Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_45_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
10 Мб
Скачать
☆
the HBV infection thereater. HBsAg levels of <2 log10 IU/mL at treatment
https://t.me/medicina_free
withdrawal were associated with a lower relapse rate ater 1–2 years (15% vs. 85%) (Liang 2011).
The predictors of of-treatment response were recently assessed in a meta-analysis including 25 studies with more than 1700 patients in whom NAs were discontinued (Papatheodoridis 2016). The duration of suppression of HBV DNA was shown to be the most important predictor of a durable of-therapy, and the probability of a viral relapse was lower in patients with suppression of HBV DNA for 24 months compared to 12 months (36% vs. 75%). Low HBsAg levels at the time point of treatment cessation were shown to be another positive predictor of treatment response (Wang 2016). However, more prospective studies are certainly needed for validation of these observations and for the reined deinition of termination of NA treatment. Severe liver damage due to ALT lares was only observed in patients with cirrhosis so far (Papatheodoridis 2016).
9. Treatment of hepatitis B infections
Figure 13. HBV DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)* levels, HBsAg loss and retreatment with TDF in 21 HBeAg- negative patients during 144 weeks after discontinuation of TDF treatment (figure taken from Berg 2017). The number of patients with different post- NA treatment are given in the bars. *ULN defined as 45 U/L. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HBsAg, hepatitis B sur face antigen; ULN, upper limit of normal
Figure 12 . Suggested association of NA treatment discontinuation and the arising of sustained immune control. Af ter a temporar y increase, HBV DNA levels durably drop below the limit of treatment indication (<2,000 IU/mL) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels normalise. HBsAg levels show some decline under increased immune control, in some patient s even to undetectable levels (van Bömmel 2018).
200 201
Management of HBV resistance
Resistance development. The mechanism of action of NAs is a
competitive inhibition of the HBV polymerase. During treatment with these substances, HBV variants bearing mutations within the HBV polymerase gene may become selected from the HBV quasispecies, a phenomenon which is deined as genotypic resistance.
Phenotypic resistance is deined as decreased susceptibility (in vitro
testing) to inhibition by antiviral drugs as sociated with genotypic resista nce (Figure 15).
Cross-resistance of HBV to antiviral treatment has been described wit hin the groups of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues, respectively (Figure 16). If a resistant population becomes the majority in an individual, treatment might fail and a viral breakthrough during treatment may appear which may be associated with severe and sometimes fatal reactivation (Zoulim
2012).
9. Treatment of hepatitis B infections
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 14. Cumulative incidence of HBV resistance. These numbers are average estimates based on different studies. Overall, resistance rates have been higher in HBeAg positive patients than in HBe antigen negative patients. Long-term data for ADV has only been reported for HBeAg negative patients and thus resistance rates may be even higher for HBe antigen positive individuals. Data for ET V is biased since both patients with best responses (e.g., HBeAg seroconversion) and patients with suboptimal virologic responses (>700,000 copies/mL after one year of treatment) were withdrawn from the study. For TDF and TAF, no viral breakthrough associated with HBV resistance has been described yet (modified from [EASL 2017].
Theoretically, all available NAs may select resistant HBV strains. However, resistance is very rare in treatment-naïve patients who receive substances with strong antiviral activity, i.e., TDF or ETV, but resistance rates against LdT, ADV and especially LAM are signiicantly higher (Figure
14).
Interestingly, for patients treated with TDF no resistance has ever been reported, not even in patients who were pretreated with ADV, although ADV resistance-associated mutations might slightly decrease response to TDF (van Bömmel 2012, Kitrinos 2014, Berg 2014).
Detection of HBV resistance. Generally, a conirmed re-increase of HBV DNA >1 log from nadir during treatment with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues is considered being a potential viral breakthrough caused by HBV resistance (Figure 10). Genotypic resistance testing is not available to most treating physicians and is generally not recommended (Cornberg 2011, EASL 2017, Terrault 2016). However, genotypic resistance testing might be helpful in individual cases. It has to be considered that most viral breakthroughs in treatment-naïve patients receiving ETV or TDF are the result of adherence issues. Therefore, patient adherence should be assessed before genotypic resistance testing is done.
Figure 15. Resistance patterns of different antiviral drugs used for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. The numbers indicate the respective amino acid position in the HBV polymerase gene. For ETV, resistance at positions rt204 plus an additional mutation at position rt184, rt202 or rt250 is required to lead to clinically significant drug resistance. The mutations rtA181V and rtN236T cause resistance against ADV and weaker response to TDF in some patients; however, to date, viral breakthrough while on TDF treatment has not yet been shown to be associated with HBV variants.
Avoidance of HBV resistance. HBV resistance occurs most frequently
in patients treated with LAM, LdT or ADV, therefore many guidelines discourage physicians to use these NAs in irst line treatment. The selection of resistant HBV strains becomes more likely if HBV DNA levels do not become suppressed to undetectable levels within 6 months of treatment with these NAs. Therefore, in patients undergoing treatment with these substances, who show detectable HBV DNA ater 6 to 12 mont hs of treatment, the treatment should be adjusted (Cornberg 2011, EASL 2017, Terrault 2016). Also, patients with high viral load (>109 copies/mL) are at increased risk of resistance and should not be treated with these substances. First-line treatment with ETV or TDF is recommended by many guidelines to avoid HBV resistance (Cornberg 2011, EASL 2017, Terrault 2016, WHO 2015).
Treatment of HBV resistance. Generally, resistance against a nucleoside
analogue should be treated with a nucleotide analogue and vice versa (Figure
13). In real life, treatment with TDF has been shown to suppress most kinds of HBV variants associated with resistance against either nucleoside or nucleotide analogues. Thus, a switch to a monotherapy with TDF was shown to be very efective in patients with resistance to LAM and also in patients with resistance to ADV in European and in Asian patients (van Bömmel 2010, Huang 2017). In a randomised study, it was shown that patients with
202 203
9. Treatment of hepatitis B infections
https://t.me/medicina_free
resistance to LAM did not show better response to a combination treatment of TDF plus emtricitabine as compared to TDF monotherapy (Fung 2014). In another study, it was observed that monotherapy with TDF was superior to entecavir-adefovir combination treatment in NA resistant patients with suboptimal response to lamivudine-adefovir (Lee 2017). However, some of these patients with genotypic ADV resistance, especially those with HBV DNA levels >107 copies/mL showed delayed or incomplete response to TDF (van Bömmel 2010). ETV was shown to be efective as monotherapy in patients with resistance to ADV. General recommendations for the management of HBV resistance are given in Table 8.
Table 9. Recommendations for the treatment of HBV resistance
Resistance to nucleoside analogues Recommended therapeutic option
lamivudine tenofovir (TDF, TAF), ADV*
telbivudine tenofovir (TDF, TAF), ADV*
entecavir tenofovir (TDF, TAF), adefovir*
Resistance to nucleotide analogues Recommended therapeutic option
adefovir (LAM-naïve) entecavir, tenofovir (TDF, TAF), (telbivudine),
(lamivudine)
adefovir (LAM-resistant) tenofovir (TDF, TAF)
tenofovir (no in vivo data available) entecavir, (telbivudine), (lamivudine)
* in case tenofovir is not available
The combination of ADV and LAM in the presence of LAM resistance delays the development of ADV resistance considerably compared to switching to ADV monotherapy (Lampertico 2007). However, combination treatment consisting of one nucleotide and one nucleoside analogue is not necessary for the majority of patients if TDF is available. However combination of TDF with a nucleoside analogue might be useful in patients with multiple pre-treatments who have accumulated diferent resistance mutations (Petersen 2012, van Bömmel 2012). In a therapeutic setting where TDF is unavailable a combination treatment with ADV should be inititiated if resistance to LAM, LdT or ETV occurs.
Treatment of HBV infections in special populations
Pr eg nancy. Globally, the vertical transmission from the mother to the newborn is the most frequent cause of HBV infection, and the highest risk is during delivery. A combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and vaccination given within 12 hours ater birth can reduce the risk of perinatal
transmission from >90 to <10% (WHO 2015). Still for a neonate born to a mother with high levels of HBV DNA (>200,000 IU/mL) the risk of perinatal transmission is considerable. Therefore, antiviral treatment is generally recommended in these women (Cornberg 2011, EASL 2017, Terrault 2016, WHO 2015). PEG-IFN α is contraindicated in pregnant women. Antivirals studied in pregnant women are LAM, LdT and TDF. In pregnant women with high levels of HBV DNA, LAM treatment during the last trimester of pregnancy was reported to reduce the risk of intrauterine and perinatal transmission of HBV if given in addition to passive and active vaccination by HBIg and HBV (van Zonneveld 2003). LdT administered for an average of 15 weeks at the end of pregnancy plus active-passive immunisation to neonates reduced vertical transmission rates from 23% to 4% compared to immunisation alone (Han 2011). Because of its high antiviral potency, TDF is oten considered the treatment of choice.
The risk of teratogenicity of NAs is assessed by a classiication based on data gathered in clinical trials as well as through the FDA Pregnancy Registry. TDF and LdT are listed as pregnancy category B drugs and LAM, whereas ADV and ETV as category C drugs. However, other side efects for the new born cannot completely be ruled out. A recent study reported that bone mineral content of infants of HIV infected mothers exposed to TDF (N=74) was 12% lower than that of infants not exposed to TDF (n=69) (Siberry 2015). Although the signiicance of this observation is yet unclear, antiviral treatment during pregnancy should be carefully monitored and limited to the second and third trimester. However, the optimal treatment duration has not been studied. As exacerbations of the HBV infection may occur, women with HBV should be monitored closely ater delivery (ter Borg 2008).
Immunosuppression. During immunosuppressive treatment, a reactivation of an asymptomatic or inactive HBV infection can occur in 20% to 50% of patients (Lok 2009). Reactivations can occur in HBsAg carriers, but also in HBsAg negative but anti–hepatitis B core antibody (HBc)– positive patients. These reactivations are characterised by an increase in HBV replication followed by an increase in liver inlammation during immune reconstitution resulting in liver damage or even liver failure in some patients (Feld 2010, Roche 2011).
HBV reactivation was especially frequently observed during treatment with corticosteroids and antitumour necrosis factor therapies (i.e., inliximab, etanercept, adalimumab), anti-CD20 therapies (i.e., rituximab­containing chemotherapy) and trans-arterial chemoembolisation for HCC (Vassilopoulos 2007, Moses 2006, Park 2005, utgeerts 2009, Mallet 2015).
Prior to initiating immunosuppressive therapies, screening for HBV infection is recommended (Lok 2009, EASL 2017). Pre-emptive treatment with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues should be initiated in all patients with
204 205
9. Treatment of hepatitis B infections
https://t.me/medicina_free
active HBV infection before any immunosuppressive treatment. HBsAg positive inactive HBV carriers have a diminished risk of HBV reactivation and mortality when pre-emptive treatment is conducted. Inactive carriers receiving immunosuppressive treatment with methotr exate or azat hioprine in monotherapy represent an exemption as these patients have a low risk of HBV reactivation (Mallet 2016).
HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive patients should only receive pre­emptive treatment if treatment with rituximab or human stem cell therapy is planned (Lok 1991, Zurawska 2012).
If available, a highly potent antiviral as ETV or TDF should be used for pre-emptive treatment. This recommendation is based on some recent reports revealing lower rates of HBV reactivation in patients treated with ETV as compared to patients treated with LAM. However, reactivations may still occur albeit in a low frequency. This was recently demonstrated in a randomised controlled trial of HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive patients receiving chemotherapy including an anti-CD20 agent. In these patients, HBV reactivation occurred in 18% of the untreated compared to 2% of those patients receiving prophylaxis with ETV (p<0.05) (Lau 2003).
Novel treatments for HBV infections
Figure 16. Novel approaches to treat HBV infections (selection). They include direct inhibition
of the viral life cycle by HBV polymerase inhibitors (1), inhibition of pgRNA encapsidation with HBc allosteric modulators (CpAMs) (2), HBV RNA inter ference with siRNA molecules inhibition of HBsAg secretion by nucleic acid polymers (3), inhibition of HBsAg secretion by nucleic acid polymers (4), stimulation of the innate immune system as toll like or receptor stimulation or the adaptive immune system as check point (e.g., programmed cell death (PD-1)) inhibitors (5), cotransporting polypeptide degradation of cccDNA by APOBEC3A/B deminases or CRISPR­associated system 9 (Cas9) proteins (6) HBV entry through sodium taurocholate blocade (7). Novel HBV serum markers are currently investigated for their value in treatment response monitoring, including HBV RNA, HBV core related antigen (HBcrAg), quantitative HBeAg and HBsAg components (8).
The complete eradication of HBV from infected individuals cannot be achieved by any of the currently available treatment strategies, and this is due to persistence of HBV cccDNA. Trials investigating the possibility of improving outcomes in the treatment of HBV infections by combination treatment of PEG-IFN α with NAs in diferent doses and durations and by using novel NAs are ongoing. Besifovir (LB80380) is an acyclic nucleotide phosphonate with a molecular structure similar to that of ADV and TDF. In a phase IIb, open-label, multicentre study in114 treatment naïve patients randomised to besifovir 90 mg or 150 mg daily or to ETV 0.5 mg daily for 48 weeks, an equally strong antiviral activity as compared to ETV was shown
206 207
9. Treatment of hepatitis B infections
https://t.me/medicina_free
for besifovir. Thus, suppression of HBV DNA to undetectable levels was found in 64, 63 and 58 %, and HBeAg seroconversion in 11, 15 and 9.5 %, respectively (Lai 2014). Of note, 94% of patients receiving besifovir had reduced serum L-carnitine, but the L-carnitine levels returned to normal with supplement.
Numerous novel substances are under investigation which might ofer more potent suppression of HBV replication and, ideally, even eradication of the infection. Multiple strategies are being followed, some of which are targeting the innate or the adaptive immune system and some targeting the HBV replication cycle at diferent steps and to date it is not clear which approach is more promising. (Figure 17). Some of these novel drugs are investigated in pre-clinical or in early clinical studies and preliminary results have already been published for some approaches.
Thus, restoring the production of antiviral cytokines, which is oten impaired in HBV infected individuals is followed by stimulation of toll like receptors (TLRs) which are located on plasmacytoid dendritic cells and myeloid cells. In HBV infected woodchucks it has been shown that treatment with the oral TL7 agonist GS-9620 was followed by a marked decrease in serum HBsAg levels. HBsAg seroconversion occurred in several of these animals (Menne 2015). In contrast, in a trial in 26 patients with chronic HBV infection there was no efect of diferent doses of GS-9620 on HBsAg levels when given over 24 weeks (Boni 2016). However, stimulating efects of the HBV speciic immune response were demonstrated including the acquisition of an activated natural killer cell type.
Interruption of HBV replication by interference with diferent key mechanisms of the HBV replication cycle is also currently investigated. The use of RNAi to inhibit the replication of HBV has been evaluated in animal models.
The siRNA molecules AC-520 (phase II: NCT02604212 and NCT02604199; Arrowhead Research Corporation, Pasadena, CA, USA), ARB-1467 (phase II: NCT02631096; Arbutus Biopharma, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada) and ALN-HBV (phase I/II: NCT02826018; Alnylam, Cambridge, MA, USA) are currently investigated in in clinical trials, The compound AC-520 was shown to induce a durable and deep suppression of HBV proteins and HBV DNA in a phase II study (Yuen 2015). The nucleic acid polymer (NAP) Rep2139 (Replicor, Montreal, Quebec, Canada), has been shown to inhibit the secretion of HBsAg by an unidentiied mechanism. Its combination with pegIFN-α in clinical trials (NTC02233075) has been shown to result in a signiicant suppression of HBsAg and HBV DNA levels and a high rate of HBsAg seroconversion.
It is likely that these substances will be used in combination with either NAs or PEG-IFN α and there is a need for new bio markers which relect the level of HBV replication and the eicacy of these new compounds when HBV DNA is suppressed to undetectable levels. For this purpose, new markers
such as quantitative HBeAg, HBV core-related antigen (HBVcrAg) and HBV RNA are currently under investigation and these molecules might be useful to tailor individual treatments and to increase response rates in the future.
An important goal for new drugs for treatment of HBV infections will be to move patients closer towards complete eradication of HBV. To date it seems, however, too early to predict the role of those novel compounds in future HBV treatments, but this fast developing ield of research deserves continuous attention.
References
Akarca US. Chronic hepatitis B. A guideline to diagnosis, approach , management, and follow-up 2007. Turkish Association for the Study of
Liver. Turk J Gastroenterol 2008 ;19:207-30. Beasley RP. Hepati tis B virus. The major aeti ology of hepatocellul ar carcinoma. Cance r 1988;61:1942-56. Berg T, Zoulim F, Moel ler B, et al. Long-term eic acy and safety of emtricitabine p lus tenofovir DF vs. tenofovir DF monotherapy in ad efovir-
experience d chronic hepatitis B pati ents. J Hepatol 2014;60:715-22. Berg T, Simon KG, Mauss S, et al. First investigation in stopping TDF treatment ater long-term virological suppression in HbeAg negative
chronic hepatit is B]. Long-term response ate r stopping tenofovir disopro xil fumarate in non-cirrhoti c HBeAg negative patients - FINITE
study. J Hepatol. 2017 Nov; 67(5):918-924 . Brown RS Jr, Verna EC, Pereira MR, et al. Hepatitis B virus and human immunodeiciency virus drugs in pregnancy: indings from the
Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry. J Hepatol. 2012;57:953-9. Brunetto MR, O liveri F, Colombatto P, et al. Treatment of HBeAg n egative chronic hepatitis B wi th interferon or pegylated interferon . J Hepatol
2003;39:S164-7. Brunetto MR, O liveri F, Colombatto P, et al. Hepatitis B surfa ce antigen serum levels help to disti nguish active from inactive hepatit is B virus
genotype D carri ers. Gastroenterology 2 010;139:483-90. Buster EH, van Erpecum KJ, Schalm SW, et al. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection - Dutch national guidelines. Neth J Med
2008;66:292- 306. Buster EH, Flink HJ, Simsek H, et al. Early HBeAg loss during peginterferon alpha-2b therapy predicts HBsAg loss: results of a long-term
follow-up study in chroni c hepatitis B patients . Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104: 2449-57. Buti M, Tsai N, Pete rsen J, Flisiak R, Gurel S , Krastev Z, Schall RA, Fl aherty JF, Martins EB, Charuworn P, Kitrinos KM , Subramanian GM,
Gane E, M arcellin P. Seven-year ei cacy and safety of treatme nt with tenofovir disoproxil fu marate for chronic hepatitis B v irus infection.
Dig Dis Sc i. 2015 May;60(5):1457-64 Buti M, Gane E, Seto WK, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of patients with HBeAg
negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2016;1:196–206. Carosi G, Rizzetto M , Alberti A, et al. Treatment of chron ic hepatitis B: update of the re commendations from the 2007 Itali an Workshop. Dig
Liver Dis. 2011 Apr;43:259- 65. Chan H, Fung S, Seto WK, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HBeAg positive chronic
hepatitis B virus infe ction: a randomised, d ouble-blind, phase 3, n on-inferiority trial. Lan cet Gastroenterol Hepato l. 2016;1:185–195. Chan HL, Leung NW, Hui AY, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B: comparing pegylated
interferon-alpha2 b and lamivudine with lamivudine a lone. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:240- 50. Chan HL, Cha n CK, Hui AJ, et al. Efects of Tenofovir Dis oproxil Fumarate in Hepatitis B e Antigen- Positive Patients with Normal Levels of
Alanine Aminotransferase and High Levels of HBV DNA Gastroenterology 2014;146(5):1240-8. Chang TT, Lai CL , Kew Yoon S, et al. Entecavir treatment for up to 5 years in patients with hepatitis B e antigen p ositive chronic hepatitis B.
Hepatology 2010; 51:422-30. Chang TT, Liaw YF, Wu SS, et al. Long-term entecavir therapy results in the reversal of ibrosis/cirrhosis and continued histological
improvement in pati ents with chronic hepatitis B . Hepatology 2010;52: 886-93. Chen CJ, Yang HI, Su J, et al. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level. JAMA
2006;295:65-73. Chen YC, Chu CM , Liaw YF. Age-speciic prognosis following spontaneous hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in chronic hepatitis B.
Hepatology 2010; 51:435-44 . Chen CH, Lee CM, Hu TH, Hung CH, Wang JH, Lu SN. Th e role of hepatitis B surface antigen qu antiication predict HBV reactivation ate r
discontinuati on of nucleos(t)ide analogueue s treatment in chronic hepati tis B patients with cirrhosis . Hepatology 2014;60:1103A Cho SW, Koh KH, Cheong JY, et al. Low e icacy of entecavir therapy in a defovir-refractory hepatiti s B patients with prior lamivudin e resistance.
J Viral Hepat 2009 Aug 12 . J Viral Hepat 2010;17:171-7. Coca S, Pe razella MA. Acute renal fai lure associated with tenofovir: evi dence of drug-induced n ephrotoxicity. Am J Med Sci 2 002;324:342-4. Colle I, Adler M , Brenard R, et al. Acta G astroenterol Belg 20 07;70:389-420. Cornberg M, P rotzer U, Petersen J, et al . Prophylaxis, diag nosis and therapy of hepat itis B virus infection - the G erman guideline . Z Gastroenterol
2011;49:871-930
208 209
9. Treatment of hepatitis B infections
https://t.me/medicina_free
Craxi A, Coo ksley WG. Pegylated int erferons for chronic hepatitis B . Antiviral Res. 2003;60 :87-9. Créput C, G onzales-Canali G , Hill G, et al. Renal le sions in HIV-1-positive patient treat ed with tenofovir. AIDS 2003;17:935-7. Crespo J, Lozan o JL, Echevarría S, et a l. Inluence of hepatiti s C virus infection and human immunod eiciency on the natural histor y of chronic
delta hepatitis . Rev Esp Enferm Dig 1994;85:185-91 .
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol
2012;57:167-85. Feld JJ. HBV reactivatio n and cancer chemotherapy. 2010 . Available at: http://goo.gl/XB4ge . Accessed Decemb er 1, 2011. Fleischer RD, Lo k AS. Myopathy and neuropathy ass ociated with nucleos(t)ide analo gue therapy for hepatitis B . J Hepatol 2009;51:787-91 . Flink HJ, van Zonneveld M, Hansen BE, et al. Treatment with Peginterferon alpha-2b for HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B: HBsAg loss is
associated w ith HBV genotype. Am J Gastroentero l 2006;101:297-303. Fried MW, Piratvisuth T, Lau GK, e t al. HBeAg and hepatitis B viru s DNA as outcome predictors during the rapy with peginterferon alfa-2a for
HBeAg positive chron ic hepatitis B. Hep atology 2008;47:428-34. Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, et a l. Randomized comparis on of tenofovir disoproxil fuma rate vs emtricitabine and tenofovir di soproxil fumarate in
patients with lamivudi ne-resistant chronic hepa titis B. Gastroente rology. 2014;146:980-8. Gallant JE, Parish MA, Keruly JC , Moore RD. Changes in renal function associated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment, compared
with nucleosid e reverse-transcriptase inhi bitor treatment. Clin Infe ct Dis 2005;40:1194-8. Gaspar G , Monereo A, Garcia-Reyne A , de Guzman M. Fanconi syndro me and acute renal failure in a patient tre ated with tenofovir: a call to
action. AIDS 20 04;18:351-2. Gish G, Lok AS , Chang TT, et al. Entecavir therap y for up to 96 weeks in patients with HBeAg po sitive chronic hepatitis B . Gastroenterology
2007;133: 1437-44. Gish G, Chang TT, Lai CL, et a l. Loss of HBsAg antigen during treatm ent with entecavir or lamivudine in nucleoside-naïve HBeAg pos itive
patients with chroni c hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat 2 010;17:16-22. Goncalves J, L aeule R, Avila C. Increase d risk with combination of telbivudine and pegylated-int erferon Alfa-2A in study CLDT600A2406,
compared to uncom mon rate with telbivudine monotherap y from the novartis global datab ase. J Hepatol 2009; 50:A329. Hadziyannis S. Hepatitis B e antigen negative chronic hepatitis B: from clinical recognition to pathogenesis and treatment. Viral Hepat Rev
1995;1:7-13. Hadziyannis SJ , Vassilopoulos D. Hepati tis B e antigen negative chroni c hepatitis B. Hepato logy 2001;34:617-24. Hadziyannis SJ , Ta ssopoulos NC, Heathc ote EJ, et al. Adefovir dipivoxil for the t reatment of hepatitis B e antigen ne gative chronic hepatitis B.
N Engl J Med 2003;348 :800-7. Hadziyannis SJ , Tassopoulos N C, Heathcote EJ, et al . Long-term therapy with adefovir dipivoxil fo r HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B fo r up
to 5 years. Gastroenterology 2006a;131:1743-51. Hadziyannis SJ, Papatheodoridis GV. Hepatitis B e antigen negative chronic hepatitis B: natural history and treatment. Semin Liver Dis
2006;26:130-41. Hadziyannis SJ, Costamena A, Laras A, Hadziyannis E. Predictors/determinants of sustained virological response (SV) and of HBsAg loss
following long term adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) therapy in HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis (CHB). Program and abstracts of the 59th
Annual Meeting of the Am erican Association for the S tudy of Liver Diseases; Oc tober 31 - November 4, 20 08; San Francisco, Ca lifornia.
Abstract 874. Han GR, Cao MK , Zhao W, et al. A prospective an d open-label study for the e icacy and safety of telbivud ine in pregnancy for the prevent ion of
perinatal transmi ssion of hepatitis B virus infe ction. J Hepatol 2011;55:1215-21. Heathcote EJ, Marcellin P, Buti M, et al. Three-year eicacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment for chronic hepatitis B.
Gastroenterology 2011;140:132-43. Hosaka T, Suzuki F, Kobaya shi M, et al. Long-term e ntecavir treatment reduces hep atocellular carcinoma in cidence in patients with hep atitis B
virus infection . Hepatology 2013;58:98 -107. Hou J, Yin YK, Xu D, et al . Telbivudine versus lamivudine in Chi nese patients with chronic h epatitis B: Results at 1 yea r of a randomized, double-
blind trial . Hepatology 2008;47:447-54. Huang H, Li X, Zhu J, Ye S, Zhang H , Wang W, et al. Entecavir vs lamivudine for preventio n of hepatitis B virus reactivation among p atients
with untreated difus e large B-cell lymphom a receiving -CHOP chemotherapy : a randomized clinical tri al. Jama. 2014;312(23):2521-30 Huang M, Lin G , Shi H, Wu Y, Jie Y, Zhu Z, Chong Y. TDF Monothe rapy Is Efective Regardless of Prior Nu cleos(t)ide Analogue Treatment in
Chronic Hepatiti s B Patients in China. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2463197 Iloeje UH, Yang HI, Su J, et al. Predicting cirrhosis risk based on the level of circulating hepatitis B viral load. Gastroenterology
2006;130:678-86. Janssen HL, van Zonneveld M, Senturk H, et al. Pegylated interferon alpha-2b alone or in combination with lamivudine for HBeAg positive
chronic hepatit is B: a randomised trial . Lancet 2005;365:123-9 . Juszczyk J, Boro?-Kaczmarska A, Cianciara J, et al. Antiviral treatment of chronic B hepatitis; 2010 - therapeutic recommendations. Pol
Merkur Lekars ki 2010;29:103- 6. Karras A, Lafaurie M , Furco A, et al. Tenofovir-related n ephrotoxicity in human immuno deiciency virus-infecte d patients: three cases of rena l
failure, Fanconi syn drome, and nephrogeni c diabetes insipidus . Clin Infect Dis 2003;36 :1070-3. Katz LH, Fraser A, Gater-Gvili A, Leibovici L, Tur-Kaspa R. Lamivudine prevents reactivation of hepatitis B and reduces mortality in
immunosuppres sed patients: systemati c review and meta-analysis. J Viral Hep at. 2008;15(2):89-102 . Kim WR, Berg T, Loomba R, et al. Long term tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hep
2013: 55;S19 . Kitrinos KM, Cors a A, Liu Y, Flaherty J, et al . No detectable resistance to te nofovir disoproxil fumarate ater 6 ye ars of therapy in patients with
chronic hepatit is B. Hepatology 2014;59(:434-42. Korean Associati on for the Study of the Liver.KASL Clinical Pract ice Guidelines: Manag ement of chronic hepatitis B . Clin Mol Hepatol. 2012
Jun;18(2):109-62. Keefe EB, Zeuzem S, Kof RS, Dieterich DT, et al. Report of an international workshop: Roadmap for management of patients receiving oral
therapy for chronic hep atitis B. Clin Ga stroenterol Hepatol 2007;5: 890-7.
Kumar M, Satapathy S , Monga R, et al. A ra ndomized controlled tria l of lamivudine to treat acute hepat itis B. Hepatology 20 07;45:97-101. Kwon H, Lok AS. Do es antiviral therapy prevent hepatoc ellular carcinoma? Antivir Ther. 2011;16:787-95 . Lai CL, Leung N, Teo EK, et al. Telbivudine Phase II Investigator Group. A 1-year trial of telbivudine, lamivudine, and the combination in
patients with hepa titis B e antigen positive chro nic hepatitis B. G astroenterology 2005;129 :528-36. Lai CL, G ane E, Liaw YF, et al. Telbivudine versu s lamivudine in patients with chron ic hepatitis B. N Eng l J Med 2007;357:2576-88. Lai CL, Ahn SH , Lee KS, et al. Phase IIb multce ntred randomised trial of besifovir (LB80380) vers us entecavir in Asian patients with chroni c
hepatitis B . Gut 2014;63:996–1004 Lampertico P, Del N inno E, Viganò M, et al . Long-term suppress ion of hepatitis B e antigen n egative chronic hepatitis B by 24-mo nth interferon
therapy. Hepatology 20 03;37:756-63. Lampertico P, Viganò M , Manenti E, et al. Low resistance to adefovir combined with lamivudine: a 3-year study of 145 lamivudine-resistant
hepatitis B patients. Gastroenterology 2007;133:1445-51. Lampertico P, Vigano M , Facchetti F, et al. Efectiveness of entecavir for NUC-naive, HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B patients in clinical
practice: A 2-year multicenter cohort study in 311 patients. Program and abstracts of the 45th Annual Meeting of the European
Association fo r the Study of the Liver; April 14-18, 2010; Vienna, Aus tria. Abstract 1009. Lampertico P, Vigano M , Di Costanzo GG, et a l. Randomised study comp aring 48 and 96 weeks peginte rferon alpha-2a therapy in genotyp e D
HBeAg negative chroni c hepatitis B. Gut 2013; 62:290–298 . Lange CM, B ojunga J, Hofmann WP, et al . Severe lactic aci dosis during treatment of ch ronic hepatitis B with entec avir in patients with impaired
liver function . Hepatology 2009;50 :2001-6. B. Gastroenterolo gy 2009;136:486-95 . Lau GK, Yiu HH, Fon g DY, Cheng HC, Au WY, Lai LS, et al. Ea rly is superior to deferred preempt ive lamivudine therapy for hepatiti s B patients
undergoing chemotherapy. Gastroenterology 2003;125:1742-1749 . Lau GK, Piratvi suth T, Luo KX, et al. Peginterferon Alfa-2a , lamivudine, and the combin ation for HBeAg positive chronic he patitis B. N Engl J
Med 2005;352 :2682-95 . Lavanchy D. Hepatitis B virus epidemiology, disease burden, treatment, and current and emerging prevention and control measures. J Viral
Hepat 2004;11:97-107. Lee SH, Cheon G J, Kim HS, Kim SG, Kim YS, Jeong SW, Jang JY, Kim BS, Jun BG , Don Kim Y, Jun DW, Sohn JH, Kim TY, Lee BS. Tenofovir
disoproxil fumarate monotherapy is superior to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy in patients with suboptimal response to
lamivudine-adefovir therapy for nucleoside-resistant HBV: a 96-week prospective multicentre trial. Antivir Ther. 2017 Apr 24. doi:
10.3851/IMP3169.
Leung NJ. Entecavir (ETV) therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients previously treated with adefovir (ADV) with incomplete response
on-treatment or relap se of-treatment. Hepato logy 2009;50:S334 . Leung N, Peng CY, Hann HW, et al. E arly hepatitis B virus DNA reduction in he patitis B e antigen positive pat ients with chronic hepatitis B : A
randomized intern ational study of entecavir versus ad efovir. Hepatology 2009a;49:72- 9. Levrero M, Cimino L, Lampertico P, et al. Tenofovir (TDF) for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Suboptimal Response to Adefovir (ADV) or
ADV/LAM Treatment: Results of the OptiB Italian Mult icenter Prospective Op en Label Study. Hepatology 2 010;52:96A. Liang Y, Jiang J, Su M, Liu Z, Guo W, Huang X, et al. Predictors of relapse in chronic hepatitis B ater discontinuation of anti-viral therapy.
Aliment Pharmaco l Ther 2011;34:344–352 Liaw YF, Leung NW, Chang TT, et al. Efects of extended lamivudine therapy in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B. Asia Hepatitis
Lamivudine Study Group. Gastroenterology 2000;119:172-80. .Liaw YF, Gane E, Leung N, et al. 2-Year GLOBE trial results: telbivudine is superior to lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
Gastroenterology 2009;136:486-95 . Liaw YF, Sheen IS, Lee CM, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine/TDF, and entecavir in patients with decompensated
chronic hepatit is B liver disease. Hepato logy 2011;53:62-72. Liaw, YF, Jia JD, Han KH, et al. 1. S horter durations and lower doses of p eginterferon alfa-2a are associate d with inferior hepatitis B e antigen
seroconversion rate s in hepatitis B virus genotyp es B or C. Hepatolo gy 2011;54:1591-9. Lin CL, Yang HC , Kao JH. Hepatitis B virus: new th erapeutic perspective s. Liver Int. 2016 Jan;36 Supp l 1:85-92. Lok AS, Liang RH, C hiu EK, Wong KL, Chan TK, Todd D . Reactivation of hepatitis B virus repl ication in patients receiving cyto toxic therapy.
Report of a prospe ctive study. Gastroenterology. 1991;100 (1):182-8. Lok AS, Lai CL, Leung N, et al. Long-term safety of lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology
2000 ;119:172- 80. Lok AS, McMa hon BJ. Chronic hepati tis B. Hepatology 20 07 ;45:507-39. Lok AS, McMa hon BJ. Chronic Hepatit is B: Update 2009 . Hepatology 2009;50 :1-35. Lok AS, Trinh H, Carosi G , et al. Eica cy of entecavir with or without tenofovir di soproxil fumarate for nuc leos(t)ide-naïve patients with chroni c
hepatitis B . Gastroenterology. 2012 , 143(3):619-28. Manesis EK , Hadziyannis SJ. Interfero n alpha treatment and retreat ment of hepatitis B e antig en negative chronic hepat itis B. Gastroe nterology
2001;121:101-9 . Manns MP, Akarca US , Chang TT, et al. Long-term safet y and tolerability of entec avir in patients with chronic hepatit is B in the rollover study
ETV-901. Expe rt Opin Drug Saf 2012. In p ress. Marcellin P, Lau GK , Bonino F, et al. Peginterfero n a-2a alone, lamivudine alone, a nd the two in combination in p atients with HBeAg negative
chronic hepatit is B. N Engl J Med 2004;351:120 6-17. Marcellin P, Bonino F, Lau GK, et al. Sustained response of hepatitis B e antigen negative patients 3 years ater treatment with peginterferon
a-2a. Gast roenterology 2009a;136: 2169-79. Marcellin P, Piratvis hut T, Brunetto MR, et al. A inite c ourse of peginterferon alfa-2a resu lts in inactive chronic hepatiti s B and HBsAg clearance
5 years post-treatment in p atients with HBeAg negative diseas e: baseline characteristi cs and predictive factors of long-term re sponse. 60th
Annual Meeting of the Am erican Association for th e Study of Liver Disease s (AASLD 2009). Boston 20 09b, Abstract 387. Marcellin P, Heathcote J, Buti M, et al. Characterization of HBsAg seroconversion in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treated with
tenofovir disoproxi l fumarate (TDF). Hepatology 2011;54:1036A. Marcellin P, Heathco te EJ, Buti M, et al. HBeAg ki netics in patients with chronic he patitis B (CHB) treated with tenofovir disoprox il fumarate
(TDF) for up to 4 years. J Hepatol 2011:54: S297.
210 211
9. Treatment of hepatitis B infections
https://t.me/medicina_free
Marcellin P, Gane E , Buti M, et al. Reg ression of cirrhosis during tre atment with tenofovir disoproxil fu marate for chronic hepatitis B : a 5-year
open-labe l follow-up study. Lancet 2013;381:468-75 .
Marcellin P, Gane E J, Flisiak R, et al. Lon g Term Treatment with Tenofovir Disoproxi l Fumarate for Chronic Hepatitis B Infectio n is Safe and
Well Tolerated and Associ ated with Durable Virologic Respo nse with no Detectable Resistan ce: 8 Year Results from Two Phase 3 Trials. American Assoc iation for the Study of Liver Dise ases (AASLD) Liver Meeting. Boston, N ovember 7-12, 2014. Abstract 2 29.
Marcellin P, Ahn SH, M a X, Caruntu FA, Tak WY, Elkashab M, et a l. Combination of Tenofovir Dis oproxil Fumarate and Peginterferon α-2 a
Increases Loss of H epatitis B Surface Antigen i n Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B . Gastroenterology. 2016 J an;150(1):134-144 .
Martinot-Peignou x M, Lapalus M, Laou énan C, et al. Predict ion of disease reactivatio n in asymptomatic hepatitis B e anti gen negative chronic
hepatitis B pati ents using baseline s erum measurements of HBsAg and HBV-DNA. J C lin Virol 2013;58:401-7.
McMahon BJ , Alward WL, Hall DB, et al. Acute hep atitis B virus infection: relation o f age to the clinical expressio n of disease and subsequent
development of the c arrier state. J Infect Dis 1985;151:599- 603.
Menne S, Tumas DB, Liu KH, et al. Sustained eicacy and seroconversion with the Toll-like receptor 7 agonist GS-9620 in the Woodchuck
model of chronic h epatitis B. J Hepatol . 2015;62:1237–1245.
Moses SE , Lim ZY, Sudhanva M, et al. Lamivud ine prophylaxis and treatme nt of hepatitis B virus-exp osed recipients rec eiving reduced intensit y
conditionin g hematopoietic stem cel l transplants with alemtuzuma b. J Med Virol 2006;78:1560- 3.
Moucari R, M ackiewicz V, Lada O, et al. Early serum HBsAg d rop: a strong predictor of sustained vi rological response to pegyl ated interferon
a-2a in HBeAg negative p atients. Hepatology 20 09;49:1151-7.
Moucari R, Korevaar A, Lada O, et al. High rates of HBsAg seroconversion in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B patients responding to
interferon: a long-term fo llow-up study. J Hepatol 2009;50 :1084-92.
Ning Q, Han MF, Sun YT, Jiang J, Tan D, Hou J, et al. Switching from entecavir to PegIFN alfa-2a in patients with HBeAg positive chronic
hepatitis B : A randomized open-labe l trial (OSST trial) J. Hepatol . 2014;61:777–784.
.Papatheodoridis G, Dalekos G, Sypsa V, Yurdaydin C, Buti M, Go ulis J, Calleja JL, Chi H , Manolakopoulos S, Man gia G, Gatselis N, Keskin
O, Savvidou S , de la Revilla J, Hansen BE , Vlachogiannakos I , Galanis K, Idilma n R, Colombo M, Est eban R, Janssen HL , Lampertico P. PAGE-B: A risk score for h epatocellular carcin oma in Caucasians with ch ronic hepatitis B under a 5-year en tecavir or tenofovir therapy. J Hepatol. 2015 De c 8. pii: S0168-8 278(15)00795-3. doi : 10.1016/j.jhep.2015 .11.035.
Papatheodoridis G, Vlachogiannakos I, Cholongitas E, et al.Discontinuation of oral antivirals in chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review.
Hepatology. 2016;63:1481–1492.
Papatheodoridis GV, Idilman R, Dalekos GN, Buti M, Chi H, van Boemmel F, Calleja JL , Sypsa V, Goulis J, Manolakopoulos S, Loglio A,
Siakavellas S , Keskın O, Gatselis N, Hansen BE, Lehretz M, de la Revilla J, Savvidou S, Kourikou A, Vlachogiannakos I, Galanis K, Yurdaydin C, Berg T, Colo mbo M, Esteban R , Janssen HLA, Lampert ico P.
The risk of hepato cellular carcinoma d ecreases ater the irst 5 ye ars of entecavir or tenofovir in Cauca sians with chronic hepa titis B. Hepatolo gy.
2017 N ov;66(5): 1444-1453.
Papatheodoridis GV, Sypsa V, Dalekos G, Yurdaydin C, van Boemmel F, Buti M, Goulis J, Calleja JL , Chi H, Manolakopoulos S, Loglio A,
Siakavellas S , Gatselis N, Keskın O, Lehretz M, Savvidou S , de la Revilla J, Hansen BE, Kourikou A, Vlachogiannakos I, Galanis K, Idilman R, Co lombo M, Esteban R, J anssen HLA, Berg T, Lampertico P. Ei ght-year survival in chroni c hepatitis B patients under lon g­term entecavir or tenofovir th erapy is similar to the general p opulation. J Hepatol . 2018 Jun;68(6):1129-1136.
Park JW, Park KW, Cho SH, et al. Risk of hepatitis B exacerbation is low ater transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy for patients
with HBV-related hepatocel lular carcinoma: report of a pro spective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2 005;100:2194-200. Perrillo RP, Lai CL, Li aw YF, et al. Predictors of HBeAg loss ater l amivudine treatment for chronic h epatitis B. Hepatol ogy 2002;36:186- 94. Perrillo RP, Schif ER, Davis GL, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of interferon alpha-2b alone and ater prednisone withdrawal for the
treatment of chroni c hepatitis B. N Engl J M ed 1990;323:295-301. Petersen J, Ratziu V, Buti M, et al. Entecavir plus tenofovir combination as rescue therapy in pre-treated chronic hepatitis B patients: an
international mult icenter cohort study. J Hepatol . 2012 Mar;56(3):520-6. Peyriere H, Reynes J, Rouanet I, et al. Renal tubular dysfunction associated with tenofovir therapy: report of 7 cases. J Acquir Immune Deic
Syndr 2004;35:269-73. Rehermann B, Fe rrari C, Pasquinelli C, C hisari FV. The hepatitis B virus persists fo r decades ater patients’ recovery fro m acute viral hepatitis
despite active ma intenance of a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte res ponse. Nat Med 1996; 2:1104-8. Reijnders JG, P as SD, Schutten M, et al . Entecavir shows limited ei cacy in HBeAg positive hep atitis B patients with a partial vi rologic response
to adefovir therapy. J Hepatol 20 09;50:674-83. Reijnders JG, d e Vri es-Sluijs T, Hansen BE, e t al. Five years tenofovir therapy is assoc iated with maintained virologic res ponse, but signiicant
decline in renal function in HIV/HBV coinfected patients. 60th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver
Diseases (AASLD 2009). B oston 2009a. Abstrac t 425. Roche B, S amuel D. The diiculti es of managing severe hep atitis B virus reactivation. L iver Int 2011;31:104-10. Rutgeerts P, Vermeire S, Van Assc he G. Biological the rapies for inlammatory bowel dis eases. Gastroenterology. 20 09;136:1182-97.Sarin SK ,
Kumar M, Lau GK , Abbas Z, Chan HL , Chen CJ, et al. Asia n-Paciic clinical pra ctice guidelines on th e management of hepatit is B: a 2015
update. Hepatol Int. 2016 Jan;10(1):1-98. Sarin SK, Kumar M , Lau GK, et al. Asian-Paciic clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update. Hepatol Int.
2016;10:1–98. Schif ER , Lee SS, Chao YC, et a l. Long-term treatment with ente cavir induces reversal of advanced  ibrosis or cirrhosis in pati ents with chronic
hepatitis B . Clin Gastroenterol Hep atol. 2011;9:274-6. Seto WK, Lai CL , Fung J, Wong DK, Yuen JC , Hung IF, Yuen MF. Signiicance of HBV DNA levels at 12 week s of telbivudine treatment and the
3 years treatment outco me. J Hepatol. 2011;55:522- 8. Seto WK, Chan TS , Hwang YY, Wong DK, Fung J, Liu KS , et al. Hepatitis B Rea ctivation in Patients With Previous Hep atitis B Virus Exposure
Undergoing Rituximab-Containing Chemotherapy for Lymphoma: A Prospective Study. J Clin Oncol. 2014. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov
20;32:3736-43. Sherman M, Yurdaydin C , Simsek H, et al. Entecavir therapy for lamivudine-refractory chronic hepatitis B: improved virologic, biochemical,
and serology outc omes through 96 weeks. He patology 2008;48:9 9-108. Siberry GK , Jacobson DL, Kalkwarf HJ , Wu JW, DiMeglio LA , Yogev R, et al . Lower newborn bone mineral conte nt associated with maternal
use of tenofovir disop roxil fumarate during pregna ncy. Clin Infect Dis 2015;61:996 -1003. Sonneveld MJ , Rijckborst V, Boucher CA , et al. Prediction of s ustained response to p eginterferon alfa-2b for hepat itis B e antigen positive ch ronic
hepatitis B usin g on-treatment hepatitis B su rface antigen decline . Hepatology 2010;52:1251-7.
Su T-H, Hu T-H, Chen C-YC-L, Huang Y-HY-W, Chuang W-L, Lin C-LC-C, et al.Four-year entecavir therapy reduces hepatocellular
carcinoma, c irrhotic events and mortality in c hronic hepatitis B patient s. Liver Int2016;36:1755–1764.
Sun J, Xie Q, Tan D, et al . 104-week eicacy and safety o f telbivudine based optim ization strategy in chronic hep atitis B patients: A randomize d,
controlled study. Hep atology. 2013 Nov 14.
Sung JJ, Lai JY, Zeuzem S, et al. Lamivudine compared with lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of HBeAg positive chronic
hepatitis B . J Hepatol 2008;48:728 -35.
Tassopoulos NC, Papaevangelou GJ, Sjogren MH, Roumeliotou-Karayannis A, Gerin JL, Purcell RH. Natural history of acute hepatitis B
surface antigen p ositive hepatitis in Gre ek adults. Gastroenterol ogy 1987;92:1844–50.
Tassopoulos NC , Koutelou MG, Polychronaki H, Paraloglou-Ioannides M, Hadziyannis SJ. Recombinant interferon-alpha therapy for acute
hepatitis B : a randomized, double-b lind, placebo -controlled trial. J Viral H epat 1997;4:387–94. ter Borg MJ, Lee mans WF, de Man RA, Janssen HL . Exacerbation o f chronic hepatitis B infecti on ater delivery. J Viral Hepat 2008 ;15:37-41. Tillmann HL, Hadem J, Leifeld L , et al. Safety and eicacy of lamivudine in patients with severe acute or f ulminant hepatitis B, a multicenter
experience . J Viral Hepat 2006;13:256- 63. Tenney DJ, Rose RE, B aldick CJ, et al. Lon g-term monitoring shows hepatitis B vi rus resistance to entecavir in nucle oside-naïve patients is rare
through 5 years of therapy. Hep atology 2009;49:1503-14. Terrault NA, Bzowej NH, Ch ang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, Mura d MH. AASLD guidelines for treatment of c hronic hepatitis B. Hep atology.
2016 Jan;63(1):261-83 . Toy M, Veldhuijzen IK, de Man RA, et al. Potential impact of long-term nucleoside therapy on the mortality and morbidity of active chronic
hepatitis B . Hepatology 2009;50 :743-751. Tseng TC, Kao JH. Treating Immune- tolerant Hepatitis B. J Viral Hep at. 2015 Feb;22(2):77-84. van Bömmel F, de Man RA , Wedemeyer H, et al. Lo ng-term eicacy of tenofovir mo notherapy for hepatitis B virus-mon oinfected patients ater
failure of nucleoside/nucleotide analogueues. Hepatology 2010;51:73-80. van Bömmel F, Trojan J, De terding K, et al. Evo lution of adefovir-resistant HBV polyme rase gene variants ater switch ing to tenofovir disoproxil
fumarate monotherapy. Antivir T her. 2012;17:1049-58. van Bömmel F, Berg T. Stopping long-term treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues is a favourable option for selected patients with HBeAg
negative chronic h epatitis B. Liver Int. 2018 Fe b;38 Suppl 1:90 -96. Van Hees S, Bourg eois S, Van Vlierbergh e H, Sersté T, Francque S, M ichielsen P, Sprengers D , Reynaert H, Henrion J, Ne grin Dastis S, De lwaide
J, Lasser L , Decaestecker J, O rlent H, Janssens F, Robaeys G, C olle I, Stärkel P, Moreno C, Neven s F, Vanwolleghem T; Belgian NA S top
Study Group. Stop ping nucleos(t)ide analogue tre atment in Caucasian hep atitis B patients ater HBeAg se roconversion is associ ated with
high relapse rate s and fatal outcomes. Aliment P harmacol Ther. 2018 Apr;47(8):1170-1180. van Zonneveld M , van Nunen AB, Niesters HG, et a l. Lamivudine treatment during p regnancy to prevent perinatal tran smission of hepatitis B
virus infection . J Viral Hepat 2003;10:294-7. Verhelst D, Monge M, Meynard JL, et al. Fanconi syndrome and renal failure induced by tenofovir: a irst case report. Am J Kidney Dis
2002;40:1331-3 . Vassilopoulos D, Calabrese LH. Risks of immunosuppressive therapies including biologic agents in patients with rheumatic diseases and
co-existi ng chronic viral infections . Curr Opin Rheumatol . 2007;19:619-25. Waked I, Salam a M, Zayed N, et al. E gyptian Guidelines 2 008. Wang C-Y, Zhao P, Liu W-WAcute Liver Failure Study Team. Acute liver failure c aused by severe acute hepatitis B : a case series from a multi-
center investigat ion. Ann Clin Microbio l Antimicrob 2014;13:23. Wang CC, Tseng KC, Hs ieh TY, et al. Assessing the durability of entecavir-treated hepatitis b us ing quantitative HBsAg. Am J Gastroenterol .
2016;111:1286–1294. Werle-Lapostolle B , Bowden S, Locarnini S, et al. Persistence of cccDNA during the natural history of chronic hepatitis B and decline during
adefovir dipivoxil therapy. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1750-8. Wiegand J, Wedem eyer H, Finger A, et al. A d ecline in hepatitis B virus surfa ce antigen (HBsAg) predicts clearance, b ut does not correlate with
quantitative HBeAg or HBV DNA levels . Antivir Ther 2008;13:547-54. Wong DK, Cheun g AM, O’Rourke K, et al. E fect of alpha-interferon treatment i n patients with hepatitis B e antige n positive chronic hepatitis
B. A meta-ana lysis. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:312-23. World Health Organization (WHO). Guideline s for the prevention, care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B infection. Geneva:
WHO. Mar 2015. Availa ble from: http://apps.who.int/iris/b itstream/10665/154590/1/9789241549059_eng.pd?ua=1&ua=1 Wu CY, Lin JT, Ho HJ, Su CW, Lee TY, Wang SY, Wu C, Wu JC. Association of nucleos(t)ide analogueue therapy with reduced risk of
hepatocellul ar carcinoma in patients with c hronic hepatitis B: a nat ionwide cohort study. Gastroe nterology 2014;147:143-151. Wursthorn K, Lutgehe tmann M, Dandri M, et al . Peginterferon alpha-2b plus a defovir induce strong cccDNA declin e and HBsAg reduction in
patients with chroni c hepatitis B. Hepato logy 2006;44:675-84. Yu JW, Sun LJ, Zhao YH, et al. The S tudy of Eicacy of Lamivudin e in Patients with Severe Acute Hepat itis B. Dig Dis S ci 2010;55:775-83. Yuen MF, Fong DY,Wong DK, et al. Hepatitis B virus DNA levels at week 4 of lamivudine treatment predict the 5-year ideal response.
Hepatology 2007;46 :1695-1703. Yuen M-F, Chan HL-Y, Liu SHK, et al. AC-520 produces deep and durable knockdown of viral antigens and DNA in a phase II study in
patients with chroni c hepatitis B. Hepato logy. 2015;62:1385A. Zhang QQ, An X , Liu YH, Li SY, Zhong Q, Wang J, et al. Lo ng-Term Nucleos(t)ide Analogueue s Therapy for Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B
reduces the Risk of Lo ng-Term Complications: a meta-analys is. Virol J 2011;8:72. Zeuzem S, Gane E, Liaw YF, et al. Baseline characteristics and early on-treatment response predict the outcomes of 2 years of telbivudine
treatment of chroni c hepatitis B. J Hepatol 2 009;51:11-20. Zoulim F, Perrillo R . Hepatitis B: rele ctions on the current approa ch to antiviral therapy. J Hepatol 2008;48 :S2-S19. Zoulim F, Locarnin i S. Management of tre atment failure in chronic hep atitis B. J Hepatol. 2 012;56 Suppl. Zurawska U, Hicks LK, Woo G, Bell CM , Krahn M, Chan KK, et al. Hepatitis B virus screening before chemotherapy for lymphoma: a cost-
efectiveness an alysis. J Clin Oncol . 2012;30(26):3167-73.
212 213
10. Hepatitis D –
https://t.me/medicina_free
diagnosis and treatment
Heiner Wedemeyer
Introduction
Hepatitis delta is the most severe form of viral hepatitis in humans. The hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is a defective RNA virus which requires the hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) for complete replication and transmission, while the full extent of the HBV helper function is unexplored (Rizzetto 1983, Taylor 2012). Hence, HDV occurs only in HBsAg positive individuals either as acute coinfection or as superinfection in patients with chronic HBV (Wedemeyer 2010) (Figure 1). Several studies have shown that chronic HDV infection leads to more severe liver disease than chronic HBV monoinfection, with an accelerated course of ibrosis progression, possibly a slightly increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and early decompensation in the setting of established cir rhosis (Hughes 2011, Manesis 2013, Beguelin 2017). Simultaneous HBV and HDV infection has also been shown to be more severe than infection with HBV alone in chimpanzees (Dienes 1990). An easy to apply clinical score has been suggested to predict the likelihood of experiencing a clinical event for patients with HDV, the baseline-event-anticipation (BEA) score (Calle-Serrano 2014). So far, only interferon α treatment is recommended against HDV (Deterding 2019) and has been linked to improve the clinical long-term outcome (Farci 2004, Wranke 2017, Yurdaydin 2018). Data on the use of pegylated interferon (PEG­IFN) conirm earlier indings, leading to prolonged virological of-treatment responses in about one quarter of patients but long-term HDV RNA relapses may occur (Heidrich 2014). Thus, HBsAg clearance should be the preferred endpoint of interferon-based therapies of HDV. Still, suppression of HDV RNA in the presence of HBsAg has been associated with improved clinical outcomes. Alternative treatment options including HBV entry inhibitors and prenylation inhibitors (www.clinicaltrials.gov) are currently in phase 3 clinical development.
215214
Figure 1. Courses of hepatitis delta
https://t.me/medicina_free
Virology of HDV
The hepatitis D virion is approximately 36 nm in size, containing HDV RNA and delta antigen. HDV RNA is single-stranded, highly base-paired, circular and by far the smallest known genome of any animal virus, containing close to 1700 nucleotides (Taylor 2012, Sureau 2016). It is coated with the envelope protein derived from the pre-S and S antigens of HBV. Other enveloped viruses including HCV and VSV can also propagate HDV infection, both in vitro as well in humanized mice (Peres-Vargas 2019). Still, it is currently unclear if viruses distinct from HBV induce dissemination of HDV also in patients. The HDV RNA has six open reading frames (ORFs), three on the genomic and three on the antigenomic strand. One ORF codes for the hepatitis delta antigen (HDAg), while the other ORFs do not appear to be actively transcribed. Two HDAgs exist: the small HDAg (24 kD) is 155 amino acids long and the large HDAg (27 kD) is 214 amino acids long. A single nucleotide change (A-G) in the small HDAg sequence leads to the synthesis of the large HDAg. The small HDAg accelerates genome synthesis, while the large HDAg that inhibits HDV RNA synthesis is necessary for virion morphogenesis (Taylor 2012). Replication of HDV RNA occurs through a ‘double rolling circle’ model in which the genomic strand is replicated by a host RNA polymerase to yield a multimeric linear structure that is then
10. Hepatitis D – diagnosis and treatment
autocatalytically cleaved to linear monomers and ligated into the circular HDV RNA viral progeny (Sureau 2016). Recent work showed that the host RNA polymerase II-is coactivated by S-HDAg using a histone mimicry strategy (Abeywickrama-Samarakoon 2020).
Genetic analysis has revealed the presence of at least eight HDV genotypes (Le Gal 2017) (Figure 2). Genotype 1 is the most frequently seen and is distributed throughout the world, especially in Europe, the Middle East, North America and North Africa. Genotype 2 is seen in East Asia and the Yakutia region of ussia, and genotype 3 is seen exclusively in the northern part of South America, especially in the Amazon basin. Genotype 4 is seen in Taiwan and Japan while genotypes 5–8 are found in Africa (Deny
2006). HDV genotype 1 is associated with both severe and mild disease whereas genotype 2 causes a milder disease over a long-term course (Su
2006). HDV genotype 5 may also take a milder course and a better response to PEG-IFNa treatment compared to genotype 1 (Spaan 2020).
HDV quasispecies evolution declines over time during HDV infection even though a continuous adaptation of HDV occurs indicating ongoing immune pressure in chronic HDV (Homs 2016).
HBV genotypes may also contribute to distinct clinical courses of HDV. There is no evidence that speciic HDV genotypes may infect patients with one speciic HBV genotype exclusively. However, recent data indicate that distinct HDV mutations may facilitate association of certain HDV genotypes with diferent HBV genotypes (Kay 2014). The global distribution of HBV and HDV genotypes is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. HBV and HDV genotypes
Region HDV genotype HBV genotype
Europe 1 D/A
Brazil 1/3 F/A/D
China, Taiwan, Japan 1/2 /4 B/C
Turkey, Iran, Pakistan, India 1 D
Western Pacific 1/2 B/C/D
Africa 1, 5–8 D/A / E
216 217
Figure 2. Prevalence of HDV genotypes
https://t.me/medicina_free
Epidemiology of HDV
HDV is not an uncommon disease. Being linked to HBV, HDV is spread in the same way as HBV, mainly through parenteral exposure (Niro 1999). It is highly endemic in Mediterranean countries, the Middle East, Central Africa, and northern parts of South America (Hughes 2011) (Figure 2). In high-income countries, high anti-HDV prevalence is found in people who inject drugs (PWID) who are HBsAg positive, both in Europe (Gaeta 2000, Heidrich 2009, Erhardt 2010) and North America (Kurcirka 2010). Worldwide, more than 240 million people are chronically infected with HBV and 15–25 million of those are estimated to be anti-HDV positive (Wedemeyer 2010). Two systematic reviews suggested that the prevalence of HDV may be even higher reaching up to 1% of the populations world­wide (Chen 2018, Miao 2019). This work has been criticized as systematic reviews can only be as good as studies included (Wedemeyer 2018). but HDV may still be more frequent than previously thought. HDV was endemic in Southern Europe. Several studies performed in the 1980s and 1990s showed a prevalence of anti-HDV of more than 20% among HBsAg positive individuals. As a result of the implementation of HBV vaccination programmes, the incidence of HDV infections signiicantly decreased in Southern Europe in the 1990s (Gaeta 2000, Degertekin 2008) (Figure 3). Other countries with a particularly high prevalence of HDV are Mongolia with up to one third of chronic hepatitis cases being caused by HDV (Tsatsralt-Od 2005), some Central Asian republics, Pakistan (Abbas 2012),
10. Hepatitis D – diagnosis and treatment
northwestern states of Brazil (Kay 2014, Braga 2014), distinct regions in Africa (Andernach 2014), and some Polynesian islands (Han 2014). Of note, prevalence rates of HBV and HDV are not linked - for example, HDV infections have been considered to be rather rare in most parts of mainland China despite very high frequencies of HBV. However, some studies revealed an HDV prevalence of up to 6.5%, suggesting that HDV may be more frequent in China than previously thought (Lia 2014). HBV/HDV coinfection was also associated with higher frequencies of end-stage liver disease in that study. In Taiwan, a country with a well-established national HBV vaccination program, the epidemiology of HDV changed over the last 20 years with PWID and HIV positive persons being particular risk groups and representing a main reservoir for HDV infection (Hung 2014, Lin 2015, Lee 2015).
One problem is that many HBsAg positive patients are not tested for HDV. A study from Greece even suggests that HDV testing declined over the last 10 years and only about one-third of people with HBV are currently assessed for the presence of HDV antibodies (Manesis 2013). Similarly, the HDV testing rate was low in four hospitals in London where people with HDV frequently had severe disease and patients were of very diverse ethnicity (El Bouzidi 2015). In the United States Veterans Afairs medical system, only 8.5% of more than 25,000 HBsAg positive patients were tested for HDV. Of those, 3.4% had evidence for HDV and HDV was associated with a 2.9 fold higher HCC incidence and a higher risk of all-cause mortality (Kushner 2015).
In our experience at a referral centre for liver disease, about 8–10% of HBsAg positive patients test positive for anti-HDV as chronic HDV still represents a signiicant health burden in Central Europe, which is a source of immigration (Wedemeyer 2007, Heidrich 2009, Erhardt 2003, Erhardt
2010) (Figure 3, Table 1). More than three quarters of these HDV patients were not born in Germany. However, the geographical origin of our patients has changed during the last decade. While until the mid-1990s the majority of HDV positive patients were born in Turkey, the proportion of Eastern European patients has signiicantly increased in recent years (Wedemeyer
2007). Similarly, high HDV prevalence in immigrant populations has been described in clinics in the UK (Cross 2008), France and Italy (Le Gal 2007, Mele 2007). HDV can also be found in high frequencies in people living with HIV who are also HBsAg positive with about 14.6% in diferent European regions (Soriano 2011). In France, the prevalence of HDV infection has increased during the last 15 years, again mainly in pre-infected newly arriving immigrants (Servant-Delmas 2013).
HDV prevalence is much lower in HBV patients without speciic risk factors and cohorts excluding a referral bias. In this setting, less than 1–2% of HBsAg positive individuals test anti-HDV positive, even in countries
218 219