Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3855_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
12 Мб
Скачать
☆
Error Management inInterventional Cardiology
. Fig. 5.3 Endovascular
simulator, example: Mentice VIST-Lab
149
5
mistakes that they would not have been expected to make. The soft skills were lacking. The quality of the technical skills is often in great contrast to the soft skills/non-technical skills. Ultimately, however, only both skills contribute to optimal patient care and only together guarantee a high level of patient safety, especially in complex procedures or in emergency situations. Even if interventional cardiologists are not directly comparable with the pilots mentioned above, there are com­monalities in the requirements prole for both occupational groups as well as similar behav­ioral expectations despite different training courses.
Similarities in the Requirement Prole
Between Cardiologists and Pilots
5 Acting in a complex working environment
5 The perception of the situation and its
changes
5 The fullment of high communication
requirements
5 Cooperation with others 5 Making decisions
5 The consistent use of standards 5 Managing resources
While pilots have been training in (full-ight) simulators for decades, neither basic skills training nor emergency management for interventional cardiologists is part of their training, licensure or even licensing. This is all the more astonishing as non-technical skills training in interventional cardiology using endovascular VR simulators and full-scale patient simulators is very effective and ef­cient. There is a high level of self-commitment among physicians in cardiology training, which makes it clear that the need for simulator- based training in interventional cardiology continues to grow steadily with the complexity of procedures possible today.
There is now more than 20 years of experi­ence in conducting non-technical skills train­ing with cardiologists in the virtual cardiac catheterization laboratory (. Fig. 5.4). And during this long time, the training physicians and teams have shown repetitive behavioral patterns that have often stood in the way of successful, error-free patient care.
150
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
E. Kaiser
5
. Fig. 5.4 Virtual cardiac catheter laboratory in the Cardioskills Simulation Center Frankfurt am Main with
endovascular simulator and fullscale patient simulator
video debrieng systems in semi-open debrief-
Behavioural Patterns of Cardiological Teams Leading to Errors in Non­technical Skills Training
5 Not a good brieng before the proce-
dure
5 No clear division of tasks 5 No clear responsibilities 5 Self-underestimation 5 Lack of perception of facts 5 Lack of questioning of circumstances 5 No good decision making in the deci-
sion making process
5 Hierarchy problems 5 No support of the other 5 Imprecise communication 5 No constructive error management in
the team
5 No debriengs
These behavioral patterns are immediately apparent to the trainer observing the training scenario, but can be used through the use of
ings to engage in constructive error manage­ment with the participating physicians (Hoff and Adamowski 1998). The combination of endovascular VR simulation and fullscale patient simulation offers the possibility to train all common emergency situations and potentially complication-prone situations with the physicians.
Topics That Are Trained in a Stan­dardized Manner Within the Framework of Emergency Management Simulation Training in the VR Cath Lab
5 Acute coronary syndrome 5 NSTEMI 5 STEMI 5 Cardiogenic shock 5 Rhythm problems 5 Anaphylactic reaction 5 Sedation issues 5 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation 5 Acute pulmonary artery embolism
Error Management inInterventional Cardiology
latent errors at management level
psychological antecedents
unsafe acts
local triggers internal defects atypical conditions
internal defenses
151
Path of an accident opportunity
5
. Fig. 5.5 Swiss cheese model. (From St. Pierre etal. 2005)
5 Neurological complications 5 And much more
It is also important to understand that, even in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, it is always a chain of unfavorable circumstances that leads to a major error or even a loss in the end. Sometimes protective mechanisms, which should always be incorporated into a work process, also fail to take effect. The so-called Swiss Cheese model by James Reason (. Fig. 5.5) illustrates this relationship very vividly using the example of a Swiss cheese with holes in it (Reason etal. 2000). Only if safety checks, perhaps also supported by checklists, are established and effective can undesirable treatment outcomes be actively prevented in the best possible way.
Thus, it must also be the task of a cardiol­ogy education and training specication to support the learning physician and the teams in the best possible way through appropriate training recommendations. The proximity of
interventional cardiology to aviation is also evident in the concrete situation of a decision­making problem in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Especially for younger and inexpe­rienced operators, the problem arises of mak­ing the right decision in highly complex situations. In addition to delegating parts of the activity in the specic situation, it has proven helpful to use decision-making models in the team in order to make the right decision despite opaque circumstances. Medicine today can also learn from reghting, for example. . Tables 5.1 and 5.2 list decision­making models for this purpose (Benner 1975; Hörmann 1994, 1995).
Both decision-making models support the operator in the cardiac catheterization labora­tory, but also the entire team in decision­making. The collection of facts always takes place jointly, but the decision is then the responsibility of the team leader, i.e. as a rule the operator as the hierarchically highest­placed personality. A steep hierarchy helps to work faster and more effectively in critical situations, while a very at hierarchy should
152
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
E. Kaiser
. Table 5.1 DECIDE model
D etect Perception that the current course
deviates from the norm
E sti-
mate
C hoose The coming decision will be taken
5
I den-
tify
D o Concrete planning and execution
E valu-
ate
. Table 5.2 FORDEC model
Does the change have any signicance for the course of events?
from the point of view of safety
Option with the best prospects of success and lowest risks is chosen
Framing of alternatives
of the measure
Checking the result. Does it t the plan?
go back to the beginning of the algorithm and perform a new evaluation.
Training
Team training of emergency situations in the cardiac catheterization laboratory now plays a central role in the quality manage­ment of an interventional cardiology department. In the virtual cardiac cathe­terization laboratory, all relevant emer­gency situations can be trained in a safe training environment using full-scale patient simulations, and team performance can be measurably improved, among other things by applying decision-making mod­els (7 www.cardioskills.com).
Cardiology training and continuing education can be given a completely new impetus if inu-
F acts What is the situation? Is there a
need for action?
O ptions What are the options for
action?
R isks and
benets
D ecision Option with the best prospects
E xecution Concrete planning and
C heck Checking the result. Does it t
Assessment of risks and uncer­tainty factors
of success and lowest risks is chosen
Framing of alternatives
execution of the measure
the plan?
ences from outside the eld are transferred into cardiology and the realism of the training is adapted. For example, non- technical skills such as communication, situational awareness, stress management and teamwork can be trained specically and effectively in the Boeing 737 style cockpit simulator (. Fig.5.6) (7 www.cardioskills.com).
Here, the parallelisms (. Table5.3) between
a Boeing 737 style cockpit and a cardiac cathe­terization laboratory are used to train physi­cians and then to transfer what they have learned back to their actual working environ­ment, the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
In the course of three standardized train­ing runs, this training method can be used to measurably optimize the non-technical skills
be chosen as the basic working model to cre­ate a team-friendly working atmosphere char­acterized by mutual respect. In both decision-making models, the nal review of the action, i.e. the “C”, is of crucial impor­tance. If the result of the executed action does not match the initial plan, it may be that the wrong facts were assumed or that circum­stances have changed in the meantime. So the whole team has to mentally and collectively
of teams in the cardiac catheterization labora­tory. A similar approach from Stanford also showed good results in the eld of laparo­scopic surgery. Here, surgeons were allowed to warm up with video games before performing laparoscopic surgery on a simulator (Plerhoples et al. 2011). Warming up with video games before laparoscopic surgical pro­cedures on the simulator signicantly reduced procedural errors and tissue injuries.
Error Management inInterventional Cardiology
153
5
. Fig. 5.6 Boeing-737 style cockpit simulator in the CardioSkills Simulation Center Frankfurt am Main
. Table 5.3 Parallelisms between a cardiac
catheterization laboratory and a Boeing-737 cockpit
Boeing 737 cockpit Cardiac cath lab
Watch ight displays Monitor patient
vital signs
Communication with PNF (Pilot Non Flying)
Work off checklist Standardized work
FORDEC in case of emergency
Communication with assistance
FORDEC in case of emergency
5.3 Outlook
ErhardKaiser
From the above it must be concluded that standardized simulation training in basic tech­nical skills and non-technical skills should be further and consistently integrated into cardi­ology education and training. Various efforts in this direction have already been made and will be continued. For example, the working group “Simulation and Virtual Reality” (founded by the editor in 2004) of the German Society of Cardiology (DGK) in cooperation
154
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
E. Kaiser
Working Group Interventional cardiology
OF THE GERMAN SOCIETY FOR CARDIOLOGY - HEART AND CIRCULAR RESEARCH e.V.
Home Autumn meeting 2011 Spring meeting 2011
5
Please click here to download the criteria
Copyright: © German Society of Cardiology - Heart and Circulation Research e.V.
. Fig. 5.7 Quality criteria simulation courses DGK
AGIK Publication Award
Quality criteria and content (QI) for DGK simulation courses in interventional cardiology The QI for simulation courses were created by the Simulation Working Group of the AGIK (Interventional Cardiology Working Group) on behalf of the DGK and serve as a basis for the certication of simulation courses by the DGK. The paper describes the basic requirements (models and simulators, teacher-student ratio, theory-practice ratio) that should be met in DGK certied simulation courses and denes the content and formal requirements for four course levels:
1. Basic course coronary diagnostics
2. Basic course PCI
3. Advanced course PCI
4. Emergency management in HKL
Simulation left
Imprint
with the working group “Interventional Cardiology” of the DGK was able to publish training recommendations and quality criteria for simulator-based training in interventional cardiology and to comment on the require-
punitive reporting systems should be
implemented in every interventional cardi-
ology department to contribute to error
prevention and patient safety.
ments for simulation devices to be used (7 www.agikintervention.de/Simulation).
These quality criteria (. Fig. 5.7) form
the basis for DGK-certied training using simulations.
Conclusion
Cardiology must continue to learn from the lessons learned in aviation. Pilot training and error management and the use of simu­lators in regular training of standards and complex situations helps to minimize errors and losses. It must be recognized that train­ing must keep pace with the current very rapid development of endovascular thera­peutic options, and it must take advantage of the fact that state-of-the-art training models can help improve patient safety and training. In addition, it must be the goal of all societies, boards, and individuals involved to create a shift away from a blam­ing culture toward a culture of error. Non-
References
Benner L (1975) L.D.E.C.I.D.E. in hazardous materials
emergencies. Fire J 69:13–18 Chaer RA, DeRubertis BG, Lin SC et al (2006)
Simulation improves resident performance in
catheter- based intervention: results of a random-
ized, controlled study. Ann Surg 244:343–352 Gallagher AG, Renkin J, Buyl H, Lambert H, Marco J
(2006) Development and construct validation of
performance metrics for multivessel coronary inter-
ventions on the VIST virtual reality simulator at
PCR2005. EuroIntervention 2:101–106 Hoff LA, Adamowski K (1998) Creating excellence in
crisis care: a guide to effective training and program
designs. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Hörmann H-J (1994) Urteilsverhalten und
Entscheidungsndung. In: Eißfeldt H, Goeters K-M,
Hörmann H-J, Maschke P, Schiewe A (eds) Effektives
Arbeiten im team: crew resource management-
training für Piloten und Fluglotsen. Deutsches
Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt, Hamburg Hörmann H-J (1995) FOR-DEC: a prescriptive model
for aeronautical decision making. In: Fuller R,
Error Management inInterventional Cardiology
155
5
Johnston N, McDonald N (eds) Human factors in aviation operations. Avebury, Aldershot
Hsu JH, Younan D, Pandalai S etal (2004) Use of com-
puter simulation for determining endovascular skill levels in a carotid stenting model. J Vasc Surg 40:1118–1125
Patel AD, Gallagher AG, Nicholson WJ, Cates CU
(2006) Learning curves and reliability measures for virtual reality simulation in the performance assess­ment of carotid angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1796–1802
Plerhoples TA, Zak Y, Hernandez-Boussard T, Lau J
(2011) Another use of the mobile device: warm-up for laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res 170(2):185–188
Reason J etal (2000) Human error: models and manage-
ment. BMJ 320(7237):768–770
St. Pierre M, Honger G, Buerschaper C (2005)
Notfallmanagement. Springer, Berlin
Further Reading
www. cardioskills. com. Retrieved 07.09.2012 www. vasa- ffm. com. Retrieved 07.09.2012 www. agikintervention. de/Simulation. Retrieved 07.09.2012 www. cardiovascular- complications. com (under con-
struction)
www. failureculture. com (under construction)
After the Cardiac
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Catheterization Laboratory
Contents
Chapter 6 Patient Follow-Up – 159
Torsten Konrad and Erhard Kaiser
157
III
159
Patient Follow-Up
TorstenKonrad andErhardKaiser
Contents
6.1 Removing theIntra-arterial Sheath andClosing/ Pressing thePuncture Site – 160
6.1.1 Access via theGroin, Puncture oftheCommon Femoral Artery – 160
6.1.2 Access via theArm, Puncture oftheRadial Artery – 163
6.2 Monitoring After Coronary Angiography andCoronary Intervention – 163
6.3 Outpatient Follow-Up Examinations After Cardiac Catheterisations – 164
6
6.4 Conclusion – 164
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature 2023 E. Kaiser (ed.), Complication Management In The Cardiac Catheter Laboratory,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66093-5_6
160
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
T. Konrad and E. Kaiser
Patient follow-up after diagnostic or thera­peutic cardiac catheter examinations is always standardized and is characterized by the aspects inherent to the procedure. During the patient follow-up, clinical and laboratory results are obtained and, if necessary, addi­tional tests are performed (e.g. color-coded duplex sonography, see 7 Sect. 2.1.1). In addition, the therapy started in the cardiac catheter laboratory is of course continued. This concerns both the medication, such as dual platelet aggregation inhibition, or circu-
6
lation stabilizing drugs up to further intensive medical therapy.
However, even after an uncomplicated intervention or purely diagnostic procedure, follow-up measures are necessary, which ultimately also involve the general practitio­ners who continue to treat the patient. This poses a particular challenge to all involved practitioners, and it has been shown time and again that only through optimal com­munication with each other can adequate therapy adherence be guaranteed for patients.
6.1 Removing theIntra-arterial
Sheath andClosing/Pressing thePuncture Site
TorstenKonrad and ErhardKaiser
6.1.1 Access via theGroin,
Puncture oftheCommon Femoral Artery
The intra-arterial sheath should be withdrawn as soon as possible, depending on the antico­agulation chosen (. Fig.6.1). In purely diag­nostic cardiac catheterizations without standard heparin administration, the intra­arterial sheath can therefore be pulled directly in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. For organizational reasons, however, there is no reason why trained personnel should not pull the intra-arterial sheath in the normal ward.
In patients anticoagulated with heparin, the intra-arterial sheath is ideally pulled under ACT control. Clinically, it is common to pull
. Fig. 6.1 Pulling the sheath after puncturing the femoral artery. (Thanks to R.Schräder)