Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5425_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
3 Carbohydrate-Based Antiviral Vaccines
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
106
132 Vonnemann, J., Sieben, C., Wolff, C. etal. (2014). Virus inhibition induced by
polyvalent nanoparticles of different sizes. Nanoscale 6 (4): 2353–2360.
133 Papp, I., Sieben, C., Sisson, A.L. etal. (2011). Inhibition of influenza virus activity
by multivalent glycoarchitectures with matched sizes. ChemBioChem 12 (6):
887–895.
134 Lee, C.M., Weight, A.K., Haldar, J. etal. (2012). Polymerattached zanamivir
inhibits synergistically both early and late stages of influenza virus infection.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
109 (50): 20385–20390.
135 Lauer, G.M. and Walker, B.D. (2001). Hepatitis C virus infection. The New England
Journal of Medicine 345 (1): 41–52.
136 The Polaris Observatory HCV Collaborators (2017). Global prevalence and
genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus infection in 2015: a modelling study. The
Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2 (3): 161–176.
137 Dubuisson, J. (2007). Hepatitis C virus proteins. World Journal of Gastroenterology
13 (17): 2406–2415.
138 Goffard, A. (2003). Glycosylation of hepatits C virus envelope proteins. Biochemie
85 (3, 4): 295–301.
139 Zhang, M., Gaschen, B., Blay, W. etal. (2004). Tracking global patterns of Nlinked
glycosylation site variation in highly variable viral glycoproteins: HIV, SIV, and
HCV envelopes and influenza hemagglutinin. Glycobiology 14 (12): 1229–1246.
140 Op De Beeck, A., Cocquerel, L., and Dubuisson, J. (2001). Biogenesis of hepatitis
C virus envelope glycoproteins. The Journal of General Virology 82: 2589–2595.
141 Pileri, P., Uematsu, Y., Campagnoli, S. etal. (1998). Binding of hepatitis C virus to
CD81. Science 282 (5390): 938–941.
142 Scarselli, E., Ansuini, H., Cerino, R. etal. (2002). The human scavenger receptor
class B type I is a novel candidate receptor for the hepatitis C virus. The EMBO
Journal 21 (19): 5017–5025.
143 Ball, J.K., Tarr, A.W., and McKeating, J.A. (2014). The past, present and future of
neutralizing antibodies for hepatitis C virus. Antiviral Research 105 (1): 100–111.
144 Helle, F., Goffard, A., Morel, V. etal. (2007). The neutralizing activity of anti
hepatitis C virus antibodies is modulated by specific glycans on the E2 envelope
protein. Journal of Virology 81 (15): 8101–8111.
145 Cormier, E.G., Durso, R.J., Tsamis, F. etal. (2004). LSIGN (CD209L) and DC
SIGN (CD209) mediate transinfection of liver cells by hepatitis C virus.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
101 (39): 14067–14072.
146 Iacob, R.E., Perdivara, I., Przybylski, M., and Tomer, K.B. (2008). Mass
spectrometric characterization of glycosylation of hepatitis C virus E2 envelope
glycoprotein reveals extended microheterogeneity of Nglycans. Journal of the
American Society for Mass Spectrometry 19 (3): 428–444.
147 Bertaux, C., Daelemans, D., Meertens, L. etal. (2007). Entry of hepatitis C virus
and human immunodeficiency virus is selectively inhibited by carbohydrate
binding agents but not by polyanions. Virology 366 (1): 40–50.

References
148 Helle, F., Wychowski, C., VuDac, N. etal. (2006). CyanovirinN inhibits hepatitis
C virus entry by binding to envelope protein glycans. The Journal of Biological
Chemistry 281 (35): 25177–25183.
149 Li, D., von Schaewen, M., Wang, X. etal. (2016). Altered glycosylation patterns
increase immunogenicity of a subunit hepatitis C virus vaccine, inducing
neutralizing antibodies which confer protection in mice. Journal of Virology
90 (23): 10486–10498.
150 Peters, C.J. and LeDuc, J.W. (1999). An introduction to Ebola: the virus and the
disease. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 179 (Suppl 1): ix–xvi.
151 Kuhn, J.H., Becker, S., Ebihara, H. etal. (2010). Proposal for a revised taxonomy of
the family Filoviridae: classification, names of taxa and viruses, and virus
abbreviations. Archives of Virology 155 (12): 2083–2103.
152 WHO Ebola Response Team (2016). After Ebola in West Africa: unpredictable
risks, preventable epidemics. The New England Journal of Medicine 375 (6):
587–596.
153 Yang, Z.Y., Delgado, R., Xu, L. etal. (1998). Distinct cellular interactions of
secreted and transmembrane Ebola virus glycoproteins. Science 279 (5353):
1034–1037.
154 Medaglini, D. and Siegrist, C.A. (2017). Immunomonitoring of human responses
to the rVSVZEBOV Ebola vaccine. Current Opinion in Virology 23: 88–94.
155 Agnandji, S.T. and Loembe, M.M. (2021). Ebola vaccines for mass immunisation
in affected regions. The Lancet Infectious Diseases S14733099 (21): 00226–00227.
156 Lennemann, N.J., Rhein, B.A., Ndungo, E. etal. (2014). Comprehensive functional
analysis of Nlinked glycans on ebola virus GP1. mBio 5 (1): e00862–e00813.
157 Michelow, I.C., Lear, C., Scully, C. etal. (2011). Highdose mannosebinding lectin
therapy for Ebola virus infection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 203 (2):
175–179.
158 Yu, D.S., Weng, T.H., Wu, X.X. etal. (2017). The lifecycle of the Ebola virus in host
cells. Oncotarget 8 (33): 55750–55759.
159 Dowling, W., Thompson, E., Badger, C. etal. (2007). Influences of glycosylation on
antigenicity, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of Ebola virus GP DNA
vaccines. Journal of Virology 81 (4): 1821–1837.
160 Ou, W., Delisle, J., Jacques, J. etal. (2012). Induction of ebolavirus crossspecies
immunity using retroviruslike particles bearing the Ebola virus glycoprotein
lacking the mucinlike domain. Virology Journal 9: 1–13.
161 Tshiani Mbaya, O., Mukumbayi, P., and Mulangu, S. (2021). Review: insights on
current FDAapproved monoclonal antibodies against Ebola virus infection.
Frontiers in Immunology 12: 721328.
162 Iversen, P.L., Kane, C.D., Zeng, X. etal. (2020). Recent successes in therapeutics
for Ebola virus disease: no time for complacency. The Lancet Infectious Diseases
20 (9): e231–e237.
163 Warren, T.K., Wells, J., Panchal, R.G. etal. (2014). Protection against filovirus
diseases by a novel broadspectrum nucleoside analogue BCX4430. Nature
508 (7496): 402–405.
107

3 Carbohydrate-Based Antiviral Vaccines
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
108
164 Julander, J., Demarest, J., Taylor, R. etal. (2021). An update on the progress of
galidesivir (BCX4430), a broadspectrum antiviral. Antiviral Research 195: 105180.
165 Mulangu, S., Dodd, L.E., Davey, R.T. etal. (2019). A randomized, controlled trial
of Ebola virus disease therapeutics. The New England Journal of Medicine
381: 2293–2303.
166 Simmons, G., Reeves, J.D., Grogan, C.C. etal. (2003). DCSIGN and DCSIGNR
bind Ebola glycoproteins and enhance infection of macrophages and endothelial
cells. Virology 305 (1): 115–123.
167 Baribaud, F., Doms, R.W., and Pöhlmann, S. (2002). The role of DCSIGN and
DCSIGNR in HIV and Ebola virus infection: can potential therapeutics block
virus transmission and dissemination? Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets
6 (4): 423–431.
168 Bhatia, S., Camacho, L.C., and Haag, R. (2016). Pathogen inhibition by
multivalent ligand architectures. Journal of the American Chemical Society
138 (28): 8654–8666.
169 Illescas, B.M., Rojo, J., Delgado, R., and Martín, N. (2017). Multivalent
glycosylated nanostructures to inhibit Ebola virus infection. Journal of the
American Chemical Society 139 (17): 6018–6025.
170 RibeiroViana, R., SánchezNavarro, M., Luczkowiak, J. etal. (2012). Viruslike
glycodendrinanoparticles displaying quasiequivalent nested polyvalency upon
glycoprotein platforms potently block viral infection. Nature Communications
3: 1303.
171 Muñoz, A., Sigwalt, D., Illescas, B.M. etal. (2016). Synthesis of giant globular
multivalent glycofullerenes as potent inhibitors in a model of Ebola virus
infection. Nature Chemistry 8 (1): 50–57.
172 Zhou, P., Yang, X.L., Wang, X.G. etal. (2020). A pneumonia outbreak associated
with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579 (7798): 270–273.
173 Du, L., He, Y., Zhou, Y. etal. (2009). The spike protein of SARSCoV– a target for
vaccine and therapeutic development. Nature Reviews. Microbiology 7 (3): 226–236.
174 Satarker, S. and Nampoothiri, M. (2020). Structural proteins in severe acute
respiratory syndrome coronavirus2. Archives of Medical Research 51 (6): 482–491.
175 Watanabe, Y., Allen, J.D., Wrapp, D. etal. (2020). Sitespecific glycan analysis of
the SARSCoV2 spike. Science 369 (6501): 330–333.
176 Shajahan, A., Supekar, N.T., Gleinich, A.S., and Azadi, P. (2020). Deducing the
N and O glycosylation profile of the spike protein of novel coronavirus SARS
CoV2. Glycobiology 30 (12): 981–988.
177 Huang, Y., Yang, C., Xu, X.F. etal. (2020). Structural and functional properties of
SARSCoV2 spike protein: potential antivirus drug development for COVID19.
Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 41 (9): 1141–1149.
178 Casalino, L., Gaieb, Z., Goldsmith, J.A. etal. (2020). Beyond shielding: the roles
of glycans in the SARSCoV2 spike protein. ACS Central Science 6 (10):
1722–1734.
179 Andersen, K.G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W.I. etal. (2020). The proximal origin of
SARSCoV2. Nature Medicine 26: 450–452.
180 Lan, J., Ge, J., Yu, J. etal. (2020). Structure of the SARSCoV2 spike receptor
binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 581 (7807): 215–220.

References
181 Yi, C., Sun, X., Ye, J. etal. (2020). Key residues of the receptor binding motif in the
spike protein of SARSCoV2 that interact with ACE2 and neutralizing antibodies.
Cellular & Molecular Immunology 17 (6): 621–630.
182 Liu, C., Zhou, Q., Li, Y. etal. (2020). Research and development on therapeutic
agents and vaccines for COVID19 and related human coronavirus diseases. ACS
Central Science 6 (3): 315–331.
183 Jiang, S., Hillyer, C., and Du, L. (2020). Neutralizing antibodies against SARS
CoV2 and other human coronaviruses. Trends in Immunology 41 (5): 355–359.
184 Wang, D. (2020). Coronaviruses’ sugar shields as vaccine candidates. Current
Trends in Immunology 21: 17–23.
185 Watanabe, Y., Berndsen, Z.T., Raghwani, J. etal. (2020). Vulnerabilities in
coronavirus glycan shields despite extensive glycosylation. Nature Communications
11 (1): 2688.
186 Duan, L., Zheng, Q., Zhang, H. etal. (2020). The SARSCoV2 spike glycoprotein
biosynthesis, structure, function, and antigenicity: Implications for the design of
spikebased vaccine immunogens. Frontiers in Immunology 11: 576622.
187 Kumbhar, P.S., Pandya, A.K., Manjappa, A.S. etal. (2020). Carbohydratesbased
diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of infectious diseases: special emphasis on
COVID19. Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications 2: 100052.
188 Galili, U. (2020). Amplifying immunogenicity of prospective Covid19 vaccines by
glycoengineering the coronavirus glycanshield to present αgal epitopes. Vaccine
38 (42): 6487–6499.
189 ValdesBalbin, Y., SantanaMederos, D., Paquet, F. etal. (2021). Molecular aspects
concerning the use of the SARSCoV2 receptor binding domain as a target for
preventive vaccines. ACS Central Science 7 (5): 757–767.
190 Yang, J., Wang, W., Chen, Z. etal. (2020). A vaccine targeting the RBD of the S
protein of SARSCoV2induces protective immunity. Nature 586: 572–577.
191 ValdesBalbin, Y., SantanaMederos, D., Quintero, L. etal. (2021). SARSCoV2
RBDtetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine induces a strong neutralizing immunity in
preclinical studies. ACS Chemical Biology 16 (7): 1223–1233.
192 ToledoRomaní, M.E., GarcíaCarmenate, M., etal., GarcíaRivera, D., Vérez
Bencomo, V., SOBERANA Phase 3 team. (2023). Safety and efficacy of the two
doses conjugated proteinbased SOBERANA02 COVID19 vaccine and of a
heterologous threedose combination with SOBERANAPlus: a doubleblind,
randomised, placebocontrolled phase 3 clinical trial. The Lancet Regional
Health– Americas, 18: 100423 doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.31.21265703.
193 Ye, F., Zhao, J., Xu, P. etal. (2021). Synthetic homogeneous glycoforms of the
SARSCoV2 spike receptorbinding domain reveals different binding profiles of
monoclonal antibodies. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition 60 (23):
12904–12910.
194 Pifferi, C., Fuentes, R., and FernándezTejada, A. (2021). Natural and synthetic
carbohydratebased vaccine adjuvants and their mechanisms of action. Nature
Reviews Chemistry 5 (3): 197–216.
195 Schijns, V., Majhen, D., Van Der Ley, P. etal. (2021). Rational vaccine design in
times of emerging diseases: the critical choices of immunological correlates of
protection, vaccine antigen and immunomodulation. Pharmaceutics 13 (4): 501.
109

3 Carbohydrate-Based Antiviral Vaccines
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
110
196 Kensil, C.R. (1996). Saponins as vaccine adjuvants. Critical Reviews in Therapeutic
Drug Carrier Systems 13: 1–55.
197 LacailleDubois, M.A. (2019). Updated insights into the mechanism of action and
clinical profile of the immunoadjuvant QS21: a review. Phytomedicine 60: 152905.
198 Wang, P. (2021). Natural and synthetic saponins as vaccine adjuvants. Vaccine
9 (3): 1–18.
199 Didierlaurent, A.M., Laupèze, B., Di Pasquale, A. etal. (2017). Adjuvant system
AS01: helping to overcome the challenges of modern vaccines. Expert Review of
Vaccines 16 (1): 55–63.
200 Bengtsson, K.L., Morein, B., and Osterhaus, A.D. (2011). ISCOM technologybased
TM
Matrix M
adjuvant: success in future vaccines relies on formulation. Expert
Review of Vaccines 10 (4): 401–403.
201 Bengtsson, K.L., Karlsson, K.H., Magnusson, S.E. etal. (2013). MatrixM
adjuvant: enhancing immune responses by “setting the stage” for the antigen.
Expert Review of Vaccines 12 (8): 821–823.
202 Tian, J.H., Patel, N., Haupt, R. etal. (2021). SARSCoV2 spike glycoprotein
vaccine candidate NVXCoV2373 immunogenicity in baboons and protection in
mice. Nature Communications 12 (1): 372.
203 Heath, P.T., Galiza, E.P., Baxter, D.N. etal. (2021). Safety and efficacy of NVX
CoV2373 Covid19 vaccine. The New England Journal of Medicine 385 (13):
1172–1183.
204 Shinde, V., Bhikha, S., Hoosain, Z. etal. (2021). Efficacy of NVXCoV2373
Covid19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant. The New England Journal of
Medicine 384 (20): 1899–1909.
TM

4
Bacterial Glycolipid Lipid Asand Their Potential
asAdjuvants
Atsushi Shimoyama and Koichi Fukase
560-0043, Japan
4.1 Introduction
Bacterial components have long been known to regulate the immune system[1].
Tumor shrinkage due to bacterial infections has occasionally been reported for the
past hundreds of years[2]. In 1893, Corey etal. first attempted to use immunotherapy for cancer with Streptococcus pyogenes and Serratia marcescens. The immunostimulatory effects of killed Salmonella typhimurium and Mycobacterium
tuberculosis were confirmed in 1916 and 1924, respectively. These immunostimulatory effects, now widely known as the innate immune system, are triggered by recognizing molecular pattern characteristics of pathogens and microbes by various
innate immune receptors in multicellular organisms. Because innate immune stimulants also activate acquired immune responses such as antigen–antibody interactions and cell-to-cell immunity, several studies have been conducted to develop
innate immune stimulants as adjuvants [3], which are vaccine ingredients that
enhance antibody production.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a major glycoconjugate in the outer membrane of
Gram-negative bacteria, is a well-known innate immune stimulator [4]. Lipid A,
which is linked to the terminal of the polysaccharide part via the peculiar acidic
sugar Kdo (2-keto-3-deoxy--mannooctanoic acid), is the active principal of LPS, and
the chemical structure of an authorized Escherichia coli lipid A (1) is described in
Figure4.1. The recognition of LPS/lipid A by Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4/myeloid differentiation protein (MD)2 receptor induces various immune responses, including
cytokine production, nitric oxide production, reactive oxygen species production,
leukocyte migration, and lymphocyte activation, which trigger the host defense system against bacteria. LPS and lipid A are also extremely strong inflammatory agents
and are known as endotoxins, which are the major contributors to sepsis and trigger
serious systemic diseases that cause multiple organ failure, hypotension, and septic
shock [4a]. Canonical E. coli LPS is highly toxic; therefore, its application as an
111
Carbohydrate-Based Therapeutics, First Edition. Edited by Roberto Adamo and Luigi Lay.
© 2024 WILEY-VCH GmbH. Published 2024 by WILEY-VCH GmbH.

Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
112
Polysaccharide
Figure4.1 E. coli LPS and Kdo-lipid A.
adjuvant requires modification to attenuate any inflammatory effects and eliminate
significant toxicity. Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) derivative, 3D-MPL (2)
(Figure4.2), has already been developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and approved as
an adjuvant component[5]. Here, we introduce the structure–activity relationship of
lipid A and the strategy for regulating the immune functions of lipid A for the development of lipid A as an adjuvant.
Figure4.2 Chemical structure of 3D-MPL and lipid IVa.

4.2 Bacterial Glycolipid Lipid A: an Innate Immune Stimulant
4.2 Bacterial Glycolipid Lipid A: an Innate
Immune Stimulant
In 1892, Pfeiffer (a disciple of the bacteriologist Koch) revealed that Vibrio cholerae
produces two different toxic components: one is a heat-labile exotoxin and the other is
a heat-stable endotoxin [6]. In 1945, Westphal (later the first director of the Max
Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics) reported that the active ingredient of endotoxin is LPS, the outer membrane component of Gram-negative bacteria [6]. In 1957, the LPS terminus-acylated disaccharide, glycolipid lipid A, was
reported as the active core of LPS[6]. Shiba and Kusumoto began collaborating with
a German research group and submitted the correct structure of E. coli lipid A (1)
(Figure4.1), and in 1985, they succeeded in the first total synthesis of E. coli lipid A
(1), confirming that lipid A is the active core of endotoxin[7]. Simultaneously,
Qureshi and Takayama identified the lipid A structure [8]. Shiba and Kusumoto
also achieved lipid IVa (3) synthesis (Figure4.2), a precursor of E. coli lipid A[1],
and found that lipid IVa (3) has an immunostimulatory effect in mice but an antagonistic effect in humans[9]. The presence of an antagonist suggested the presence
of receptors, which led to LPS receptor exploratory studies. In 1996, a breakthrough
was achieved by Hoffmann, who revealed that the Toll gene, which regulates dorsoventral axis formation in Drosophila, is essential to the defense mechanism
against the fungus, leading to the discovery of various innate immune receptors[10]. In 1997, TLRs were found to be human homologs of the Drosophila Toll
protein[11], and Beutler identified TLR4 as an LPS receptor in 1998[12]. To date,
10 types of TLRs (TLR1–10) in humans and 12 types (TLR1–9, TLR11–13) in mice
have been identified.
TLRs are membrane glycoproteins containing a leucine-rich repeat motif in the ectodomain and a cytoplasmic signaling domain homologous to the interleukin 1 receptor
(IL-1R), called the Toll/IL-1R (TIR) domain. TLR4 signaling is mediated via various
adaptor molecules (MyD88, TRIF, TIRAP, and TRAM), including the TIR domain
(Figure4.3) [15]. MyD88-mediated signaling activates NF-κB, a transcription factor
involved in inflammation, and induces the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines
such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-6. These inflammatory cytokines are produced as a protective response against infection. However, TRIF-mediated signaling
leads to the activation of interferon (IFN) regulator 3 (IRF3) and induces the production of the antiviral cytokine type I IFN. Canonical E. coli LPS strongly activates both
signals simultaneously (Figure 4.3), resulting in a massive inflammatory response
leading to lethal toxicity. Therefore, lipid A attenuation and TLR4-signaling pathway
regulation are essential for the development of lipid A-based adjuvants.
To achieve lipid A attenuation and TLR4-signaling regulation, it is essential to
elucidate the molecular basis of lipid A recognition by TLR4. Miyake found that
MD2, an accessory protein to TLR4, is essential for TLR4 signaling[16]. We synthesized a radiolabeled E. coli lipid A analog 4 (Figure4.4), which Miyake used to elucidate the interaction between the TLR4/MD-2 complex and lipid A (Figure4.4)[17].
Miyake also clarified that the species specificity of TLR4/MD-2 is due to differences
in lipid A recognition by MD-2 [18]. Furthermore, X-ray crystallography revealed
113

Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
114
Lee and
coworkers [14]
Satow and
coworkers [13]
Figure4.3 Innate immune system activation via TLR4/MD2.
the binding modes of TLR4/MD-2 to agonists and antagonists. The crystal structure
of the complex of human MD-2 with lipid IVa (3) was revealed by Ohto and
Satow[13], and the crystal structure of mouse TLR4/MD-2 complex with Eritoran
(5) (Figure 4.5), a TLR4 antagonist developed by Eisai, was demonstrated by
Lee[14]. In 2009, X-ray crystallography of the human TLR4/MD-2 complex with
E. coli LPS was performed by Lee[19]. The results indicate that five of the six acyl
chains of E. coli lipid A (1) are housed within the hydrophobic pocket of MD-2,
while the remaining acyl chain interacts with the hydrophobic surface of the adjacent TLR4. These interactions trigger the dimerization of the TLR4/MD-2 complex
to activate the immune response. For lipid IVa (3), an antagonist, the lipid A moiety
binds to MD-2in the form in which lipid A is rotated by 180° compared to the agonistic E. coli lipid A (1), and all acyl chains are placed within the MD-2 pocket, thus
not causing TLR4/MD-2 dimerization. Ohto revealed the crystal structure of mouse
TLR4/MD-2 with lipid IVa (3); incidentally, lipid IVa (3) acts as an antagonist in
humans but as an agonist in mice[20]. In mice, three of the four acyl chains of lipid
IVa (3) are housed within the MD-2 pocket, and the remaining one interacts with
the hydrophobic surface of the adjacent TLR4, resulting in TLR4/MD-2 dimerization. These studies revealed that differences in the binding mode of lipid A to MD-2
significantly affect TLR4-mediated immune regulation.

Miyake and coworkers [17, 18]
Lee and coworkers [14, 19]
Lien and coworkers [21]
Figure4.4 Molecular mechanism of TLR4/MD2 dimerization.
Ohto et al. [13]
Ohto et al. [20]
Fukase et al. [22]
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
