Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_125_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
12.10.2026
Размер:
7 Мб
Скачать
☆
Dentoalveolar 93
https://t.me/med1917
RADIOGRAPHIC ZONES OF EDENTULOUS MAXILLA AND THEIR MANAGEMENT
e following classication is used to aid in planning and carry­ing out implant treatment in the edentulous maxilla.
1. Half-canine to half-canine
2. Half-canine to distal of 4
3. Distal of 4 posteriorly
●
Bone in 1–3 – traditional implants
●
Bone in 1 and 2 only – angled conventional implants (all on
4) with implant-supported or -retained prosthesis
●
Bone in 1 only – anterior conventional, posterior zygomat­ics (allon 4) with implant-supported prosthesis
●
No bone in any zones – quad zygoma or on-lay everything
RCS (ENGLAND) GUIDELINES ON IMPACTED CANINES
e following guidelines are used to assist surgeons in decision making regarding the management of impacted canines.
●
Age 10–13, not severely displaced, extract C (maintain space if needed) and wait 12 months
●
Otherwise, expose if orthodontically feasible (not in midline, above apices or horizontal)
●
Buccal teeth need bond and chain, palatal not necessary, down to orthodontist preference
Modifications:
●
If patient does not want to proceed and no pathology – monitor
●
If patient needs treatment of permanent canine for resorption of adjacent teeth (except laterals), but no further treatment aer – extract permanent canine (if laterals resorbing, ideally replace them with canines)
●
If patient wants treatment but is unwilling to wear braces – transplantation (if root more than three-quarters formed, needs RCT at 10 days)
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
94 Classifications and Lists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
RCS (ENGLAND) GUIDELINES FOR SURGICAL ENDODONTICS
e following guidelines set out objective indications that would warrant surgical endodontic therapy. e aim of endodontic treatment is to disinfect the pulp space followed by sealing this space to prevent recontamination.
●
Unable to do conventional root canal therapy (RCT)
●
Failed RCT (repeating is detrimental/have a good coronal seal)
●
Cyst needs biopsy of apex
●
Root perforation/apical one-third fracture
●
Unsuitable for prolonged/multiple RCT phases
Contraindicated if
●
Unrestorable
●
Advanced periodontal disease
●
Close to nerve
●
Inadequate access
●
Unusual bone or root form
ROOD AND SHEHAB CLASSIFICATION FOR INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE (IAN) INJURY RISK – RADIOGRAPHIC SIGNS AND INDICATIONS OF CONE BEAM COMPUTERISED TOMOGRAPHY (CBCT)
e following signs have been proposed to establish the relation­ship between the IAN and the third molar root observed on pan­oramic radiography.
A. Root darkening B. Rood deection C. Root narrowing D. Dark line in apex E. Loss of white line F. Inferior alveolar nerve narrowing G. Inferior alveolar nerve diversion
High (19%) risk of nerve injury if proceed. NB: OPG has high negative predictive value, so if none of these ndings is low risk; if ndings are present, positive predictive value is poor so need CBCT to fully assess.
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Dentoalveolar 95
https://t.me/med1917
STAGES OF PERICORONITIS
Pericoronitis is an intraoral inammatory process due to infec­tion of the gingival tissue surrounding or overlying an erupting or partially erupted tooth. e stages are depicted in the following.
1. Pericoronal
2. Submucosal
3. Fascial plane
SIEBERT’S CLASSIFICATION OF ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS
Alveolar ridge defects may occur due to injury, trauma or nor­mal healing post-extraction. e following classication is used to classify alveolar bone loss.
1. Horizontal (bucco-lingual tissue loss)
2. Vertical (apico-coronal tissue loss)
3. Combined (both bucco-lingual and apico-coronal tissue loss)
WALDRON AND MUSTOE’S CLASSIFICATION OF PRIMARY INTRAOSSEOUS ODONTOGENIC CARCINOMA (‘SCC IN BONE WITH NO ULCER AND NO DISTANT PRIMARY AT DIAGNOSIS OR 6 MONTHS AFTERWARDS’)
Primary interosseous carcinoma is an uncommon neoplasm. e following classication is used to classify from where the tumours can arise.
1. From cyst
2. Ameloblastic a. Metastasising malignant ameloblastoma b. Ameloblastic carcinoma
3. De novo
4. Mucoepidermoid
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
96 Classifications and Lists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
Other types:
●
Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma – clear cytoplasm with strands of hyalinised tissue (from mucoepidermoid, renal cell or Pindborg tumour)
●
Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma, secondary to Pindborg or Gorlin’s cyst (may also be mistaken for craniopharyngioma)
●
Ameloblastic brosarcoma – benign epithelial part but malig­nant mesenchymal part
Criteria for giant cell tumour versus lesion (minor criteria):
●
>5cm
●
Recurrent
●
Rapid + tooth involvement + cortical thinning
WHARFE AND OTHER ASSESSMENTS TO DETERMINE DIFFICULTY FOR LOCAL ANAESTHETIC (LA) VERSUS GENERAL ANAESTHETIC (GA)
e following guidelines are used to aid in decision making regarding which patients may benet from LA versus GA in third molar extraction.
●
W – Winter (disto-angular)
●
H – height of mandible
●
A – angulation of second molar
●
R – root (long thin divergent)
●
F – follicle (thin)
●
E – exit path (obstructed)
●
Plus – Pell and Gregory 3C
●
Winter’s lines – red line perpendicular from amber bone level line, 1mm increase in length means 3× increase in diculty; less than 5mm LA is ok, more than 5mm needs sedation or GA
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Dentoalveolar 97
https://t.me/med1917
WINTER CLASSIFICATION FOR IMPACTED THIRD MOLARS
e following classication is based on the inclination of the impacted wisdom tooth (third molar) to the long axis of the sec­ond molar. It is used to determine the diculty of removal of these molars.
●
Mesio-angular 44%
●
Vertical 38%
●
Disto-angular 6%
●
Horizontal 3%
●
Linguo-angular/bucco-angular/inverted are rare
FURTHER READING
Ackermann GL, Altini M, Shear M. The unicystic ameloblas-
toma: Aclinicopathological study of 57 cases. J Oral Pathol. 1988;17(9–10):541–6.
Akram A, Fuadfuad MD, Malik AM, Nasir Alzurfi BM, Changmai
MC, Madlena M. Comparison of the learning of two nota tions: Apilot study. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017;5(2):67–72.
Braånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, etal. Osseointegrated
implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1–132.
Cawood JI, Howell RA. Aclassification of the edentulous jaws. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17(4):232–6.
Ellis GE, Davey KW. The classification and treatment of inju-
ries to the teeth of children. 5th ed. Chicago, IL: Year Book Medical; 1970.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for
the removal of wisdom teeth. In: Greenwood MC, Corbett IP, eds. Dental emergencies. 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2012. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ pdf/10.1002/9781118702895.app5
-
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
98 Classifications and Lists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
Husain J, Burden D, McSherry P, Morris D, Allen M. National
clinical guidelines for management of the palatally ectopic maxillary canine. Br Dent J. 2012;213(4):171–6.
Karthik K, Sivakumar, Sivaraj, Thangaswamy V. Evaluation of
implant success: Areview of past and present concepts. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013;5(Suppl 1):S117–9.
Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In:
Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Company; 1985: 199–209.
Pell GJ, Gregory GT. Impacted mandibular third molars:
Classification and modified technique for removal. Dent Dig. 1933;39:330–8.
Reeder MM, Felson B, Bradley WG. Reeder and Felson’s gam-
uts in radiology, comprehensive lists of roentgen differential diagnosis. New York: Springer; 1993.
Scholl RJ, Kellett HM, Neumann DP, Lurie AG. Cysts and cystic
lesions of the mandible: Clinical and radiologic-histopatho­logic review. Radiographics. 1999;19(5):1107–24.
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
12
https://t.me/med1917
Critical Conditions (Perioperative and Emergency Care)
COMPUTERISED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) OF CERVICAL SPINE INDICATIONS
e indications for CT of cervical spine in a trauma patient are discussed next.
Within one hour if:
●
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 13 initially, intubated, X-rays inadequate/unclear/impossible
●
Suspicion plus 65years old or more/mechanism/neurology, multiregion trauma
●
If just neck pain but none of the preceding, get three view cervical spine X-rays in 1hour
DOI: 10.1201/9781003156895-12 99
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
100 Classifications and Lists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
GODRINSKY AND HOLYOKE SEVEN SPACES
Potential routes of cervicofacial infection spread and neck space infections.
1. Platysma-investing fascia
2. Investing fascia – infrahyoid fascia
2a. Infrahyoid muscles
3. Pretracheal/retrovisceral
4. Prevertebral – alar fascia [i.e. between retropharynx and prevertebral fascia (route into mediastinum)]
4a. Prevertebral-investing fascia (above clavicles)
5. Prevertebral
GLASGOW COMA SCALE (MOVE)
e Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a method for assessing the impairment of conscious level in response to a dened stimulus. Scores range from 3–15, with 3 being the most severe.
●
Movement (6 – obeys, 5 – localises, 4 – withdraws, 3 – exor, 2 – extensor, 1 – none)
●
Verbal (5 – alert, 4 – confused, 3 – inappropriate, 2 – incom­prehensible sounds, 1 – none)
●
Eye (4 – spontaneously open, 3 – voice, 2 – pain, 1 – none)
HEAD INJURY SEVERITY
e severity of head injury and its impact on prognosis are related to the GCS of the patient following injury. AGCS score of less than 8 warrants emergency intubation.
●
Severe – GCS 3–8
●
Moderate – GCS 9–12
●
Mild – GCS 13–14
●
Minor – GCS 15
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Critical Conditions (Perioperative and Emergency Care) 101
https://t.me/med1917
MANAGEMENT OF ANTICOAGULANTS AND ANTIPLATELETS IN SURGERY
e following describes how and when to stop specic anticoag­ulants prior to surgery and how to go about reversal if required.
●
When to stop warfarin before elective surgery:
●
5 days before the day of surgery
●
When to stop direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) before elec­tive surgery:
●
24hours (48hours if high risk)
●
Restart at 6–12hours if low-risk surgery
●
Restart at 48hours if high-risk surgery
●
What if a patient on warfarin needs emergency surgery?
●
5 mg vitamin K and wait 6hours, or four-factor prothrom­bin complex concentrate (Octaplex)
●
What if a patient on DOACs needs emergency surgery?
●
Tranexamic acid helps
●
Reverse Apixaban/Rivaroxaban with Andexaret
●
Reverse Dabigatran with Idarucizumab
●
Who needs bridging therapy with low molecular weight hepa­rin (LMWH) in elective surgery?
●
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 3 months/high­risk VTE patients (e.g. multiple VTEs)
●
Atrial brillation (AF) patients with – Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) in last 3 months – CVA in past with three or more risk factors of conges-
tive cardiac failure/hypertension/age > 75/diabetes
– CHADS2 score of 5 or greater (With this risk scoring
tool, one point is awarded for the presence of each of: congestiveheart failure, hypertension, AF, diabetes mellitus, age ≥ 75 and two further points are awarded if there is a history of either CVA or transient ischaemic attack [TIA], thus providing a total combined score)
●
Mechanical heart valve – Bridging LMWH – when to stop before/restart aer:
usually stop 24hours before, restart at 48hours if highrisk
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
102 Classifications and Lists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
●
Should aspirin be stopped?
●
No, unless high bleeding risk, in which case stop 3 days before and restart 7 days aer
●
What about those on dual antiplatelet therapy?
●
If recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/stent, don’t stop unless necessary
●
If bleeding risk is high, postpone surgery; if have to oper­ate, stop clopidogrel 5 days prior
●
If particularly high thrombotic risk and high bleeding risk, consider bridging with tiroban aer stopping clopidogrel (Glp 2b/3a receptor inhibitor)
●
If not recent ACS/stent, do not stop if low bleeding risk (ifhigh bleeding risk, can stop clopidogrel as in preceding)
●
How does tranexamic acid work?
●
Inhibits plasminogen (antibrinolytic)
MANAGING CAROTID INVOLVEMENT
e following passage describes how to manage a patient with a head and neck cancer that involves the carotid artery and may potentially result in carotid blowout and catastrophic bleeding.
●
Multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion
●
Conservative/interventional radiology?
●
Acute bleed in a dying patient, conservative management needs a concrete ‘Emergency plan’
●
Dark towels
●
Suctioning equipment
●
Brisk bleeding indicates use of 5–10 mg midazolam
●
Reassurance, instructions regarding contacting next of kin
●
UK head and neck guidelines suggest the following:
●
If a sentinel bleed, manage with endovascular stenting if possible
●
If acute blowout, apply pressure/remove clips if expanding haematoma, emergent clamping and if possible reconstruct as high morbidity without carotid
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH