas D., Karyotis I., Daskalopoulos G., Lianos E., Mavromanolakis E. Independent predictors
of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter. J
Рекомендовано к изучению редакторами сайта МедУнивер - https://meduniver.com/
Endourol. 2003; №17 (4):201-5.
127. Yang C., Li S., Cui Y. Comparison of YAG Laser Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave
Lithotripsy in Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2017; №98 (4):373-381. doi:
10.1159/000452610.
128. Ouzaid I., Al-qahtani S., Dominique S., Hupertan V., Fernandez P., et al. A 970 Hounsfield units
(HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves
patients" selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective
study. BJU Int. 2012; №110 (11):438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x.
129. Shinde S., Al Balushi Y., Hossny M., Jose S., Al Busaidy S. Factors Affecting the Outcome of
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment. Oman Med J. 2018; №33 (3):209-
217. doi: 10.5001/omj.2018.39.
130. Razvi H., Fuller A., Nott L., Méndez-Probst C.E., Leistner R., et al. Risk factors for perinephric
hematoma formation after shockwave lithotripsy: a matched case-control analysis. J Endourol. 2012;
№26 (11):1478-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0261.
131. Schnabel M.J., Gierth M., Bründl J., Chaussy C.G., Burger M., et al. Antiplatelet and
anticoagulative medication during shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2014; № 28 (9):1034-9. doi:
10.1089/end.2014.0162.
132. Elkoushy M.A., Violette P.D., Andonian S. Ureteroscopy in patients with coagulopathies is
associated with lower stone-free rate and increased risk of clinically significant hematuria. Int Braz J
Urol. 2012; №38 (2):195-202.
133. Watterson J.D., Girvan A.R., Cook A.J., Beiko D.T., Nott L., et al. Safety and efficacy of
holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses. J Urol. 2002; №168 (2):442-5.
134. Aboumarzouk O.M., Somani B.K., Monga M. Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser
lithotripsy for stone disease in patients with bleeding diathesis: a systematic review of the literature.
Int Braz J Urol. 2012; №38(3):298-305.
135. Toepfer N.J., Baylor K., Henry Y., Simmons J., Berger P.B. The effect of antiplatelet and
anticoagulant therapy on the clinical outcome of patients undergoing ureteroscopy. Urology. 2013;
№82 (4):773-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.019.
136. Turna B, Stein R.J., Smaldone M.C., Santos B.R., Kefer J.C., et al. Safety and efficacy of flexible
ureterorenoscopy and holmium:YAG lithotripsy for intrarenal stones in anticoagulated cases. J Urol.
2008; №179 (4):1415-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.076.
137. Sharaf A., Amer T., Somani B.K., Aboumarzouk O.M. Ureteroscopy in Patients with Bleeding
Diatheses, Anticoagulated, and on Anti-Platelet Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of
the Literature. J Endourol. 2017; №31 (12):1217-1225. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0253.
Рекомендовано к изучению редакторами сайта МедУнивер - https://meduniver.com/
138. Wang Q., Guo J., Hu H., Lu Y., Zhang J., et al. Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus
percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;
№12 (2): e0171478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171478.
139. Wang Y., Zhong B., Yang X., Wang G., Hou P., et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of
URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized
controlled trial. BMC Urol. 2017; №17 (1): 50. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0236-0.
140. Wu T., Duan X., Chen S., Yang X., Tang T., Cui S. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic
Ureterolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral
Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2017; № 99 (3):308-319. doi:
10.1159/000471773.
141. Topaloglu H., Karakoyunlu N., Sari S., Ozok H.U., Sagnak L., et al. A comparison of antegrade
percutaneous and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones. Biomed Res
Int. 2014; 2014:691946. doi: 10.1155/2014/691946.
142. Prakash J., Singh V., Kumar M., Kumar M., Sinha R.J., et al. Retroperitoneoscopic versus open
mini-incision ureterolithotomy for upper- and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study.
Urolithiasis. 2014; №42 (2):133-9. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0624-1.
143. Skolarikos A., Papatsoris A.G., Albanis S., Assimos D. Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an
updated evidence-based review. Urol Res. 2010; №38 (5):337-44. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0275-4.
144. Kumar A., Vasudeva P., Nanda B., Kumar N., Jha S.K., Singh H. A Prospective Randomized
Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteral
Stones >2 cm: A Single-Center Experience. J Endourol. 2015; № 29 (11):1248-52. doi:
10.1089/end.2013.0791.
145. Torricelli F.C., Monga M., Marchini G.S., Srougi M., Nahas W.C., Mazzucchi E.. Semi-rigid
ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta -
analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Braz J Urol. 2016; №42 (4):645-54. doi: 10.1590/S1677-
5538.IBJU.2015.0696.
146. Kallidonis P., Ntasiotis P., Knoll T., Sarica K., Papatsoris A., et al. Minimally Invasive Surgical
Ureterolithotomy Versus Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Large Ureteric Stones: A Systematic Review
and Meta-analysis of the Literature. Eur Urol Focus. 2017; № 3 (6):554-566. doi:
10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.006.
147. Sun X., Xia S., Lu J., Liu H., Han B., et al. Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones:
randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde
ureterolithotripsy. J Endourol. 2008; №22 (5):913-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0230.
148. Moufid K., Abbaka N., Touiti D., Adermouch L., Amine M., Lezrek M. Large impacted upper
ureteral calculi: A comparative study between retrograde ureterolithotripsy and percutaneous antegrade
Рекомендовано к изучению редакторами сайта МедУнивер - https://meduniver.com/
ureterolithotripsy in the modified lateral position. Urol Ann. 2013; №5 (3):140-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-
7796.115729
149. El-Nahas A.R., Eraky I., el-Assmy A.M., Shoma A.M., el-Kenawy M.R., Abdel-Latif M., Mosbah
A., Abol-Enein H., Shaaban A.A., Mohsen T., el-Kappany H.A. Percutaneous treatment of large upper
tract stones after urinary diversion. Urology. 2006; №68 (3):500-4.
150. El-Assmy A., El-Nahas A.R., Mohsen T., Eraky I., El-Kenawy M.R., Shaban A.A., Sheir K.Z.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi in patients with cystectomy and
urinary diversion. Urology. 2005; №66 (3):510-3.
151. Honeck P., Wendt-Nordahl G. Krombach P. Bach T. Häcker A. et al. Does open stone surgery still
play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center. J Endourol. 2009;
№23 (7):1209-12. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0027.
152. Ohmori K., Matsuda T., Horii Y., Yoshida O. Effects of shock waves on the mouse fetus. J Urol.
1994; №151 (1):255-8.
153. Smith D.P., Graham J.B., Prystowsky J.B., Dalkin B.L., Nemcek A.A. Jr. The effects of
ultrasound-guided shock waves during early pregnancy in Sprague-Dawley rats. J Urol. 1992; № 147
(1):231-4.
154. Chaussy C.G., Fuchs G.J. Current state and future developments of noninvasive treatment of
human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1989; 141:782–789.
155. Mira Moreno A., Montoya Lirola M.D., García Tabar P.J., Galiano Baena J.F., Tenza Tenza J.A.,
et al. Incidence of infectious complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in patients
without associated risk factors. J Urol. 2014; №192 (5):1446-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.091.
156. Honey R.J., Ordon M., Ghiculete D., Wiesenthal J.D., Kodama R., et al. A prospective study
examining the incidence of bacteriuria and urinary tract infection after shock wave lithotripsy with
targeted antibiotic prophylaxis. J Urol. 2013; №189 (6):2112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.063.
157. Lee SW, Yoon S, Do J, et al. The risk factors of recurrent febrile urinary tract infection within 1
year in urinary stone patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis. Urogenital Tract Infect. 2017;
12:82-8.
158. Westh H., Knudsen F., Hedengran A.M., Weischer M., Mogensen P., et al. Extracorporeal shock
wave lithotripsy of kidney stones does not induce transient bacteremia. A prospective study. The
Copenhagen Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Study Group. J Urol. 1990; №144 (1): 15-6.
159. Duvdevani M., Lorber G., Gofrit O.N., Latke A., Katz R., et al. Fever after shockwave lithotripsy
– risk factors and indications for prophylactic antimicrobial treatment. J Endourol. 2010; №24 (2):277-
81. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0283.
Рекомендовано к изучению редакторами сайта МедУнивер - https://meduniver.com/
160. Streem S.B., Yost A. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses. J
Urol. 1990; №144 (6):1347-8.
161. Klingler H.C., Kramer G., Lodde M., Dorfinger K., Hofbauer J., et al. Stone treatment and
coagulopathy. Eur Urol. 2003; №43 (1):75-9.
162. Ruiz H., Saltzman B. Aspirin-induced bilateral renal hemorrhage after extracorporeal shock wave
lithotripsy therapy: implications and conclusions. J Urol. 1990; №143 (4):791-2.
163. Knorr P.A., Woodside J.R. Large perirenal hematoma after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.
Urology. 1990; №35 (2):151-3.
164. Sare G.M., Lloyd F.R., Stower M.J. Life-threatening haemorrhage after extracorporeal
shockwave lithotripsy in a patient taking clopidogrel. BJU Int. 2002; №90 (4):469.
165. Alsaikhan B., Andonian S. Shock wave lithotripsy in patients requiring anticoagulation or
antiplatelet agents. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011; 5:53–57. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.09140.
166. Rechenmacher S.J., Fang J.C. Bridging Anticoagulation: Primum Non Nocere. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 2015; №66 (12):1392-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.002.
167. Altay B., Erkurt B., Albayrak S. A review study to evaluate holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy with
flexible ureteroscopy in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy. Lasers Med Sci. 2017 № 32
(7):1615-1619. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2289-4.
168. Carey S.W., Streem S.B. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for patients with calcified
ipsilateral renal arterial or abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Urol. 1992; №148 (1):18-20.
169. Vasavada S.P., Streem S.B., Kottke-Marchant K., Novick A.C. Pathological effects of
extracorporeally generated shock waves on calcified aortic aneurysm tissue. J Urol. 1994; № 152
(1):45-8.
170. Tse G.H., Qazi H.A., Halsall A.K., Nalagatla S.R. Shockwave lithotripsy: arterial aneurysms and
vascular complications. J Endourol. 2011; №25 (3):403-11. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0355.
171. Wang H., Man L., Li G., Huang G., Liu N., et al. Meta-Analysis of Stenting versus Non-Stenting
for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones. PLoS One. 2017; № 12 (1):e0167670. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0167670.
172. Shen P., Jiang M., Yang J., Li X., Li Y., et al. Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave
lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2011; № 186
(4):1328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.073.
173. Musa A.A. Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial:
results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2008; № 40 (1):19-22. doi:
10.1007/s11255-006-9030-8
Рекомендовано к изучению редакторами сайта МедУнивер - https://meduniver.com/
174. Ghoneim I.A., El-Ghoneimy M.N., El-Naggar A.E., Hammoud K.M., El-Gammal M.Y., et al.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized
comparison between stented and non-stented techniques. Urology. 2010; № 75 (1):45-50. doi:
10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.071.
175. Lu Y., Tianyong F., Ping H., Qiang W. Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Shock Wave Lithotripsy in
Patients with Sterile Urine Before Treatment May be Unnecessary: A Systematic Review and Meta-
Analysis. J Urol. 2012; №14: S0022-5347(12)04900-2. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.215.
176. Bootsma A.M., Laguna Pes M.P., Geerlings S.E., Goossens A. Antibiotic prophylaxis in urologic
procedures: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2008; №54 (6):1270-86. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.033.
177. Alexander C.E., Gowland S., Cadwallader J., et al. Routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not required
for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy: outcomes from a national shockwave lithotripsy
database in New Zealand. J Endourol. 2016; 30:1233–8.
178. Wollin D.A., Joyce A.D., Gupta M., Wong MY.C., Laguna P., et al. Antibiotic use and the
prevention and management of infectious complications in stone disease. World J Urol. 2017; № 35
(9):1369-1379. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2005-9.
179. Li K., Lin T., Zhang C., Fan X., Xu K., et al. Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in
urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Urol.
2013; №190 (4):1260-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.075.
180. Semins M.J., Trock B.J., Matlaga B.R. The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock
wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2008; №179 (1):194-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.173
181. Connors B.A., Evan A.P., Blomgren P.M., Handa R.K., Willis L.R., et al. Extracorporeal shock
wave lithotripsy at 60 shock waves/min reduces renal injury in a porcine model. BJU Int. 2009; №104
(7):1004-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08520.x
182. Connors B.A., Evan A.P., Blomgren P.M., Handa R.K., Willis L.R., et al. Effect of initial shock
wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping. BJU
Int. 2009; №103 (1):104-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07922.x.
183. Handa R.K., McAteer J.A., Connors B.A., Liu Z., Lingeman J.E., et al. Optimising an escalating
shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave
lithotripsy. BJU Int. 2012; №110 (11):1041-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11207.x.
184. Skuginna V., Nguyen D.P., Seiler R., Kiss B., Thalmann G.N., et al. Does Stepwise Voltage
Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a
Prospective Randomized Trial. Eur Urol. 2016; №69 (2): с.267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.017.
185. Maloney M.E., Marguet C.G., Zhou Y., Kang D.E., Sung J.C., et al. Progressive Increase of
Lithotripter Output Produces Better in-Vivo Stone Comminution. J Endourol. 2006; № 20 (9): 603–
606. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.603
Рекомендовано к изучению редакторами сайта МедУнивер - https://meduniver.com/
186. Demirci D., Sofikerim M., Yalçin E., Ekmekçioğlu O., Gülmez I., et al. Comparison of
conventional and step-wise shockwave lithotripsy in management of urinary calculi. J Endourol. 2007;
№21 (12):1407-10.
187. Pishchalnikov Y.A., Neucks J.S., VonDerHaar R.J., Pishchalnikova I.V., Williams J.C. Jr, et al.
Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the
delivery of shock wave energy. J Urol. 2006; №176 (6):2706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.149.
188. Jain A., Shah T.K. Effect of air bubbles in the coupling medium on efficacy of extracorporeal
shock wave lithotripsy. Eur Urol. 2007; №51 (6):1680-6. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.049
189. Wendt-Nordahl G., Mut T., Krombach P., Michel M.S., Knoll T. Do new generation flexible
ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors? Urol Res. 2011; №39 (3):
с.185-188. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0331-0.
190. Deng T., Liu B., Duan X., Cai C., Zhao Z., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic
lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. BJU Int. 2018; № 122
(1):29-39. doi: 10.1111/bju.14101.
191. Lo C.W., Yang S.S., Hsieh C.H., Chang S.J. Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics against
Post-Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Infect
(Larchmt). 2015; №16 (4):415-20. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.013.
192. Martov A., Gravas S., Etemadian M,. Unsal A., Barusso G., et al. Postoperative infection rates in
patients with a negative baseline urine culture undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal: a matched
case-control analysis on antibiotic prophylaxis from the CROES URS global study. J Endourol. 2015;
№29 (2):171-80. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0470.
193. Chew B.H., Flannigan R., Kurtz M., Gershman B., Arsovska O., et al. A Single Dose of
Intraoperative Antibiotics Is Sufficient to Prevent Urinary Tract Infection During Ureteroscopy. J
Endourol. 2016; №30 (1):63-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0511.
194. Dickstein R.J., Kreshover J.E., Babayan R.K., Wang D.S. Is a safety wire necessary during
routine flexible ureteroscopy? J Endourol. 2010; №24 (10):1589-92. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0145.
195. Eandi J.A., Hu B., Low R.K. Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire
during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2008; №22 (8):1653-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0071.
196. Ulvik Ø., Rennesund K., Gjengstø P., Wentzel-Larsen T., Ulvik N.M. Ureteroscopy with and
without safety guide wire: should the safety wire still be mandatory? J Endourol. 2013; № 27 (10):
с.1197-202. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0248.
197. Molina W.R. Jr, Pessoa R.R., Silva R.D., Gustafson D., Nogueira L., et al. Is a safety guidewire
needed for retrograde ureteroscopy? Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2017; № 63 (8):717-721. doi:
10.1590/1806-9282.63.08.717.
Рекомендовано к изучению редакторами сайта МедУнивер - https://meduniver.com/
198. Ulvik Ø., Wentzel-Larsen T., Ulvik N.M. A safety guidewire influences the pushing and pulling
forces needed to move the ureteroscope in the ureter: a clinical randomized, crossover study. J
Endourol. 2013; №27 (7):850-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0027.
199. Tokas T., Herrmann T.R.W., Skolarikos A., Nagele U., Training and Research in Urological
Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.) Group. Pressure matters: intrarenal pressures during normal and
pathological conditions, and impact of increased values to renal physiology. World J Urol. 2019; №37
(1):125-131. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2378-4.
200. Omar M., Noble M., Sivalingam S., El Mahdy A., Gamal A. et al. Systemic Inflammatory
Response Syndrome after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Single-Blind Clinical Trial
Evaluating the Impact of Irrigation Pressure. J Urol. 2016; № 196 (1):109-14. doi:
10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.104.
201. Ahmed M., Pedro R.N., Kieley S., Akornor J.W., Durfee W.K., et al. Systematic evaluation of
ureteral occlusion devices: insertion, deployment, stone migration, and extraction. Urology. 2009;
№73 (5):976-80. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.048.
202. Leijte J.A., Oddens J.R., Lock T.M. Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: predictive
factors for complications and success. J Endourol. 2008; №22 2):257-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0299.
203. Pierre S., Preminger G.M. Holmium laser for stone management. World J Urol. 2007; № 25
(3):235-9.
204. Garg S., Mandal A.K., Singh S.K., Naveen A., Ravimohan M., et al. Ureteroscopic laser
lithotripsy versus ballistic lithotripsy for treatment of ureteric stones: a prospective comparative study.
Urol Int. 2009; №82 (3):341-5. doi: 10.1159/000209369.
205. Binbay M., Tepeler A., Singh A., Akman T., Tekinaslan E., et al. Evaluation of pneumatic versus
holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted ureteral stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011; №43 (4):989-95.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-9951-8
206. Martov A.G., Ergakov D.V., Guseinov M.A., Andronov A.S., Dutov S.V., et al. Initial experience
in clinical application of thulium laser contact lithotripsy for transurethral treatment of urolithiasis.
Urologiia. 2018; 1:112-120.
207. Fried N.M., Irby P.B. Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy.
Nat Rev Urol. 2018; №15 (9):563-573. doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0035-8.
208. Hardy L.A., Kennedy J.D., Wilson C.R., Irby P.B., Fried N.M. Analysis of thulium fiber laser
induced bubble dynamics for ablation of kidney stones. J Biophotonics. 2017; №10 (10):1240-1249.
doi: 10.1002/jbio.201600010.
209. Hardy L.A., Irby P.B., Fried N.M. Scanning electron microscopy of real and artificial kidney
stones before and after Thulium fiber laser ablation in air and water. Proc. SPIE 10468, Therapeutics
and Diagnostics in Urology. 2018; 104680G. doi: 10.1117/12.2285069.
Рекомендовано к изучению редакторами сайта МедУнивер - https://meduniver.com/
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана