Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4634_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
12 Мб
Скачать
☆
Anesthesia Considerations
https://t.me/medicina_free
inOce-Based andOR-Based Laryngeal Surgery
2
2.1 Application ofLocal Anesthesia inOce-Based Laryngeal Surgery
Ofce-based laryngeal surgery has gained popu­larity over the last two decades as a safe alterna­tive to laryngeal performed under general anesthesia This evolution in laryngology practice is due in part to advances in technology and the effective use of topical anesthesia to the upper airway. The introduction of the exible nasopha­ryngoscope with a working channel has enabled physicians to apply local anesthetics to the laryn­gopharyngeal mucosa safely and efciently. In-ofce surgery has several advantages, one of them is the ability to operate on the vocal folds while the larynx is in neutral position. The patient is instructed to breath quietly and slowly during surgery to minimize the vertical movement of the laryngeal complex and brisk abduction of the vocal folds during inspiration. The patient also may assist the surgeon by executing different phonatory tasks that help optimize surgical preci­sion and voice outcome. Another advantage to ofce-based laryngeal surgery is improved time efciency. The short duration of procedures per-
Supplementary Information The online version con­tains supplementary material available at https://doi.
org/10.1007/978- 3- 031- 35283- 6_2. The videos can be
accessed individually by clicking the DOI link in the accompanying gure caption or by scanning this link with the SN More Media App.
formed in-ofce and possibly reduced time for recovery in some cases are of paramount impor­tance to professional voice users and others whose voice is their source of income [1–3].
Different types of topical anesthetics are used in ofce-based laryngeal surgery. These are clas­sied as amides and esters. Amides include lido­caine and prilocaine, whereas esters include benzocaine, procaine, and tetracaine. The sur­geon should be familiar with the time of onset action and duration of each anesthetic, as well as with the dosage needed to optimize the surgical time. The surgeon also should know the maxi­mum appropriate dose in order to avoid compli­cations associated with overdose. The application of topical anesthesia to the upper airway starts with the nose in order to facilitate the introduc­tion of the exible nasopharyngoscope into the laryngeal inlet. The local anesthetic is applied to the nasal cavity using cotton pledgets, spray, or gel. Superiority of one method over the other has not been established. Decongestants such as
0.05% oxymetazoline may also be used to widen the nasal passages and improve hemostasis. Anesthesia is applied to the oropharynx and hypopharynx by spraying the anesthetic solution (lidocaine 2 or 4%) or by dripping a mall aliquot at the base of the tongue via a curved cannula. Asking the patient to gargle with the anesthetic solution for few minutes can improve the disper­sion of the anesthetic to the pharyngeal mucosa [4]. An alternative method is the use of a cotton
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 A.-L. Hamdan et al., Blue Laser Surgery in Laryngology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35283-6_2
9
10
https://t.me/medicina_free
2 Anesthesia Considerations inOce-Based andOR-Based Laryngeal Surgery
ball (soaked with the anesthetic) that is held by a forceps and introduced through the oral cavity. This method allows access to caudal structures in the hypopharynx such as the epiglottis, the pyri­form sinuses, and even the vocal folds. Different types of local anesthetics can be used, and these include lidocaine 2.5%, or a combination of anesthetic solutions such as benzocaine 14%, butamben 2%, and tetracaine hydrochloride 2% [3, 5–9]. In past decades, cocaine was used routinely.
Application of topical anesthesia to the larynx should be tailored to each patient accounting for individual variation in anatomy and threshold for pain and for gagging. The surgeon must be trained well to apply local anesthesia to the upper airway using more than one method. The goal is to achieve a numb surgical bed for at least 15–20 min during which the procedure is per­formed safely and with minimal discomfort. Persistence of laryngeal sensation and inability to attenuate the brisk adductor reex of the vocal folds can lead to termination of the procedure or to suboptimal results. Application of local anes­thetic to the larynx can be achieved via different ways. The oral route is used very commonly by otolaryngologists. While the patient is seated in the “snifng” position and the tongue is pro­truded and grasped forward, the anesthetic solu­tion is installed at the tip of the epiglottis using a cannula or a curved suction. Under direct visual­ization of the larynx using a exible nasopharyn­goscope (or even a mirror if a exible laryngoscope is not available), more anesthetic solution can be applied to the supraglottic and glottic structures (Fig.2.1). The working channel of the exible nasopharyngoscope also may be used instead of a curved cannula. An aliquot of 2–4mL of anesthetic solution such as lidocaine 2 or 4% is dripped on the laryngeal surface of the epiglottis or just above the vocal folds while the patient is asked to sustain a vowel such as /e/. Gentle laryngeal gargle can be used to disperse the anesthetic solution throughout the laryngeal inlet (Video 2.1) [2, 10].
Local anesthesia to the larynx also may be achieved using a nebulizer. After its introduction by Thawley in 1987, nebulized anesthesia to the
Fig. 2.1 Transoral administration of topical anesthetic using a curved cannula introduced through the oral cavity. (Video 2.1 Laryngeal gargle with the anesthetic solution (Lidocaine 2%). Note the dispersion of the solution in the laryngeal inlet and to surrounding structures) (▶ https://doi.org/10.1007/000- amm)
larynx has been advocated as a safe method with a success rate reaching 94% [11]. Its two main advantages are the “non-touch” mode of applica­tion which minimizes discomfort and pain to the patient and the even distribution of the anesthetic solution to different anatomic sites of the upper airway. The size of the atomized particles is an important determinant of the distribution and deposition of the aerosols. Large particles are more likely to deposit in the supraglottis and glottis, whereas small particles are more likely to reach the lower airway such as the tracheobron­chial tree and lungs [12]. Laryngeal anesthesia also can be administered using a percutaneous approach. Under direct visualization of the vocal folds using a exible nasopharyngoscope held by an assistant, a 25-gauge needle is introduced per­cutaneously through the thyrohyoid membrane, cricothyroid membrane, or thyroid cartilage into the laryngeal inlet, and a 2–4cc of 2 or 4% lido­caine is injected after ensuring safe position of the needle by withdrawing air into the syringe. A cough is usually elicited following the injection, which helps disperse the anesthetic solution into the larynx [13]. A far less commonly used approach to topical application of anesthesia to the larynx is the superior laryngeal nerve block. This approach usually is reserved for those who do not reach the desired anesthetic effect using
2.2 Anesthesia forOperating Room-Based Laser Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
11
the topical approaches mentioned. Local anes­thetic is injected between the greater cornu of the hyoid bone and the superior cornu of the thyroid cartilage at the entry of the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve into the larynx. The nee­dle should not penetrate the laryngeal lumen, and the anesthetic solution should be injected in the space between the hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage.
Before the application of local anesthesia to the upper airway, the patient should be notied of the disturbance in swallowing and breathing that occur afterward. Blocking the voltage-gated sodium channels at the surface membrane creates a decrease in chemosensory input and an increase in sensitivity threshold, all of which lead to impairment in oral sensation. Clinically, there is an increase in the swallowing time and interval between swallows [14, 15]. Local anesthesia to the larynx also may affect upper airway reexes resulting in increase in airway resistance and decrease in maximal inspiratory ow rate [16]. The alteration in upper airway sensitivity and reexes often is accompanied by hemodynamic changes of which the surgeon needs to be aware. These may include transient increase in systolic and diastolic pressure and increase in heart rate [17, 18]. Systemic toxicity following topical anesthesia to the larynx and pharynx in ofce­based laryngeal surgery has not been previously reported, although methemoglobinemia from excessive cetacaine is a potential adverse event that opts for preventive measures such as the use of methylene blue. To that end, numerous authors have conrmed the safety of various ofce-based procedures including esophagoscopy and injec­tion laryngoplasty [19, 20]. The lack of toxicity reports has been attributed mostly to the decline in the use of cocaine and its substitution with other local anesthetics such lidocaine. Nevertheless, surgeons should be familiar with the symptoms and signs of toxicity should the plasma level of the local anesthetic used reach a toxic level (above 5μg/mL in case of lidocaine). These include neurologic symptoms such as light-headedness, confusion, tinnitus and muscle twitching, and hemodynamic symptoms such as bradycardia and hypotension. In severe cases,
respiratory distress, arrythmia, and convulsion may occur [21–25].
2.2 Anesthesia forOperating Room-Based Laser Surgery
This topic has been discussed by the author (RTS) previously and will be summarized here [26]. Probably the most important consideration in general anesthesia for voice patients is the choice of the anesthesiologist. Laryngologists perform­ing voice surgery must insist on the collaboration of an excellent anesthesiologist who understands vocal fold surgery and the special needs of voice patients. When a gentle, skilled, well-informed anesthesiologist and laryngologist collaborate, the choice of anesthetic depends solely on the patient and lesion, and safe, effective surgery can be performed.
The choice of agents for general anesthesia is beyond the scope of this chapter. Usually, the regimen includes short-term paralytic agent to avoid patient motion or swallowing. Intubation and extubation should be accomplished atrau­matically, using the smallest possible tube. Most laryngeal endoscopic procedures are short in duration, and a 5–0 tube is generally sufcient even for most moderately obese patients. When a laser is used, a laser-resistant endotracheal tube should be placed.
Antireux medications are prudent especially in patients with symptoms and signs of reux, but reux may occur under anesthesia even in patients who do not have routine, troublesome clinical reux. The combination of acid exposure and direct trauma from the endotracheal tube can lead to laryngeal mucosal injury. So, pre­operative reux treatment (usually a proton­pump inhibitor) should be considered. Intravenous steroids (e.g., 10mg of dexametha­sone) may be helpful in minimizing inamma­tion and edema and possibly in protecting against cellular injury, and intravenous steroids should be used at the surgeon’s discretion, if there is no contraindication.
Endotracheal intubation provides the safest, most stable ventilation under general anesthesia,
12
https://t.me/medicina_free
2 Anesthesia Considerations inOce-Based andOR-Based Laryngeal Surgery
and it permits adequate visibility for most lesions in most patients. However, in some cases, even a small endotracheal tube may interfere with sur­gery especially for lesions in the posterior por­tion of the larynx. Alternatives include general anesthesia without intubation (intermittent mask, or high-ow oxygen which might add risks if a laser is being used), with intubation with apnea and repeated extubation and reintubation by the surgeon during the procedure, and with jet ventilation.
Venturi jet ventilation is a useful technique. Anesthetic and oxygen can be delivered through a catheter placed in the airway through the laryngoscope. Placing the jet catheter below the vocal folds causes less mechanical interference at the vibratory margin during surgery than supra­glottic jet ventilation. The airway must remain unobstructed for expiration. If the laryngoscope moves or is removed obstructing the airway with­out a warning to the anesthesia team, pneumotho­rax may result. During laser surgery, oxygen concentration (FiO2) must be 30% or less to avoid laser re, and ventilation (especially jet) is stopped during laser use and resumed when oxy­gen saturation decreases.
All the care exercised in gentle intubation may be for naught unless similar caution is exercised during extubation. The most common error dur­ing extubation is failure to deate the endotra­cheal tube cuff fully. This may result in vocal fold trauma or arytenoid cartilage dislocation/sublux­ation. The anesthesia team should be aware of these problems. The surgeon should be present and attentive during intubation and extubation to help minimize the incidence of such problems. If vocal fold injection medialization has been per­formed, the author (RTS) usually extubates the patient himself with the laryngoscope in place. This holds the tube posteriorly and prevents the tube from contacting the musculomembranous portions of the vocal folds and squeezing out the injected material. This technique also may be used following other delicate surgery such as mini-microap. The patient is then managed by mask or laryngeal mask ventilation during emer­sion. If the patient requires voice rest, it is essen­tial for the surgical team to communicate
instructions to the recovery room staff and the patient’s family.
It also should be noted that surgery in the operating room does not necessarily mean sur­gery under general anesthesia. For patients who would benet from the approaches used during in-ofce procedures but who either cannot toler­ate them, or who have medical comorbidities that present unacceptable risk, transnasal or transoral surgery can be performed in an operat­ing room with the patient in a sitting position, with assistance from the anesthesiologist who can provide sedation and monitoring. Suspension laryngoscopy also can be performed with the patient awake. It usually is accomplished best using superior laryngeal nerve blocks, topical oral and transtracheal anesthesia, pharyngeal nerve block, and tongue base block. Although the author (RTS) uses this technique most com­monly for problems such as arytenoid disloca­tion, it also works well for laser procedures for conditions such as supraglottic stenosis. For such cases, patients may be managed awake and breathing spontaneously while the airways is opened, sometimes avoiding the need for tra­cheotomy (although the patient always is pre­pared for urgent tracheotomy during such procedures, with the neck having been injected with lidocaine with epinephrine and with the tracheotomy set opened) prior to beginning the procedure.
References
1. Jourdy DN, Kacker A.Regional anesthesia for ofce­based procedures in otorhinolaryngology. Anesthesiol Clin. 2010;28(3):457–68.
2. Wang SX, Simpson CB.Anesthesia for ofce proce­dures. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2013;46(1):13–9.
3. Woo P. Ofce-based laryngeal procedures. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2006;39(1):111–33.
4. Chan CK, Fok KL, Poon CM. Flavored anesthetic lozenge versus Xylocaine spray used as topical pha­ryngeal anesthesia for unsedated esophagogastroduo­denoscopy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(4):897–901.
5. Frosh AC, Jayaraj S, Porter G, Almeyda J. Is local anaesthesia actually benecial in exible breop­tic nasendoscopy? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998;23(3):259–62.
References
https://t.me/medicina_free
13
6. Özkırış M, Aydın R, Gencer ZK, Saydam L. Comparison of topical anesthetic effects of lido­caine, prilocaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine in transnasal beroptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014;28(3):e141–3.
7. Bourolias C, Gkotsis A, Kontaxakis A, Tsoukarelis P. Lidocaine spray vs tetracaine solution for trans­nasal ber-optic laryngoscopy. Am J Otolaryngol. 2010;31(2):114–6.
8. Wellenstein DJ, van der Wal RA, Schutte HW, Honings J, van den Hoogen FJ, Marres HA, et al. Topical anesthesia for endoscopic ofce-based pro­cedures of the upper aerodigestive tract. J Voice. 2019;33(5):732–46.
9. Zainudin BM, Raa MH, Sufarlan AW.Topical nasal anaesthesia for breoptic bronchoscopy: lignocaine spray or gel? Singap Med J. 1993;34(2):148–9.
10. Hogikyan ND. Transnasal endoscopic examination of the subglottis and trachea using topical anesthesia in the otolaryngology clinic. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(7):1170–3.
11. Thawley SE. Nebulized anesthesia for the nose, pharynx, larynx, and trachea. Laryngoscope. 1987;97(4):499–500.
12. Perkins EL, Basu S, Garcia GJ, Buckmire RA, Shah RN, Kimbell JS.Ideal particle sizes for inhaled ste­roids targeting vocal granulomas: preliminary study using computational uid dynamics. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;158(3):511–9.
13. Hamdan AL, Sataloff RT, Hawkshaw MJ. Topical anesthesia in ofce-based laryngeal surgery. In: Hamdan AL, Sataloff RT, Hawkshaw MJ, editors. Ofce-based laryngeal surgery. NewYork: Springer;
2022. p.123–37.
14. Chee C, Arshad S, Singh S, Mistry S, Hamdy S.The inuence of chemical gustatory stimuli and oral anaesthesia on healthy human pharyngeal swallow­ing. Chem Senses. 2005;30(5):393–400.
15. Raphael JH, Stanley GD, Langton JA.Effects of topi­cal benzocaine and lignocaine on upper airway reex sensitivity. Anaesthesia. 1996;51(2):114–8.
16. Liistro G, Stãknescu DC, Veriter C, Rodenstein DO, D’odemont JP. Upper airway anesthesia induces air­ow limitation in awake humans. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146(3):581–5.
17. Yung KC, Courey MS.The effect of ofce-based ex­ible endoscopic surgery on hemodynamic stability. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(11):2231–6.
18. Morrison MP, O’Rourke A, Dion GR, Eller RL, Weinberger P, Postma GN. Hemodynamic changes during otolaryngological ofce-based exible endo­scopic procedures. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121(11):714–8.
19. Postma GN, Cohen JT, Belafsky PC, Halum SL, Gupta SK, Bach KK, etal. Transnasal esophagoscopy: revisited (over 700 consecutive cases). Laryngoscope. 2005;115(2):321–3.
20. Sulica L, Rosen CA, Postma GN, Simpson B, Amin M, Courey M, et al. Current practice in injection augmentation of the vocal folds: indications, treat­ment principles, techniques, and complications. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(2):319–25.
21. Schmalbach CE.Patient safety and anesthesia consid­erations for ofce-based otolaryngology procedures. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2019;52(3):379–90.
22. McCaughey W.Adverse effects of local anaesthetics. Drug Saf. 1992;7(3):178–89.
23. Vessely MB, Zitsch RP III. Topical anesthetic­induced methemoglobinemia: a case report and review of the literature. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;108(6):763–7.
24. Hieger MA, Afeld JL, Cumpston KL, Wills BK. Topical benzocaine and methemoglobinemia. Am J Ther. 2017;24(5):e596–8.
25. Taleb M, Ashraf Z, Valavoor S, Tinkel J.Evaluation and management of acquired methemoglobin­emia associated with topical benzocaine use. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013;13(5):325–30.
26. Sataloff RT. Professional voice: the science and art of clinical care. 4th ed. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2017. p.1382–4, 1510–1511.
Blue Laser Therapy ofVocal Fold
https://t.me/medicina_free
Varices andEctasias
3
3.1 Introduction
The microcirculation of the vocal fold is unique. There is marked disparity in the microvascular anatomy of the vocal fold cover and body. The blood vessels in the lamina propria run along the longitudinal axis of the vocal folds with little or no communication with the microvasculature of the vocalis muscle. This vascular pattern contrib­utes to the pliability of the vocal fold cover despite the stress of phonation. Other contribut­ing factors to the patency and resilience of the submucosal vocal fold vessels are their undulat­ing pattern, abundance of arteriovenous anasto­mosis, and presence of thin and short intermediate laments within the endothelial cells [1–3]. Despite the sophisticated histologic structure and course of these vessels, aberrant microvascula­ture structures within the supercial layer of the lamina propria are encountered frequently in oto­laryngology practice. Based on a review by Hochman et al. in 1999, these are stratied mainly as varices or ectasias [4]. Vocal fold vari­ces are abnormally dilated or tortuous vessels, whereas ectasias are more coalescent aggrega­tions of blood that can be mistaken for hemangio-
Supplementary Information The online version con­tains supplementary material available at https://doi.
org/10.1007/978- 3- 031- 35283- 6_3. The videos can be
accessed individually by clicking the DOI link in the accompanying gure caption or by scanning this link with the SN More Media App.
mas (which are extremely rare on the vocal folds). Varices and ectasias are more common in women compared to men. This has been attrib­uted to changes in hormonal environment in women, the impact of which on the vocal fold microvascular structure has been investigated thoroughly. Abitbol et al. reported engorgement of the vocal fold submucosal capillaries prior to menstruation in one-third of women. This change in vasculature, in addition to desquamation of the vocal folds and change in mucus consistency, is responsible for a constellation of vocal symp­toms referred to as “pre-menstrual vocal syn­drome” or “dysphonia premenstrualis.” This syndrome is characterized by voice fatigue, pitch breaks, and contracted voice range [5, 6]. The prevalence of varices and ectasias is also higher in professional voice users, particularly singers with high vocal demand [7–9]. Postma et al. reported varix incidence of 5% in male profes­sional voice users in comparison to only 1.6% in male non-professional voice users. The incidence was also markedly higher in female professional voice users in comparison to female non­professional voice users (14% vs. 4.5%, respec­tively) [7]. The high prevalence of varices and ectasias in professional voice users is generally ascribed to phonotrauma, although denitive evi­dence is lacking. The increase in the collision forces during phonation in professional voice users leads to engorgement of these vessels in the supercial layer of the lamina propria and aberra-
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 A.-L. Hamdan et al., Blue Laser Surgery in Laryngology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35283-6_3
15
16
https://t.me/medicina_free
3 Blue Laser Therapy ofVocal Fold Varices andEctasias
tion in their direction. Similar ndings might be expected in non-professional voice users who experience voice overuse, abuse, or misuse, espe­cially those with muscle tension dysphonia, but research will be needed to test this hypothesis.
Patients with vocal fold varices and ectasias may be asymptomatic or complain of a range of voice symptoms. These include hoarseness, voice fatigue, contracted voice range, pain on phonation, voice instability, diplophonia and aphonia. On laryngeal examination the most common location of these lesions is on the superior lateral surface of the vocal fold, and on the superior surface near its mid-point, an area that corresponds to the most lat­eral extent of mucosal waves. They are also fre­quently encountered in the middle third of the vocal fold on or near the contact edge, the injury­prone region often referred to as the “striking zone.” In a review of 42 patients with 87 vocal fold ectasias and varices, 77% of the lesions were found on the upper surface of the vocal fold and 83% at the middle of the musculomembranous portion of the vocal fold [4]. This is in alignment with the study by Jiang etal. that showed that the mid-por­tion of the vocal fold is subject to maximum stress during phonation, particularly in patients with laryngeal hyperfunction [10]. Other ndings for which the physician should be alert are the pres­ence of a yellowish discoloration of the vocal fold cover and/or a feeding vessel to an angiomatous polyp or other mass. The presence of yellowish vocal fold cover secondary to hemosiderin deposi­tion suggests previous vocal fold hemorrhage. The hemorrhage usual was recent, but duskiness and even yellowish discoloration can persist long-term in some patients. The risk of hemorrhage in patients with vocal fold varices is ten times higher in com­parison to patients without varices. Tang et al. reviewed the risk of hemorrhage in patients with vocal fold varices and reported an incidence rate of
3.3 per 1000in comparison to 0.5 per 1000in those with no varices [11]. The study group included 499 patients, 22.4% of whom had vocal fold varices. The use of anticoagulants also is a precipitating factor for bleeding within the supercial layer of the lamina propria once there is rupture in the aber­rant vasculature. Laryngeal videostroboscopy is invaluable in determining the extent of hemorrhage
and the need for voice rest, voice therapy, and/or surgical intervention. A decrease or absence of mucosal waves at the site of the dilated varices in patients with change in voice quality can be an ominous sign [12].
Varices and ectatic vessels of the vocal folds are not always treated because many of them are asymptomatic. The main indications for treatment are enlarging varices, engorgement associated with phonation that affects voice quality or endur­ance, history of hemorrhage, recurrent hemor­rhage especially within the vocal fold, and co-existence of vocal fold mass such as angioma­tous polyp [7, 13, 14]. The rst step in manage­ment of vocal fold varices or ectasias is voice therapy. The aim of voice therapy is to improve vocal hygiene, minimize phonotrauma, and con­trol confounding factors that could have contrib­uted to the presence of aberrant vasculature. Common examples of such factors are laryngo­pharyngeal reux and allergy. Poor response of the vocal fold pathology to medical intervention and voice therapy may suggest the need for surgical intervention. The advances in instrumentation have paved the way for renement in the surgical technique [14, 15]. Sataloff etal. described dissec­tion and removal of aberrant vocal fold vessels through a cordotomy placed lateral to the lesion. Using a vascular knife and a micro- scissor, the vessel is isolated, dissected, and removed [14]. A main limitation of surgical excision of varices and ectasias is the high risk of vessel rupture during dissection, although it is unlikely to happen and has not been reported by the author (RTS) or in the literature. As an alternative, diode lasers were introduced to minimize the risk of hemorrhage [16–18]. Gökcan and Dursun reviewed their expe- rience with 162 patients with vascular lesions of the vocal folds who were treated using the carbon dioxide (CO2) laser in a pulse mode and reported improvement in the acoustic parameters following surgery [19]. A feared complication of the CO2 laser therapy of vocal fold varices is thermal injury to the mucosal lining and deep structures of the vocal folds. In a review of 42 patients with vocal fold varices or ectasias (19 of whom were treated in the operating with the CO2 laser with or without cold instrument excision), Hochman et al. noted
3.2 Case Presentations
https://t.me/medicina_free
17
vocal fold stiffness in 4 patients [4]. This adverse effect led to the introduction of photoangiolytic lasers as a safer alternative to diode lasers. Their high afnity for oxyhemoglobin made them more precise when treating vascular lesions. Usually, the lesion is targeted from a distance and ablated in a non-contact mode [20, 21]. Zeitels etal. reported the successful use of pulsed angiolytic laser in the treatment of ectasias and varices in singers. In their review of 39 patients who underwent 40 pro­cedures (25 cases using the pulse dye laser (PDL) and 15 cases using the potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser under endotracheal anesthesia), none of the patients had decrease in mucosal waves on stroboscopy. All patients had improvement in voice quality and returned to normal active singing [13]. Selecting a wavelength that targets oxyhe- moglobin, and choosing a pulse mode that reduces thermal impact, was key to optimize surgical out­come. Aligheiri etal. described timeline postoper­ative changes following KTP vaporization of vocal fold varices characterized by edema on day 1 and extravasation of blood submucosally 1 week later[22].
With the evolution in laryngology practice toward ofce-based laryngeal surgery, laser pho­toangiolysis is now performed often in the ofce. The laser glass ber is introduced through the working channel of a exible endoscope and used safely to treat vocal fold lesions [23, 24]. In a review of 386 cases of endoscopic laryngeal surgery performed in the ofce, Burns et al. stressed the versatility of the KTP laser in treat­ing diverse vocal fold lesions among which were three cases of vocal fold varices or ectasia [25]. In 2013, Centric etal. reviewed their experience in ofce-based PDL therapy of 33 patients, 6 of whom had vascular lesions of the vocal folds. The authors noted complete regression of the lesion at 6months following surgery and none of the patient needed surgical intervention in the operating room [26]. In another review of 255 patients treated endoscopically using angiolytic laser, 11% of whom had vocal fold varices, Del Signore etal. reported good patient tolerance and low risk of complications. The authors advocated careful patient selection and standardization of laser parameters to optimize surgical outcome
[24]. Balouch etal. reported satisfactory results using the blue laser, then a new photoangiolytic laser with a wavelength of 445nm, in the treat­ment of 31 subjects with vocal fold vascular lesions, intentionally using very low power den­sity. In comparison with the KTP laser, the risk of hemorrhage was less at the rst and second visit postoperatively, but the long-term recurrence rate was higher [27]. The authors believed that that was due to power density, and their preliminary experience at higher settings suggests the recur­rence rates are comparable to those achieved with KTP. Data were being analyzed at the time of writing of this book.
3.2 Case Presentations
3.2.1 Case 1: Right Vocal Fold Ectasia
Forty-seven-year-old female presented to the Voice Clinic (ALH) with hoarseness of a few months’ duration. The patient was a heavy smoker with a history of voice overuse and abuse. She denied any history of allergy or reux disease. Her Voice Handicap Index-10 score was 21. On perceptual evaluation, she had grade 2 dysphonia, grade 2 roughness, and grade 1 breathiness. Acoustic analysis showed a fundamental fre­quency (F0) of 207.43 Hz, habitual pitch of
190.73 Hz, jitter (RAP): 1.21, shimmer: 2.78,
noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR): 0.08, voice turbu­lence index (VTI): 0.02. Her maximum phonation time (MPT) was 9.51s. On laryngeal examination she had a right vocal fold hemorrhagic mass at the mid-third of the vocal fold with dilated vessels feeding the lesion (Fig. 3.1). The patient under­went ofce-based blue laser therapy for her lesion under local anesthesia. The power used was 10W, pulse duration 10 ms, and pulse pause 300 ms. This high-power setting was chosen in view of the size of the vascular mass lesion. The laser was used in a non-contact mode 2–3mm distant from the vocal fold mucosa (Fig.3.2, Video 3.1). The procedure was tolerated well. The patient pre­sented 2 weeks later with improvement in her voice quality. The Voice Handicap Index-10 score
18
https://t.me/medicina_free
3 Blue Laser Therapy ofVocal Fold Varices andEctasias
Fig. 3.1 Endoscopic view of the larynx showing a right vocal fold vascular lesion at the mid- musculomembranous portion of the vocal fold with dilated vessels around the lesion
Fig. 3.2 Intraoperative endoscopic view showing the laser beam targeting the vascular lesion. Note that the laser glass ber is used in a non-contact mode. (Video 3.1 A laryngeal endoscopic view of blue laser therapy of right vocal fold ectasia. The laser was used in near-contact mode) (▶ https://doi.org/10.1007/000- amr)
decreased to 18, and on perceptual evaluation she had a normal voice. Acoustic analysis showed an increase in Fo and HP to 216.64 and 202.11Hz, respectively, with no signicant change in the remaining acoustic parameters. Laryngeal endo-
Fig. 3.3 Postoperative endoscopic view 2 weeks later showing complete regression of the lesion
scopic examination showed complete regression of the lesion (Fig.3.3).
3.2.2 Case 2: Right Vocal Fold Dilated Submucosal Vessels withReinke’s Edema
A 55-year-old female presented to the Voice Clinic (ALH) with history of hoarseness and deepening of her voice of a few months’ dura­tion. She reported no history of reux disease or other systemic illness. Her VHI-10 score was 26. Perceptual evaluation revealed grade 3 dyspho­nia, grade 3 roughness, grade 1 breathiness, and grade 1 strain. On laryngeal examination, she had bilateral grade 1 Reinke’s edema, with dilated vessels on the upper surface of the vocal folds. Laryngeal videostroboscopy showed mild increase in mucosal waves with good closure of the vocal folds during phonation. The patient underwent blue laser therapy for both vocal folds using 3W power, 10ms pulse duration and single pulse for the treatment of the dilated vessels, and 10W power, 40 ms pulse duration, and 300ms pulse pause for the treatment of the Reinke’s edema (Fig. 3.4) One month following surgery there was reduction in Voice Handicap Index-10
3.2 Case Presentations
https://t.me/medicina_free
19
Fig. 3.4 Laryngeal endoscopic view showing the laser beam in a non-contact mode 2–3mm above the surface of the vocal fold
Fig. 3.5 Laryngeal examination 1 month later showing almost complete regression of the Reinke’s edema with mild residual blanching of the upper surface of the vocal fold which resolved later
score to 21 and improvement in perceptual evalu­ation parameters (grade 2 dysphonia, grade 2 roughness, grade 1 breathiness, and no asthenia or strain). Her F0 increased from 134.9Hz pre­operatively to 144.56 Hz postoperatively. Laryngeal examination showed almost complete regression of the Reinke’s edema with mild resid­ual blanching of the upper surface of the vocal fold (Fig. 3.5). Laryngeal videostroboscopy
Fig. 3.6 Blue laser glass ber aiming at the Reinke’s edema of the right vocal fold. (Video 3.2 Blue laser ther­apy of right vocal fold dilated vessels in a patient with type 1 Reinke’s edema. Note blanching of the vessels fol­lowing treatment) (▶ https://doi.org/10.1007/000- amp)
showed improvement in mucosal waves with good closure of the vocal folds.
3.2.3 Case 3: Right Vocal Fold Tortuous Submucosal Vessels
A 66-year-old female with history of smoking presented to the Voice Clinic (ALH) with hoarse­ness and deepening of her voice of 1-year dura­tion. VHI-10 score was 16. On perceptual evaluation she had grade 3 dysphonia, grade 3 roughness, grade 1 breathiness, grade 2 asthenia, and grade 3 strain. Laryngeal examination using the exible endoscope revealed grade 1 right­sided Reinke’s edema with tortuous vessels on the upper surface of the vocal fold. The patient underwent ofce-based blue laser therapy for the right vocal fold dilated vessels with power 10W, pulse duration 10ms, pulse pause 300ms. A non­contact mode was used (Fig.3.6, Video 3.2). Four weeks following the procedure, the patient reported improvement in voice quality. VHI-10 score was 0. On perceptual evaluation, she had grade 1 dysphonia, and grade 1 strain, but no roughness or breathiness. The laryngeal exami-