Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5947_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
10 Мб
Скачать
☆
2 Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) of Pharmaceuticals 77
Fig. 2.20 A detailed overview of orally administered dosage forms. (Reprinted with permission from Gioumouxouzis et al.
2019)
Weietal. (2020) constructed tablets containing carvedilol and haloperidol in a polyvinyl alcohol matrix. Pereira et al. ( containing up to 4 different drugs for cardiovascular treatment (Pereira et al.,
2019) constructed a multi-layered tablet
2019).
Other innovative tablet designs include for example a two-compartment dosage form, the DuoCaplet, which represents a smaller caplet containing paracetamol within a larger one containing caffeine. The idea is to enable the production of a controlled release tablet where the encapsulated drug is released after a certain lag time needed to dissolve the outer layer (Goyanes et al.,
2015).
2.5.1.2 Paediatric Dosage Forms
Due to the flexibility in size and shape, FDM 3D-printing proves to be exceptionally suited for the production of paediatric medicines. Scoutaris et al. (
2018)havedevel-
oped drug-loaded sweet-like chewable tablets (“Starmix”) utilizing indomethacin­loaded HPMCAS filaments (Scoutaris et al.,
2018).
78 S. Henry et al.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
2.5.1.3 Targeting Specific Release
The flexibility of 3D-printing allows the exploitation of different tablet designs to target a specific drug release profile, optimally suited for the proposed treatment strategy. Investigated modifications of the tablet include the construction of a specific porosity level, pore structure, surface area or polymeric composition.
Porosity
In comparison to direct compression, porosity and tablet dimensions are not corre­lated, as indicated by studies which reported the construction and characterization of tablets with identical size but varying porosity (Kempin et al.,
2018; Henry et al., 2021c). This enables the production of dosage forms with a wide variety of release
rates. For example, Henry et al. (2021) constructed dosage forms with an infill level varying from 20% to 90%. This altered the time needed to dissolve 63.2% of the API from 60 to 176 min (Henry et al.,
2021c). Another study noted a decline in
percentage of itraconazole released after 45 min from 96.9% to 80.9% when the infill was decreased from 67.2% to 39.9% (Jamroz et al.,
2020).
Moreover, the porosity of FDM 3D-printed products can be freely chosen which enables the production of hollow products. As a result, some studies have focused on the development of gastro-retentive floating tablets (GRFTs) to enhance the bioavailability of certain drugs. Giri et al. ( consisting of theophylline and hydroxypropyl cellulose (Giri et al., et al. (
2022) prepared floating tablets containing a drug-loaded core and hollow air
cell for the sustained release of venlafaxine (Zhao et al.,
2020), for example, developed a GRFT
2020). Zhao
2022). Vo et al. (2020)
developed floating tablets utilizing hydroxypropyl cellulose and vinylpyrrolidone vinyl acetate containing cinnarizine (Vo et al.,
2020). Chai et al. (2017)have
developed a floating tablet containing hydroxypropyl cellulose to increase the bioavailability of domperidone (Chai et al.,
2017).
Pore Structure
Next to the degree of porosity, the pore structure can also be tailored utilizing different infill patterns. An example is given by Nukala et al. (
2019a), who compared
two infill patterns (hexagonal and diamond) and their effect on the mechanical strength and dissolution kinetics. They found significant differences between the patterns, even when the same level of infill was used (Nukala et al.,
2019a).
Surface Area
Another way to control the dissolution behaviour is tailoring the surface area of the tablet. Viidik et al. (
2021) designed tablets with an outer honeycomb lattice to
increase the outer surface area and enhance the drug dissolution rate of theophylline (Viidik et al., 2021). In another study, Prasad et al. (2019) have developed circular and rectangular tablets with varying surface area to investigate the effect on dissolution (Prasad et al.,
2019). Adaptations of the standard tablet design to achieve
a certain release behaviour are easily made by modification of the digital design.
2 Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) of Pharmaceuticals 79
Fig. 2.21 Radiator-like oral solid dosage forms with varying inter-plate spacing to boost and control drug release. (Reprinted with permission from Isreb et al.
2019)
Sadia et al. (2018) incorporated channels in the tablet to promote dissolution kinetics by increasing the tablets’ surface area (Sadia et al., tablets have been prepared by Ayyoubi et al. ( (Ayyoubi et al.,
2021). Radiator-shaped tablets utilizing polyethylene oxides with
2018). Solid and channeled mini-
2021) to tailor the release of nifedipine
varying inter-plate spacing were produced to boost and tailor the release profile of theophylline, as can be seen in Fig.
2.21 (Isreb et al., 2019). Tidau et al. (2019)
investigated the release from cylinders, rings and balls loaded with theophylline (Tidau et al., 2019).
Polymeric Composition
Modifying the ratios between the components in a formulation or changing the additives could also be employed to obtain a specific release pattern. Tan et al. (
2020) developed a dosing platform containing theophylline with a polymeric
composition of hydroxypropyl cellulose, Eudragit RL PO and polyethylene glycol. They stated that different sustained release properties could be achieved when the ratio of these polymers was varied (Tan et al., dissolution behaviour was discussed by Shi et al. (
2020). Another approach to tailor
2021) as they developed a dosing
platform containing ibuprofen (20%), ethyl cellulose (60%) and a release modifier (20%). The release modifier was either poly(vinyl alcohol), Soluplus, PEG 6000, Eudragit RSPO, Eudragit RLPO, HPMC, Kollidon 17 PF, Kollidon 30 or Kollidon VA64. The nature of the release modifier influenced the dissolution kinetics of the model drug, hence controlling the zero-order release behaviour (Shi et al.,
2021).
2.5.1.4 Amorphous Solid Dispersion
Poorly soluble drug molecules are troublesome to formulate as they often display poor bioavailability. Transforming t he formulation to an amorphous system, molec­ularly dispersed within its polymeric carrier could provide a solution. Hot-melt extrusion and consequent FDM 3D-printing will provide the necessary energy to overcome the crystal lattice energy of the drug (Kolter et al., was exploited by Omari et al. (
2022), who produced immediate release tablets
2012). This mechanism
of loratadine, a poorly soluble compound that was solubilized in hydroxypropyl cellulose (Omari et al.,
2022). Parulski et al. (2022) could also produce stable (up
to 52 weeks) amorphous dispersions of itraconazole, a poor soluble compound, in
80 S. Henry et al.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 2.22 Various designs of mini floating polypills for Parkinson’s disease. (Reprinted with permission under the open access CC BY 4.0 license from Windolf et al.
2022)
a Kollidon VA64-HPMC matrix. The produced tablets showed a highly improved dissolution rate (Parulski et al.,
2022).
2.5.1.5 Complex Oral Dosage Forms
The unlimited versatility of FDM 3D-printing can be used to construct a wide variety of complex dosage forms. An example is the polypill developed by Windolf et al. (
2022) as can be seen in Fig. 2.22. The floating pill contained levodopa,
benserazide and pramipexole for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, addressing both prolongation of levodopa absorption and personalization of the treatment since the drugs possess a narrow therapeutic range (Windolf et al.,
2022). Another
example was the construction of abuse deterrent egg-shaped tablets (“egglets”) from PVA by Nukala et al. (2019b), which could prevent snorting and injection abuse (Nukala et al.,
2019b). Zhang et al. (2022) developed combi-pills of tranexamic acid
and indomethacin by coupling semi-solid syringe extrusion with FDM to achieve both an immediate and a sustained-release profile with the same pill (Zhang et al.,
2022).
2.5.1.6 Print and Fill Technology
Certain oral dosage forms are produced using the “print and fill” technology (Cailleaux et al.,
2021). An outer, hollow shell is printed using a commercially
available or self-made filament. During or after the printing process, it is filled with a drug or other substance. For example, Markl et al. (
2017) constructed
hollow compartmental tablets of polyvinyl alcohol. Halfway through, the printing process was stopped to enable manual filling with carbamazepine powder or self­nanoemulsifying liquids. After this filling step, the printing process was resumed (Markl et al.,
2017). Linares et al. (2019) developed an automated sequence
combining FDM 3D-printing and injection volume filling to produce “Printfills” as can be seen in Fig.
2.23. A porous structure is printed utilizing PLA, after which
the process is automatically stopped and the structure filled with a drug-loaded ink consisting of a theophylline-loaded hydro-alcoholic gel (1% HPMC gel: ethanol in a 25:75 ratio). Consequently, printing is resumed and a pH sensitive polymer dispersion injected into the top layer (Linares et al.,
2019).
Stopping the process mid-print could however cause anomalies in the printed
structure as was noted by X
. μCT analysis (Markl et al., 2017). A solution could be
to only fill the print after its production is finished, as was demonstrated by Maroni
2 Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) of Pharmaceuticals 81
Fig. 2.23 An illustration of how injection volume filling (IVF) and FDM 3D-printing can be combined to create printfills (a). First, a porous structure is printed (b) which is automatically filled with a drug-loaded ink (c). Next, 3 additional layers are printed on top of the drug-loaded structure. Finally, the top layer is injected with a pH-sensitive polymeric dispersion to allow colon­targeting (d) and the final printfill is obtained (e). (Reprinted with permission from Linares et al.
2019)
et al. (2017). They printed two hollow halves and joint structure. The hollow halves were manually filled with acetaminophen or dye-containing Kollicoat powder. Subsequently, the halves were manually assembled by means of the joint structure in between. This joint structure enables the two hollow parts to form a closed device but additionally also serves as separation between the two chambers. The produced capsular devices hence contained different compartments which could possess other thicknesses or compositions to produce two-pulse release patterns. Additionally, this device could contain different APIs or formulations (Maroni et al., example is provided by Okwuosa et al. (
2018) who printed polymethacrylate shells
2017). Another
which were filled with a theophylline solution or dipyridamole suspension in a single print step (Okwuosa et al.,
2018).
The print and fill technology can also be used to build additional functionalities
into the dosage forms as demonstrated by Palekar et al. (
2022) who devel-
oped aversion liquid-filled capsules (“3D-RECAL”). A capsule shell consisting of metformin-loaded polyvinyl alcohol was printed and manually filled with aversion liquid. The aversion liquid consists of pigment and starch in an oil base and its presence within the capsule did not interfere with drug release. However, this dark and viscous aversion liquid is released from the shell upon attempted solvent extraction or manipulation, engulfing the drug particles and forming swollen and non-snortable particles (Palekar et al.,
2022).
82 S. Henry et al.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
2.5.2 Transdermal and Transmucosal Films
FDM 3D-printing has also been used to produce transdermal and transmucosal films, as an alternative to the traditional oral treatment. Investigated dosage forms include fast-dissolving oral films, mucoadhesive buccal formulations, skin patches or microneedle patches.
2.5.2.1 Fast-Dissolving Oral Film
Fast-dissolving oral films (FDFs) could improve customer acceptance by fast disso­lution in the mouth without the need for water. Ehtezazi et al. (
2018) demonstrated
its potential by printing single- and multi-layered FDFs containing both taste­masking and drug layers (Ehtezazi et al., 2018).
2.5.2.2 Buccal Film
Mucoadhesive buccal films could achieve local and systemic delivery while avoid­ing passage through the gastro-intestinal tract and the first-pass effect. Eleftheriadis et al. (
2020), for example, have prepared mucoadhesive films using hydroxypropyl
methylcellulose loaded with ketoprofen, for the local treatment of inflammation associated with periodontitis. A back layer of ethyl cellulose was created to ensure unidirectional release (Eleftheriadis et al.,
2020). Elkanayati et al. (2022)have
printed immediate-release buccal films consisting of xylitol and adipic acid in a polyethylene oxide carrier to treat xerostomia or dry mouth (Elkanayati et al.,
2022).
2.5.2.3 Skin Patch
Skin patches could be an interesting alternative to oral treatment for drugs dis­playing bitter taste, poor solubility and/or instability in the gastro-intestinal tract (Oliveira et al.,
2021). Chaudhari et al. (2021) have 3D-printed skin patches for
transdermal delivery from polyvinyl pyrrolidone containing amorphous quercetin to increase its bioavailability. The patch contained an impermeable back layer of Eudragit RS PO (Chaudhari et al.,
2021). Another example is montelukast, a drug
suffering from extensive first-pass metabolism resulting in limited bioavailability. Azizo˘glu and Özer (
2020) have developed 3D-printed transdermal patches for skin
delivery of montelukast, aiming to increase its bioavailability (Azizo˘glu and Özer,
2020).
Alternatively, skin patches could be tailored in size and composition based on the region of interest and necessary treatment. Anatomically adaptable wound dressings containing the antimicrobial metals silver, copper and zinc were produced by Muwaffak et al. (
2017). Another study reported the use of composite materials from PLA and
et al.,
2017) after 3D-scanning of the region of interest (Muwaffak
lignin which were utilized to produce meshes with antioxidant properties for wound treatment (Domínguez-Robles et al.,
2019). Goyanes et al. (2016) have developed
anti-acne drug-loaded patches for topical delivery of salicylic acid utilizing 3D­scanning to construct a 3D-model based on the physical characteristics of a volunteer. Both polylactic acid and polycaprolactone were investigated as printing matrices (Goyanes et al.,
2016).
2 Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) of Pharmaceuticals 83
Fig. 2.24 Microneedle patches for galantamine delivery at x24 magnification (a), x200 magni- fication (b) and x335 magnification (c). (Reprinted with permission from Antonara et al.
2022)
2.5.2.4 Microneedle Patch
Microneedle patches contain small needles usually of a height below 1000 . μm. They have been investigated for transdermal delivery of drugs to improve patient compliance, reach constant systemic drug levels and reduce dosing frequency. The needles will disrupt the stratum corneum, hence allowing diffusion of the drug directly into the deeper skin layers and consequently the blood circulation. Antonara et al. ( after which these were infused with a galantamine solution (Fig. et al.,
2022). Wireless controlled devices for wound delivery of vascular endothelial
growth factor have been reported by Derakhshandeh et al. (
2022), for example, printed polylactic acid microneedle scaffolds,
2.24) (Antonara
2020), who produced
polymeric miniaturized needle arrays utilizing a desktop FDM printer. These arrays were consequently loaded with the drug and placed into a programmable smart bandage (Derakhshandeh et al.,
2020).
84 S. Henry et al.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
2.5.3 Implants
Implants might be preferred over oral formulations since they deliver the drug at a specific site, hence potentially lowering the systemic concentration. As a result, side effects are reduced and patient compliance increased. 3D-printing could enable the production of tailored implants, with a shape modified to the needs of the patient (Domsta and Seidlitz,
2021). Kempin et al. (2017) have demonstrated the use of
different polymers to create implants loaded with quinine. They obtained excellent drug homogeneity within the constructed implants whereby the drug release rate depended on the polymer or drug loading (Kempin et al.,
2017).
2.5.3.1 Antiplatelet Therapy
Antiplatelet vascular grafts containing dipyridamole have been prepared using thermoplastic polyurethane. The grafts showed effective antiplatelet activity and could provide sustained release for 30 days. Double-layered tubular grafts con­taining additional rifampicin with antimicrobial activity have also been prepared (Domínguez-Robles et al.,
2022).
2.5.3.2 Anticonception
Intrauterine devices and subcutaneous rods with sustained release were produced using indomethacin as model drug in ethylene vinyl acetate carriers (Genina et al.,
2016) or polycaprolactone (Holländer et al., 2016). Vaginal rings with personalized
shapes (O-, Y- or M-shaped) for controlled progesterone release have been produced by Fu et al. (2018) as can be seen in Fig. 2.25 (Fu et al., 2018). Urethra pessaries with personalized geometry to fit the anatomy of an individual vaginal cavity were produced by Spoerk et al. (
2021), utilizing a novel polyester-based elastomer.
The mechanical properties could be changed based on the patient requirements by adapting the in-silico model (Spoerk et al.,
2021). A biodegradable projectile made
from polylactic acid containing progesterone for contraception of wild life without the need to restrain the animal was constructed by Long et al. (
2018).
2.5.3.3 Scaffold
Sustained release scaffolds containing ibuprofen were prepared by Yang et al.
2022) utilizing polycaprolactone. The addition of chitosan acted as a plasticizer
( and induced the formation of channels within the implant, hence controlling dif­fusion rate (Yang et al.,
2022). Polycaprolactone scaffolds with gold nanoparticles
immobilized on their surface using plasma polymerization have been produced for tissue regeneration by Joseph et al. (
2021).
2.5.3.4 Biodegradability
Most implants are constructed utilizing non-biodegradable polymers, hence neces­sitating surgical removal after completion of the therapy. Stewart et al. (
2020)have
2 Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) of Pharmaceuticals 85
Fig. 2.25 CAD files (a–c) and 3D-printed (d–f) vaginal rings for progesterone release with tailored “O”, “Y” and “M” shapes. A cross-section is depicted in figure J. Reprinted with permission from Fu et al. (
2018)
developed different sizes of a biodegradable implant from either PVA or PLA after which the implants were filled directly with a powdered model drug, ibuprofen. They also investigated the effect of implant coating on the release characteristics (Stewart et al.,
2020).
86 S. Henry et al.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
2.6 Challenges and Future Perspectives
Fused deposition modeling in pharmaceuticals could be a technique exploited in Industry 5.0, a new industrial revolution anticipating to merge human creativity and industrial accuracy to enable mass personalization. Smart additive manufacturing (SAM) is one of the keystones of Industry 5.0 due to its potential for sustain­able and cost-effective production. Applications of SAM and more specifically FDM in healthcare could be prescription of personalized doses, manufacturing of personalized implants, assistive technology, smart medical education or disas­ter management. However, before these techniques can be exploited to provide decentralized manufacturing, the production life cycle will have to be digitized and innovated. Development of cloud manufacturing platforms could enable access control and intellectual property protection for designers, while the actual manufac­turing occurs at a decentralized production site. Since fused deposition modeling is a digitized, computer-based technique, a high level of security in data s torage and handling is required to guard patient privacy. Authentication, integrity of stakeholders, restricted access control and auditability of these digital processes could mitigate this risk. Additionally, decentralized production requires optimized supply chain management, which could be achieved by for example predictive analytics anticipating disruptions (Kumar et al.,
Understanding and controlling all production process variables from digital design to printed product is vital prior to implementation in healthcare. At the moment, most pharmaceutical research focuses on the use of non-GMP desktop printers from various brands in combination with different slicer programs like Cura, Makerware or PrusaSlicer. These programs convert stereolithography files to g-code, a sequence of instructions utilized by the printer. The conversion itself might vary between different programs, utilizing a different user interface, model settings and algorithms. Next to the program itself, different printer brands also introduce variability. Changes in nozzle length, feed mechanism or filament diame­ter tolerance for example might influence processability and jeopardize standardized results (Cailleaux et al.,
2021; Henry et al., 2021a). Another critical aspect related
to the design of a GMP printer is the importance of cleanability. In pharmaceutical research, different cleaning protocols utilizing high temperatures, brass brushes, immersion in solvents or flushing with cleaning polymers like cellulose-based derivatives have been investigated (Henry et al., acceptable medical printer should have easily cleanable parts, should be made from pharmaceutical grade material to avoid leachables in the drug product and should be in cleanroom (Trenfield et al.,
2018). Application of the printing technique in
healthcare however necessitates the use of biocompatible starting material (Awad et al.,
2018) and the development of pharmaceutical-class printers including the
use of inert contact parts, easily cleanable and enabling pharmaceutical process validation checks (Crowley et al.,
2007).
At the moment, only a limited number of materials are suitable for pharma-
ceutical FDM 3D-printing due to constraints in terms of mechanical, thermal
2022).
2021a; Melocchi et al., 2016). An